Discussion:
Now THAT'S the way to deal with Nazis! :)
(too old to reply)
NEMO
2015-05-12 20:04:11 UTC
Permalink
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis

This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...

Loading Image...

LOLOK!
Topaz
2015-05-12 20:32:03 UTC
Permalink
Quotes from Dr. Joseph Goebbels:

The historical revolution which, beginning on January 30, 1933,
wrought itself out thenceforth in the public life of the Reich before
the eyes of the world, has a significance and bearing not immediately
to be plumbed and measured. This event rightly bears the name of the
German revolution, for it has to do, indeed, with a revolution in
values, with the overthrow of an entire world of thought which up to
that date had been accepted as a matter of course by the German
people.

That which yesterday was paradox, had become a triviality today.
Things unthinkable, chimerical but a few months ago, are become today
mere matters of course, about which no one makes any further ado.

It was seldom that the men around Adolf Hitler elected to fight the
adversary with his own weapons. They knew only too well they could not
put a stop to the campaign of lies in the Press by doing so.

Quotes from Goebbels diary:

A well-known officer of high rank, with redoubtable World War
record, had scruples whether or not to come over to us. The glaring
injustice of our great meeting at the Sportpalast being officially
prohibited, put the idea into his head.

If things go on like this, we may predict a great success. Bit by
bit we shall force Marxism to its knees.

Another S.A. man shot in Berlin. Public indignation is at the boiling
point. Some time or other it will boil over.

Back to Munich by night in a dense fog. The Berlin Press lies till
all's blue. Every time a S.A. man is killed, it declares the victim
and not the murderer is guilty!

The Berlin Press is insupportable. It is beginning to asperse our
private life without a glimmer of truth in it's assertions.

Thousands of people awaiting us at the station at Chemnitz. We have
entirely conquered this city. A marvelous parade of the S.A. And that
in what used to be 'Red Chemnitz'. I remember with a shudder the year
1925, when I spoke here.
During a riotous meeting at the Marmorpalast we had one dead and one
hundred and fifty seriously injured. The Communists had occupied three
quarters of the hall, and we were in a hopeless minority. That was the
beginning; today these 'Red Fortresses' are at our feet.

Impossible to continue reading the Berlin Press! Our S.A. men are
assaulted with heavy casualties and even fatalities, and the Press
mendaciously reports them as having attacked a peaceful suburban
garden settlement. The fact that S.A. men are being accompanied home
by their comrades, since they would be shot if they went alone, is
represented in the Press as an armed attack on the part of our men.
The Communists are the innocent victims, and we are accused as the
aggressors. That the Jews are such liars is not surprising, as they
hang together from the Berliner Tageblatt to the Rote Fahne (Red
Flag), but it is scandalous that even our so-called 'National' papers
should give in to this campaign of misrepresentation. One would like
to spit at them.

A small boy of the Hitler Jugend has been stabbed at Moabit ('Red'
suburb of Berlin). First they hunted the child down, then some
fiendish individual brutally plunged a dagger into his breast. The boy
managed to crawl into a doorway and cried weakly for help. The marks
made by his little blood-stained hands, when he tried to raise himself
up for the last time, can still plainly be seen on the white wall.

Reading a pamphlet written by a Democrat on 'Hitler's Way'. It is
beneath notice. The bourgeois world does not, and surely cannot,
understand us. Its arguments always just miss the essentials of the
Movement.

The Jew Weiss has prohibited me from speaking in public on account of
my demeanor, recently, in Court. The right of free speech seems to
depend in this most liberal of all Democracies on a certificate of
conduct to be given by the Headquarters of the Police.
May the day come when we enter the Headquarters of the Police, knock
on a Jew's door, and inform him that his day is over!

We attend the funeral of our S.A. comrade, Professor Schwartz,
murdered at the Kolonie Felseneck. Stirring and heartrending scenes.

I pass the spot in Moabit once more, where the 'Hitler-Youth boy',
Norkus was stabbed. The bloody finger-marks of the dying child show
like a 'menetekel' on the white wall.

Something decisive must be done. If it lay with the people we National
Socialists would have long attained office.

We bury the 'Hitler boy' Norkus on a biting cold day. From the bottom
of my heart I speak to the children and men gathered round the narrow
coffin. The boy's father, a simple workman, is brave beyond words.
Grief-stricken, with an ashen face, he raises his hand in salute to
the strains of the 'Horst Wessel Lied', and sings with bitter pride
and deep wrath 'Hold high the flag!'
Outside the churchyard gates the red rabble stands waiting for its
victims. This plague must be exterminated like rats.

The Prussian Ministry of the interior has extended the muzzling order
against me to include the whole of Prussia.

I consult a lawyer in order to transfer my library to another person's
name. Who knows if a bailiff will not suddenly turn up and confiscate
it, because in the eyes of the Government it might be of assistance in
preparing a revolution.

When the history of our time comes to be written later on, the valiant
deeds of the S.A. are worthy of being placed side by side with the
most heroic achievements of our people.

In the afternoon I talk over the final plan for the coming campaign
with the Leader. He is splendid to work with, and belongs to those few
who, once having given their confidence, leave one to carry on freely
by oneself, untrammeled. In the same way as he claims authority for
himself, he accords the right of authority to everybody to whom, in
their turn, it is necessary. The hostile Press depicts him quite
falsely and gives rise to a very erroneous idea of him. There is
nobody in the world less qualified for the role of tyrant than Hitler.

These brave old companions have led National Socialism in Berlin
victoriously against all obstacles. Once this 'Red' bulwark (Berlin)
is taken, and the Capital of the Reich reconquered for German
Nationality we shall have them to thank for it.
One can well understand that they are proud of having fought on our
side from the beginning. It required very real patriotism at that time
to espouse a seemingly hopeless cause for no sake but its own.

Off and on a bourgeois crosses our path, who is unable to understand
the present situation. He uses arguments that merely enter one ear and
go out the other. It is useless trying to discuss things with him.

The moment Willikins begins to read a couple of sentences written by
me at the end of his address, a police officer rises to close the
meeting. He is answered by a wild and deafening hooting.

They seem unable to grasp that we really embody something essentially
new, that we cannot and will not be compared to any other party,

Fifteen thousand S.A. men have formed up in the Sportpalast for the
roll call.

The S.A. of Berlin is first rate. What opposition and persecution
these men have had to endure! They have become steeled though terror
and repression. Now, imperturbably, they await the signal to act.

We spend the evening at home with the Leader. We have invited one or
two actors, who meet him for the first time, and are amazed to find
how little he resembles his portrayal by the Jewish gutter Press.

Leave for Hannover, where I am speaking. The festival hall is packed
with six thousand people. It required endless machinations to procure
permission for me to speak.


The Marmorpalast evokes ancient memories. Here, once upon a time,
broken chairs and table-legs piled up in heaps, and blood stained the
floor. Today things are cheerful, and National Socialism is in fine
fighting trim.

Sportpalast packed. General meeting of the members of the northern,
eastern, and western districts. Immense ovations at the very outset.
When after about an hour's preparation I publicly proclaim that the
Leader will come forward as a candidate for the Presidency, a storm of
deafening applause rages for nearly ten minutes. Wild ovations for the
Leader. The audience rises with shouts of joy. They nearly raise the
roof.

The newspapers are one mass of lies.

S.A. man shot in the north of Berlin and two gravely injured. The
press becomes contemptibly hypocritical.

The campaign of personal calumny has reached its climax. We must take
good care to stand shoulder to shoulder.

Lustgarten. A marvelous sight in spite of snow and frost. Eight
thousand have assembled. Indescribable enthusiasm. We have routed all
the others. The crowd swears, with hands held high aloft, never to
forsake the great cause.

The Jewish Press is a mere concoction of lies.

It is sought be every means to outlaw our proceedings, which are not
in the least illegal.

I intend to fly from Tempelhof to Hamburg. Am not allowed to take off!
Chicanery of the police! Wait for hours, and finally leave by train in
the evening.

The houses of prominent party members are guarded by Storm Troopers
for the next few weeks.

Our job now is to scotch the worst of the campaign lies. For instance,
a proclamation by the Leader that he resigns his candidature! This
lie is propagated mainly in the eastern provinces.

Our press has fought a straight fight. It is worthy of all praise.

If the Leader does not weaken neither will the Organization. He is
masterly at a crisis. I have never seen him waver.
The attitude of the Press towards us has sunk to the lowest personal
level.

The 'Red' delegates provoke the Leader beyond all bounds. He suddenly
loses patience and gives them the rough edge of his tongue in return.
That makes us all feel better.

Various subjects are under discussion. Finally we come to No. 218 (a
law against abortion). The Leader takes up the same stand on this
subject as does every decent man. This kind of thing must not be
allowed to spread or it will become a national evil.

The Angriff again banned for a week. Our other papers have already
been banned during the last few days. That means our entire Press is
suppressed.
On top of this comes the Easter breathing space, but license to speak
in public is still withheld. We are condemned to absolute silence.

In the morning the lovely countryside is clad in deep snow.
The mountains stand out as clear as crystal above the sleepy little
town.

The Jews calumniate us in the most disgusting way, but they won't they
won't succeed in putting us out of countenance.

Worked out plans. Practice with a pistol. The Leader is an absolutely
sure shot.

I begin to understand why the Leader loves being in the mountains.
Here it is possible for him to arrive at momentous decisions without
being disturbed and distracted by the rush and hurry of life in a
great city.

The Party was severely attacked on the subject of its attitude during
the last election. Woman is, always has been, and always will be the
complement and helpmeet of man. Even in the present economic situation
this cannot be altered. Formerly women worked in the fields, now she
works in the office. Man organizes life, and woman assists him in its
fulfillment.

The author, Hans Grimm, openly announces his allegiance to the Leader.
Seven Universities professors do the same.

Groener definitely squashes our Press. That is an open breach of the
Constitution. We have hardly any means left us whereby to fight the
campaign.

The Jewish Press publishes a falsified bill of the Leader's at the
Kaiserhof. It is impossible induce the Republican law courts to defend
out honor.
All the forces of Conservatism attack us. We have to lie low until
April tenth.

A decent judge at Hannover forbids Hans Noske to go on suppressing the
distribution of additional editions of our papers. That is a blow for
the Republicans.
The police search our house for three hours. We do all we can to
irritate and annoy them.

The city is hardly recognizable. Our posters blaze forth on all
advertising pillars. Everything is taking its course.
The Leader speaks in Saxonia, on Monday, to 250,000 people. He is fit
and ready.
One hundred and fifty thousand march to the Lustgarten. I deliver the
first address. Then the Leader appears. Indescribable enthusiasm
prevails. He makes a wonderful speech.

For the moment our propaganda chiefly consists in contradicting lies.
A disgusting task, but it has to be done.

The Press continues to spread an incredible number of lies.

This campaign of personal slander causes us lot of bother.
At all hours of the day fresh misrepresentations and wrongful
imputations continually crop up.
Attack follows attack in breathless haste. If this sort of campaign
was to be waged for six months, we should all be fit for the
mad-house!

We must invent new posters for Prussia. The old ones have one and all
been prohibited by Grzesinski.

The entire Movement is swamped by a flood of lies: one is almost
crushed by them.

Motor through Berlin. Nothing to be seen but Swastika flags, or red
rags.

The conservative parties have been beaten all along the line.

During the night an S.A. man has been shot on the Kreuzberg. The
bullet hit him in the middle of the forehead. At midday all flags are
draped with mourning.

We have obtained one hundred and sixty mandates, and have thus become
the strongest party in the country. In Prussia alone eight millions of
voters have declared for us.

In the evening Streicher comes to visit us, and we talk politics till
late at night.

The Jew Weiss breaks into the House in full session with his police
and stations himself on the Government platform. Members of the Party
are arrested.

It is not at all easy to obtain power. Once it is ours, however, we
can congratulate ourselves that we have deserved it.

The Bolshevist faction-leader, Pieck, is speaking from the rostrum,
and becomes insufferable. One of the Communists hits a party member in
the face. That is the signal for a general settlement. It is short,
but to the point, and it is fought with inkpots and chair legs for
weapons. Our faction is left alone in the hall, victorious, in three
minutes. The Communists have been driven out; the parties of the
'Middle' have already taken to flight. We sing the Horst Wessel song.
The casualties generally, amount to eight seriously wounded. That
should be a warning: it is the only way to ensure respect. The Council
Chamber is a scene of wreckage.

The S.A. prohibition is going to be cancelled. Uniforms are to be
allowed again.

On the way the farmers of the Mark of Brandenburg stop the Leader's
car at the roadside to grasp him by the hand.

If not for us it would only be a matter of a very short time when the
Bolshevist revolution would break out. But there is really no object
in coming to the assistance of bourgeois-minded politicians.

The S.A. prohibition has been cancelled. Now the prohibition against
of meetings must also be cancelled.

The Bolshevist reign of blood is assuming unbearable proportions. The
government remains completely inactive against it. Nothing remains for
us to do but to defend ourselves.

Every day heaps of letters arrive full of threats, insults, and
blackmail.

At noon we bury our murdered comrade, Koester, in a churchyard outside
Berlin. Our S.A. are pale with rage and indignation.

One espies files of 'Red' murderers slinking along by the walls of
houses in the darkness of night. Who may it be who will have to pay
with his life, this time? It is enough to drive one mad.

A group of S.A. men coming from the funeral is fired upon out of the
Vorwaerts building. Two seriously injured.

The 'Red' mob has blocked the surrounding streets, so that it is
difficult to reach the meeting hall. But we have so thoroughly well
learned how to deal with a situation of this sort in Berlin during the
last six years, that little stops us now.

The Government Press in Bavaria has falsified my Sportpalast speech in
the most insolent manner, and turned it into an attack in the worst
possible taste against the Bavarian people.

At Kiel the whole town displays our flags. The large hall is packed
with fifteen thousand people.

With diabolical insolence the 'Red' murder columns fall upon our
comrades. At Wedding we had one killed and ten seriously injured
again. The hospitals refuse to take in our wounded. We have erected
our own infirmaries, but lack the necessary funds to keep them
suitably equipped.

Despite the unbounded provocation these young men endure, they
preserve an incredible and admirable discipline. With them one can
achieve a revolution.

With this Government one has to go like a cat on hot bricks. Every
outspoken word is forbidden; one must not call a spade a spade.

We drive into Hagen quite openly, uniformed, and in open car. The
streets are swarming. Full of the mob and Communist rabble. They block
the thoroughfare so that we can neither advance nor go back. There is
nothing for it but to drive straight ahead at full speed and give them
to understand we don't care a fig for them! We dash straight through.
Each of us has his revolver ready and is decided to pay for his life,
if needs be, as dearly as possible.

The 'Red' campaign of murder is raging throughout the country. The
Government is inactive. Seventeen killed in a few days!

In front of the hotel the 'Red' mob is howling. The police refuse to
intervene

The Angriff banned again. The 'Red' murder campaign is still raging.
The moment we defend ourselves the Jewish Press makes a fuss.

Terrible news from Altona. The Communist assault our S.A. on the march
in an organized attack. Fifteen dead and fifty seriously wounded. That
is open civil war.

We send envoys to General Schleicher. The Government is completely
inactive. It's only to the 'bloody Sunday' at Altona is to issue a
prohibition to hold further meetings.

The Government attacks us because the Communists fire at us. It
forbids our demonstrations because the destroyers of the State and of
civilization might be upset thereby.

The Leader's determination is inexhaustible. He really remains
undaunted in the midst of all crisis and dangers.

An attempt on the Leader's life at Nuremberg has fortunately misfired.
He is entirely unhurt.

New men, new ideas, fresh departures. We must presently get rid of
conservatism; that is the most important thing next to the overthrow
of Marxism.

The Press is full of the most blatant lies. It drivels about
antagonisms in the Party, and of disagreements haven taken place
between the Leader and his subordinates. We have many a good laugh
over all of this.

The idea of the Leader as Vice-Chancellor of a bourgeois cabinet is
too ludicrous to be treated seriously. Rather go on struggling for ten
years more than accept this offer.

It must not become a Party of 'Property and Intellectualism', but
remain a Party of the People.
It is always to be based on its old fighters, and must help the
workmen get bread and work. For that we have struggled and it is for
that, that power is so necessary to us.

A lot of spies have sneaked into the Party, and are trying to shake
the morale of members of long standing.

He who is fortunate enough to be often with the Leader likes him
better from day to day. Not only has he the gift of rapid and correct
decision, but personally he has an indescribable aura about him of
kindness and hearty good-fellowship, and so captivates everyone who
approaches him.

We owe it to our dead to stand stubbornly on our rights, and do our
duty for the sake of the cause, even if the struggle should seem
hopeless.

One of the most difficult problems is how to provide for the hundreds
of our men taken prisoners.

That which is popular to-day will be unpopular tomorrow. We have only
to remain firm, and hold fast to our ideas, and never give in.

The evening Press is publishing hypocritical articles against us. Both
sides, 'Right' and 'Left' gloat over our defeat. We have to struggle
hard against our own depression;

It is also important that we should bring out a morning paper in
Berlin. With one single evening paper we cannot combat the hostile
Press of the whole world.

In the evening we saunter through this wonderful of Goethe's, and are
spellbound by its indescribable charm.

Deep depression throughout the organization. Lack of money is making
it impossible to do things thoroughly well.

Is this the beginning of 1933? We shall have to stand up and make a
fight for it in order to hold our own.

In the night a boy of the Hitler-youth has been murdered.

We march behind the coffin of this murdered boy through eternal walls
of men for two and a half hours. The whole S.A., S.S., and
Hitler-youth follows. Hundreds of thousands of people are in the
streets.

The Leader is a genuine friend; not only in political , but also in
private life, he is an extremely generous and benevolent man.

The square looks like a military camp. The Communists are making an
uproar in the side-streets. Armed motor cars and machine-guns are
everywhere to be seen. The police have posted themselves on the roofs
and at the windows facing the Platz, waiting the course of events.
Punctually at two o'clock the Leader arrives.

The struggle is a light one now, since we are able to employ all means
of the State. Radio and Press are at our disposal.

The Jews in their editorial offices have become quite humble.
The terror though has not yet been checked. A new wave of blood is
flowing over the country.

The Leader is greeted with frantic cheering. He delivers a fine
address containing an outspoken declaration of war against Marxism.

It is very difficult to steer the Party from a state of white-hot
opposition into being the instrument, itself, of the State.

Victor Lutze has already assembled his officers as newly appointed
President of the Police. Now the wind sets in a very different
direction. Formerly we were beaten with clubs, and now we are masters
of the land!

Two S.A. men shot in Berlin during the night. They will not go
unrevenged.

Forty million people are now standing in the squares and in the
streets, or sitting in the Bierhallen and their homes by the Radio,
and become conscious that a new era has dawned.

Throngs of people are marching through the streets singing.

Now the constructive part of the German revolution can begin.

Swastika flags are hoisted all over Germany. The nation has a new
appearance.

Our outlawed, laughed-at flag is hoisted by the Reich! The flag of the
German Revolution!

The Leader remains absolutely the same in his private and public life.
He does not surround himself with splendor and luxuries, but appears
as usual in his simple brown shirt, and is just as unpretentious in
heart as in appearance.

The horrors propaganda abroad gives us much trouble. The many Jews who
have left Germany have set all foreign countries against us.

It is a serious error on the part of our opponents to lie so
shamelessly about us. They will not be able in the long run to prevent
foreign countries getting in touch with us,

Last Easter we were in the thick of the hardest fight for the very
existence of our Party. Who, then, could have foreseen that we should
be in power a year later?

A vast philanthropic effort has been taken in hand to look after the
poor here as well as in the whole Reich.

My mother, who has been calumniated, slandered, belittled, and
persecuted for years, and has suffered unspeakably from it. One knows
what this sort of thing is like. To be a social outcast is to be
mortally stricken. It is torture for an old woman to have heard
nothing for years but remarks of pity, or indignation, on account of
an unruly son who lives at daggers drawn with Church, State, and
Society.

Workmen and bourgeois, high and humble, employers and employees; now
these differences are obliterated

The Horst-Wessel Hymn rises to the eternal evening sky. The voices of
the million and a half gathered in the Tempelhofer Feld are borne on
the ether over the whole country, over towns and villages, and
choruses will be joining everywhere.




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The Peeler
2015-05-12 20:38:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
I suppose we won't hear from The Rectum for a while as he will be jerking
off to that one! LOL
NEMO
2015-05-12 20:47:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
I suppose we won't hear from The Rectum for a while as he will be jerking
off to that one! LOL
He can ask Walt "Pigshit" Hampton to help him along! It's a cinch,
with the Parkinson's disease!
The Peeler
2015-05-13 14:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
Post by The Peeler
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
I suppose we won't hear from The Rectum for a while as he will be jerking
off to that one! LOL
He can ask Walt "Pigshit" Hampton to help him along! It's a cinch,
with the Parkinson's disease!
What did I tell you? You post a picture of a naked dead Nazi and, as
predicted, The Rectum doesn't post for the first time in a long time. He
must be quite sore by now, jerking off to that picture! LOL
--
The Rectum about sex with corpses:
"Smell? Most necrophilia is carried out on bodies that are either
freshly deceased or embalmed and refrigerated."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Topaz
2015-05-14 20:45:39 UTC
Permalink
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich

The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.

We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
is. He united State and Nation in Germany.

Only the eye-witness, who has experienced day by day, at the side of
Adolf Hitler, the wave of love and enthusiasm which greets him from
every class of German, can realize that such ovations, so rare in the
life of statesmen, signify no artificial feeling, but genuine
affection.. Hundreds, thousands throng the streets and roads, and
surge toward his car.. The scenes which we witness day by day are
touching and heart-rending. They are not isolated examples, but occur
everywhere.

The history of the National Socialist Movement shall be handed down to
posterity as the epic of the resurrected German Nation.

With indomitable will and unprecedented perseverance, which no
reverse can dishearten, this previously unknown man of the people,
with a few faithful adherents, dared to pierce the lines of the
Marxist terror.. He knows; terror is not overcome by intellect, but by
terror.

Adolf Hitler was not permitted to speak in public. The party lacked
the most essential means. It's existence during the following years -
probably the most arduous of its life - was one long series of
persecutions, muzzling, and trickery. Whoever admitted National
Socialism, was banished from civil life, from the decadent bourgeoisie
and from the class-conscious workers. The mere suspicion of National
Socialism meant the loss of employment and bread, boycott and ruin of
business interests, the inevitable acceptance of misery.

Hundreds, thousands were imprisoned by the November State Government.
Throughout the streets raged bloodshed and scenes of Marxist terror.
All the powers of hell were let loose against the advancing young
movement.

After twelve years of inconceivably laborious preparation, the
N.S.D.A.P. felt strong enough to knock at the door of power in the
Reich

But strong elements of economic opposition were still prevalent, and
these he attacked at the beginning of 1932.

Even today, I can picture this meeting of prominent men. We came for
Godesberg, and drove up to the Park Hotel, amidst the hooting of the
Marxists. The room was over crowded. Huddled together, sat the chief
West German magnates. There were familiar and unfamiliar faces. Men in
the public eye , and those quiet , but no less influential powers,
who, moving behind the scenes, control the fate of economy by the soft
sounds issuing from their private offices- men said to bear a ledger
rather than a heart.

Joyful expectation brightened the faces of those already converted.
But the vast majority bore an air of superiority and cool reserve-
probably flattered that Hitler had approached them. Mere curiosity,
and general interest lured them to the meeting. They wanted to hear
Hitler speak. They had no intention of being converted; the came to
criticize, seeking confirmation of their own infallible opinion.

Our leader received a chilly ovation; he spoke from a slightly raised,
projecting balustrade, he hands resting lightly on the iron railing. I
sat, amongst the listeners, taking notes, and observing the effect of
his speech which lasted for over two hours. From world political
perspective and with cogent logic, out leader elucidated the relations
between economy and politics, their reciprocal effect, and their
results in Germany. He explained the cause of the situation , and
proposed the only possible remedy.

The general impression upon this group of most impassive listeners was
astounding. After an hour, their chilly reserve gave way to intense
interest. Hitler spoke of the titanic struggle of his political
warriors, needy and persecuted, but making every sacrifice, even that
of life, for their nation. He contrasted the German youth's unselfish
idealism, personified in National Socialism, and the noble character
of working-class followers, with the lack of comprehension, the
materialism, and the heavy guilt of the purely economically
established Bourgeoisie. He pricked their social conscience without
causing offence.

They began to flush, fixed their gaze upon out Leader's lips, and it
seemed as if their hearts were moved. He spoke to their very souls.
Faint, then thundering applause greeted Hitler at the conclusion of
his speech; he had won a battle.


The Jewish and Marxist Press lied boldly next day that Hitler had
feasted with the industrial magnates on champagne and lobsters.
Actually, a few minutes later, the night say us on the road again,
bent on fresh work.

Next day, Hitler addressed with equal success the Crefeld Silk
magnates in Godesberg. Later the national club in Hamburg. Everywhere,
the scene was the same.

Those were daring journeys, fraught with danger, through the very
strongholds of the Marxist potentates who were on the track of their
hated, sworn foe.

But Adolf Hitler fought his way through. The number-plate of his car
was smeared with oil and coated with dust- quite indiscernible.

Then we held our first meeting in Goerlitz, where the attendance
exceeded the hundred thousand figure. All the roads were crowed with
masses of people on foot, on bicycles, and in lorries, all with the
same destination.

Hitler spoke as the stars arose in the heavens, and amidst the flaring
torches.

Now the crowds recognized the luminous plane carrying our leader, who
had just devoted his time to them. Cheers broke out from a hundred
thousand throats, drowning even the thunder of our motors, whilst the
crowds brandished flaming torches in greeting.

We have experienced the following fact; In Germany, wherever economic
and moral distress was greatest, wherever things seemed most
intolerable, there, confidence in our leader was strongest, and
gripped all the people.

Wherever our leader approached, every man and woman came out. Crowds
lined the streets. Aged grandmothers, on whose distressed faces the
direst poverty was written, raised their arms in greeting. Wherever we
stopped, the women stretched out their children towards our leader.
There were tears of joy and emotion.

They used to meet upon the Platterhof. Adolf Hitler would often come
in the night fog to the Platterhof, to take counsel with his friends.

The "Conservative State Idea" appropriated our ideas. The most ancient
political mummies of the past suddenly appeared upon the scene, and,
without shame, claimed the credit for out previous successes.

The Youth stood by Hitler, because it knew that he personified the
Nation's Youth. From the beginning, our leader had valued most highly
the immense importance of Youth for the movement. Not the old
generation, but a rising generation, uncorrupted by the destructive
poison of the world ideas of the ruling classes, could bear the new
Germany upon its shoulders.

Finally, on 30th January, 1933, our leader made the short drive over
the Wilhelmsplatz to the Reichskanzler's Office. Amidst boundless
cheers. The seige was over, the fortress had fallen, the gates lay
open.

The political lie had played a prominent role in all epochs of
parliamentary history. But such accumulations of lies and defamations
as our opponents have hurled against the awakening young Germany in
the course of our 13 years' struggle have not been experienced.

What National Socialist's blood does not boil, if he recalls the rapid
fire of press lies, that witches Sabbath of infernal songs of hatred,
which burst upon the National Socialist Movement every day?

The activity of the Marxist Press against National Socialism, by means
of profligacy, unscrupulous lies and base agitation of the public,
stands unrivalled throughout the press of the whole world.

But this systematic lying campaign of our opponents was always the
best evidence of the moral weakness of their own position. The more
desperate their situation was, the more unscrupulous became their
press agitation.

The agitation of the Jewish-Marxist Press against the N.S.D.A.P., has
been such an essential ingredient of our opponents' struggle during
all these years, that we would be guilty of historical forgery if we
did not lay due stress upon this lying campaign in our description of
the events.

The National Socialist Party has re-united people and State, it has
restored the people to the State, and the State to the people. In this
way, an organism, complete within itself, and comprising every
function of the life of the community, was born from the Nation
itself, in the midst of a decadent people and a corrupt State.

In Nuremberg, the Party represented the German people and the German
State, before the eyes of the whole world. This was a more complete, a
more morally dignified, and a more imposing representation than the
State and Nation have ever previously enjoyed.

If proves the recognition that a new valuation of men, a valuation
based upon the laws of nature, is beginning to force its way through
from the hearts of the European Nations. It is about to overcome
Liberalism, and replace it by a new conception of the living
community.

The democratic, parliamentary Liberalism apodictically claimed for
itself the eternal title of the most purposeful and best form of
representation of the peoples rights. At last with its own eyes, the
Nation has recognized National Socialism as the organization of
naturally chosen leaders. National Socialism's achievements in the
fields of Socialism, Economy, Administration, and Reformation of the
Reich, speak for themselves. In one sweep, these leaders have
accomplished what dozens of previous parliamentary, democratic
governments vainly attempted in the most deplorable way.

Probably it is an act of justice and compensation, that the German
Nation, so sorely afflicted by the world-war, is chosen to lead the
way to a better future for the nations.




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-14 23:21:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.

Some road to power.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-16 00:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
So did your Asiatic shithole homeland, the Flippines.
NEMO
2015-05-16 10:27:57 UTC
Permalink
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis

This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...

http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg

LOLOK!
NEMO
2015-05-16 19:22:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until operation of the camp was taken over by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is his contribution to civilisation...
http://voiceseducation.org/content/burning-pit
LOLOK!
LOLK! jew Bratwurst innit kikey!
The Peeler
2015-05-16 19:27:19 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 May 2015 12:22:49 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
LOLOK!
LOLK! Nazi Bratwurst for me! Thanks!
Sure, any time, you sick old fag!
--
Nefesh about The Rectum: "All good people shit on the Revd"
MID: <8560bbb2-d446-4ba9-a3e7-***@c20g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
Topaz
2015-05-17 09:28:29 UTC
Permalink
'Nazi' Concentration Camps on Staten Island?
Hengist - Focal Point
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/fake/GlennObit.html

In 1981, Jack Glenn, director of the popular 1940's newsreel series
"March of Time" died at age 76. His obituary ... let slip an amazing
revelation: "As senior director for the popular movie house newsreel,
he often created world events with actors and movie sets. One such
news feature film, Inside Nazi Germany, made in 1938, included footage
of a `concentration camp' that was filmed on Staten Island with scores
of New York City actors..." Millions of Americans watching the
"news"-reels in their local theatres were convinced that they were
seeing "the real thing." How many such images of "reality" that we see
on a regular basis are actually the creation of movie magicians?

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-16 19:29:00 UTC
Permalink
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis

This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...

http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg

LOLOK! If only poor old Walt Hampton could get it up! :)
NEMO
2015-05-17 00:30:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until operation of the camp was taken over by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is his contribution to civilisation...
http://voiceseducation.org/content/burning-pit
LOLOK!
LOLK! jew Bratwurst innit kikey!
Heinrich
2015-05-17 04:20:52 UTC
Permalink
KILL limeys NOW, THIS IS HOW!
Photograph of British criminals hanged by brave
http://tinyurl.com/d87sga7
you hate your own people so much, is it because you were
molested as a little limey boi

More and more british folks tell how they were molested as boys,
what a nation of perverts

http://tinyurl.com/osu5vsa

"Wave of Sexual Abuse Allegations for Private Boys. Schools in Britain"

simply disgusting
The Peeler
2015-05-17 10:14:17 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:30:54 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
LOLOK! If only poor old Walt Hampton could get it up! :)
LOLK! Nazi Bratwurst for me! Thanks!
You're welcome, perv! LOL
--
tomcov about "The Rectum":
"Assholes come
Assholes go
But the revd asshole goes on forever.
(and he speaks through it)"
MID: <83356bf8-8666-4f4f-ac9a-***@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:15:46 UTC
Permalink
by Richard A. Widmann

In his recently published book, Why People Believe Weird Things,
Skeptic editor Michael Shermer recounts an exchange from the Phil
Donahue show. On that particular episode, CODOH director Bradley Smith
stated, "It [is] a lie that Germans cooked Jews to make soap from
them." Shermer, who is skeptical of many things, but generally a
believer in the Holocaust story, replied, "No, not a lie. It's a
mistake."

For some the tales of vicious Germans manufacturing Jews into bars
of soap and lampshades are indeed a lie, for others, like Shermer,
they are the products of innocent mistakes; for still others, the
stories remain an unassailable truth. In fact, these propaganda lies
have been dispelled many times, but continue to be repeated frequently
in establishment sources. It is no wonder that many people still
believe these horror stories.

General Lucius Clay, the military governor of the US zone of
occupied Germany, explained the lampshade story, "Well, it turned out
actually that it was goat flesh [sic --clearly the general meant
skin]. But at the trial [of Ilse Koch] it was still human flesh."
(Interview with Lucius Clay, 1976, Official Proceeding of the George
C. Marshall Research Foundation Quoted in M. Weber, "Buchenwald:
Legend and Reality," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87
7(4), pp. 406-407.)

In regard to the human soap story, darling of the establishment
media and virulent anti-revisionist Deborah Lipstadt noted in 1981
"The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that
matter anyone else, for the production of soap." ("Nazi Soap Rumor
During World War II," Los Angeles Times, May 16, 1981, p II/2.)
Michael Berenbaum, former director of the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum, now supervising Steven Spielberg's taxpayer-funded
Holocaust remembrance project, admitted in 1994, "there is no
evidence, despite widespread reports, that human fat was used for
soap. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum tested several bars
of soap reported to be composed of human fat but no such fat was
found." (Y. Gutman, M. Berenbaum, Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp,
Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1994, p.80.)
One would clearly think that the case is closed, and that further
repetition of these propaganda stories would constitute nothing more
(and nothing less!) than arrant anti-German bigotry.

Still, the lies persist. On May 10, 1997 the New York Times ran an
article entitled, "Holocaust Collection Is Educator for Young." The
story concerns Milton Kohn, the owner of the world's "largest private
collection of Holocaust memorabilia." Kohn wanders the world repeating
anti-German hate stories to children. Part of his traveling collection
includes an alleged "bar of soap rendered from human fat [which] was
bought from a third party in Eastern Europe in 1968." Surely the New
York Times, which prides itself on reporting "all the news that's fit
to print," is aware that the soap story has been discredited.

The month of May also saw a revival of the hateful story of human
lampshades. In a mailing from Time-Life Video designed to hawk their
"World at War" series of videos, the advertisement reads: "More than
60 million people were shot, hanged, bombed, starved, gassed, frozen
or drowned. Nazis turned humans into lampshades... Now you can see
what hell is really like in the most definitive war footage you can
find today!"

Obviously, anti-German hatred still sells. Those who profit from
spreading these hateful lies should be called to account. It's up to
those with a sense of justice and respect for the truth to let the
offenders know that countenancing, let alone spreading, such lies
can't and won't be tolerated.

New York Times
229 West 43rd Street
New York, New York 10036

Time Life Video
1450 E. Parham Road
Richmond, VA 23286-4257

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth,
he will either quit being mistaken or cease being honest.

SOAP MADE FROM JEW FAT ?
Author Walter Laqeur stated in The Terrible Secret that there are no
facts to back up this tale.


Chicago Tribune, April 25, 1991, wrote, "Nazis didn't make soap from
Jews' fat."


In a Jan. 1986 letter, investigators at the Danzig Institute admitted
that soap was never made from human corpses during the war.


Cited numerous times before in this book, Yehuda Bauer, a historian
specializing in the holocaust at Hebrew University in Israel,
disclosed in Apr. 1990 that the soap tall-tales weren't true.


Those in charge of protecting the holocaust legacy have admitted that
director Billy Wilder's film about Nazis making soap from Jewish fat
consisted of lies accomplished via the use of film props.


Bars of RIF soap were scientifically tested to determine if they
possessed any human remains. Not one single experiment showed positive
results.


Famed holocaust apologist Deborah Lipstadt shocked the world with a
1981 confirmation that the human soap story was never based on
reality. "The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of the
Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap."


Holocaust historian, Professor Raul Hilberg, revealed, "The Nazis did
into manufacture soap from human fat and did not kill their victims
with diesel exhaust."


In Israel, a renowned spokesman for the Yad Vashem holocaust agency,
Shmuel Krakowski, issued a statement in 1990. "Historians have
concluded that soap was not made from human fat" and the
tale was nothing but a mere legend.

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2015-05-17 09:29:41 UTC
Permalink
Some Myths About the Origin of World War II
Mark Weber - Podcast
http://www.ihr.org/mwreport/2012-02-29
Much of what we're told about the how World War II began is
misleading, distorted or just plain untrue. It's often claimed, for
example, that after taking power Hitler moved quickly to build a large
army and air force to conquer Europe. In fact, and as reputable
scholars have quietly acknowledged, Third Reich rearmament in the
years before the outbreak of war in 1939 was remarkably modest. Hitler
neither wanted nor planned for a major war. The British and French
declarations of war against Germany, which were secretly encouraged by
US President Roosevelt, transformed the limited German-Polish conflict
into a major, European-wide war.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-17 16:25:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Some Myths About the Origin of World War II
Mark Weber - Podcast
http://www.ihr.org/mwreport/2012-02-29
Much of what we're told about the how World War II began is
misleading, distorted or just plain untrue. It's often claimed, for
example, that after taking power Hitler moved quickly to build a large
army and air force to conquer Europe. In fact, and as reputable
scholars have quietly acknowledged, Third Reich rearmament in the
years before the outbreak of war in 1939 was remarkably modest. Hitler
neither wanted nor planned for a major war. The British and French
declarations of war against Germany, which were secretly encouraged by
US President Roosevelt, transformed the limited German-Polish conflict
into a major, European-wide war.
When Germany militarized the Rhineland in violation of the Versailles
Treaty, France and Britain had sufficient justification to kick the German
troops out.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-17 17:13:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
Some Myths About the Origin of World War II
Mark Weber - Podcast
http://www.ihr.org/mwreport/2012-02-29
Much of what we're told about the how World War II began is
misleading, distorted or just plain untrue. It's often claimed, for
example, that after taking power Hitler moved quickly to build a large
army and air force to conquer Europe. In fact, and as reputable
scholars have quietly acknowledged, Third Reich rearmament in the
years before the outbreak of war in 1939 was remarkably modest. Hitler
neither wanted nor planned for a major war. The British and French
declarations of war against Germany, which were secretly encouraged by
US President Roosevelt, transformed the limited German-Polish conflict
into a major, European-wide war.
When Germany militarized the Rhineland in violation of the Versailles
Treaty, France and Britain had sufficient justification to kick the
German troops out.
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
The Peeler
2015-05-17 17:17:05 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:13:57 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
When Germany militarized the Rhineland in violation of the Versailles
Treaty, France and Britain had sufficient justification to kick the
German troops out.
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of psychotic BULLSHIT!
--
Gray Guest about The Rectum: "You are a subhuman. You should not be
permitted to propagate your genes."
MID: <***@88.198.244.100>
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-17 18:09:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:13:57 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
When Germany militarized the Rhineland in violation of the Versailles
Treaty, France and Britain had sufficient justification to kick the
German troops out.
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of psychotic BULLSHIT!
Indeed.

Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with the
United States of America.

The war with Gaza should end the same way as the war with Japan did.

The Revd NEMO is a mangina.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-17 18:41:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
When Germany militarized the Rhineland in violation of the Versailles
Treaty, France and Britain had sufficient justification to kick the
German troops out.
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of SENSE!
Gosh! Innit!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Indeed.
Keep zsucking, asshole.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with
the United States of America.
There is NO comparison. There was NO declaration of war. There WAS a
massively disproportionate jew response to a handful of harmless
Palestinian fireworks which strayed across the border. Only a
slant-eyed rectum zsucking asshole like you would think otherwise.
Post by Michael Ejercito
The war with Gaza should end the same way as the war with Japan did.
Yes. By 'Israel' getting nuked into a radioactive parking lot.
Post by Michael Ejercito
The Revd NEMO is a mangina.
YOU are a craven rectum sucking gook piece of pro-semitic shite.
The Peeler
2015-05-17 18:50:47 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 17 May 2015 11:41:27 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by NEMO
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of psychotic BULLSHIT!
Gosh! Innit!
As usual, you psychopathic swine!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Indeed.
Keep zsucking, asshole.
It's you and your "life" that suck ...like TOTALLY!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with
the United States of America.
There is NO comparison. There was NO declaration of war. There WAS a
massively disproportionate jew response to a handful of harmless
Palestinian fireworks which strayed across the border. Only a
slant-eyed rectum zsucking asshole like you would think otherwise.
Yet another load of psychotic NONSENSE! LOL
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
The war with Gaza should end the same way as the war with Japan did.
Yes. By 'Israel' getting nuked into a radioactive parking lot.
ONLY in your psychotic dreams, psychopath!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
The Revd NEMO is a mangina.
YOU are a craven rectum sucking gook piece of pro-semitic shite.
He isn't. But you ARE a mangina!
--
Gray Guest about The Rectum: "You are a subhuman. You should not be
permitted to propagate your genes."
MID: <***@88.198.244.100>
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:18:37 UTC
Permalink

Hamas has little homemade rockets powered by fertilizer. The Jews have
the latest high tech guided missiles supplied by the USA. The Jews do
massive death and destruction. The feeble attempts of Hamas to fight
back are almost useless.

Americans Should Be Ashamed
Philip Giraldi
http://www.unz.com/article/americans-should-be-ashamed/
... US weaponry supplied to Israel is by law only supposed to be used
for defensive purposes. Tank and mortar fire is conceivably defensive
when a dug in position is being attacked, but that is not the case in
Gaza. Tanks and mortars are instead being used offensively to bombard
Palestinian buildings, to include the UN schools and also hospitals
where civilians have taken refuge ... This makes the United States,
which likes to think of itself as a moral nation, complicit in the
carrying out of a horrific war crime ... The United States is apt to
moralize about what it does and does not do, but in practice it is not
at all guided neither by ethical considerations nor by national
interests. It rather responds to pressure groups and lobbies.




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-17 18:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles. Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of SENSE!
Gosh! Innit!
Not!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Indeed.
Keep zsucking, asshole.
Nithing, you suck in every way.
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with
the United States of America.
There is NO comparison.
Yes, there is.
Post by NEMO
There was NO declaration of war. There WAS a massively disproportionate
jew response to a handful of harmless Palestinian fireworks which strayed
across the border.
There is nothing harmless about those rockets.
Post by NEMO
Only a slant-eyed rectum zsucking asshole like you would think otherwise.
An honorable, decent person recognizes that the Gazans started the war
and if they do not unconditionally surrender, they will be unconditionally
destroyed.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-17 19:28:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
'Israel' invaded Gaza in violation of human rights principles.
Eye-ran
has sufficient justification to nuke the jew ragheads to Hell.
What a LOAD of SENSE!
Gosh! Innit!
Not!
Is!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Indeed.
Keep zsucking, asshole.
Nithing, you suck in every way.
Gook, you zsuck every fat jew rectum within zsucking distance.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with
the United States of America.
There is NO comparison.
Yes, there is.
No, there is NOT.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
There was NO declaration of war. There WAS a massively
disproportionate jew response to a handful of harmless Palestinian
fireworks which strayed across the border.
There is nothing harmless about those rockets.
They're TOTALLY harmless. In contrast to the shells and bombs used by
the jews whose rectums you zsuck.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Only a slant-eyed rectum zsucking asshole like you would think otherwise.
An honorable, decent person recognizes that the Gazans started the
war and if they do not unconditionally surrender, they will be
unconditionally destroyed.
As a slant-eyed subhuman piece of pro-semitic shite, you are EXEMPT from
honour and decency. Gaza has no NEED to surrender. It is 'Israel' that
needs to be unconditionally destroyed.
Heinrich
2015-05-17 19:30:47 UTC
Permalink
In article <mjaq5h$9eb$***@news.mixmin.net>,
the limey sicko FAKE revd, forging as NEMO, wrote:

[deleted]

Why do limey nazoids like yourself suck dicks and molest
children? It's very bad and even the Lord Jesus will not
forgive you.

More on neo-nazis and child porn
--------------------------------
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7469180.stm
British Neo-Nazi had child abuse images


British neo-nazi leader was gay, died of AIDS
---------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Crane
Nicky Crane was a British neo-Nazi skinhead activist. He came out
as gay before dying from an AIDS-related illness.


Another British neo-nazi leader turns out to be a paedophile
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nazi-paedo-jailed-over-sicko-87392
Nazi paedo jailed over sicko snap
A NAZI-sympathising paedophile who police caught with a huge stash of
child porn has been jailed for four years.
The Peeler
2015-05-17 20:15:21 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 17 May 2015 12:28:43 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Nithing, you suck in every way.
Gook, you zsuck every fat jew rectum within zsucking distance.
NONSENSE! It's YOU and your "life" that suck ...like TOTALLY!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Gaza started the war with Israel just like Japan started the war with
the United States of America.
There is NO comparison.
Yes, there is.
No, there is NOT.
Slave, if your master Michael that there IS, then there IS! You need to
correct your attitude, slave!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
There was NO declaration of war. There WAS a massively
disproportionate jew response to a handful of harmless Palestinian
fireworks which strayed across the border.
There is nothing harmless about those rockets.
They're TOTALLY harmless. In contrast to the shells and bombs used by
the jews whose rectums you zsuck.
How can they be harmless when they were designed to kill people and did
already kill people, you psychopathic swine?
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Only a slant-eyed rectum zsucking asshole like you would think otherwise.
An honorable, decent person recognizes that the Gazans started the
war and if they do not unconditionally surrender, they will be
unconditionally destroyed.
As a slant-eyed subhuman piece of pro-semitic shite, you are EXEMPT from
honour and decency. Gaza has no NEED to surrender. It is 'Israel' that
needs to be unconditionally destroyed.
Psychopathic BULLSHIT!
--
Retarded, anal, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident
psychopath, The Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:25:25 UTC
Permalink
"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.

BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.

The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?

I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
was LYING.

And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?

DaX

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-17 19:08:38 UTC
Permalink
neo-nazi "Leader" tries to rape BLACK worker, and gets his head bashed in!
http://tinyurl.com/lr4jzoh
"Eugene Terreblanche 'killed after sex attack on one of his workers'"
Those were male workers, of course... actually, Black male workers.
And here's how the nazi perv looked afterwards...
http://tinyurl.com/ncwmgzp
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:23:44 UTC
Permalink
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce

"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.

Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.

So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.

Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.

As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.

And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.

There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.

Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.

Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.

The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.

Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.

Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.

How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?

Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.

Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."

Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.

Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.

In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."

Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.

The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.

Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.

The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.

Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.

Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.

Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.

Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.

Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:17:34 UTC
Permalink
September 10, 2005
Israel's Successful Use of the Art of Realpolitik

by Ramzy Baroud

Many lessons can be drawn from the observation of Israeli dominion
over
the Palestinians in the past fifty-five years, most notably the
audacious mandate of institutionalized violence.

Even more alarming than the crimes themselves is the fact that even
after blatantly violating international law, Israel manages to remain
in the safety of the fold of the international community. Perhaps the
Sharon government gleaned its wisdom from Niccolo Machiavelli's
treatise, The Prince, rather than the Geneva Conventions. Consider the
following scenario as a paradigm of the Machiavellian philosophy
applied to the "Palestinian problem":

The fall of the classic theory and practice of imperialism compels us
modern imperialists, who are keenly interested in maintaining control
of our remaining settlements, to develop an advanced strategy that
will
protect our interests. Consolidating our power over indigenous
populations may be difficult, but if done the right way, the Israeli
way, that is, our settlements can be successfully sustained while our
subjects are effectively subdued.

An important factor in institutionalizing oppression is through the
utilization of the legal system. Israel has successfully passed laws,
such as the Law of Return, which allow Jews and only Jews, to
immigrate
to Israel based on their race, while Palestinians are denied the right
to live in their homeland and on their own property because they don't
fit into this category.

Moreover, the Absentee Law allows the state to confiscate the property
of dispossessed Palestinians and claim it as state property. These
laws
have proved quite successful, since they make race the determining
factor in attaining rights in Israel, with Jews as first class
citizens
and Arabs second class. They also rid Israel of some five million
refugees, scattered elsewhere.

Another important element of institutionalized oppression is military
occupation. Israel has occupied Palestine and other Arab lands for
decades. This way, although condemned by futile United Nations
resolutions, Israel has successfully achieved the upper hand over its
subjects.

The modern imperialist must understand that a strong army remains
essential in controlling the settlements and their people. Thanks to
the sheer strength of Israel's invincible army, Palestinian rebellions
have been suppressed through massive applications of force. It doesn't
matter whether force is used against armed or unarmed individuals,
children, women or the elderly. What matters most is conveying a
message that subjects have no chance of gaining the rights for which
they fight, and if they want to live, they must surrender to whatever
the State demands.

Today's imperialists must use the mass media, for it is unquestionably
the most effective tool in winning today's wars. It is important that
the message conveyed through the media highlights the losses of the
colonialist, not the colonized. The media must portray us as civilized
and our enemies as savage; it must show us as righteous and our
enemies
as wicked; it must show us as peaceful and our enemies as terrorists.

If the media is tightly controlled, we can fashion our own reality. We
can cause the world to blame our enemy when we kill their children,
and
we can make our soldiers heroes while their fighters are branded as
criminals. Israel has indeed mastered the art of media control, to the
point that we can even blame Palestinian parents for sending their
children to be killed to grab media attention. Interestingly enough,
many believe us.

Killing your enemies, torturing prisoners, occupying land and
confiscating properties are very important, but not enough. You must
humble the enemy while you carry out your policies. The tactic of
humiliation is indeed a winning stratagem, for through its employment,
you can destroy the spirit of your enemy. Yes you can kill a man, but
slaying him as his family watches and then stealing his dead body is
more effective.

You can beat a defiant young man who refuses to plead for mercy, but
if
you strip him naked first, you will certainly break his defiant spirit
and make him wish for death. Yes you can torture a prisoner by beating
him, but imagine how successful it will be if you threaten to rape, or
if you do in fact rape, his wife or sister. We've done it, and it was
often quite successful.

If your subjects submit, reward them with partial freedom and allow
them to get menial jobs. But if they defy you, clamp down and have no
mercy. Otherwise they will rebel too often. If you push them until
they
rise up against you, don't back down. Fight back. Close down their
schools, uproot their trees, burn down their farms, block their
streets, isolate their cities, demolish their homes, throw them in
jail, keep them under curfew for weeks, deny them clean water,
electricity and basic supplies.

If they increase their defiance by using firearms, then feel free to
do
all that can be done. In Israel, for example, we are using our best
high-tech weapons against them: F-15s, F-16s, Apache helicopters,
missiles and more.

Destroy their symbols and deny them an identity. In Israel we have
destroyed numerous mosques and have attacked and desecrated many
churches. Imagine what that made them feel? Even God cannot protect
them now.

If you issue them with identification cards, designate their
nationality as "undefined." Burn their flags, ban their books, forbid
them from learning their own history; call their intellectuals
"militants" and their leaders "fanatics." Make them feel trapped with
nowhere to escape.

Besiege their land, their air and water. Make them feel like a wild
animal trapped in a net. Terrorize them. Give them ultimatums. Force
them to accept their fate, which of course you ordain.

Turn them against each other whenever possible. Some of them might be
weak, easy to manipulate. Use these to spy on the others. If such
traitors become known, they'll be jailed or even executed. That's
good,
because then, like we do here in Israel, you can tell the world that
your enemies violate human rights. You win both ways.

Build trenches and enormous walls around their fertile land, towns and
villages, as we have done throughout the West Bank with our famous
security fence. We said it was a security measure. The world believed
us, and the people lost thousands of hectares of fertile land that is
now in our hands, free of its inhabitants, whose high numbers have
threatened our racial supremacy for generations.

Eradicate their forests and woodlands. Dump your toxic waste in their
land and destroy their environment. In short, imprison their men, rape
their land, murder their youth and push them to the brink of
desperation, to the point of suicide, literally. You will then have
succeeded in the complete dehumanization and defeat of your enemy,
while through the media you will have convinced the world you are
actually the victim.

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-17 19:17:21 UTC
Permalink
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis

This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...

http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg

LOLOK!
Topaz
2015-05-18 21:26:30 UTC
Permalink
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.

The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels

Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."

One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker's charges back on him, and the attacker
becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be
more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Jew wants.
He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the
result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he
has no time to do what the Jew really fears: to attack. The accused
has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the
dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought
the Jew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully
aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the
following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Jew by positive means. He is a negative, and
this negative must be erased from the German system, or he will
forever corrupt it.

2. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with the Jews. One can
hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.

3. One cannot allow the Jew the same means one would give an honest
opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and
nobility only to trap his enemy.

4. The Jew has nothing to say about German questions. He is a
foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights
that he always abuses.

5. The so-called religious morality of the Jews is no morality at all,
rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to
protection from the state.

6. The Jew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and
craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically-he follows
entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken
through political means.

7. A Jew cannot insult a German. Jewish slanders are but badges of
honor for a German opponent of the Jews.

8. The more a German person or a German movement opposes the Jew, the
more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Jews, that is a
sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Jews, or who
is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.

9. The Jew evaluates German questions from the Jewish standpoint. As a
result, the opposite of what he says must be true.

10. One must either affirm or reject anti-Semitism. He who defends the
Jews harms his own people. One can only be a Jewish lackey or a Jewish
opponent. Opposing the Jews is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the anti-Jewish movement a chance of success.
Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Jews, only such a
movement will be feared by them.

The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore
is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we
are constantly attacked in the Jewish gazettes. They may shout about
terror. We answer with Mussolini's familiar words: "Terror? Never! It
is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just
as a doctor does to a bacterium.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-18 23:49:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels
A man who murdered his children.
Post by Topaz
Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
?confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
Post by Topaz
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
No wonder Nazi Germany did not have a chance.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-19 14:15:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels
A man who murdered his children.
And this coming from a gook who zsucks jew rectums!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
?confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
Post by Topaz
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
No wonder Nazi Germany did not have a chance.
And yet you claim that six million jews got 'holocausted'®™ by Germany.
The Peeler
2015-05-19 15:50:56 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 May 2015 07:15:29 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
by Joseph Goebbels
A man who murdered his children.
And this coming from a gook who zsucks jew rectums!
And this coming from the psychotic who no longer can talk like a half-way
normal human being!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
No wonder Nazi Germany did not have a chance.
And yet you claim that six million jews got 'holocausted'®™ by Germany.
Actually, Nazi Germany doesn't even EXIST now, psychopath ...but the Jews
are thriving more than ever!
--
Retarded, anal, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident
psychopath, The Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Topaz
2015-05-19 20:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:

"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."

"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."

"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"

"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."

"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."

"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."

"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."

"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"

"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-19 23:21:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
On Tue, 19 May 2015 07:15:29 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
No wonder Nazi Germany did not have a chance.
And yet you claim that six million jews got 'holocausted'®™ by Germany.
Actually, Nazi Germany doesn't even EXIST now, psychopath ...but the Jews
are thriving more than ever!
The Revd NEMO and Topaz hate it every day.


Michael
--
Retarded, anal, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident
psychopath, The Retard (aka "The Rectum").
NEMO
2015-05-20 04:15:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
No wonder Nazi Germany did not have a chance.
And yet you claim that six million jews got 'holocausted'®™ by Germany.
Actually, Nazi Germany does, EXIST now ...but the, Jew psychopaths
are, bleeding more than, ever!
Gosh! Seems!
Post by Michael Ejercito
The Revd NEMO and Topaz hate it every day.
You zsuck it every day.
The Peeler
2015-05-20 10:04:36 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 19 May 2015 21:15:45 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Actually, Nazi Germany doesn't even EXIST now, psychopath ...but the Jews
are thriving more than ever!
Gosh! Seems!
See, you finally learned something new, retard! <BG>
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
The Revd NEMO and Topaz hate it every day.
You zsuck it every day.
YOU and your "life" suck every day ...and like TOTALLY!
--
bozo about "The Rectum":
"you come to us on your knees everyday, revd, begging for any kind of
attention you can get just like the sodomized attention-whore you are"
MID: <c8ae83dc-f281-4856-94ad-***@kn5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
Topaz
2015-05-21 20:45:26 UTC
Permalink
A cause célèbre for the 'anti-racists'?

Since the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence, seemingly by
Whites, in a street in Eltham, South East London, back in 1993, the
British public has never been allowed to forget about the incident.
With the encouragement of his politically militant mother, Lawrence
has become a cult figure for 'anti-racists' everywhere - although a
racial motive in his killing is still far from certain, least of all
proven. The Lawrence affair has been milked for all it is worth by the
political left - and not only the left but 'liberals' right across the
spectrum. There have been marches, demonstrations, public meetings,
political speeches, never-ending TV documentaries, and even TV plays
on the Lawrence theme.

Part of the element of cause célèbre surrounding the Lawrence episode
was the failure of the authorities to bring a successful prosecution
against anyone for the killing. This was blamed on the local police
for the allegedly casual way they handled the investigation; and -
wait for it! - yes, police 'racism' was named as a factor in all this.
Indeed, the very fact that Lawrence's killer, whoever he or she may
be, is probably still at large has been a boon to the leftist and
anti-racist grudge industry in Britain: the whole saga makes so much
better propaganda in consequence.

But now let us shift the scene to a street in Oldham, Lancashire, one
night in February 2002, where 19-year-old Gavin Hopley was walking
with two friends away from a night-club. They strayed into the
Glodwick area, which many members of the local Asian community regard
as their own exclusive territory. The three were set upon by a gang of
young Asians, and Gavin was brutally beaten. He died six days later in
hospital. Gavin and his two mates were white.

Eight Asians were later arrested and charged with the murder but the
charges were then dropped because of lack of evidence. Then the case
was reopened in March 2003, when two of the Asian gang agreed to
testify against one of their number, Mohsin Raza, who they claimed
delivered the crucial kick which led to Gavin's death.

But Raza walked from court free last month when a jury - including
some Asian members - accepted an alibi that he had been working at an
Indian restaurant at the time of the murder.

An alibi supplied by others working at the restaurant, needless to say
- in other words, by Asians!

Gavin's parents issued a public condemnation of certain members of the
Asian community for protecting the culprits. "With their evidence the
outcome could have be different," they said.

The killers of Gavin Hopley got off, just as those of Stephen Lawrence
did.

But will we now see the murder of Gavin Hopley turned into a
decade-long political circus, with rent-a-mob marching in the city in
protest against the 'racism' that caused this and led to the culprit
not being brought to justice? Will we hear politicians making
impassioned speeches about it? Will there be years of TV documentaries
and plays devoted to Gavin's memory and the ghastly 'racism' of those
who killed him and those who protected the killers? Will Gavin Hopley
become a cult figure of the 'anti-racist cause?

Something tells us that pigs growing wings and taking to the sky is
more likely!

Spearhead Online



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The Peeler
2015-05-21 20:55:07 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 21 May 2015 15:45:26 -0500, Topaz wrote:

<FLUSH>

Stupid, retarded, typical Muzzie copy & paste monkey! LOL
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-22 14:33:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
Post by The Peeler
<FLUSH>
Stupid, retarded, typical Muzzie copy & paste monkey! LOL
You got that right.


But what else can we expect from Topaz?


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-22 14:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
<FLUSH>
I'm, stupid, retarded, typical Grik, copy &, paste monkey! LOL
Gosh! SEEMS! LOLOK
Post by Michael Ejercito
You got that right.
You zsucked that right.
Post by Michael Ejercito
But what else can we expect from Topaz?
All we can expect from you is jew ainlungus, gook...it's what you DO.
The Peeler
2015-05-22 16:03:35 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 May 2015 07:55:17 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Stupid, retarded, typical Muzzie copy & paste monkey! LOL
Gosh! SEEMS! LOLOK
It not only "seems" so, The Rectum!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
You got that right.
You zsucked that right.
It's YOU, your "mind" and your "life" that suck ...like TOTALLY!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
But what else can we expect from Topaz?
All we can expect from you is jew ainlungus, gook...it's what you DO.
Psychotic NONSENSE! <tsk>
--
Nefesh about The Rectum: "All good people shit on the Revd"
MID: <8560bbb2-d446-4ba9-a3e7-***@c20g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
Topaz
2015-05-22 20:06:37 UTC
Permalink
I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large
degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He
made it the end and aim of his life.

MARK TWAIN (S. L. Clemens). 19th c. American writer. In the U.S.
Cotton states, after the war .. the Jew came down in force, set up
shop on the plantation, supplied all the negroes' wants on credit, and
at the end of the season was the proprietor of the negro's share of
the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites
detested the Jew. The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The
reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the
Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities.
The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came,
he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm-like Joseph.
In the England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He
gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of
Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons,
Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of
centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to
curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had
to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If
he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something
else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the
poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make
money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical
commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it,
but not for the other nine.
Protestants have persecuted Catholics-but they did not take their
livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants-but
they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel
convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world's
attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than
that event..

Twain's opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in
American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric
daughter Clara married-or was married by-the Jewish piano player,
Ossip Gabrilowitsch. Twain's publishers were given speedy
instructions to delete "Concerning the Jews" from the collected works,
where it had appeared in the book The Man That Corrupted Hadleybutg &
Other Stories. Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators
who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil
War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a
legitimate question whether there was any pre-planning for the
wholesale-and retail-economic looting done by mainly Jewish
carpetbaggers after the war.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-22 18:33:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
<FLUSH>
I'm, stupid, retarded, typical Grik, copy &, paste monkey! LOL
Gosh! SEEMS! LOLOK
Not!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
You got that right.
You zsucked that right.
Mangina, YOU suck.
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
But what else can we expect from Topaz?
All we can expect from you is jew ainlungus, gook...it's what you DO.
I do no anilingus; you do no coitus.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-23 14:09:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
<FLUSH>
I'm, stupid, retarded, typical Grik, copy &, paste monkey! LOL
Gosh! SEEMS! LOLOK
Not!
Does!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
You got that right.
You zsucked that right.
Mangina, YOU suck.
Gook, YOU zsuck every jew rectum within zsucking distance.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
But what else can we expect from Topaz?
All we can expect from you is jew ainlungus, gook...it's what you DO.
I do no anilingus; you do no coitus.
You do HEAP ainlungus; you are EXEMPT from coitus.
The Peeler
2015-05-23 15:55:58 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 May 2015 07:09:01 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not!
Does!
Slave, your master Michael says NOT, so it does mean NOT for you!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
You got that right.
You zsucked that right.
Mangina, YOU suck.
Gook, YOU zsuck every jew rectum within zsucking distance.
He doesn't. But YOU, your "mind" and your "life" suck indeed ...and
obviously VERY hard!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
But what else can we expect from Topaz?
All we can expect from you is jew ainlungus, gook...it's what you DO.
I do no anilingus; you do no coitus.
You do HEAP ainlungus; you are EXEMPT from coitus.
HE doesn't! You ARE exempt! And you can't hide it! LOL
--
Shadow to The Rectum:
"Just listening to your filth reflects your gross psychological problems"
MID: <555230e8$0$11531$b1db1813$***@news.astraweb.com>
Topaz
2015-05-24 09:54:11 UTC
Permalink
By Walter Ruthard

I myself was brought up in a small village in the southwest of
Germany. In 1939, when the war broke out, we left for the less exposed
Odenwald area until the possible danger of a French invasion had
passed. Shortly after that my father was transferred to the Ruhr
region. He as requested work as a foreman for the Mauser arms factory.
The government, true to their claims to be national and socialist,
took their promises seriously and provided young people starting a
family, as well as those who already had children, with affordable
housing. The first child brought a reduction of the mortgage by 25
percent, and when the fourth child arrived the mortgage was no more.
My parents already had four children then and thus were eligible for a
free newly built house from the government.

This was but one of the many programs the government established in
order to improve the quality of life for its citizens..

Then there was the "Kinderlandverschickung" program. It was started
before the war and enabled mothers in need of recreation to spend some
time in rural settings together with their children..

Another very popular social program of the government was "Kraft
durch Freude" (strength through joy). Here deserving workers could
take all-inclusive tours on luxury liners that were built especially
for this purpose. On these ships there was only one class and
everybody was treated the same. They visited the Azores and
Spitsbergen among other places. Those ships were not allowed to dock
in and English port however. The reason was that the British
government did not want it's citizens to see what it also could have
done for them..

The most misinterpreted program in Germany was the so-called
"Lebensborn". It was the exact opposite of what people are made to
believe it was, or should I say, of what people like to believe.. The
Lebensborn was the institution to help unwed mothers who did not know
where to turn for help. They were taken care of during their
pregnancies and afterward as well. This was the Lebensborn, and any
other interpretation is plain hogwash..

My father was able to buy not one but three guns plus two pistols,
together with plenty of ammunition. All it took him was proof that he
was indeed a German citizen without a criminal record. Then in 1945,
when the French "liberated" us, they disarmed him. I know that he was
not the only one to have guns at home, because I saw the many, many
arms that were handed over to the French, and this was in a very small
village..

Then, after the war was over, we had our first experience with a real
democracy. The French introduced it and gave us some shining examples;
one was that the lived off the country and stole everything which
wasn't nailed down..

It was not until many years later that I learned that Hitler held at
least five plebiscites during the first half of his rule. In
democratic Germany, from 1945 until today there has never been a
plebiscite.

There were foreign workers employed in Germany during WWII. I knew
one of them. He worked on a farm and was treated exactly like the son
who was in the army. After the war he stayed on and married the
daughter of the house. He was a prisoner of war from Poland and I
never saw him guarded by any policeman. This is how foreigners were
treated in Germany. They earned the same wages as the Germans, they
took part in the social insurance program, had paid-for holidays
including free train fares, and many came back with friends who also
wanted to work for these "horrible" Germans. Today they are called
slave laborer.

Not everyone was entitled to go on to a university. Only good marks
and above-average performance in schools qualified. But good
performers were promoted with all means available. Today we are much
more democratic; everyone is entitled to a university education and if
the parents are wealthy enough, the son or daughter can study until
they are 35..

Germany was also the country to introduce, in 1933, the first-ever
comprehensive animal protection law. Farm animals had to be kept in
strictly natural environments and no animal factories were allowed. Of
course, no testing of products on animals was permitted, and no kosher
slaughter.

If new industrial facilities were built they had to conform to the
highest standards with adequate lighting and air inside, canteens
where the workers were served nutritious meals at affordable prices,
and beautiful lawns outside: all for the benefit of the workers.. In
national socialist Germany, no child labor was allowed as it still was
in other European countries.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-23 22:07:34 UTC
Permalink
Nazism and homosexuality/perversion: general survey
---------------------------------------------------
http://gaynazis.com/
"Many founding and high-ranking Nazis were homosexuals.
The evidence indicates that Adolf Hitler himself was
a homosexual."
"The Nazis arose out of a macho homosexual subculture long-
incubating in Germany that idealized warriorship and homosexual
pederasty (Male sex with younger males). The evidence of this
is overwhelming"
Topaz
2015-05-24 09:55:13 UTC
Permalink
"The text of this web page was originally published by the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a pamphlet titled "Homosexuals:
Victims of the Nazi Era".

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
100 Raoul Walenberg Place SW,
Washington D.C. 20024-2150.

As part of the Nazis' attempt to purify German society and propagate
an "Aryan master race," they condemned homosexuals as "socially
aberrant." Soon after taking office on January 30, 1933, Hitler banned
all homosexual and lesbian organizations. Brownshirted storm troopers
raided the institutions and gathering places of homosexuals. Greatly
weakened and driven underground, this subculture had flourished in the
relative freedom of the 1920s, in the pubs and cafes of Berlin,
Hamburg, Munich, Bremen, and other cities."
http://www.holocaust-trc.org/homosx.htm



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Topaz
2015-05-22 20:05:22 UTC
Permalink
Vice President Joe Biden said:

"Jewish heritage has shaped who we are - all of us - as much or more
than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that's a fact," Biden
told a gathering of Jewish leaders on May 21 in Washington, DC. "The
truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such
an essential part of who we are that it's fair to say that Jewish
heritage is American heritage," he also said.

Biden knows what's he talking about. He was a US Senator for 26 years,
held important posts in Congress, and was twice a US presidential
candidate. Few men have been more deeply involved in Washington
politics, or are more intimately familiar with the realities of power
in American public life.

Even though Jews make up only one or two percent of the US population,
the Jewish role in American cultural and political life has been
"outsized" and "immense," Biden said.

"You make up eleven percent of the seats in the United States
Congress," he told his Jewish audience. He might also have mentioned
that three of the nine members of the US Supreme Court are Jewish, and
that Jews are vastly overrepresented in other high-level federal,
state and city government posts, including chairman of the Federal
Reserve System, and as the mayors of America's three most populous
cities.

"The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has
had such an outsized influence per capita," he also said. Biden went
on to speak about the Jewish role in shaping popular attitudes with
regard to race relations, the role of women in society, and "gay
rights," and thereby in changing policies, laws and behavior.

"I believe what affects the [social- political] movements in America,
what affects our attitudes in America, are as much the culture and the
arts as anything else ... It wasn't anything we [politicians]
legislatively did," he went on. "It was [such television shows as]
'Will and Grace,' it was the social media. Literally. That's what
changed peoples' attitudes. That's why I was so certain that the vast
majority of people would embrace, and rapidly embrace" same-sex
marriage.

"Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes,
whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish
leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is
immense," he said.

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-19 18:31:00 UTC
Permalink
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis

This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...

http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg

LOLOK!
Topaz
2015-05-19 20:15:48 UTC
Permalink
By Patrick Grimm

We hear daily of the alleged dangers of "Holocaust denial." We read in
newspapers the frightful scare-mongering, comparing those who deny
"global warming" to "Holocaust deniers." But I purport that there is
one form of denial truly more deadly to the survival of all nations
than any other. It is "Jew-denial."

Now you might say, no one denies that Jews exist, that they live among
us and have done quite well economically, sometimes honestly and other
times dishonestly. This is not what I refer to. "Jew-denial" or a
"Jew-denier" is a person, either uninformed or collusive with the
overclass, who denies the power of Jews in America and the world,
denies that their organized power has been corrosive (and many honest
Jews will admit that it is) and denies that Jews are a racial group
(their own words) who believe in their right to rule over the Goyim
(which means cattle). To deny all these things is only to ignore the
words of Jewish leaders and the words of the Jews' own holy books, the
Torah and the Talmud. It is also to jettison mountains of evidence and
decades of Jewish political activism.

But the Jew-deniers are everywhere, a ubiquitous dullard or deceptive
or deceived (take your pick) band of human beings. The Jew-deniers are
in our churches, in our governments, in our schools, in our military,
in our White House and in some of our own houses. Now I don't believe
these people should be jailed, imprisoned or fined for swallowing
false news or abetting the genocide the Jews are working to bring upon
us all, whites and Palestinians alike (the white is the Palestinian of
the European sphere), but they should be approached with caution,
mainly because a lifetime of brainwashing and hornswoggling can elicit
an animalistic reaction when one of these Jew-deniers is smacked in
the face with the truth.

The Jew-deniers (at least the lay ones) should be pitied rather than
stigmatized, though I do exactly that with this article and I deeply
apologize for that. But in all seriousness, they need help. They are
not mentally ill as the Jews call any person who disagrees with their
steamrolling of humanity. The Jew-deniers are misinformed and in need
of rescuing from a life of reckless disinfo which the media Jews will
be glad to force-feed them on a daily basis forever and ever if they
are willing to read the Jew newspapers and watch inane Jew newscasts
with reporters who are front men and front women for Big Jewry. These
types of medium masteries only perpetuate Jew-denial and breed more
little Jew-deniers, persons for whom the thought that Jewry could
desire anything but beneficence and ennoblement toward the Gentile
herds is a "canard" or a "libel", either bloody or bloodless, or an
"anti-Semitic" screed.

Present facts, statistics, troubling Israeli massacres, Talmudic
quotes, lists of ultra-liberal Jewish wheelers and dealers,
anti-Christian political action committees, discombobulating
historical accounts that show Jews as they are rather than as how they
dress themselves up for the camera, and a Jew-denier and those who are
card-carrying members of the Jew-denial movement that numbers in the
millions upon millions will spit out one or more replies taken from a
prepared list of oodles of Pavlovian conditioned retorts. For the sake
of brevity, here are just a select few:

1.You're an anti-Semite!

This one is easy to combat because most Jews are not Semites and many
non-Jews are. Most Jews are Khazars, Ashkenazi Khazars, so this
characterization (anti-Semite) is a real living, breathing canard.
Inform the Jew-denier of this reality and recommend Arthur Koestler's
book The Thirteenth Tribe for his/her perusal. Some Jew-deniers are
smart, while others don't read anything more intellectual than Harry
Potter novels. If this is the case, a sympathetic and platonic hug may
be in order.

2 Jews are "God's Chosen People"

If the Jew-denier is someone who believes in God, ask the Jew-denier
if God is indeed a racist of the crudest sort (though this is not to
say that racism defensively and properly understood is always a
negative). If the reply is a reflexive egalitarian 'no', and it will
be if this person goes to any Zionized, Judaized church in this
country, then ask the person if he/she honestly believes that God
would have sanctioned the killing of thousands upon thousands of
innocent human beings only for the purpose of having the Jews procure
their property, vineyards, wives, concubines, etc. Either God is a
genocidal maniac or the stories of the Old Testament are
Judahite-penned justifications of mass murder. It's one or the other.
This is not going to wash as an argument if you are talking to a
biblical literalist or one of those folks who believes that all
Scripture is "God-breathed" and "inerrant." If the Jew-denier
regularly sends financial love gifts to television evangelists, then
quietly walk away after shaking the dust from your Reeboks.

3. Jews are just members of one of the world's monotheistic religions

Jews identify themselves as a "race", a "master race" superior to all
other races and destined to enslave the world. Jews consider
themselves a race, first and foremost. One helpful quote is in order:
"The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to
Jewish group in southern California said: 'If Israel had not come into
existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race
wouldn't have survived. I stand before you and say you must strengthen
your commitment to Israel.'" [1]
Judaism is a racial religion based on blood purity and conquest of the
Gentile as ordered by their holy books. This is not conspiracy theory.
This is basic Old Testament hermeneutics. I won't list all the verses
here where God tells the "Chosen People" that they are destined to
rule the world, but you can find them in your family Bible in books
like Deuteronomy and Numbers and present them to any Jew-deniers you
happen to run into.

CONCLUSION
Friends and countrymen, Jew-denial is an epidemic sweeping the world,
especially the American portion of it. Our churches are cranking out
little Judaized clones right off the conveyor Bible belt, ready to
parrot the words of Cyrus Scofield and John Hagee. Our governments are
rife with Judeophilic politicians scared to speak out about the Jewish
hijacking of our foreign policy. They attack those like Jim Moran,
even projecting Protocols of Zion conspiracies onto his temperate and
reasonable critiques of AIPAC and the Israel-First-Last-And-Always
Lobby. The Jew-denial movement is running wild in the United States!
It is ignoring the real issues, which are Jewish dual loyalty or
Israel-only loyalty, the Jewish machinations manipulating our currency
and economy and the debauching of our culture and the shattering of
our borders by galvanized Jews drunk and delirious with political
power and ruinous regency.

Should we prosecute the Jew-deniers, persecute the Jew-denial movement
on the internet, lock up its sycophants, lackeys and philo-Semitic
toadies and batter these simpletons in the streets with steel pipes
and tire irons? No, there's no use emulating the Jews.

We can only curb or put the kibosh on the Jew-denial movement by
spreading data far and wide on the web and to anyone who will listen
to the straight skinny on Jew supremacism and traitorous Jew antics.
The Jew-denial campaign has done quite a bang-up job deceiving and
misdirecting the energies of ordinary individuals (acolytes of
Jew-deniery) away from their true enemy and their greatest threat,
Jewish extremism and onto bogeymen like supposed white supremacists
and radical Islamists. Because of the popular front and font of lies
and anti-white disempowerment, most people are unaware or too
apathetic to even notice the Big Jewry Hidden Hand pouring our
liberties and our freedoms straight down the Talmudic drain.
To paraphrase the son of a rabbi and the creator of Communism, Karl
Marx "Jew-recognizers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose
but your high interest rates!"

[1] (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front
page)

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
NEMO
2015-05-22 15:34:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until operation of the camp was taken over by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy yidoid cockroaches...
http://voiceseducation.org/content/burning-pit
LOLOK!
Gosh kikey! The Americans did a good job innit! LOLOK!!!
NEMO
2015-05-22 15:52:50 UTC
Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Joyce

"they shot him through the buttocks, leaving four wounds"

LOLOK! I bet that having his arse penetrated FOUR times at
once gave him a smile that lasted until he was hanged, the
little cocksucker! :)
Topaz
2015-05-22 20:08:40 UTC
Permalink
In the cold, pre-dawn hours of December 15, 2000, police deputy
Matthew Lynch looked down at the snow in a lonely soccer field in
Wichita, Kansas. The snow was pink, and spotted with red. It was
stained with blood: the blood of the White victims of one of the most
vicious racial attacks in American history -- the attack that has
become known as the
Wichita Massacre.

The bodies of four dead White Americans lay in that soccer field, and
there would have been five if not for a near-miracle that allowed one
of the White victims, a 25-year-old schoolteacher we'll call HG, to
survive to tell her story. She ran naked for a mile in 17-degree
weather before she found help, and she refused medical attention (even
though she was suffering from a gunshot wound) until she was sure that
her helpers had heard and understood her story. She said "...Don't
call 911 yet! I want you to hear this story in case I die." You see,
young HG wasn't sure she would live long enough to tell her story
otherwise -- after having been kidnapped, robbed, repeatedly raped,
forced to engage in sex acts, shot execution-style in the back of the
head, and then run over by a truck
and left for dead by her two Black male attackers. That 25-year-old
woman wanted us to know what happened. And thanks to the workings of a
fate which looks a lot like Providence, and to her own endurance and
courage, we do know what happened there. And we must never forget the
Wichita Massacre...

According to HG's testimony (which was subsequently censored)
transcribed at the court TV message board, the Whites were forced to
submit to rape and sodomy from the Blacks and were also forced to rape
each other to put on a kind of "sex show" for the Blacks : "they had
Heather and I come out of the bedroom...and they told us to perform
oral
sex. I did to Heather first and she did that back and then ...he
shouted ...my mouth to her vagina..uh...it would be her mouth to my
vagina... they wanted [us] to... digitally penetrate one another and
we did that." The Blacks then forced Mr. Befort and Mr. Heyka to have
intercourse with HG, and when they were unable or unwilling to perform
as demanded they were mercilessly beat on the head with golf clubs
until they were almost senseless. Neighbors stated that the men's
blood, as a result of these beatings, "was everywhere in the duplex."
HG's testimony continued: "We had sex but he didn't have an
erection... so they were angry...several guys came out...they hit him
on the back of the head and after that I went back into the closet.
...we were under the impression that after they were done they would
probably shoot us. And then they were just screaming, one of them made
er ....a howling sound... they moved so that they could get a better
view... they were angry that he wasn't doing what they had asked him
to do...he didn't do what they
wanted...there was some conversation about an erection....you have
some certain time to get that vagina entered! ...He cried out. if he
didn't have an erection, he would be SHOT...so I was trying to help
Jason..." Later, the Blacks repeatedly raped and sodomized the two
White women, in the words of HG: " at that point in time Brad was gone
...while Brad was gone ...I was pulled out to the wetbar...where he
raped me. ...he had on an orange and black sweater that has FUBU. ...I
was spread on the floor on all fours...with him behind me ...I saw a
silver handgun ...by me as I was down on all fours."...

Three hours after the ordeal began, at 2:07 AM, the Blacks loaded the
men into the trunk and took the five young Whites for their final
ride, the men nude, the women naked from the waist down.

Arriving shortly thereafter at the lonely, snow-covered soccer field,
the Blacks ordered the five Whites to kneel in the snow and then shot
them one by one in the back of the head. HG remembers "As I was
kneeling, a gun shot went off? I heard Aaron . . . I could distinguish
Aaron's voice. He said, 'Please, no sir, please.' The gun went off."

There were three shots and then: "I felt the bullet hit the back of my
head. It went kind of gray with white like stars. I wasn't knocked
unconscious. I didn't fall forward. Then someone kicked me, and I had
fallen forward. I was playing dead. I didn't move. I didn't want them
to shoot me again." The Blacks, thinking the Whites were dead, got
into
Jason Befort's pickup truck and ran over the bodies, including the
living body of HG.

She says: "I waited until I couldn't hear any more, then I turned my
head and saw lights going. I looked at everyone. Everyone was face
down. Jason was next to me. I rolled him over. There was blood
squirting everywhere, so I took my sweater off and tied it around his
head to try and stop it. He had blood coming out of his eyes." The
rest you know.
Everyone except HG was killed, and she is now testifying in the trial
of Jonathan and Reginald Carr.

According to New Nation News, a pro-White alternative Web site, the
autopsy of 25-year-old Heather Muller, the student who was also a
preschool teaching volunteer, indicated new trauma to her hymen,
showing that she had been a virgin at the time of her rape and murder,
belying the statement allegedly made by Reginald Carr "Ever been with
a Black dude before, you bitch?"

Naturally, the defense is trying to confuse the identities of the
brothers: the brother who had a bushy "afro" style now wears
"cornrows," and the brother who had "cornrows" has shaved his head,
and both are now wearing glasses and squinting a great deal.

And the arrogance of these Blacks, who know that the system in this
country will not tolerate Whites expressing even the mildest racial
preference or concern, is almost unbelievable. One Black juror, a
Boeing employee, was being questioned about his feelings toward the
Carrs when he said "I hate to see young Black men go through this."

In a CourtTV forum message, a local woman in Wichita stated:

"I attended the second day of the preliminary hearing, the day after
the surviving victim recounted the horrific ordeal of the Carr
brothers' victims. During a break in the proceedings, several family
members of the Carr brothers left their seats in the back of the
courtroom and sat in the jury box, where they were only a few feet
away from the defendants. All manner of laughing, giggling and making
faces at each other then ensued. It was the most surreal and repugnant
sight I've ever witnessed. When Reginald Carr saw me staring at this
display, he flicked his tongue, obscenely, at me; a gesture I've
experienced several times before when driving by black men on the
street."

And the massacre didn't even begin with the horrors of that night. A
few days earlier, the Carr brothers carjacked a White man, Andrew
Schreiber, and attacked and repeatedly shot Linda Walenta, a cellist
in the Wichita Symphony, as she tried to escape them. She was
paralyzed and suffered for three weeks before finally dying.

From the time of the attacks themselves, through the arrests of the
Carr brothers, the preliminary hearings, the depositions, and now the
trial itself, the Wichita Massacre has received very little national
attention from the Jewish-controlled media, just as we predicted it
would not.

Though these same media outlets shouted from the housetops for years
about the dragging death of a Black man in Texas committed by Whites,
and about the murder of homosexual Matthew Shepard, and even filled
the airwaves with "outrage" over the use of excessive force against
the Black criminal Rodney King, there has been hardly a mention of the
grisly rape-murders of the Wichita Massacre.

Almost all of the coverage has been local Wichita coverage, with even
readers in Kansas City complaining they get little news of the
massacre in their local media. Ingram's, a local magazine, states that
the major media there have given only inside-page notice to the
massacre - with no mentions of the interracial nature of the crimes in
the Kansas City
Star, and that their research revealed that Kansas City media had
given considerably more coverage to the killing of an animal called
"Scruffy the Dog" a few years back than they did to the Carr brothers
and their seven White victims.

Another message, this one from a retired police detective, which was
posted (and then removed) from CourtTV's Internet forum, stated the
media non-coverage issue succinctly:

"As a retired Chicago homicide detective, I have yet to hear of any
more VICIOUS and COLD-BLOODED (5) homicides involving a PERSONAL
CONFRONTATION between victims and STRANGERS than this case which
resulted in ONE HUNDRED HIRTEEN (113) FELONY COUNTS vs. Reginald CARR
and his brother, Jonathan.

"This case involves a home invasion, repeated rapes and sexual
assaults, armed robberies, burglary, abductions, theft and car-jacking
as well as the execution-style murders of naked victims in a
snow-covered soccer field.

"Aside from the Internet and local media, the mainstream national
media has suppressed news coverage of these most HEINOUS atrocities
outside of the State of Kansas. The case also involves a gag order in
which (considering ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN FELONY COUNTS) the public has
yet to learn the full extent of this outrage!

"Please have full COURT TV national coverage of Kansas v. Carr. Bros?
Veteran homicide detectives can assure all that it does NOT get ANY
WORSE than the WICHITA MASSACRE!"

Please, please give this trial national coverage -- so pleaded
hundreds of White people outraged at the silence of the media. (It
should have been hundreds of thousands, but give the new White media
time to grow.) It looked too good to be true when Time-Warner's
CourtTV, in the person of chief anchor Fred Graham, announced in
September that they would air "gavel-to-gavel" coverage of the Wichita
Massacre trial. That statement sent a wave of hope through the White
community, but that hope was dashed to the ground when, a few weeks
later, CourtTV abruptly decided to drop all but minimal coverage of
the trial. At around the same time, many discussions on CourtTV's own
message board about the case suddenly disappeared, and those who tried
to re-post the deleted information or protest the censorship found
that their accounts had been terminated and
their messages erased.

There had been no public protest of the upcoming trial coverage.
Despite the arrogance of the anti-White forces in our society, they
still didn't dare to publicly call for censorship of such a horrific
crime. The pressures that forced the change in plans were
behind-the-scenes pressures, pressures that have been kept secret from
us. The ostensible reason given by front man Graham for nixing the
Wichita Massacre coverage was the upcoming trial of a rabbi accused of
murdering his wife. That in itself would be enough to make us suspect
intentional misdirection from Jewish sources, even if we hadn't
discovered the fact that CourtTV is, according to their own Web site,
a proud "partner" with the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
Brith, whose anti-White activities are well known. CourtTV states on
their own Web site that the ADL "is one of the nation's premier civil
rights/human relations agencies fighting anti-Semitism and all forms
of bigotry, defending democratic ideals, and protecting civil rights."

I also checked the ADL's own Web site, and they announce proudly that,
right around the time that the coverage of the Wichita Massacre would
have started, CourtTV will be airing an ADL-sponsored program called
"Empowering Children in the Aftermath of Hate." What an interesting
coincidence. When one sees these connections, and remembers that
heavily-Jewish Time Warner is a major owner of CourtTV, it is no
longer
surprising that CourtTV suddenly -- and at the last minute -- pulled
the rug out from under coverage of the Wichita Massacre Trial, leaving
other networks ill-prepared to step in even if they had wanted to.

The Jewish minority in the United States has a virtual monopoly
control over our mass media, and all decisions that they make are
decisions which place Jewish interests first. That is the key to
understanding why CourtTV didn't cover this trial; that is the key to
understanding why White people aren't allowed to have any institutions
or preferences for
themselves, that is they key to understanding why outrages like the
Wichita Massacre aren't considered hate crimes - even when they
involve Blacks targeting only Whites seven times in a row, even when
they involve gross sexual degradation and murder of Whites by Blacks,
and even when racial references are made by the attackers - while at
the same time Whites who post an innocent sticker saying that Whites
are an endangered species are charged with hate crimes. Understanding
the facts and the consequences of Jewish media control are the keys to
understanding what has happened to our country. I hope you'll continue
to listen to these programs and write to us for a copy of our book
catalog and magazine so you can understand the problem more fully and
help us solve it in the future. Without Jewish media control, the
situation in America would never have deteriorated to the point that
made the Wichita Massacre possible. Even in the America of today,
without Jewish media control changing the massacre from a hate crime
to a hush crime the outrage from an enlightened White population would
sweep the nation. Understanding media control is the key to
understanding our current paralysis.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The Peeler
2015-05-22 16:10:34 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 May 2015 08:34:20 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
SS-Standartenfuhrer Franz Ziereis (13 August 1905 - 24 May 1945)
was the commandant of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp from
1939 until the camp was liberated by the Americans in 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Ziereis
This is how the story ended for the filthy nazoid cockroach...
http://freies-oesterreich.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ziereis_tod.jpg
LOLOK!
Gosh kikey! This is wonderful Thank you! I'm getting my first hard-on
after so many years! LOLOK!!!
I bet, you do, sicko!
--
Retarded, anal, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident
psychopath, The Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Topaz
2015-05-17 09:26:41 UTC
Permalink
What has happened to New York City is what is happening to the
rest of North America. Yes, the details may be different in
Georgia or California, but the essentials are the same: White
people are being driven out and replaced by non-Whites, who are
taking our land and transforming it into something alien, ugly,
and dangerous. In New York City, things have progressed -- or, I
should say, regressed -- just a little bit farther and faster
than in most other places in the White world. Therefore, New York
City is a warning and a lesson to all of us. Looking at New York
under the microscope is like looking at an approaching tidal wave
with a powerful telescope.

White societies are known for their probably unique combination
of the qualities of cleanliness, order, peace, progress,
innovation, and relative freedom. Whatever the governmental or
economic system may be, whatever the historical epoch, our racial
qualities shine through. It is the inherent qualities of the
people themselves which make a society what it is.
Sentimentalists, liberals, and conservatives don't agree with
that. They say that the environment, such as one's cultural
milieu or education, makes a society what it is. Race, they say,
doesn't matter. Given the right education and nutrition, pygmies
could have spontaneously come up with Notre Dame Cathedral, and
the Arawak Indians could have built the Parthenon and the Saturn
V rocket.

One could hardly devise a more compelling test of that thesis
than the city of New York today. It is a center -- in many ways
the center -- of art, business, education, and power in the
United States. If ever there was a ready-made bit of advanced
European civilization and culture into which to drop the
non-Europeans to see how they -- and the civilization -- fared,
New York City was it.

The civilization hasn't fared well, and the non-Europeans have
remained profoundly alien. The multiracialist experiment that
began in 1965, promising to give non-White immigrants a chance to
share in America, has succeeded only in wiping out what America
used to be, and making her resemble more and more the Third World
that the non-Whites were fleeing in the first place.

New York's borough of Queens is case in point. Now, according to
a revealing article in The Oregonian, large parts of it are now
inhabited by Asian Indians. It's gone from being 60 per cent.
White to 28 per cent. White in just ten years. And that 28 per
cent. figure is undoubtedly high, since Jews and Arabs and
sometimes even other groups are counted as White by census-takers
and survey organizations. In 1970, just five years after
America's immigration laws had been repealed at Jewish
insistence, Queens was still 86 per cent. White -- Whiter than
Kansas, Whiter than Utah is today.

In Queens today, what used to be DeVito's Lumber Warehouse is now
a huge Indo-Guyanese Hindu temple that is booked for weddings
three years in advance. Just down the street is one of the
largest Sikh temples in the East.

When they were pushing for the repeal of America's pro-White
immigration laws in 1965, multiracialists claimed that America
would not change in any significant way, and that the small
numbers of non-Whites who would come would become assimilated and
Americanized just as the European immigrants of the last century
had. Multiracialist author Roger Sanjek, in his book The Future
of Us All, shows us that that claim was a lie -- and he also
agrees with us that New York provides a glimpse into the
multiracial future that is planned for us:

"The United States is in the midst of a great transition." So
begins "The Future of Us All," Roger Sanjek's landmark study,
published in 1998, of Elmhurst-Corona, the Queens neighborhoods
that went from 98 percent white in 1960 to 10 percent in 2000.
"It is in New York's diverse, changing neighborhoods," the Queens
College anthropologist writes, "that clues about the future of us
all may first be glimpsed."

Between the last two U.S. Censuses, the population of Queens
hardly changed in raw numbers. But huge waves of non-White
immigrants arrived -- and the percentage of Whites in the
population went down dramatically. Hundreds of thousands of
Whites were pushed out by newcomers. Some fled. And many simply
died leaving too few descendants to replace them.

First, the multiracialists promised us that scrapping our
immigration laws wouldn't change the face of America. Then, once
the huge legal and illegal Third World influx became impossible
to deny, they told us we just had to accept that America was
going to change dramatically, and they promised us a
coffee-colored racially mixed world of harmony and racelessness.
Now that the newcomers are determined to change America into
their own image, we see the truth.

One interesting aspect of the Queens story is that the happy,
homogeneous, mixed-race world that the multiracialists promised
us shows no sign of arriving. We've simply imported the many
races and cultures of Guyana, of India, of Mexico, and of the
rest of the Third World into our society, and they are
transforming America instead of America transforming them. The
reciprocal conflicts and hatreds and rivalries and terror and war
of all these groups are being brought to our shores and
multiplied endlessly. If this result had been shown in all its
grisly detail to the American people in 1965, how many would have
acquiesced in the treasonous abandonment of our immigration laws?

And it isn't just happening in Queens. When my wife and I
traveled recently through western North Carolina and north
Georgia, large parts of the countryside were turning into Mexico.
Even in Minnesota, traditional Scandinavian-American strongholds
are becoming disease- and corruption-ridden enclaves of Somalis
and Hmong tribesmen. Los Angeles, California was, as recently as
my boyhood, the Whitest large city in America -- now you can
drive for miles without the slightest indication you not in the
slums of Mexico City. And, I can assure you, these newcomers have
no interest in individual rights, in European culture, in the
American work ethic, in the moral and ethical values that have
made America great. They're interested in getting a piece of the
action. They're interested in escaping the squalid conditions
that they created in their homelands. They're interested in
taking what we have. And they have no intention of pledging
allegiance, waving the flag, obeying our laws, or becoming like
us any longer than it takes to get what they want. 'Hand over
your money and your jobs and your towns and your wide open
spaces, sucker, and I understand you have a pretty daughter.' [
http://tinyurl.com/39s7n ]

***

Some of the information I've brought you this week came from a
very useful Web site run by an outfit called 'Americans Against
Discrimination and Preferences' at aadap.org. They're headed by
some of the same people who pushed California's anti-Affirmative
Action Proposition 209. They regularly scour the media and
academic journals for stories related to their agenda, and many
of those stories are quite relevant to the future of White people
in the United States. The agenda of the AADAP is to hoist the
non-White interest groups on their own petard, by using the
'color blind' rhetoric of the Black 'civil rights' movement of
the 1960s to torpedo all of the racial preference programs that
have been instituted in government and the academy by
multiracialists. Thus they oppose Affirmative Action programs and
college admission programs that favor non-Whites, disclaiming all
the while that they have the interests of White people at heart
-- in fact, they really are claiming that they are the true and
pure multiracialists and that the non-White special interest
groups are actually practicing 'identity politics,' which is very
wicked indeed since it contradicts the 'color blind' ideal.

Now, I thank them for their research, which is often useful, but
if the folks at AADAP do have the best interests of White people
as their primary value, then I find their hypocrisy on the matter
-- framing everything in the context of the multiracialist scale
of values -- to be a very bad example for White people to follow.
And if they really believe in the 'color blind' line, then
there's no hope for them.

Their tactic reminds me of the conservative opposition to
multiracialism back in the 1960s and 1970s, an opposition that
has now totally collapsed as the Jewish neoconservatives, who are
enthusiastic multiracialists, have taken over. The old-line
conservatives could argue against Martin Luther King and the
Civil Rights Acts on every ground but the most crucial one. They
could say that many of the people pushing these forced
association laws were Communists, and that was true. They could
argue that forced association and 'fair employment' laws were
unconstitutional, which was also true. They could point out the
undoubtedly bad economic consequences of hiring unqualified
non-Whites in our businesses and industries. But what they
wouldn't do and what they didn't do was say:

"We are Americans, White people of Western civilization. Our
values, and the great culture and science and wealth we have
created, are ours and ours alone. Our survival depends on us
keeping them for ourselves, and on keeping the land that sustains
us, as our property and no one else's. Furthermore, the very
existence of that culture and that science depends on our
continued existence, and we cannot risk losing what we are by
mixing with other and incompatible races. All that we and our
ancestors built depends on us -- and we in turn depend on it for
our sustenance and progress. No group of outsiders will be
allowed to take our land or corrupt our blood, whether by force
or by stealth, and any who attempt to do so will pay the ultimate
penalty."

But the conservatives didn't take that position; they didn't
stand their ground. One can hardly call them 'conservatives' at
all, since they absolutely failed to conserve. They gave up
ground so fast that the conservatives' position on matters of
race is hardly distinguishable from that taken by radical
multiracialists just 30 years ago, and in fact we now have
soi-disant conservatives claiming to be the true intellectual
heirs of the Black Communist agitator 'Martin Luther' King. A
better name for the conservatives would be the comfortable
cowards. As long as they could move to a relatively safe suburb,
smoke their imported cigars, puff themselves up with dogmatic
17th-century morality, engage in purposeless militarism and
utterly empty patriotism to a flag and not a people, they were
content. They like the comfortable reservation their enemies have
allowed them in payment for their treason, and in their softness
they fear a direct battle with those enemies. So they never fight
one. They just keep on making deals (with people who are much
better at making deals than they are) and selling out their
children's future, right to the end. Eventually, the children of
those conservatives will be a tiny and hated minority, most of
them unable to advance into even the third tier of the new elite,
and will be forced to live cheek by jowl with the lowest peons of
the Third World underclass that the billionaire Jewish elite is
importing to our country. Whites are being pushed down to the
proletarian level everywhere in North America.

Pretending to be the 'true' exponents of 'fair' multiracialism
will not stop the importation of cheap labor and the
proletarianization of the White worker. It will not do much to
prevent the ever-more-numerous members of the more intelligent
non-White groups from pushing our children out of the best
schools. It will not close the wide open sluices of non-White
immigration into the West. It will not stop the rape and sexual
slavery of our children and women by peoples with a very
different understanding of their value than we have. It will not
stop the rising tide of non-White crime and corruption. It will
not stop the open pandering to non-White interest groups by our
careerist politicians. It will not stop the academic
establishment's pushing of multiracialist values on our students.
It will not change the anti-White alien control of our mass
media. Accepting the multiracialist values promulgated by people
who want to kill you, and meekly asking for 'fairness' from those
people and their employees is not a formula for success. It is a
formula for death.

To all of you good people who are supporting efforts based on
that formula, I urgently ask you to reconsider. At this late
hour, only an affirmation that we are White and that we must do
whatever is necessary to ensure that our race survives can save
us. White people have an absolute non-negotiable right to exist,
to organize and govern ourselves, to have our own exclusive
territories for our nations and peoples, and to keep the products
of our labor for ourselves and our posterity. Only by taking that
uncompromising stand, and backing it up with all the wealth and
will and power we can muster, do we have a chance to provide for
future generations of our people. Only by stopping our pretenses
and halting our retreat do we have a chance of being worthy
descendants of our ancestors.

That is the message of the men and women of the National
Alliance. As our society descends into darkness, we must be
building alternative structures of community and communication
and racial and cultural preservation, structures which will
survive this dark time and emerge into a brighter future of our
own making. We need your help.

Stay a part of the more timid efforts if you like, but with a
goal of radicalizing and enlightening your co-workers there.
Support the Alliance with all you can afford in time and energy.
Give a tenth of your income if you can to the cause of our
children's future. Subscribe to all of our print publications.
Attend our meetings and use your influence and intelligence to
add to our efforts -- and make them better. Take a stand. The
half-measures and pretending of the conservatives are really a
kind of lie, and a rather weak and ineffectual lie at that. The
National Alliance represents the uncompromised truth.

The Romans had a saying, Truth is mighty, and will prevail. And
so it shall -- so long as the noble race, the scientific race,
the beauty-loving race, the truth-loving race continues to exist
on the Earth.

***

A new issue of National Vanguard magazine is now available. Here
are just a few of the articles you'll read in our latest issue:

In our lead article, which is sure to make huge waves, 'The
Anthrax Mystery: Solved,' long-time National Vanguard researcher
Robert Pate exposes the hidden agenda behind the worst-ever
incident of bio-terrorism on American soil, and makes a strong
case that Israel was involved.

In 'The Death of Dov Eitan, Part II,' brilliant writer Paul
Westman tells us how the mysterious death of John Demjanjuk
defense attorney Dov Eitan provides insight into the labyrinthine
motives of so-called 'good Jews' -- and the fanatical ideology of
hate which motivates Jewish supremacists.

In a major interview scoop, National Vanguard contributing editor
Ben Parker interviews soon-to-released White activist David Duke
in 'From the American Gulag: David Duke Speaks.' Mr. Duke speaks
frankly, from behind prison walls, on his life, his books, and
his plans for the future.

In his regular column 'News from the Homelands,' British
pro-White activist Mark Cotterill brings us European news:
homosexual outrages in Norway and Scotland, resistance to the
Jews in Greece, nationalist advances in France and Holland, and
much more.

In his column 'Situation Terminal, But Not Serious' veteran
writer and hilarious wit Bob Whitaker writes on insanity of the
Drug War, America's national defeatism, and the pathology of
'anti-racist' conservatives.

In the 'Postscripts' column which regularly features the
out-of-print and unpublished works of Revilo P. Oliver, the
incisive mind of Professor Oliver gives us a look at 'Latin,
Discipline, and the Decline of Education,' and he explores the
mysterious motives behind the changes in the John Birch Society
-- which Dr. Oliver helped to found -- in his essay 'The B'nai
Birch.'

Professor Robert S. Griffin, author of Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds
and One Sheaf, One Vine, draws lessons from George Lincoln
Rockwell's This Time the World.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-17 16:24:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
White societies are known for their probably unique combination
of the qualities of cleanliness, order, peace, progress,
innovation, and relative freedom.
Like the Irish neighborhoods in 19th century New York?
Post by Topaz
Whatever the governmental or
economic system may be, whatever the historical epoch, our racial
qualities shine through. It is the inherent qualities of the
people themselves which make a society what it is.
So what inherent qualities did the Germans have that led to the
Holocaust?


Michael
The Peeler
2015-05-16 10:53:28 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 May 2015 17:32:08 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
So did your Asiatic shithole homeland, the Flippines.
So do YOU and your "life", you devastated miserable psychopathic asshole!
You can't even hide it! LOL
--
The top 5 truths about our colostomy bag wearing resident psychopath, aka
"The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
Michael Ejercito
2015-05-16 14:32:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
On Fri, 15 May 2015 17:32:08 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
So did your Asiatic shithole homeland, the Flippines.
So do YOU and your "life", you devastated miserable psychopathic asshole!
You can't even hide it! LOL
No doubt about it.

What a mangina.


Michael
NEMO
2015-05-16 15:12:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Topaz
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
So did your Asiatic shithole homeland, the Flippines.
So do, I and my, Grik "life", I'm devastated miserable psychopathic Grik asshole!
I can't, even hide it innit! LOL
Gosh! Seems! LOLOK
Post by Michael Ejercito
No doubt about it.
Loads of zsucking about it, gook!
Heinrich
2015-05-16 15:16:22 UTC
Permalink
http://topconservativenews.com/2014/08/video-from-greenville-protest-against-amnesty/
Pigshit Walt is the pallid, half-blind gramps with the yellow butterfly
on his shirt.
Note the crooked positioning of his feet, which indicates a medical
"I have. They recommend surgery. However, they want me to sign
legal documents exempting them from responsibility should the surgery
go wrong and I lose the use of my legs. I said no thanks, and
will just continue with the codeine."
GOOD! <snigger>
extremely naughty
The Peeler
2015-05-16 15:16:52 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 May 2015 08:12:59 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
It lay in ruins in 1945.
So did your Asiatic shithole homeland, the Flippines.
So do YOU and your "life", you devastated miserable psychopathic asshole!
You can't even hide it! LOL
Gosh! Seems! LOLOK
It's a FACT! There's NO way for you to hide it!
Post by NEMO
Post by Michael Ejercito
No doubt about it.
Loads of zsucking about it, gook!
It's YOU and your "life" that suck ...like TOTALLY!
--
Nefesh about The Rectum:
"Now when the Revd tries to think,
He begins to stink."
MID: <a48017af-a595-4fd0-8275-***@y35g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Topaz
2015-05-17 09:32:33 UTC
Permalink
No Way Out But Through the Jews
A Review of Paul Gottfried's The Conservative Movement
by Alex Linder

Executive summary: The Jews have taken over the American right, and
they have the money and media access to shut out any contenders.
Meaning: Unless you build a movement that explicitly forbids Jewish
participation and focuses on Jews as the political enemy, you are
destined to be coopted or crushed. Or at least rendered impotent, like
the Old Right, and left broke and fuming on the sidelines. Caveat: The
Internet isn't accounted for in Gottfried's calculus.

...the review

In his 1993 book The Conservative Movement, Jew Paul Gottfried
provides an excellent short history of post-WWII conservatism, and one
that provides a clear, if implicit, message for today's White
nationalist. That message is the title of this review: No way out but
through the Jews. If you plan to pursue the political goal of a
civilized White America, these Jews will be at your throat every step
of the way. So you might as well not kid yourself about that but set
your phaser on "kill" from the start.

Gottfried never comes right out and says it, but the upshot of his
history is that the right has been taken over by Jews. Centered around
the Podhoretz and Kristol families, this Jewish movement pushes an
anti-American ideology. Where George Washington and Thomas Jefferson
advocated no entangling alliances abroad and local rule at home, the
neocons promote a plus-sized managerial state at home, and global
democratic crusades abroad. Since their infiltration in the late
sixties, early seventies, says Gottfried, these Jewish "conservatives"
have garnered the lion's share of money and media access,
marginalizing the traditional right. And although he nowhere mentions
talk radio or the Internet, Gottfried sees virtually no options at the
disposal of those who would usurp the usurpers.

Who are the neoconservatives? Essentially, they are a small group of
East Coast Jewish intellectuals of regular private morality. They are
former reds or red-diaper babies who departed from the New Left when
it started advocating odd sex and communism and other policies they
felt were potentially anti-Semitic. As they emerged from this sixties
morass, they gravitated to the right, where they found allies in the
anti-communist cause; friends with foundation money that could be used
to construct a bulwark against their crazier New Left brethren. Over
the course of the seventies, the Jewish neoconservatives took over one
foundation after another, supplanting the Christian traditionalist
bias of American conservatism with their detailed policy studies and
position papers. These bore proof of their sociological and
statistical cast of mind, different from the Kirkian
religious-literary bias of traditionalists.

By the time of Reagan, they had achieved dominance. Any conservative
hoping to make a career of it, whether in politics or writing or
commentating, had to hew to their specific vision of the America they
wished to conserve if he wished to preserve his own office, air-time
or sheet space. Any vestigial strains of racial feeling or regional
sympathy were anathema to these racist philo-Semitic anti-racists who
are unstinting in their anathematizing of anyone who diverges from
their pluralist, democratic dogmas. Any American, that is. The
dogmatic democratic pluralism disappears when it comes to Israel,
where Semitic chauvinism is, quite rightly they think, the law. What
White racialists want for America is no different from what Jewish
neoconservatives want for Israel. But they will try to shout down
anyone who makes the equation, just ask Joe Sobran. Only Jews have a
right to an ethnostate; democratic pluralism is good enough for the
rest of us. This hypocritical double-standard springs directly from
the gut Jewish feeling that an America made up of many conflicting
groups, riven by cultural standards, divided by ethnicity, history and
behavior, is the America in which the Jew is safest, and can move
about most freely. A strong, sure White nation scares the Jew. So
whether it's America or Europe, he tries to undercut it with
anthropological lies about the unreality of race, falsified histories
("diversity has always been our greatest strength") support for open
immigration, suppression of free speech and the destruction of free
association-all in the name of "civil rights." Neoconservatives are
Jews, no need to look further than that. Jews, whether left or right,
ask only one question: Is it good for the Jews? They hide behind
universalist rhetoric, but their concern is for themselves. And you
can be absolutely sure of this: Their interests are not our
interests..

David Horowitz would be a prime example of an expert deployer of a
plausible, counterfeit theory and history of America to suck in
potential White racialists and get them four-square behind a nutty,
extremist, ahistorical view of politics that can only lead America
into South Africa's pit of horrors. The triumph of individual rights
in Black lands means the triumph of the jungle. It is extremist,
rationalist and counter-historical to elevate a political process over
the character of the people. How can ignorant, 75-IQ blacks produce
civilization protecting the individual rights these neoconservatives
claim to love? Can one-man, one-vote really produce that miracle? Of
course not, and these Jews know it. And they know that the Founders
knew it. So they lie. The truth, as they know and cover up, is that
the Founders understood that only civilized, self-controlled White men
were capable of civilization, and that to expect dissolute, lazy,
TV-drenched slobs mixed with mulattoes and Negroes and Mexicans to
vote in ordered liberty was to expect the impossible. But David
Horowitz, living in Los Angeles, can look out the window and tell you
it's possible. Never underestimate the power of Jewish duplicity in
furthering Jewish self-interest. That's a second corollary to
Gottfried's study.

We asked above whether or not these neoconservative Jews were really
conservative. Perhaps that question isn't important. One point
Gottfried does develop, writing in 1993, is just how little difference
there is in today's political discourse between left and right. As I
write, George W. Bush is battling Al Gore, so the point is hardly
stale. Effectively, the left and right may differ in degree, but
everybody supports a capitalist welfare state and global democracy.
Everybody is "inclusive." Everybody bows before the great God of
Diversity. Are the Jews conservative? In the deeper sense, no. They
are still radicals, intent on spreading their lies about human
fungibility, from which they aone are exempt as the "Chosen" people.
Left or right, they are eager to destroy our White civilization to
further their group interests.

On the second most important political issue of the day-leaving the
borders open to the third world-the Jews speak with one voice: no
patrols. Note this well: Never in American history has a majority of
Whites favored colored immigration. The Jews alone favored it, for
reasons outlined above. Now whose policy is followed today? -- that of
the Jewish minority, which doesn't think like you and I do. You
thought the majority was supposed to prevail in a democracy? Wrong.
Political control in a democracy, as Aristotle observed, is vested in
those who control television. This is part of what certain Americans
are getting at with the 'ZOG' formulation that all the
pseudo-sophisticated college-educated folk laugh at (as TV has taught
them to). The Jews almost to a man push open-borders immigration, and
they denounce anyone who differs as an evil racist/nativist/xenophobe.
All the Jewish lies dovetail intellectually, and all of them advance
Jewish interests. I recommend, I urge, I wish I could force everyone
who hasn't to read Kevin MacDonald's paper on the Jewish influence in
the hundred years of debate preceding the nation-killing 1965
immigration act that opened the floodgates to the third world. The
Jewish hatred of the White world is the story that doesn't make the
news, even as it remakes your neighborhood. I doubt the plush-paunched
Republicans watching TV politics as spectator sport will ever pick up
on it. You will run a long way before you meet an average American
with the slightest historical awareness-nor the interest in developing
one. But the arguments are lying there, exactly as I've presented
them, and perhaps in a crisis people will take a hard look at what
brought us to our current position. For all the disinformation out
there, it's still not too hard to detect the patterns once you have
the facts. . .

So we've seen that Jews claiming themselves "conservatives" but not
all that different from their leftist brethren have come in and
dominated the right. Where does this leave whatever is left of the
non-Jewish right? I would break this set into two subsets: those who
are openly racist (which Gottfried avoids) and those who make veiled
or open Semitically Incorrect arguments while attempting to maintain
their "respectability." The former have no political power, while the
latter are desperate to hang on to their columns and speaking
engagements.

Although there are a handful of Jews pushing standard White-racist
arguments, and who would receive even less notice than they do get if
they weren't Jewish, these same never take into account that Jews can
never simply be another ethnic group assimilated into a purified White
America. The nature and qualities and history of their group shows
just that-they are a group. And since they are a group that recognizes
itself as a group and fights against other groups on that basis-they
must be opposed as a group. This is not so much guilt by association
as guilt by genetics and behavior and history. As a group they have
strategized to destroy the civilized White America they felt
threatened by, and anything we do to them in return is more than
deserved. Treating them as individuals, just like we are, has failed.
The correct path is to treat them as the radical alien outsiders and
eliminate their influence. We need to take their flag off the
courthouse, so to speak.

Getting back to the lesson at the top of the page, Jews have so
strategized their evolution (see Kevin MacDonald's work) as to be
considerably more intelligent than their hosts, with an average IQ of
115, a standard-deviation above the White mean. This intelligence and
their proven historical character combine to ensure Jews will always
be the yeast, the irritants, the makers-uncomfortable, the
revolutionaries. Wherever they exist in White society they will be a
force for disruption. The fact that some can exist as peaceful ethnics
among the White majority does not negate this Big Truth (for if there
can be Big Lies, there can also be Big Truths). Because
class-arguments can be abused, and because injustice will be meted out
to individual non-Whites when we rebuild civilization, the Jews
enforcing their dogma of individualism will always have points to make
that resonate with our myopic right-wing individualists. But just as
surely as these Jews averted their eyes from the general horrors
ensuing in South Africa after their racial-and-political equality
dogmas were enacted, the pro-White right must be louder than ever in
showing that their ethnic Jewish self-interest can only end in the
extinction of the White race. Really. Those are the stakes.
The media neoconservatives can't afford to admit the evidence of the
failure of their dogma in South Africa, rape and murder capital of the
world; rather they redouble their insistence on individualism to evade
the Big Truth that colored demographics and political democracy doom
White minorities everywhere. And taking a global perspective-as we are
all supposed to do, nowadays-the White race is a small minority, and
growing smaller every day. Our White kinsmen are already being
butchered in their homes and driven off their farms in South Africa
and Zimbabwe. Literally tens of millions of Whites have become victims
of violent Black assault in America since the Jew-eased passage of
"Civil Rights" legislation. The Jews well know these facts, and that
is why they avoid reporting them. They hated South Africa when it was
ruled by civilized Whites. They don't give a damn what happens to
Whites once their beloved Negroes are carrying the whip. Foolish,
foolish White man-will you not wake up while there is time?

What we are discussing is a very simple: the Jews are a class fighting
to dominate other classes, just as Benjamin Stein saw in his report on
the TV Weltanschauung, The View from Sunset Boulevard. Jew Stein, like
Jew Michael Levin (Feminism and Freedom), will never name his people
as that class, pointing to "writers and producers," "feminists," and
"neoconservatives." (It is really truly amazing the way that Jews are
able to camouflage their interests, always presenting their specific
goal as a general good, and that their terms are tacitly accepted in
their opponents' rhetoric. It's like we all are under contract to
agree that the Jews aren't a group and don't have any specific
interests and certainly don't work to advance those interests and even
if they do, they aren't in conflict with ours. But notice that on the
flip side, the opposite conditions obtain: Jews always attack their
opponents by class (right-wing Christian extremists, racist haters,
Arabs), lingering lovingly on the specific interests of their
undifferentiated opponents; always forestalling counter-arguments as
"anti-Semitism" driven by the only motive Jews ever allow their
opponents-all together now-"hate." The Jews can only get away with
this clever I-criticize-you-and-you
criticize-that-bag-of-flour-over-there setup because they exert
extraordinary control over television and newspapers. And their backup
line of defense, of course, is to denounce anyone who notices the
strategies behind their tactics as an anti-Semitic conspiracymonger.
This is a second aspect of what the 'ZOG'-minded are pointing to.
Stein is writing about the class of TV writers and producers;

Gottfried is writing about neoconservatives; Levin is writing about
feminists. All of them mean Jews, none of them can afford to say it.
When you become a Jew, it's almost as though you have to sign a sheet
saying you will either avoid mentioning negative Jewish
characteristics or-pace Marx and Freud-reinterpret specific, offensive
Jewish behaviors or patterns as generically human: i.e., repression,
or characteristic of an exploited class. (An excellent book, The
Ordeal of Civility, by John Murray Cuddihy, covers this topic in
depth.) The one thing none of these rightist Jews wants is a civilized
White society where Jews are nonexistent. Or ghettoized. Or looked
down on socially. Or in which you are free to speak and write and talk
about Jews as specific people who act, look and think in generalizable
ways. Jews may be physically ugly duplicitous socialist troublemakers,
but they don't want you saying that. They will propagandize through
the schools and TV until you are practically unable to notice it
because the whole context in which you might make such an observation
has been destroyed. They will make hard to find the few books that
dare discuss it. (Just try finding Cuddihy's book.) History is nothing
but a propaganda tool to them. In living memory they were kept out of
the better hotels and clubs and colleges, and since treatment of the
Jews, to Jews, is the true measure of civilization, any time they were
legally or socially treated as other than the God-sent gift they
present themselves (that is, all history up until about fifty years
ago) must be falsified into Dark Ages (Jews out of power) preceding
today's Enlightened Age (Jews running the show). Let alone the
ghettoes of old Europe, these people are capable of portraying the
fifties in America as some sort of racist hellhole, saved only through
heroic Blacks led by saintly Jews in the name of civil rights or
federal tyranny, if you prefer your descriptions accurate. What is
clear to every Jew seems to be unclear to most White Americans,
especially those on the right who ought to know better:

this is a war of classes, a war for power and dominance between a
small but smart and well-positioned ethnic group and the vast majority
of civilized White people. The Jews instinctively recognize this
battle, feel it in their blood, and are fighting hard for their side.

Most on our side aren't even aware a war is going on.
Gottfried points to two symbolic episodes that show the transfer of
power from the traditional right to the neocons: 1) Rockford's firing
of John Neuhaus, and his subsequent denunciation of traditionalist
racism and anti-Semitism among the Old Right; and, 2) the neocons'
successful defeat of M.E. Bradford, a traditionalist historian, as
head of the National Endowment of Humanity. What was the traditional
right to do? Basically, it retreated, licked its wounds, and looked
about in search of allies and money and media outlets. What has
happened, and this is clearer now than when Gottfried completed the
book, is that the American political system under Clinton has gotten
so corrupt that even average people began to notice. This alone has
strengthened the traditional right's never-too-strong confidence, and
strengthened its new ally, the libertarians, too. And both sides have
benefited hugely from the Internet, which at once strengthens small
groups and somewhat threatens established media institutions. By 2000,
there were enough ganglia of pro-Whites on the Internet to get
mainstream Jewish groups scribbling "hate crimes" model statutes,
anti-gun legislation, and politically correct browser censorware at
top speed.

It might have been expected that the loss of power and funding would
have resulted in the radicalization of the traditional right, at least
to the point of open talk about taking the American right back from
the Jews. There was very little of such talk, none of it open-at least
among those with one eye on "respectability," that ever leftward
moving boundary observed by fools.

What we still see on the right in the year 2000 are leading non-Jewish
right-wing Whites couching what they know to be racial arguments in
regional or race-neutral terms. Sam Francis speaks of Middle American
Revolutionaries. He means Whites, but he's afraid to come out and say
it. Of course, he gets called racist just the same. And he got fired
from the neocon Washington Times just the same. But Jews, to him, are
just people with a different religion, and he can still find a way to
fit minorities into that Middle American revolution.

Then there are the various Southern separatist groups. All are
carefully non-racial. All get accused of being racist. All fail to
draw the correct conclusion. It is amusing in a sick and increasingly
irritating way. Is there nobody left who can think clearly and isn't
afraid to voice his conclusions publicly? No, the Southern Semitically
Correct separatists present as sorry a face as they always do. Always
trying for that elusive respectability, always failing to achieve it,
and always losing the few-and merely symbolic-battles they do engage
in. For people who brag incessantly "on" their heroic Confederate
ancestors, they show little courage and less intelligence.

I'll say it again, a little louder now, so Johnny Reb can hear me:
THERE IS NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS. IT DOES YOU NO GOOD TO BE OR
PRETEND TO BE NON-RACIST. YOU ARE THREATENED AS A GROUP, BY A GROUP,
AND YOU'D BETTER GET THOSE GROUPS STRAIGHT IN YOUR HEAD TO HAVE ANY
HOPE OF PRESERVING THE LAND AND PEOPLE YOU LOVE.
A little more on the Southern-rights groups. The left always froths
over them, as though people too scared and powerless to say what they
mean openly are going to achieve anything. This frothing is more a
measure of media boredom and the fact that the left is so dominant it
has forgotten what real opposition feels like that it goes overboard.
The left so buys its own frothing demagoguery it can't even realize
these people have ceded the essential point before they even start
arguing. Pity the poor Southern separatist. He can't even keep the
flag in the air or the Blacks from pooping on the statue of his
great-grandaddy. Even with all that Confederate heroism running in his
blood, he's still selling his problem as Northerners, not Blacks. As
though America hasn't been homogenized by TV into one big mall or
airport lobby. As though the guy in Arkansas is worried about the
White man just over the Missouri line, more than the Black next door.
How pitiful and obvious he is, our man of gray, thinking the media
will buy that he's really not racist. He can't see that it doesn't
matter in the slightest if he isn't, and if he is, he's contemptible
for not arguing openly. Ditch the gray and go for black and white,
Southern Man.

How many times does the right have to learn that the media really is
controlled by Jews, by intimidation where not by ownership; that Jews
really are leftist; and that anyone preaching anything remotely
resembling White pride gets treated like a human showing emotion in
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (that is, squawked at and pointed out
to the cops by the aliens who are taking over the planet) - so that he
might as well oppose the Jew's anti-White hatred openly. You can't win
where the other guy defines the terms, sets the labels, interprets the
law. You must oppose him openly, directly, explicitly and give him no
quarter. Why are you always on the defensive? Could it be the same
reason you always lose? Here we come to a deep-lying problem with
conservatism. First of all, nobody's ever satisfactorily defined it. A
branch of that problem is that there is no philosophical basis for
incorporating political attack. A new conservatism must be envisioned
that incorporates not merely the preservation of custom and tradition,
but one that can accommodate formless spiritual or psychic drives that
are even more important than patterned behaviors: questing,
exploration, simple competitiveness. Even blood-lust. What could be
more conservative than blood-lust? But where do you find it among the
Republicans; over at the Jew-intimidated National Review? Among the
foundation-based low-tax remonstrators?

The funny thing is that once you say, Yes, I am a racist. Just like
George Washington. And you are a White-hating Jew-the poison is drawn.
They have set the terms of this political game we all play, and only
by refusing to play do we stand a chance of winning. It is utmost
foolishness, as anybody who has published conservative articles
anywhere in the world will tell you, to try to escape the racist tag.
You can't, and in any case it ain't a meaningful word, people-it's
just a way to smear and discredit you. Fight the smearers and
discrediters directly, refuse to play on their terms. Love and
fairness no more conquer hate than they conquer bullets. Prefixing
your conservative arguments with "I'm not a racist, but..." and
expecting to achieve your political goals is like one of those African
rebel guerillas smearing himself with magical pig grease thinking it
will stop bullets.

Apart from your opinion of the Nazis, consider their tactics. Did they
win-democratically-by adopting the tactics of the respectable American
right, or did they gain converts by their physical courage and their
willingness to confront the Jew-led communists? How much worse can the
Old Right do than it is doing right now? Not much. The mainstream
right-as I write, G.W. Bush and the Republican convention are in full
swing, every other speaker addressing the hall is a colored-has
decided to ape the liberals. In the words of the song, Freedom's just
another word for nothing left to lose. Well, what on earth do the Sam
Francises and Thomas Flemings and the Pat Buchanans have left to lose?
A column in an obscure magazine? A speech to a few dozen like-mindeds?
Is it possible they will turn to effective tactics out of sheer
boredom? Sam Francis (you'll serve as representative here), how could
you possibly do worse than you are doing now by openly criticizing
Jews instead of making pusillanimous attacks on East Coast elitists
and New World Order bureaucrats? How could you possibly fare any worse
by defending the Black-and-White truths of the Founders in
black-and-white terms?

Then you've got the libertarians, trying to get government off our
backs without any recourse to racial explanations or group interests
in explaining human behavior. Trying to understand the world one
person at a time. Some of these libertarians are products of Silicon
Valley, and to the extent they philosophize, they are Randian
individualists. They believe in free trade and free movement of
peoples, and make no distinctions between them. Libertarians seem to
instinctively turn away from any historical recognition of the
circumstances under which the freedoms they demand were actually
realized. Even their few (and in many ways impressive) intellectuals
who are interested in history tend to fall in line with the
politically safe Jewish lie about the non-racial aspect of our
founding, building their future utopias in that tired old,
misunderstood, misrepresented "all men are created equal."
Politically, libertarians are laughable, beyond their useful ability
to supply policy papers. Imagine a whole bunch of computer geeks and
economics professors marching on Washington under the fear-inspiring
banner of "Me!" Now there's an Army even our heroic neo-Confederates
could take! Libertarians maybe never will realize that, again I yell,
BLOOD AND RACE ARE WHAT MOVE PEOPLE, NOT THE RIGHT TO SMOKE DOOBIES
AND BUGGER YOUR BOYFRIEND. NOT EVEN ECONOMICS. Am I really the only
idiot to notice that when Whites ruled America, White people were
free? And that when Jews and Blacks rule America, they're slaves? But
most "right-wing" libertarians would rather support a minimum wage
hike than acknowledge this simple historical fact. They are too
rationalist in temperament, too much like our liberal dictators. Too
in love with their idea of
people-as-individuals-in-the-low-tax-multicultural-utopia-of-tomorrow
to pay attention to street-level political and historical reality.
Many of us want individual liberty, but it only obtains under certain
circumstances. There sure doesn't seem to be much of it around in
these days of "civil rights" for everybody except the people who
created the idea of 'em in the first place. If there's anything that
gives the lie to what passes for "conservatism" these days, it's right
here: Genuine civil rights-association, property, speech,
self-defense-were much better protected in the days before the prating
Jews and their colored parasite minions rose to the fore. Yet
recognition of the race-based nature of practical, effective, genuine
freedom will get you kicked out of the Libertarian party faster than
you can say Don't Do Drugs!

Libertarians take one aspect of looking at the world and inflate it
into the entire cosmos. This is their built-in bias. When you combine
it with their standard right-wing fear of crossing the Semitical
Correctness line, you have a second hurdle between them and racialism.
The conservative Christians share these political flaws. Their concern
is not for the race or the group, but for the salvation of the
individual soul. Of course, since in years past the Good Book has been
used to support virtually every position under the sun including
communism, there is a bit more hope for their conversion on the racial
issue, should the powers that be change. TV Christians have proven
able adopters of the Semitically Correct line. Israel is good and
racialism is bad. That's the message they're getting from New York,
and that's the message Pat Robertson is putting out to rural North
Carolina. The libertarians have their hated parties, but these are
always anonymous "bureaucrats" or "statists," or "socialists"-never
anyone you can actually get your hands on. Same with the Christian
conservatives. They are the equivalent of the libertarians in that the
former are excellent at certain types of economic reasoning (Why We
Should Privatize Trash Collection) while the Christians retain solid
moral and character-development advice. They are both good on the
small-picture stuff. But neither group can take a realistic look at
the general; they are both concerned about saving Heaven or Liberty
one soul at a time. They both simply refuse to make necessary
generalizations.

Christians, again like Libertarians, invariably throw their
opprobrium on carefully generic targets: Atheists, secular humanists
(gays are the one exception, and even here they say "Hate the sinner,
not the sin," as though that doesn't conflict with their doctrine of
free will). A Jew or a black or a Mexican is a vivid image,
immediately recognizable. The abstractions countered by the Christians
and the libertarians are creatures that nobody would recognize on a
public street. They are fighting abstactly against abstractions,
instead of coherently for something concrete.

Never do the Christians go after the Jews who are killing their
doctrines; never do they speak the name of their real enemy despite
the spittingly obscene provocations to which he has subjected them.
This is why, with tens of millions in numerical advantage, the
Christians aren't even masters of the civilization they created. In
fact, much of the leadership class of the Christians has become so
enthralled with Jewish ideas that now the church will bend any which
way the Jews require, whether it's removing the Commandments from the
classroom the way the Jew judge and Jew-created and -run ACLU tell
them to, or rewriting history to avoid the fact that Jews condemned
their own Savior to die (as in the revised [read: Semitically Correct]
Passion Plays)! They may think they are only turning the other cheek,
but self-abasing worms is what these new Christians truly are. This
used to be a religion whose adherents killed others in glorious
crusade for their Truth, and died at the stake before renouncing their
Faith. Today, the biggest name in Christendom hobnobs with nutty
Buddhists and faxes apologies to Jerusalem. For all its residual focus
on humility and self-discipline (welcome antacids to the Jewish public
school lies about self-esteem, which is really self-absorption and
self-worship; in a word, selfishness), the Christian church in America
is today furthering the racial evils that Jewish ideologues,
especially those misappropriating the name conservative, have
subjected us to. Pat Robertson has no problem with those influxing
Mexican chicken-pluckers heaping his collection plates, and has
publicly advocated miscegenation as the long-term solution to our
racial ills. If he preached miscegenation as a sin, as his hardier
forebears did, he would be burned at the stake. Pardon me, I mean, he
wouldn't be on TV. The fact that any evangelicals are on TV at all is
conditioned on their support for Israel and their multiracialism. This
is what makes their leaders despicable-not the hypocrisy and
White-trashiness the left and right would have us sneer at them for.
Recently Bush's first national campaign ad aired. It shows him at a
school surrounded by little black and brown kids, all well on their
way to becoming the computer programmers and doctors and lawyers and
Republicans of tomorrow. It seems the GOP has made up its mind which
way it's going. It's everyvato's party; down with the homies, too.
Make any show that persuades in order to capture power. The old
Clinton strategy. After all, reality is that waves of wets wash over
the border every night, and at some point they and their kids will
vote. The bulk White population is fading, and the core demographic
supporting conservative principles simply won't be there to swing a
presidential election in another ten years.

Even Jew-genuflecting National Review has noticed this Californication
of America, as has been termed in a different context. But sucking up
to the powers that be, angling for a spot, doing what he's told, is
something the middle-manager mind that makes up the Republican ranks
well understands. Ya got to roll with the punches, ya know?

White man, you have to decide. If you choose not to decide, you still
have made a choice, to make a phrase. You can pull a Christian
Scientist, and pretend that that brown spot on our national chest will
just go away if we think positive thoughts long enough, refuse to
acknowledge it. But it won't. Those coloreds swamping the border,
those grasping welfare niggers, those lying Jewish press manipulators
won't disappear of their own accord. Twenty years from now, George
Bush-Brown will be president, and all the things you fear today-
your kids blood-libeled at school; yourself discriminated against on
the job; your taxes higher than ever; your wife subject to insults,
rape or assault; your big cities gang-dominated; your small cities
dominated by nigger "music" and clothing pollution; your guns
outlawed; your political opinions criminalized; your TV louder and
more intrusive and hateful-will be worse. As Paul Gottfried shows,
but doesn't tell, the same Jews that have made the present possible
are working hard to make this future inevitable. But there is still a
window of opportunity. But only if you recognize that we-you and I
and the others reading this-are part of the White race, share
interests, and must band together. And that, politically, culturally
and socially, to achieve a civilized future, there is
NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEWS!

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index5.htm

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2015-05-17 09:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Is Britain Under Zionist Control?
Alistair Fenner tackles a 'sensitive' subject

"ln an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary
act." George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
I am confident that no one will disagree with me when I state that
most leaders in the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland are the lapdogs of the rulers of the US - and
that, whatever they say or do, 'our' leaders follow the latter like
rats did the pied piper, regardless of whether it is in our national
interests or not.
Knowing this, we must look into who truly has control over the US
Government, who mans the oligarchy of power within the United States,
who are those who have the power to say what's what and what our next
move will be.
I am also confident that no one will disagree when I say that this
'war on terror'- including the war on Iraq - has been against our
national interests: a war into which we had no reason to go headlong
and one that has given so much fuel to the hate against our nation in
the Middle Eastern World (those who understand that our foreign policy
is governed by our unconditional subservience to the United States and
support of Israel). This is not to mention the outright lies about
'weapons of mass destruction', the claims that Saddam Hussein was a
'direct threat' to our nation, and that those who waged war on America
and the Western World by crashing two planes into the World Trade
Centre did so because they "hated our freedom."
It was because of the pro-Israel oligarchy within the US Government
and the total Jewish control of the news and entertainment media in
America - a more powerful weapon than bombs and missiles, and one that
can change the minds of millions and manipulate the world - that those
planes struck.
This is far from an 'anti-Semitic' statement by some wild-eyed
'racist'. It is, rather, a fact easily confirmed by research. I hope
this short essay will encourage some to do a little more research and
to make decisions for themselves on these issues.
In 1998, on the American ABC network, Osama Bin Laden gave his views
very clearly on why he opposed America. Here are some excerpts:-
'I say to them that they (the Americans) have put themselves at the
mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton's
administration. We believe that it represents Israel inside America.
Take the sensitive ministries such as the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Defence and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the
upper hand in them. They make use of America to further their plans
for the world... For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have
been slaughtered and assaulted (by the Israelis) and robbed of their
honour and of their property. Their houses have been blasted, their
crops destroyed.'
So I ask: Is 'anti-Semitism' never a result of Jewish behavior?
Britain potential terrorist target
Due to the United Kingdom's unconditional support of the US Government
- and the latter's and our unconditional support of Israel - we are
the country which, next to the US, is most likely to be attacked by
terrorists. We have let Jewish supremacists take control of Britain,
its leaders and its policies, which are ultimately in total opposition
to our national interests.
American National Alliance spokesman Kevin Alfred Strom, speaking on
the 'American Dissident Voices' broadcast on the 6th September 2003,
said: "Next to the United States, Britain is probably the country most
firmly under the Jewish thumb."
Do you start to feel uneasy when I say that we are controlled by a
cabal of Jewish Supremacists? Then please give your attention to a
statement made by President Ariel Sharon when speaking to Shimon Peres
on the Kol Yisrael radio station October 3, 2001:-
'Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will
do that... I want to tell you something very clear. Don't worry about
American pressure on Israel. We the Jewish people control America, and
the Americans know it.'
This clearly confirms what I and many others have been saying. And
Sharon is not the only source. In 2003, US Rep. James Moran made the
this daring statement:-
'If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for
this war with Iraq we would not be doing this. The leaders of the
Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the
direction of where this is going, and I think they should.'
Later, Mr. Moran fell on his knees and apologised - but the facts
remain the same. On this side of the ocean, long-time MP Tam Dalyell,
in an interview with Vanity Fair magazine last May, referred to a
Jewish 'cabal'. Later, defending this on Radio Four's 'World at One'
programme, he said:-
'The cabal that I referred to was in the US... There is far too much
Jewish influence in the United States.'
And he went on to say of one body:
'That is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. I was
thinking of [Paul] Wolfowitz, Deputy Defense Minister [Richard] Perle,
[John] Bolton, Assistant Secretary of State, [Douglas] Feith, [Ken]
Adelman, [Elliot] Abrams and [Ari] Fleischer [Mr Bush's press
secretary]. Those people drive this policy.'
Dalyell said that the Government of the US is "being unduly influenced
by a cabal of Jewish advisers." He also confirmed Jewish influence in
Britain, thus:-
'I am worried about my country being led up the garden path on a
Likudnik [Ariel] Sharon agenda... Straw, Mandelson & Co. are leading a
tremendous drive to sort out the Middle East.'
Michael Lord Levy, Tony Blair's chief fund-raiser and personal envoy
to the Middle East, also Jewish, received mention from Dalyell as
well:-
'I believe his influence has been very important on the Prime Minister
and has led to what I see as this awful war and the sack of Baghdad.'
Dalyell later went on to say that he had "picked out one person [in
Britain] about whom I am extremely concerned, and I have to be blunt
about it. That is Lord Levy." Finally, he rightly asserted that: "The
British people have been deceived."
The United Kingdom is being turned into a Third World slum by
uncontrolled non-white immigration. It is being plagued by dramatic
increases in criminal violence, racial tension, AIDS and cultural
discord since the multi-racialist experiment began here, along with a
growing anti-white bias in the news and entertainment media. These
policies are being financed and led, in large part, by Jewish
supremacists through our Government and media.
From the horse's mouth
One example among many of outright Jewish admittance of their control
was in the August 1996 issue of Moment magazine, which had as its
headline 'Jews run Hollywood - so what?' Michael Medved, a well-known
Jewish film critic, wrote this piece, in which he stated:-
'It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power
and predominance in popular culture. Any list of the most influential
production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce
a heavy majority of recognisably Jewish names.'
I will leave you now with one last quote, a fitting one and one to
which I certainly subscribe:-
'Whether or not One World is the secret final objective of Zionism,
World Jewry is the most powerful single force on earth, and it follows
that all the major policies which have been ruthlessly pursued through
the last several decades must have had the stamp of Jewish approval.
Indeed, common sense applied to such facts as have come to light must
lead to the conclusion that the policies, directed against the most
cherished Gentile values, were incubated by adroit Jewish brains and
fulfilled, or carried to the verge of fulfilment, by the dynamism of
the Jewish spirit. At the same time, so many Gentiles are associated
with the conspiracy, both directly and through the formation of
fronts, there are so many Gentile agents and agencies, and so many
Gentile governments which have acquiesced in the conspiracy by falling
into line with policies inimical to their own national interests, that
it would be ludicrous to offload onto Jewish shoulders responsibility
for the destruction, or near destruction, of Christendom and the
Western World. Nevertheless, it would be equally ludicrous to deny the
Jewish part, especially where it is admitted...
'Had we of the Gentile nations stood firm in defense of our own
traditions and values, instead of cravenly capitulating, the Jews
would have remained what they ought to be - a small sect living
contentedly and at peace with their neighbors, exercising neither
national nor international power and entertaining no inordinate
ambitions. That, as I wrote at the outset, is how most of them
actually do live. That a minority of them has been able to mount such
a stupendous drive for world power is not their fault but ours alone,
and it is we who must put things right - or perish. The way to put
things right is not to engage in 'hate campaigns' (which in any event
more often than not play into Jewish hands) but to make a determined
stand for our own legitimate and distinctive interests.'
Those were the words of A.K. Chesterton in The New Unhappy Lords. They
provide a good point at which to rest my case.
Spearhead Online

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...