Jade Helm
2024-12-03 18:11:39 UTC
https://www.amren.com/blog/2024/12/two-tier-keir-admits-the-great-replacement/
Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 3, 2024
Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer is no far-right radical, but he has
come close to confirming the strong version of the Great Replacement
theory — that white people are being replaced in their homelands not
merely due to natural flows; it is deliberate. In a recent speech, he said:
[T]he independent Office of National Statistics has conducted vital work
on the state of immigration and found the previous Government were
running an open borders experiment.
As the ONS sets out, nearly one million people came to Britain in the
year ending June 2023. That is four times the migration levels compared
with 2019.
Time and again — the Conservative Party promised they would get those
numbers down. Time and again — they failed.
And now the chorus of excuses has begun. . . .
But what we didn’t hear what the British people are owed: an explanation.
Because a failure on this scale isn’t just bad luck it isn’t a global
trend or taking your eye off the ball.
. . . This happened by design, not accident.
Policies were reformed deliberately to liberalise immigration.
Brexit was used for that purpose to turn Britain into a one-nation
experiment in open borders.
Global Britain — remember that slogan. That is what they meant. A policy
with no support and which they then pretended wasn’t happening.
And now they want to wave it away with a simple “we got it wrong”.
Well, that’s unforgivable.
Some might fault the prime minister for calling Brexit a “one-nation
experiment in open borders.” Most proponents supported it because it
would supposedly restore British control over its borders. Instead,
Boris Johnson, the second-most important Brexit spokesman, increased
immigration. Mr. Starmer’s pledge to reduce immigration has a low bar to
clear, but it is more than the Tories managed, despite many promises
over many years.
In many countries, mass immigration has been treated like the weather —
a natural process that’s futile to oppose — and it is remarkable that a
Labour leader should admit that it can be controlled. Mr. Starmer now
says that securing borders is “the [emphasis his] issue that matters to
working people.” What happens now to the idea that border control is
“racist”?
After the Prime Minister’s comments, columnist Josh Glancy in The Times
wrote, “Liberals have lost the argument on migration.” After some
throat-clearing on the glories of migration, he admitted that “radical
and painful decisions need to be made” lest “fascists” be the ones to
solve the problem. But if the issue is worthy of consideration by
respectable people, it is much harder to deplatform Reform UK and Nigel
Farage. The party is already criticizing Labour for failing to stop
migrants crossing to the UK on small boats, despite the Prime Minister’s
repeated pledges to “smash the gangs” responsible. What grounds are
there to censor “far-right” voices who want to punish human smugglers
and stop the boats now that Labour’s leader is talking about “smashing”
them? What excuses are there for Keir Starmer to fail when he says
Conservatives deliberately allowed mass immigration?
Renaud Camus, who coined the “Great Replacement” term, says Amazon
refused to sell his book on the topic. Amazon now says it is reversing
that decision, claiming it was an “error.” That is progress, as is a
British publication even covering the reversal.
Some in Labour will try to rebuild the moral cordon sanitaire around
immigration. Zarah Sultana, a Labour MP, criticized her leader even for
having a chat with Nigel Farage on the floor of Parliament.
The fact that “Zarah Sultana MP” is lecturing British people on who they
should and should not talk to proves that immigration is out of hand.
Still, this may be a clever political move. Whites want to believe that
they are doing the right thing, even if it hurts our interests. Appeals
to tribalism usually don’t work for whites. This is why people who want
to keep borders open resort to moral shaming.
However, if even the left-wing party says controlling immigration is a
worthy goal, why not vote for the party that will take the hardest line?
A general election is probably years away, and it is unlikely that
either Labour or the Tories can deliver on immigration — but maybe Keir
Starmer will surprise us. He has promised a white paper soon with HM
Government’s plan to control migration. Talk is cheap, but he has left
himself wide open to charges that any failure to control immigration
will be as deliberate as the Conservatives’ failure. For the first time
in many years, there is a real opening to stop replacement migration. We
have Labour and Two-Tier Keir Starmer to thank.
--
"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection
1324(a)(3)."
“Western values mean three things: migration, LGBTQ, and war." Viktor Orban
Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 3, 2024
Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer is no far-right radical, but he has
come close to confirming the strong version of the Great Replacement
theory — that white people are being replaced in their homelands not
merely due to natural flows; it is deliberate. In a recent speech, he said:
[T]he independent Office of National Statistics has conducted vital work
on the state of immigration and found the previous Government were
running an open borders experiment.
As the ONS sets out, nearly one million people came to Britain in the
year ending June 2023. That is four times the migration levels compared
with 2019.
Time and again — the Conservative Party promised they would get those
numbers down. Time and again — they failed.
And now the chorus of excuses has begun. . . .
But what we didn’t hear what the British people are owed: an explanation.
Because a failure on this scale isn’t just bad luck it isn’t a global
trend or taking your eye off the ball.
. . . This happened by design, not accident.
Policies were reformed deliberately to liberalise immigration.
Brexit was used for that purpose to turn Britain into a one-nation
experiment in open borders.
Global Britain — remember that slogan. That is what they meant. A policy
with no support and which they then pretended wasn’t happening.
And now they want to wave it away with a simple “we got it wrong”.
Well, that’s unforgivable.
Some might fault the prime minister for calling Brexit a “one-nation
experiment in open borders.” Most proponents supported it because it
would supposedly restore British control over its borders. Instead,
Boris Johnson, the second-most important Brexit spokesman, increased
immigration. Mr. Starmer’s pledge to reduce immigration has a low bar to
clear, but it is more than the Tories managed, despite many promises
over many years.
In many countries, mass immigration has been treated like the weather —
a natural process that’s futile to oppose — and it is remarkable that a
Labour leader should admit that it can be controlled. Mr. Starmer now
says that securing borders is “the [emphasis his] issue that matters to
working people.” What happens now to the idea that border control is
“racist”?
After the Prime Minister’s comments, columnist Josh Glancy in The Times
wrote, “Liberals have lost the argument on migration.” After some
throat-clearing on the glories of migration, he admitted that “radical
and painful decisions need to be made” lest “fascists” be the ones to
solve the problem. But if the issue is worthy of consideration by
respectable people, it is much harder to deplatform Reform UK and Nigel
Farage. The party is already criticizing Labour for failing to stop
migrants crossing to the UK on small boats, despite the Prime Minister’s
repeated pledges to “smash the gangs” responsible. What grounds are
there to censor “far-right” voices who want to punish human smugglers
and stop the boats now that Labour’s leader is talking about “smashing”
them? What excuses are there for Keir Starmer to fail when he says
Conservatives deliberately allowed mass immigration?
Renaud Camus, who coined the “Great Replacement” term, says Amazon
refused to sell his book on the topic. Amazon now says it is reversing
that decision, claiming it was an “error.” That is progress, as is a
British publication even covering the reversal.
Some in Labour will try to rebuild the moral cordon sanitaire around
immigration. Zarah Sultana, a Labour MP, criticized her leader even for
having a chat with Nigel Farage on the floor of Parliament.
The fact that “Zarah Sultana MP” is lecturing British people on who they
should and should not talk to proves that immigration is out of hand.
Still, this may be a clever political move. Whites want to believe that
they are doing the right thing, even if it hurts our interests. Appeals
to tribalism usually don’t work for whites. This is why people who want
to keep borders open resort to moral shaming.
However, if even the left-wing party says controlling immigration is a
worthy goal, why not vote for the party that will take the hardest line?
A general election is probably years away, and it is unlikely that
either Labour or the Tories can deliver on immigration — but maybe Keir
Starmer will surprise us. He has promised a white paper soon with HM
Government’s plan to control migration. Talk is cheap, but he has left
himself wide open to charges that any failure to control immigration
will be as deliberate as the Conservatives’ failure. For the first time
in many years, there is a real opening to stop replacement migration. We
have Labour and Two-Tier Keir Starmer to thank.
--
"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection
1324(a)(3)."
“Western values mean three things: migration, LGBTQ, and war." Viktor Orban