Discussion:
9/11 truth! At last, a compromise answer
(too old to reply)
just john
2010-01-18 15:11:11 UTC
Permalink
Semicontrolled Demolition: http://xkcd.com/690/
Rev Carter
2010-01-18 15:21:12 UTC
Permalink
Semicontrolled Demolition:  http://xkcd.com/690/
"Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
coincidence."
John D Salt
2010-01-18 18:52:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Semicontrolled Demolition: http://xkcd.com/690/
I've never heard flying aircraft into buildings described as
"semicontrolled demolition" before, but I suppose it is a fair description.

All the best,

John.
--
In what method shall we implement the matrix of this government display
picnic?
-- Bill Bailey
Glenn Knickerbocker
2010-01-19 14:54:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by John D Salt
I've never heard flying aircraft into buildings described as
"semicontrolled demolition" before, but
neither have the rest of us who read the captions more carefully.
Freedom Man
2010-01-18 20:16:45 UTC
Permalink
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK

On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade Center
(WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of
the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after
the towers fell, WTC building 7 also collapsed suddenly, completely, and
straight down at near free-fall speed. This steel-framed building was not
touched by the planes that struck the towers, and had sustained relatively
minor debris damage and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily
damaged remained standing.

In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan Reynolds,
former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated,
"The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11,
2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day
goes beyond the pale."

We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's tale
that's "beyond the pale"!

Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics, and the
emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have stymied
objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of authoritarian
assertions?

The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told us
that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now referred to as
a "pancake collapse". According to the government claims, the plane crashes
and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet fuel is NOT exotic) fires
heated the UL-certified structural steel to the point where it was
significantly weakened, which is very difficult to believe, never mind
repeat in an experiment. Even with massive fires that incinerate everything
else, the steel frames of such buildings generally remain standing.
According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical evidence was
quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly caused part of the
tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the tower, which, we've been
repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain reaction of the lower floors
sequentially, one at a time, yielding to the weight falling from above.

There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the observed
facts:

* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical steel core
columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the next.

* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to gravity
alone. This article focuses on the latter of these two discrepancies.

Those that concocted the "pancake theory" made a fatal error - they didn't
check their story against the inviolate laws of physics! This is easy to do,
even without any physical evidence to examine. We can test that incredible
pancake tale using basic high-school physics. Let's do that - use a simple,
unassailable, incontrovertible conservation-of-energy analysis to perform a
reality check that establishes once and for all that the government, and
such government story backers as PBS, Popular Mechanics, and Scientific
American have falsified the true nature of the 9/11 disaster.

How Gravity Acts:

Sir Isaac Newton noticed that apples fell from trees. Others had also
noticed this, but none had ever devised a theory of gravity from the
observation. Over the years, mankind has learned that the force of gravity
at and near Earth's surface produces an acceleration of known constant
magnitude. That doesn't mean we know HOW it works, or WHY, but we have
become able to predict its effects with a high degree of precision and
certainty - gravity has always had the same, predictable, effect.

Galileo Galilei used the leaning tower of Pisa to demonstrate that a large
ball and a small one (of lesser mass) fell (accelerated downward) at the
same rate. Prior to Galileo, people had just assumed that heavier objects
fall faster, much the way they had assumed the Earth was flat.

So while an object of greater mass will exert more force (its weight) upon
anything supporting it against gravity's pull, it does not experience any
greater acceleration when gravity's pull is not opposed - when it is
falling. Earth's gravity at and near the surface of the planet can only
accelerate objects downward at one known, constant rate: 32 feet per second
for each second of free fall. As Galileo demonstrated centuries ago, heavier
objects are not accelerated any quicker than are lighter objects.

So Earth's gravity produces a downward acceleration of 32 feet per second
per second. This means that an object, after falling one second, will be
falling at a speed of 32 ft/sec. After the 2nd second, it will be falling at
64 ft/sec. After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96 ft/sec., and so
on.

Further, since gravity's acceleration is constant, and an object is falling
at 32 ft/sec after one second has elapsed, we know that it has averaged 16
ft/sec for the entire distance. Thus after one second, the object has fallen
16 feet.

Scientists have derived simple free-fall equations that can be used to
harness this knowledge mathematically. These equations can be found in any
high-school physics book:

* Falling velocity = acceleration of gravity x time. (V = G x T)

And

* Distance fallen = 1/2 x acceleration of gravity x time squared. (D = 1/2
x G x T x T)

So if we want to know how far an object has free-fallen after 3 seconds:

Distance = 1/2 x 32 x 9 = 144 feet

So after 3 seconds in Earth's gravity, an object will have fallen 144 feet
and will be falling at 96 ft/sec.

Checking Our Work:

We've just solved a simple physics problem. Now let's check our work, using
conservation of energy.

We know that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - it merely changes
form. If we take the potential (in this case chemical, molecular) energy in
a barrel of oil and burn it, it changes to heat energy. When we burn
gasoline in our car's engine, we get kinetic (motional) energy, plus some
heat, as an engine is not 100% efficient. When we use our car's brakes to
bleed off some of that kinetic energy (slow down), that energy is converted
into heat (the brakes get hot). Explosives convert potential energy
[molecular or atomic] to kinetic energy (explosive force) quickly enough to
shatter or even pulverize concrete.

In the case of the free-falling object, the two kinds of energy we are
concerned with are kinetic energy and potential energy. Examples of
potential (gravitational) energy are the energy available from water stored
up high in a water tower, or a boulder perched atop a hill. If whatever is
holding it up there is removed, it will fall under the influence of
gravity's pull. As it accelerates downward, the potential energy is
converted to the kinetic energy of the object's motion.

So, as an object falls, it changes its potential energy into kinetic energy.

The equation for potential energy is:

* Potential Energy = Mass (or weight) x Gravity x Height. (PE = M x G x H)

The equation for kinetic energy is:

* Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity squared. (KE = 1/2 x M x V x V)

So let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that our falling object has a
mass of 1. (Remember, the object's mass will affect its energy, and its
momentum, but not its rate of free-fall.)

The potential energy given up by falling 3 seconds (144 ft) is: 1 x 32 x 144
= 4608

The kinetic energy gained after falling 3 secs is 1/2 x 1 x 96 squared = 1/2
x 9216 = 4608

So, the available potential energy was converted into kinetic energy. Seeing
that energy was, in fact, conserved is how we know that the answer in the
simple case above was correct. We've checked our work, using an independent
analysis, based upon the sound physical principle of conservation of energy.
Now, and only now, we can be certain that our answer was correct.

One Little Complication - the effect of air resistance:

The free-fall equations above reflect a perfect, frictionless world. They
perfectly predict the behavior of falling bodies in a vacuum. In fact, you
may have seen a science class demonstration in which the air is pumped out
of a tube and then a feather will fall, in that vacuum, just as fast as will
a solid metal ball.

That's how parachutes work: much of the falling object's potential energy
gets expended doing the work of pushing a lot of air out of the way in order
for the object to fall. As a result, not all of the gravitational potential
energy can go towards accelerating the object downward at gravity's rate of
32 ft/sec/sec.

In other words, only when there is zero frictional resistance can any
falling object's potential energy be completely converted into kinetic
energy. Anything that resists a falling object's downward velocity reduces
its acceleration from the maximum gravitational acceleration of 32 feet per
second per second, as some of gravity's potential energy is consumed in
overcoming frictional resistance.

This explains the phenomena of "terminal velocity". The free-fall equations
predict that a falling object's velocity will continue to increase without
limit. But in air, once a falling object reaches a certain speed, its
propensity to fall will be matched by the air's resistance to the fall. At
that point the object will continue to fall, but its speed will no longer
increase over time. Another way of looking at it is this: gravity's
incessant force produces a downward acceleration, but friction with the air
creates an upward force and thus an upward acceleration. When falling at
terminal velocity, the acceleration downward equals the acceleration upward,
they cancel each other out, and a constant downward velocity is maintained.
Thus the parachute, with its high air friction resistance, allows the person
attached to it to float to earth unharmed.

A Quick Recap:

Earth's gravity causes objects to fall, and they fall according to precise
physical equations. The equations assume no air or other resistance. Any
resistance at all will cause the object to fall less rapidly than it would
without that resistance. If a falling object is affected by air resistance
it falls slower than it would if free-falling, and it will take longer to
fall a given distance.

Free-fall From WTC Building Heights:

The towers were 1350 and 1360 feet tall; average = 1355 feet. Let's start by
using our free-fall equation to see how long it should take an object to
free-fall from the towers' height.

Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time squared. (D = 1/2 x G x T x T)

With a little basic algebra, we solve the equation for the fall time, T:

2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared) (2 x D = G x T x T)

Time squared = (2 x Distance) / Gravity (T x T = 2 x D / G)

Time squared = 2 x 1355 / 32 = 84.7 (T = square root of (2 x D / G))

Time = 9.2

So our equation tells us that it takes 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the
ground from the height of the WTC towers.

Using our simpler equation, V = G x T, we can see that at 9.2 seconds, the
free-falling object's velocity must be about 295 ft/sec, which is just over
200 mph.

But that can only occur IN A VACUUM.

Since the WTC was in Earth's atmosphere at sea level, you might be able to
imagine how much air resistance that represents. Think about putting your
arm out the window of a car moving even half that fast! Most free-falling
objects reach their terminal velocity long before they reach 200 mph. For
example, the terminal velocity of a free-falling human body is around 120
mph. The terminal velocity of a free-falling cat is around 60 mph.

Therefore, it is clear that air resistance alone will make it take longer
than 9.2 seconds for anything falling from the towers' height to reach the
ground.

Observations from 9/11:

On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's
"complete and final report" on 9/11, that the South Tower collapsed in 10
seconds. Here is the exact quote:

"At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That's the
government's official number. With all the videos that show it, they could
not lie about this.

But as we've determined above, the FREE-FALL TIME IN A VACUUM is 9.2
seconds, and 10 seconds is an exceptionally short fall time through the air.

This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from the
air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the tower. Those
undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered resistance thousands of
times greater than that of air. Those lower stories, and the central steel
core columns, had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years
despite hurricane-force winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.

Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the way of
the upper floors as gracefully and relatively frictionlessly as air would?
Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing the fall of the upper
floors less than would, say, a parachute?

It is beyond the scope of the simple but uncontested physics here to tell
you how long such a collapse should have taken. Would it have taken a
minute? Ten minutes? Hard to say, but certainly it would take far more than
10 seconds!

What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers could not
have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower stories, as
rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is shown above to be
physically impossible!

Not only was tremendous energy expended in causing the observed massive
high-speed sideways debris ejections, but virtually all the concrete and
glass of the tower was pulverized - actually dissociated is a better word.
Never mind what happened to all the supporting steel core columns! The
energy requirements to do anything like that, alone, rival the total amount
of potential energy that the entire tower had to give. Gravity alone is
sufficient to cause some things to fall that far, even through air, in close
to the observed 10 second collapse time. But that is without the huge
expenditure of energy necessary to pulverize all of that concrete and glass,
eject debris, plus cause the steel core columns to effectively disappear.
The gravitational potential energy present was certainly not enough to have
done all these things at once.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it only changes form. So WHERE
DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM?

Conclusions:

In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the observed
duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more of the
following zany-sounding conditions must have been met:

* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero resistance to
the collapse.

* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any expenditure
of energy.

* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by magic.

* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, gravity was much stronger than
gravity.

* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, energy was not conserved.

None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible, conditions can
be accounted for by the official government theory of 9/11, nor by any of
the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to prop up this official myth
of 9/11.

The Bottom Line:

The government explanations for the WTC collapses fail the most basic
conservation-of-energy reality check. Therefore the government theory is
FALSE; it does not fit the observed facts, and the notion of a "pancake
collapse" cannot account for what happened. The "pancake collapse"
explanation is impossible, and thus absurd. It is A LIE.

It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that the WTC
collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the plane impacts.
The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that the
towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but rather they
came down because something else was causing them to disintegrate.

So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates' other
premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is left to you to
decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly incorrect
presumptions, is also flawed.

The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, and which
also collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day,
similarly fails the conservation-of-energy analysis. The 9/11 Commission
made no attempt to explain it.

Just how and why so many highly-accredited and credentialed people all so
miserably failed to check the "pancake collapse" theory, by giving it this
basic physics reality check, is beyond the scope of this analysis.

---------------------------------
FURTHER IRREFUTABLE PROOF BY PHYSICS OF THE 9/11 INSIDE JOB:

http://vehme.blogspot.com/2007/12/glaring-proof-of-something-hotter-than.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law_of_black_body_radiation
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-18 20:28:18 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 18, 3:16 pm, "Freedom Man" <***@once.net> wrote:

(rubbish snipped)

How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Government Shill #2
2010-01-18 20:31:40 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.

--
Shill #2

If Freedom Man says a foolish thing fifty million times, it is
still a foolish thing.
Me (with apologies to Anatole France)
Mark
2010-01-18 22:06:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
just john
2010-01-18 22:14:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/jjMusic
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-18 23:48:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
FROM HELL!
Mark
2010-01-19 00:21:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done. My walls are covered with the
first run editions of /intricate valuable artwork/.
I have the originals safely stored away too. All
these pieces were commissioned before they were
started, and they represent thousands of dollars
in revenue. They were all done by the same artist.

Me
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
just john
2010-01-19 01:09:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/jjMusic
Mark
2010-01-19 16:50:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Rev. Richard Skull
2010-01-20 00:10:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again?  You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month.  That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
Mark
2010-01-20 00:32:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again?  You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month.  That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.

Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.

I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.

Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability. So, at closing time

1. I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.

2. The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.

This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.

I basically got it for free.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Greendistantstar
2010-01-20 01:30:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by just john
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability. So, at closing time
1. I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2. The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.

http://www.hosanna1.com/

GDS

"Let's roll!"
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-20 01:55:33 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:44 +0800, Greendistantstar
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by just john
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability. So, at closing time
1. I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2. The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
Along with the Internet, Mark also invented HTML. He can do with it as
he pleases, without any sense of style at all needed.
Mark
2010-01-26 17:53:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:44 +0800, Greendistantstar
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by just john
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability. So, at closing time
1. I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2. The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
Along with the Internet, Mark also invented HTML. He can do with it as
he pleases, without any sense of style at all needed.
I never said that.

I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man. I'm still attempting
things people think are impossible. I'm a dichotomy, shoot em dead
brainbell jangler, a soft diamond, a militaristic saint, and always a
very wise fool.

If anything I'm a Zena
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
dlzc
2010-01-26 19:26:07 UTC
Permalink
Dear Mark:

On Jan 26, 10:53 am, Mark <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more than 20 years, we have
rules for posting on-topic content in newsgroups.

...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.

Followup-To set to more appropriate newsgroup.

David A. Smith
Mark
2010-01-26 19:49:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more than 20 years, we have
rules for posting on-topic content in newsgroups.
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
No Zena as in Goddess Of Lesbianism.
Post by dlzc
Followup-To set to more appropriate newsgroup.
???
Post by dlzc
David Assclown Smith
Oh, a joke.

Good one.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
dlzc
2010-01-26 21:45:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more
than 20 years, we have rules for posting
on-topic content in newsgroups.
No smart-assed remark about the facts at least...
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
No Zena as in Goddess Of Lesbianism.
As in the same identical g*d-damned Zena that "xenophobic" was derived
from, you clueless, spamming jerk.

Relativity is in the domain of Science. Posts here are archived for
years. Your faux-pas here can be fodder for your enemies until the
end of time. I'd suggest you quit dumping crap here.

David A. Smith
Mark
2010-01-26 22:33:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by dlzc
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more
than 20 years, we have rules for posting
on-topic content in newsgroups.
No smart-assed remark about the facts at least...
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
No Zena as in Goddess Of Lesbianism.
As in the same identical g*d-damned Zena that "xenophobic" was derived
from, you clueless, spamming jerk.
Can't you read? Zena, Goddess Of Lesbianism, pls keep up.
Post by dlzc
Relativity is in the domain of Science.
This is relativism distilled to it's pure essence like
a sun-baked dog turd.
Post by dlzc
Posts here are archived for
years. Your faux-pas here can be fodder for your enemies until the
end of time. I'd suggest you quit dumping crap here.
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts anti-Mark
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it. If you put ten,
I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred, I'll put a thousand. So tell
your sandnigger friends they're responsible for the ANTI campaign that
follows.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Constable Leonovich
2010-01-26 22:44:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more
than 20 years, we have rules for posting
on-topic content in newsgroups.
No smart-assed remark about the facts at least...
Post by Mark
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
No Zena as in Goddess Of Lesbianism.
As in the same identical g*d-damned Zena that "xenophobic" was derived
from, you clueless, spamming jerk.
Can't you read? Zena, Goddess Of Lesbianism, pls keep up.
Post by dlzc
Relativity is in the domain of Science.
This is relativism distilled to it's pure essence like
a sun-baked dog turd.
Post by dlzc
Posts here are archived for
years. Your faux-pas here can be fodder for your enemies until the
end of time. I'd suggest you quit dumping crap here.
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts anti-Mark
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it. If you put ten,
I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred, I'll put a thousand. So tell
your sandnigger friends they're responsible for the ANTI campaign that
follows.
Jesus H. Madonna Jehovah, Mark(ie), go to fucking *HELL* and live.
--
http://www.noob.us/pictures/consider-the-seat-color-when-buying-a-new-bicycle/
Dr. HotSalt
2010-01-26 23:45:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more than 20 years, we have
rules for posting on-topic content in newsgroups.
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
Actually, it's Jeffey Bloss, sporging Mark in a lame attempt to get
his account terminated. Jeffey got his panties in a twist, and can't
get over it.

One marker (as it were) is the link to the execrable hosanna
website.

Others are in the headers, but Jeffey doesn't know how to spoof
those.


Dr. HotSalt
Tiger Would
2010-01-27 02:53:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dr. HotSalt
Post by dlzc
...
Post by Mark
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man.
Welcome to the 21st century, where, for more than 20 years, we have
rules for posting on-topic content in newsgroups.
...
Post by Mark
If anything I'm a Zena
... phobe.
Actually, it's Jeffey Bloss,
Are you sure?

Proof.
Post by Dr. HotSalt
sporging Mark in a lame attempt to get
his account terminated. Jeffey got his panties in a twist, and can't
get over it.
One marker (as it were) is the link to the execrable hosanna
website.
You clled Mark(ie)'s site crap? Like the shit in your colostomy bag?
Post by Dr. HotSalt
Others are in the headers, but Jeffey doesn't know how to spoof
those.
Dr. HotSalt
Jeffrey doesn't care.
--
http://tr.im/1f9p
Rev. Richard Skull
2010-01-26 22:54:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:44 +0800, Greendistantstar
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again?  You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month.  That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability.  So, at closing time
1.  I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2.  The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
Along with the Internet, Mark also invented HTML. He can do with it as
he pleases, without any sense of style at all needed.
I never said that.
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man. I'm still attempting
things people think are impossible. I'm a dichotomy, shoot em dead
brainbell jangler, a soft diamond, a militaristic saint, and always a
very wise fool.
If anything I'm a Zena
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I think your a little teapot, short & stout
Mark
2010-01-27 02:55:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:44 +0800, Greendistantstar
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again?  You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month.  That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability.  So, at closing time
1.  I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2.  The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
Along with the Internet, Mark also invented HTML. He can do with it as
he pleases, without any sense of style at all needed.
I never said that.
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man. I'm still attempting
things people think are impossible. I'm a dichotomy, shoot em dead
brainbell jangler, a soft diamond, a militaristic saint, and always a
very wise fool.
If anything I'm a Zena
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I think your a little teapot, short & stout
Let me tell you something you little bastard, and I'm only
gonna tell you once. You've been trolling my posts for 3
months and libeling me and there are people who can find
out who you are in real life.

When I get my hands on you I will make you eat every
Goddamn word you've posted. You got that? You will be
located and I will put you in the motherfucking hospital that I own.
I will ruin you for life and it's gonna hurt real fucking bad.
You've fucked yourself son.

Not really but that felt good. Lost my Prozac script.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-27 03:04:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:44 +0800, Greendistantstar
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again?  You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month.  That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability.  So, at closing time
1.  I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2.  The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
Along with the Internet, Mark also invented HTML. He can do with it as
he pleases, without any sense of style at all needed.
I never said that.
I *can* tell you this. I am a Renaissance Man. I'm still attempting
things people think are impossible. I'm a dichotomy, shoot em dead
brainbell jangler, a soft diamond, a militaristic saint, and always a
very wise fool.
If anything I'm a Zena
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I think your a little teapot, short & stout
Let me tell you something you little bastard, and I'm only
gonna tell you once. You've been trolling my posts for 3
months and libeling me and there are people who can find
out who you are in real life.
When I get my hands on you I will make you eat every
Goddamn word you've posted. You got that? You will be
located and I will put you in the motherfucking hospital that I own.
I will ruin you for life and it's gonna hurt real fucking bad.
You've fucked yourself son.
Bryce Utting
2010-01-20 09:33:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy
I've lost track. which of the sock puppets was it that was
complaining about having its species called into question?
Post by Greendistantstar
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an
abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
OOHHHH NO, you can't make me.

hey Dave, what's this bozo's site say?


ta,
butting
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-20 09:36:03 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:33:46 +0000 (UTC), Bryce Utting
Post by Bryce Utting
Post by Mark
http://www.hosanna1.com/
OOHHHH NO, you can't make me.
hey Dave, what's this bozo's site say?
That site is SO BAD it demeans the character of those
World's Worst Web Site sites, ALL of them.
David DeLaney
2010-01-23 18:31:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bryce Utting
Post by Greendistantstar
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an
abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
OOHHHH NO, you can't make me.
hey Dave, what's this bozo's site say?
I am NOT c'lickin'g on that l`in`k with my m"ous"e. Especially since this
thread waited for four days and then showed up ALLATONCE.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from ***@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
Mark
2010-01-26 17:50:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greendistantstar
Post by Mark
Post by Rev. Richard Skull
Post by Mark
Post by just john
Post by Mark
You can call yourself a creative genius when you've
done what I've done.
Oh, you again? You cut-n-pasted that same thing last month. That's how
creative you are; you run out of material and go into re-runs on what,
your third reply to me?
You did know that in Junior high school I memorized the
Latin genus of all the snakes in North America? I was a herpetologist by
age 15...the same time I began to sell my cubist paintings.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
Did you memorize teh snakes by shoving them up you arse one by one?
No but I will tell you what I am capable of.
Since I have been rich man made or should I say Mark made wealthy I
thought I would share a recent land deal secret with you.
I located the multiple, out-of-state, owners of adjoining properties and
convinced them all to sell me their tracts of land for a value which I
assigned, and then upon agreement, found a local buyer to pay me 5 times
what they were going to sell it to me for.
Now here's the best part, then, once I'd gotten full commitment from all
parties, I actually told the land owners that I was going to sell a
fraction of the land as soon as it was mine, and I told the new buyer
that I actually didn't own all the land yet and he said no problem...
So then upon talking to each parties's attorneys, I was advised that we
should just make it a JOIN CLOSING for everyone, and even better, to
transfer a portion of the property directly from the original owners to
my new buyer, thereby I avoided any tax liability. So, at closing time
1. I didn't have an attorney, but the other 2 parties did, and they
paid for the closing.
2. The new buyer submitted a fat check to the property owners at
closing time, and received a fraction of the real estate, and the
remainder of the land was transferred to me for free, along with another
check.
This lake property is now worth approximately 900 thousand dollars.
I basically got it for free.
Such a shame that with all that (putative) wealth, you have such an abomination of a web site.
http://www.hosanna1.com/
GDS
"Let's roll!"
Just between me and you, I AM Mr. Wonderful, but the art of declaring it
takes timing and occasion.

Roll that asshole.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Father Haskell
2010-01-19 05:58:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
India.
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-19 06:29:47 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:58:54 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
Post by Father Haskell
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
India.
no, tha's where ZERO comes from.

Like the point of this thread.
Father Haskell
2010-01-20 01:04:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:58:54 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
Post by Father Haskell
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
India.
no, tha's where ZERO comes from.
The value or the symbol?
Zapanaz
2010-01-19 06:27:12 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:14:30 -0500, just john
Post by just john
Post by Mark
Post by Government Shill #2
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:28:18 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
(rubbish snipped)
How much are the Saudis paying you to spread this disinfo?
Freedy shows his stupidity to the world for free.
Muhammed was a camel fucking warlord that couldn't
get along with his own family. Islam is an ignorant
knock-off religion of Christianity. Go build a plane
out of Elmer's glue, and hit 20k ft. Merry Christmas
rag head.
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
from under cabbage-patch leaves
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
THE CHURCH OF THE SUBGENIUS TAUGHT ME TO POOP!

IN MAILBOXES!

ON FIRE!

AND LOOK GOOD DOING IT!

:: Currently listening to The Song of Seikilos, Ancient, by Seikilos
Glenn Knickerbocker
2010-01-19 14:57:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
Now explain to us where algebra came from.
Ebneezra Kadabra, Witch Goddess of Lankershim Boulevard.
Dr. HotSalt
2010-01-18 23:19:21 UTC
Permalink
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.


Dr. HotSalt
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-18 23:56:08 UTC
Permalink
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
  What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.

That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Mark
2010-01-19 00:20:04 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
  What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-19 01:01:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
  What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
No, I'm sure you could fit just a few more things on that page.
Flashing things.

And the crudely-rendered wings on the Afghan? PRICELESS.
Paul Jamison
2010-01-19 02:40:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Dr. HotSalt
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
No, I'm sure you could fit just a few more things on that page.
Flashing things.

And the crudely-rendered wings on the Afghan? PRICELESS.

==================================

I think Afghans are lovely, elegant dogs. They deserve far better than that.

MAN, that is one ugly webpage!
Mark
2010-01-19 16:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Mark
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Dr. HotSalt
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
No, I'm sure you could fit just a few more things on that page.
Flashing things.
And the crudely-rendered wings on the Afghan? PRICELESS.
==================================
I think Afghans are lovely, elegant dogs. They deserve far better than that.
MAN, that is one ugly webpage!
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
If you put ten, I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred,
I'll put a thousand. So tell your sandnigger friends they're
responsible for the ANTI campaign that follows.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-19 19:24:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Mark
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Dr. HotSalt
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
No, I'm sure you could fit just a few more things on that page.
Flashing things.
And the crudely-rendered wings on the Afghan? PRICELESS.
==================================
I think Afghans are lovely, elegant dogs. They deserve far better than that.
MAN, that is one ugly webpage!
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
If you put ten, I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred,
I'll put a thousand. So tell your sandnigger friends they're
responsible for the ANTI campaign that follows.
Hey, Rich Boy, pilot wannabe, MARK with the Capital M !!!

Do you know your muslin sheets are made by muslims?

Well, do you, punk?
Mark
2010-01-19 21:37:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Mark
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Mark
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:08 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Dr. HotSalt
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
What an amazingly rancid pile of shit.
That page highlights the sense of taste and style they bring to their
web design business. Looks like they used everything they knew to that
page.
That page is hypnotic in its awfulness. Real bulldada.
Doesn't work like that and I know from my work at
MIT on the Jupiter speech synthesis engines
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
No, I'm sure you could fit just a few more things on that page.
Flashing things.
And the crudely-rendered wings on the Afghan? PRICELESS.
==================================
I think Afghans are lovely, elegant dogs. They deserve far better than that.
MAN, that is one ugly webpage!
Look here boyo...if you or anyone else puts a muslim
propaganda post here, I'm gonna put 10 posts against it.
If you put ten, I'll put a hundred. If you put a hundred,
I'll put a thousand. So tell your sandnigger friends they're
responsible for the ANTI campaign that follows.
Hey, Rich Boy, pilot wannabe, MARK with the Capital M !!!
Do you know your muslin sheets are made by muslims?
Well, do you, punk?
Punk? No one was calling me punk when I was
convincing the chairman of the bank and head
of the Georgia Republican party to fly to Washington,
D.C. and within 3 days bring me a Small Business Admin.
check for 350 thousand dollars.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
Al Dykes
2010-01-18 20:39:59 UTC
Permalink
Your math is wrong in a way that fundamentally flaws you logic and
conclusion. It's been wrong from the first time you posted this.
See the specifics below.

I believe FF has me on "ignore". Please repost this so he sees it.
Post by Freedom Man
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade Center
(WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of
the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after
the towers fell, WTC building 7 also collapsed suddenly, completely, and
straight down at near free-fall speed. This steel-framed building was not
touched by the planes that struck the towers, and had sustained relatively
minor debris damage and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily
damaged remained standing.
In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan Reynolds,
former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated,
"The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11,
2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day
goes beyond the pale."
We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's tale
that's "beyond the pale"!
Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics, and the
emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have stymied
objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of authoritarian
assertions?
The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told us
that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now referred to as
a "pancake collapse". According to the government claims, the plane crashes
and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet fuel is NOT exotic) fires
heated the UL-certified structural steel to the point where it was
significantly weakened, which is very difficult to believe, never mind
repeat in an experiment. Even with massive fires that incinerate everything
else, the steel frames of such buildings generally remain standing.
According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical evidence was
quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly caused part of the
tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the tower, which, we've been
repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain reaction of the lower floors
sequentially, one at a time, yielding to the weight falling from above.
There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the observed
* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical steel core
columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the next.
* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to gravity
alone. This article focuses on the latter of these two discrepancies.
Those that concocted the "pancake theory" made a fatal error - they didn't
check their story against the inviolate laws of physics! This is easy to do,
even without any physical evidence to examine. We can test that incredible
pancake tale using basic high-school physics. Let's do that - use a simple,
unassailable, incontrovertible conservation-of-energy analysis to perform a
reality check that establishes once and for all that the government, and
such government story backers as PBS, Popular Mechanics, and Scientific
American have falsified the true nature of the 9/11 disaster.
Sir Isaac Newton noticed that apples fell from trees. Others had also
noticed this, but none had ever devised a theory of gravity from the
observation. Over the years, mankind has learned that the force of gravity
at and near Earth's surface produces an acceleration of known constant
magnitude. That doesn't mean we know HOW it works, or WHY, but we have
become able to predict its effects with a high degree of precision and
certainty - gravity has always had the same, predictable, effect.
Galileo Galilei used the leaning tower of Pisa to demonstrate that a large
ball and a small one (of lesser mass) fell (accelerated downward) at the
same rate. Prior to Galileo, people had just assumed that heavier objects
fall faster, much the way they had assumed the Earth was flat.
So while an object of greater mass will exert more force (its weight) upon
anything supporting it against gravity's pull, it does not experience any
greater acceleration when gravity's pull is not opposed - when it is
falling. Earth's gravity at and near the surface of the planet can only
accelerate objects downward at one known, constant rate: 32 feet per second
for each second of free fall. As Galileo demonstrated centuries ago, heavier
objects are not accelerated any quicker than are lighter objects.
So Earth's gravity produces a downward acceleration of 32 feet per second
per second. This means that an object, after falling one second, will be
falling at a speed of 32 ft/sec. After the 2nd second, it will be falling at
64 ft/sec. After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96 ft/sec., and so
on.
Further, since gravity's acceleration is constant, and an object is falling
at 32 ft/sec after one second has elapsed, we know that it has averaged 16
ft/sec for the entire distance. Thus after one second, the object has fallen
16 feet.
Scientists have derived simple free-fall equations that can be used to
harness this knowledge mathematically. These equations can be found in any
* Falling velocity = acceleration of gravity x time. (V = G x T)
And
* Distance fallen = 1/2 x acceleration of gravity x time squared. (D = 1/2
x G x T x T)
Distance = 1/2 x 32 x 9 = 144 feet
So after 3 seconds in Earth's gravity, an object will have fallen 144 feet
and will be falling at 96 ft/sec.
We've just solved a simple physics problem. Now let's check our work, using
conservation of energy.
We know that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - it merely changes
form. If we take the potential (in this case chemical, molecular) energy in
a barrel of oil and burn it, it changes to heat energy. When we burn
gasoline in our car's engine, we get kinetic (motional) energy, plus some
heat, as an engine is not 100% efficient. When we use our car's brakes to
bleed off some of that kinetic energy (slow down), that energy is converted
into heat (the brakes get hot). Explosives convert potential energy
[molecular or atomic] to kinetic energy (explosive force) quickly enough to
shatter or even pulverize concrete.
In the case of the free-falling object, the two kinds of energy we are
concerned with are kinetic energy and potential energy. Examples of
potential (gravitational) energy are the energy available from water stored
up high in a water tower, or a boulder perched atop a hill. If whatever is
holding it up there is removed, it will fall under the influence of
gravity's pull. As it accelerates downward, the potential energy is
converted to the kinetic energy of the object's motion.
So, as an object falls, it changes its potential energy into kinetic energy.
* Potential Energy = Mass (or weight) x Gravity x Height. (PE = M x G x H)
* Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity squared. (KE = 1/2 x M x V x V)
So let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that our falling object has a
mass of 1. (Remember, the object's mass will affect its energy, and its
momentum, but not its rate of free-fall.)
The potential energy given up by falling 3 seconds (144 ft) is: 1 x 32 x 144
= 4608
The kinetic energy gained after falling 3 secs is 1/2 x 1 x 96 squared = 1/2
x 9216 = 4608
So, the available potential energy was converted into kinetic energy. Seeing
that energy was, in fact, conserved is how we know that the answer in the
simple case above was correct. We've checked our work, using an independent
analysis, based upon the sound physical principle of conservation of energy.
Now, and only now, we can be certain that our answer was correct.
The free-fall equations above reflect a perfect, frictionless world. They
perfectly predict the behavior of falling bodies in a vacuum. In fact, you
may have seen a science class demonstration in which the air is pumped out
of a tube and then a feather will fall, in that vacuum, just as fast as will
a solid metal ball.
That's how parachutes work: much of the falling object's potential energy
gets expended doing the work of pushing a lot of air out of the way in order
for the object to fall. As a result, not all of the gravitational potential
energy can go towards accelerating the object downward at gravity's rate of
32 ft/sec/sec.
In other words, only when there is zero frictional resistance can any
falling object's potential energy be completely converted into kinetic
energy. Anything that resists a falling object's downward velocity reduces
its acceleration from the maximum gravitational acceleration of 32 feet per
second per second, as some of gravity's potential energy is consumed in
overcoming frictional resistance.
This explains the phenomena of "terminal velocity". The free-fall equations
predict that a falling object's velocity will continue to increase without
limit. But in air, once a falling object reaches a certain speed, its
propensity to fall will be matched by the air's resistance to the fall. At
that point the object will continue to fall, but its speed will no longer
increase over time. Another way of looking at it is this: gravity's
incessant force produces a downward acceleration, but friction with the air
creates an upward force and thus an upward acceleration. When falling at
terminal velocity, the acceleration downward equals the acceleration upward,
they cancel each other out, and a constant downward velocity is maintained.
Thus the parachute, with its high air friction resistance, allows the person
attached to it to float to earth unharmed.
Earth's gravity causes objects to fall, and they fall according to precise
physical equations. The equations assume no air or other resistance. Any
resistance at all will cause the object to fall less rapidly than it would
without that resistance. If a falling object is affected by air resistance
it falls slower than it would if free-falling, and it will take longer to
fall a given distance.
The towers were 1350 and 1360 feet tall; average = 1355 feet. Let's start by
using our free-fall equation to see how long it should take an object to
free-fall from the towers' height.
Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time squared. (D = 1/2 x G x T x T)
2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared) (2 x D = G x T x T)
Time squared = (2 x Distance) / Gravity (T x T = 2 x D / G)
Time squared = 2 x 1355 / 32 = 84.7 (T = square root of (2 x D / G))
Time = 9.2
So our equation tells us that it takes 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the
ground from the height of the WTC towers.
Using our simpler equation, V = G x T, we can see that at 9.2 seconds, the
free-falling object's velocity must be about 295 ft/sec, which is just over
200 mph.
But that can only occur IN A VACUUM.
Your mistake is that the 9 second interval wasn't from 1300 ft. It was
from about 1,000 ft. It was the measured fall time from some beam
from the impact zone. That would be something from the 78-84th floor,
not 1300 ft. Call it 80% of the full height; 1,040 ft (320m).

Free fall from 1,040ft is 8.07 seconds and v in the last second is
abouy 240ft/sec so that extra second is plenty to account for aero
drag.

SOURCE:

6. How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and
9 seconds (WTC 2)-speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped
from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST
estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to
strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the
towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately
9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1)
precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence,
and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades,
N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave
transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A)... [2]


You get an "F" in your High School physics paper.
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
just john
2010-01-18 20:50:39 UTC
Permalink
But what about those hundreds of people seen sneaking tons and tons of
explosives into the buildings, months ahead of time?

Oh, right ... They were wearing those invisibility suits.
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/jjMusic
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-18 20:56:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
But what about those hundreds of people seen sneaking tons and tons of
explosives into the buildings, months ahead of time?
Oh, right ...  They were wearing those invisibility suits.
Semi-hemi-demi-controlled demolitions.
Rev. Richard Skull
2010-01-18 23:16:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by just john
But what about those hundreds of people seen sneaking tons and tons of
explosives into the buildings, months ahead of time?
Oh, right ...  They were wearing those invisibility suits.
--
* Radio Free Entropy:http://just-john.com/jjMusic
THey were wearing their Freemasonry Aprons!

Like the magic cloaks on "Lord of the Rings", a Freemason's apron can
hide him from the eyes of "Real Men" who don't understand that any
object that is in freefall will accelerate until it hits a terminal
velocity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity

Something I learned in "Basic Physics" in high school.
Iarnrod
2010-01-19 01:43:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Freedom Man
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
2010-01-19 01:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Freedom Man
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
just john
2010-01-19 02:04:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Freedom Man
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
Hey, Lard is a damned good band!
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/jjMusic
Iarnrod
2010-01-19 02:00:25 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 18, 6:49 pm, Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Freedom Man
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE -
GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
What is "lardknob?"

Can you identify the six lies in Reality Fighter's first paragraph? If
you do, I'll stick a little gold star to your forehead.
Rev. Charlie Freemanson
2010-01-19 03:19:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
On Jan 18, 6:49 pm, Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Iarnrod
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING
COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
What is "lardknob?"
Can you identify the six lies in Reality Fighter's first paragraph? If
you do, I'll stick a little gold star to your forehead.
Who the fuck cares?
Iarnrod
2010-01-19 05:05:35 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 18, 8:19 pm, "Rev. Charlie Freemanson"
Post by Rev. Charlie Freemanson
Post by Iarnrod
On Jan 18, 6:49 pm, Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Iarnrod
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING
COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
What is "lardknob?"
Can you identify the six lies in Reality Fighter's first paragraph? If
you do, I'll stick a little gold star to your forehead.
Who the fuck cares?
Well, obviously, you for one
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-19 06:00:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
On Jan 18, 8:19 pm, "Rev. Charlie Freemanson"
Post by Rev. Charlie Freemanson
Post by Iarnrod
On Jan 18, 6:49 pm, Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
Post by Iarnrod
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING
COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
Six lies in the first paragraph alone sends this pathetic little
"paper" straight to the trash can, Reality Fighter!
Oh, it's lardknob again.
What is "lardknob?"
Can you identify the six lies in Reality Fighter's first paragraph? If
you do, I'll stick a little gold star to your forehead.
Who the fuck cares?
Well, obviously, you for one
Lessening you and your kind's each post toward dumbosity.

Not One WIT!
mr.torfalk
2010-01-19 02:17:25 UTC
Permalink
Who can understand anything of all thi
s rubbish?

___tor
rincewind
2010-01-19 15:06:19 UTC
Permalink
Semicontrolled Demolition:  http://xkcd.com/690/
How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
collapse?
Otto Bahn
2010-01-19 16:02:06 UTC
Permalink
Semicontrolled Demolition: http://xkcd.com/690/
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?

1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?

2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.

--oTTo--
rincewind
2010-01-20 11:55:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-20 12:18:02 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.

Live it, or live with it.

You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
rincewind
2010-01-20 22:56:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
Iarnrod
2010-01-20 23:37:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 00:01:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Oh? So your back for more, huh, Lardknob?

Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.

Didjo momma have any kids that lived, Lardknob???
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 01:15:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 02:54:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?

GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?

The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight? Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as you car. You people are so lame.

PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!

If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?

"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."

Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."

So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.

I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob. And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.

Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 03:47:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They’re not, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you’re lkying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don’t lie, we need never worry; it’s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as you car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.

Hey, you’re on the internets too, Pussy Boy:
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin’ parakeet staring into a
mirror?
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin’ clue.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin’ crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 04:00:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They’re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you’re lkying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don’t lie, we need never worry; it’s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin’ parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin’ clue.
Again, you lie.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin’ crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.

Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 17:04:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it’s in the GTE documents.

Wow you’re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They’re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
“cell phone calls” does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you’re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don’t lie, we need never worry; it’s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin’ parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin’ wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin’ clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you’re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin’ crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is “Lardknob?” Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?

And why are you lying about 9/11 when you’ve been proven wrong?
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 21:38:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it’s in the GTE documents.
Wow you’re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They’re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
“cell phone calls” does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you’re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don’t lie, we need never worry; it’s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin’ parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin’ wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin’ clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you’re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin’ crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is “Lardknob?” Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you’ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!

Lardknob is a Liar!

Lardknob is a Liar!
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 23:10:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 23:26:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob', mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
during the "ATTACK ON AMERICA" which proves you are a waste of human
flesh. Turning you into MacDonald's quarter pounder hamburgers would
result in MacDonald's getting shut down for using too much fat in
their burgers. The Ivory soap folks maybe could use you in their
product, but the stench would be so overwhelming the entire state
would have to be evacuated. Your parents would be evicted from the
trailer park if they ever let you out of the basement you're
chained-up in after all your neighbors died of the toxic gases you
release while breathing your filthy scum ass wind.

So, in closing, go back to pretending you're an older woman, Lardknob.

LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!

LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!

LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!

LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!

LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 23:47:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob',
No I'm not, shit-for-brains. When addressing your betters, you should
show more respect.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
BWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! More proof of Pussy Boy's pedophiliac delusions!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
How come everything I have said is proven correct, Pussy Boy?

Can't handle that one, can ya, luzer!
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-22 00:04:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob',
No I'm not, shit-for-brains. When addressing your betters, you should
show more respect.
Yes you are, Lardknob. Kiss my feet, child! Respect This!!!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
BWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! More proof of Pussy Boy's pedophiliac delusions!!
Your fake boobs are showing, Lardknob!!!!1!!!!!!11
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
How come everything I have said is proven correct, Pussy Boy?
NOTHING you have ever said has been proven anything more lies on top
of lies on top of lies. Liars that live in lie houses shouldn't keep
lying all the time.
Post by Iarnrod
Can't handle that one, can ya, luzer!
What's to handle you lying liar fat ass, Lardknob!!1!1!!!!!
When you wake up from your coma, feel free to leave the country, you
terrorists supporter, you.

Why Do You Hate America So Much, Lardknob???
Iarnrod
2010-01-22 03:01:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
How come everything I have said is proven correct, Pussy Boy?
NOTHING you have ever said has been p...<<S-L-A-P-!-!>>
Pussy Pedo, the point isn't even debatable. It's beyond dispute.
Everything I have said is the proven truth and everything you have
said has been exposed as the lies they are. It just is what it is and
you'll just have to settle for being wrong, mmmmm-kay, dearie?
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-22 03:20:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
How come everything I have said is proven correct, Pussy Boy?
NOTHING you have ever said has been p...<<S-L-A-P-!-!>>
Pussy Pedo, the point isn't even debatable. It's beyond dispute.
Everything I have said is the proven truth and everything you have
said has been exposed as the lies they are. It just is what it is and
you'll just have to settle for being wrong, mmmmm-kay, dearie?
You couldn't prove whether you are above pond scum in intelligence if
your life depended on it, Lardknob. Show us your mighty web site of
9/11/2001 "ATTACK ON AMERICA" truths, Lardknob. Post a photo of
yourself with all your fancy grade school and middle school diplomas.
I bet you were voted least likely to finish high school, Lardknob

Go back to your buggering yourself, you lying liar, Lardknob.
And take a bath at least once a week, Lardknob.
You're smelling up the place with your retched BO and dick cheese.
Iarnrod
2010-01-22 03:38:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
How come everything I have said is proven correct, Pussy Boy?
NOTHING you have ever said has been p...<<S-L-A-P-!-!>>
Pussy Pedo, the point isn't even debatable. It's beyond dispute.
Everything I have said is the proven truth and everything you have
said has been exposed as the lies they are. It just is what it is and
you'll just have to settle for being wrong, mmmmm-kay, dearie?
You couldn't prove whe...<<S-L-A-P-!-!>>
Pussy Pedo, the point isn't even debatable. It's beyond dispute.
Everything I have said is the proven truth and everything you have
said has been exposed as the lies they are. It just is what it is and
you'll just have to settle for being wrong, mmmmm-kay, dearie?
thunder.willow
2010-01-26 18:42:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
Post by Otto Bahn
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not designed for
    such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad that you don't
seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick around. That
is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000 feet
altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE Airphones.
Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these calls
reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could not
have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains. More
delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping all
over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you are
the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing to even
one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about. Funny, that.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost as much
as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a male
teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the
crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the
lake. "More debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8
miles away from the crash. "State police and the FBI initially said
they didn't want to speculate whether the debris was from the crash,
or if the plane could have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify you,
shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring into a
mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from three to
six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane were found six to
eight miles from the main impact area: "Authorities also said another
debris site had been cordoned off six to eight miles away from the
original crash debris site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to eight
miles away; that was road distance, making several turns, shit-for-
brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as reported)
or something happened to that plane that would cause a debris field as
far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site, which does not match any of
your lying liar "what really happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice fellas,
Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now asking
total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts', Lardknob?
You really do a piss poor job of it. You really ought to see a doctor
about your masturbating in public problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got nothing
else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying about
it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys. This
says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob', mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
during the "ATTACK ON AMERICA" which proves you are a waste of human
flesh. Turning you into MacDonald's quarter pounder hamburgers would
result in MacDonald's getting shut down for using too much fat in
their burgers. The Ivory soap folks maybe could use you in their
product, but the stench would be so overwhelming the entire state
would have to be evacuated. Your parents would be evicted from the
trailer park if they ever let you out of the basement you're
chained-up in after all your neighbors died of the toxic gases you
release while breathing your filthy scum ass wind.
So, in closing, go back to pretending you're an older woman, Lardknob.
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
etc

first he thinks he's a teen boy becuz lardknob likes titties
then he gets a gander at lardknob and realizes he was wrong about the
teen boy scene.
But Rev can't accept the way lardknob looks so decides lardknob is a
young woman.
Rev can't get it through their thick skull that if he was wrong on
number one assumption,
that it's possible he's wrong about assumption number two.
Therefore... Rev meow is a moron.

And obsesessed with lardknobs titties.

But of course no one can blame rev for that last bit.

Good thing lardknob has a good sense of humor, for rev meows sake.
Mike Jones
2010-01-27 01:01:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by thunder.willow
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:04:14 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:47:38 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:15:40 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:37:23 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
On Jan 18, 10:11 am, just john
Demolition:http://xkcd.com/690/
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell
because of <explosives, why were there no
explosives heard at the beginning of the <collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by
the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to
steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not
    designed for such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't
believe either Tower (or 7) was brought down by
explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard
suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad
that you don't seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick
around. That is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000
feet altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE
Airphones. Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Iarnrod
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these
calls reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could
not have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains.
More delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Iarnrod
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping
all over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you
are the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing
to even one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about.
Funny, that.
Post by Iarnrod
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost
as much as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Iarnrod
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a
male teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to
your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Iarnrod
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Iarnrod
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles
from the crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was
adjacent to the lake. "More debris from the plane was found in
New Baltimore, some 8 miles away from the crash. "State police
and the FBI initially said they didn't want to speculate
whether the debris was from the crash, or if the plane could
have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify
you, shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring
into a mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Iarnrod
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from
three to six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane
"Authorities also said another debris site had been cordoned
off six to eight miles away from the original crash debris
site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to
eight miles away; that was road distance, making several turns,
shit-for- brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as
reported) or something happened to that plane that would cause
a debris field as far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site,
which does not match any of your lying liar "what really
happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Iarnrod
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice
fellas, Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now
asking total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Iarnrod
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts',
Lardknob? You really do a piss poor job of it. You really
ought to see a doctor about your masturbating in public
problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got
nothing else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying
about it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys.
This says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob', mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
during the "ATTACK ON AMERICA" which proves you are a waste of human
flesh. Turning you into MacDonald's quarter pounder hamburgers would
result in MacDonald's getting shut down for using too much fat in their
burgers. The Ivory soap folks maybe could use you in their product, but
the stench would be so overwhelming the entire state would have to be
evacuated. Your parents would be evicted from the trailer park if they
ever let you out of the basement you're chained-up in after all your
neighbors died of the toxic gases you release while breathing your
filthy scum ass wind.
So, in closing, go back to pretending you're an older woman, Lardknob.
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
etc
first he thinks he's a teen boy becuz lardknob likes titties then he
gets a gander at lardknob and realizes he was wrong about the teen boy
scene.
But Rev can't accept the way lardknob looks so decides lardknob is a
young woman.
Rev can't get it through their thick skull that if he was wrong on
number one assumption,
that it's possible he's wrong about assumption number two. Therefore...
Rev meow is a moron.
And obsesessed with lardknobs titties.
But of course no one can blame rev for that last bit.
Good thing lardknob has a good sense of humor, for rev meows sake.
Heh! I'm getting popcorn!
--
*=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
*=( For all your UK news needs.
thunder.willow
2010-01-27 08:36:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Jones
Post by thunder.willow
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:04:14 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:47:38 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:15:40 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:37:23 -0800 (PST), Iarnrod
Post by Iarnrod
Post by rincewind
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:55:55 -0800 (PST), rincewind
Post by rincewind
On Jan 18, 10:11 am, just john
Demolition:http://xkcd.com/690/
<
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell
because of <explosives, why were there no
explosives heard at the beginning of the <collapse?
1.  How much of the steel support was taken out by
the impact?
2.  I spent a summer applying foam insulation to
steel supports.
    The impact shook most of it off.  It was not
    designed for such a thing.
--oTTo--
I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't
believe either Tower (or 7) was brought down by
explosives.
It was the Color Of Magic that brought WTC 7 down.
Live it, or live with it.
You should change your 'nym, phony-ass wizard
suck-dick dude.
I'm surprised you got the reference. However, it's sad
that you don't seem to have anything to contribute here.
He bends over and contributes his derriere for us to kick
around. That is something at least!
Tell us all again how cell phones really do work at 30,000
feet altitude.
Proven FACT, Pussy Boy. Besides, most of the calls were GTE
Airphones. Another FACT.
Where is this alleged 'fact' of yours 'proven', Lardknob?
In the documents of GTE, shit-for-brains.
CITE or show us your tiny little weiner, Lardknob.
I told you, shit-for-brains, it s in the GTE documents.
Wow you re stupid.
Post by Iarnrod
GTE Airphones aren't called cell phones. So why were these
calls reported as cell phone calls?
They re not, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they are.
They are not, of course, not in dispute. Your mistakenly calling them
cell phone calls does not magically transform the reality into your
delusion, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
The last I heard you people were saying they were 'Satellite
Phones'.
No one has ever made any such claim so you re lying, you could
not have heard any such thing, shit-for-brains.
Yes, they have.
Nope. You have no cite, therefore you are lying, shit-for-brains.
More delusions from Pussy Boy.
Post by Iarnrod
Can't you people ever get your stories (read: LIES) straight?
Since we don t lie, we need never worry; it s you who is jumping
all over making shit up, shit-for-brains.
All of you live in your world of lies, and don't deny it, Lardknob.
Yet while I am devastating your kooker klaims with proof that you
are the unremitting liar, you are completely incapable of pointing
to even one thing I have even gotten wrong let alone lied about.
Funny, that.
Post by Iarnrod
Like
that many people are going to have satellite phones that cost
as much as your car. You people are so lame.
Why did you make that one up, shit-for-brains?
<<crickets>>
Post by Iarnrod
PS. You are FAMOUS on YouTube, Lardknob!
I am famous EVERYWHERE, shit-for-brains.
For lying about you being an older woman when you are really a
male teeny-bopper transvestite wannabe. You are a disgrace to
your gender.
The real question is, why is Pussy Boy fantasizing about teenage boys.
Post by Iarnrod
http://tinyurl.com/yzemprj
Why do you have your head stuck up my ass in that photo, Lardknob?
More lies from Pussy Boy!
Post by Iarnrod
If flight 93 actually crashed into the ground, where is the
evidence?
There on the ground, shit-for-brains.
<<crickets>>
Post by Iarnrod
"A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles
from the crash scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was
adjacent to the lake. "More debris from the plane was found in
New Baltimore, some 8 miles away from the crash. "State police
and the FBI initially said they didn't want to speculate
whether the debris was from the crash, or if the plane could
have broken up in midair."
Light debris blew a short distance away. Why does this mystify
you, shit-for-brains? Are you like a fuckin parakeet staring
into a mirror?
That must've been some Big Heep Mojo Wind there, LYING Lardknob.
Nope. It was paper and insulation, shit-for-brains. Do you think a
fuckin wing blew eight miles away? BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!
Post by Iarnrod
Additionally, Flight 93's debris field covered anywhere from
three to six miles and, as CNN reported, pieces of the plane
"Authorities also said another debris site had been cordoned
off six to eight miles away from the original crash debris
site."
It was light debris, shit-for-brains, and it was not six to
eight miles away; that was road distance, making several turns,
shit-for- brains. Get a job so you can buy a fuckin clue.
Again, you lie.
Again you re lying about me lying, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
So, Lardknob, flight 93 either crashed into the ground (as
reported) or something happened to that plane that would cause
a debris field as far away as 8 miles from the 'crash' site,
which does not match any of your lying liar "what really
happened" LIES, Lardknob.
All of the evidence matches what I say, shit-for-brains.
No it doesn't, Lardknob.
It does, of course. This is not even remotely in dispute.
Post by Iarnrod
I bet you believe Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were real nice
fellas, Lardknob.
WTF? Are you smoking fuckin crack tonight, Pussy Boy?
Is your crack all used up again, Lardknob?
Thanks for confirming you smoked up all your crack and are now
asking total strangers if they have any for you, shit-for-brains.
Post by Iarnrod
And you play with a Genghis Khan action figure that you take
with you to beddy bye every night when your mommy tucks you in.
Maybe something more powerful than crack.
Imagine away, lying liar Lardknob.
And I am not far off, as per usual, given the depth of your lying
delusions, Pussy Boy.
Post by Iarnrod
Where did you do your research on how an 'older woman acts',
Lardknob? You really do a piss poor job of it. You really
ought to see a doctor about your masturbating in public
problem also.
Sex insults, the last refuge of shit-for-brains kooks who got
nothing else to go on.
When you lie about you being something other than the punk-ass
teeny-bopper boy-toy you are, pointing out the fact you are lying
about it is only insulting to you since you are the one lying
about it.
Again Pussy Boy engages in his fantasies about teenage boy-toys.
This says a lot about Pussy Boy and his over-active perverted mind.
Lardknob The Liar
Lardknob The Liar
Who is Lardknob? Why are you fantasizing about teenage boy-toys, as
you put it?
And why are you lying about 9/11 when you ve been proven wrong?
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
Your 'nym 'Iarnrod' has been retired for many weeks and you are now
'nymed 'Lardknob', mostly for your being a big fat teen-age boy living
in your parents basement hole under your their single-wide trailer
while making up your kooky kook lies about what happened on 9/11/2001
during the "ATTACK ON AMERICA" which proves you are a waste of human
flesh. Turning you into MacDonald's quarter pounder hamburgers would
result in MacDonald's getting shut down for using too much fat in their
burgers. The Ivory soap folks maybe could use you in their product, but
the stench would be so overwhelming the entire state would have to be
evacuated. Your parents would be evicted from the trailer park if they
ever let you out of the basement you're chained-up in after all your
neighbors died of the toxic gases you release while breathing your
filthy scum ass wind.
So, in closing, go back to pretending you're an older woman, Lardknob.
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
LARDKNOB IS A LIAR!
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
Rev meow is a moron
etc
first he thinks he's a teen boy becuz lardknob likes titties then he
gets a gander at lardknob and realizes he was wrong about the teen boy
scene.
But Rev can't accept the way lardknob looks so decides lardknob is a
young woman.
Rev can't get it through their thick skull that if he was wrong on
number one assumption,
that it's possible he's wrong about assumption number two. Therefore...
Rev meow is a moron.
And obsesessed with lardknobs titties.
But of course no one can blame rev for that last bit.
Good thing lardknob has a good sense of humor, for rev meows sake.
Heh! I'm getting popcorn!
--
*=(http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
*=( For all your UK news needs.
I like it hot and salty

george
2010-01-22 00:22:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
It knows that its wrong and is attempting (very unsuccessfully) to
invoke anything to disguise its error ridden claims
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-22 01:11:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by george
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Lardknob is a Liar!
Who is "Lardknob?"
It knows that its wrong and is attempting (very unsuccessfully) to
invoke anything to disguise its error ridden claims
Prove it!
Otto Bahn
2010-01-20 15:06:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
<
<I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
<Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.

Seven might have been, with them not wanting to have to explain
it. I don't really care either way, just as flight 93 might
have been shot down as some reported. It doesn't really matter,
high command was paralyzed -- it is SOP for fighters to trail
hijacked planes. Shooting them down was new territory, and
Bush was reading a story about goats.

Hell, they have ships in the Chesapeake that can shoot down MiGs
hundreds of clics away. I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles. The PENTAGON!!! Puh-lease. If Washington
D.C. didn't have SA capabilities, nowhere did.

They didn't shoot because the order never came.

--oTTo--
Iarnrod
2010-01-20 15:30:21 UTC
Permalink
 I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles.  
It did not then and does not today. You ought to stop getting your
impressions about real life from Hollywood.
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
They didn't because there is no such thing.

Planes fly over the Pentagon ever friggin' day from the runway at
National.
rincewind
2010-01-20 22:59:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
Post by Otto Bahn
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
<
<I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
<Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
Seven might have been, with them not wanting to have to explain
it.
Again, I have to ask if explosives brought down any of the buildings,
why weren't they heard by half of lower Manhattan? AND there's
testimony from a firefighter at the scene that they were concerned
about WTC7 because it began to tilt and bulge about three hours before
it collapsed. That must have been one helluva slow motion controlled
demo that didn't have any sounds of demolition charges heard.
Post by Otto Bahn
 I don't really care either way, just as flight 93 might
have been shot down as some reported.  It doesn't really matter,
high command was paralyzed -- it is SOP for fighters to trail
hijacked planes.  Shooting them down was new territory, and
Bush was reading a story about goats.
If 93 had been shot down, it would have come down in a normal crash
pattern. The fact that it went straight into the ground shows that it
was piloted there.
Post by Otto Bahn
Hell, they have ships in the Chesapeake that can shoot down MiGs
hundreds of clics away.  I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles.  The PENTAGON!!! Puh-lease.  If Washington
D.C. didn't have SA capabilities, nowhere did.
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Otto Bahn
2010-01-21 14:51:46 UTC
Permalink
"rincewind" <***@hotmail.com> wrote i

<If 93 had been shot down, it would have come down in a normal crash
<pattern.

Yes, all shot down planes fall to earth in the exact same crash pattern.
I'm not saying 93 was shot down, just that it could have been.

They didn't try to cover up the Vincennes either. Oh, wait...they not
only did that, but gave the Vincennes a combat ribbon for shooting down
a civilian Airbus. Excuse me for being skeptical about official reports.

--oTTo--
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 16:36:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
<If 93 had been shot down, it would have come down in a normal crash
<pattern.
Yes, all shot down planes fall to earth in the exact same crash pattern.
I'm not saying 93 was shot down, just that it could have been.
They didn't try to cover up the Vincennes either.  Oh, wait...they not
only did that, but gave the Vincennes a combat ribbon for shooting down
a civilian Airbus.  Excuse me for being skeptical about official reports.
People on the ground near Shanksville watched the plane come down. It
was not shot down.
Matthew L. Martin
2010-01-21 00:05:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
Post by Otto Bahn
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
<
<I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
<Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
Seven might have been, with them not wanting to have to explain
it. I don't really care either way, just as flight 93 might
have been shot down as some reported. It doesn't really matter,
high command was paralyzed -- it is SOP for fighters to trail
hijacked planes. Shooting them down was new territory, and
Bush was reading a story about goats.
Hell, they have ships in the Chesapeake that can shoot down MiGs
hundreds of clics away. I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles. The PENTAGON!!! Puh-lease. If Washington
D.C. didn't have SA capabilities, nowhere did.
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
That would be a reasonable expanation if this was the USSR. Commanders in
the US military have the latitude to make that decision and face a Court
Martial if they were out of line. It appears that none were willing to take
the risk.

Matthew (I think a Coast Guard Commander would have pulled the trigger)
--
"All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of
people". Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936):
Otto Bahn
2010-01-21 14:43:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matthew L. Martin
Post by Otto Bahn
Post by Otto Bahn
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
<
<I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
<Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
Seven might have been, with them not wanting to have to explain
it. I don't really care either way, just as flight 93 might
have been shot down as some reported. It doesn't really matter,
high command was paralyzed -- it is SOP for fighters to trail
hijacked planes. Shooting them down was new territory, and
Bush was reading a story about goats.
Hell, they have ships in the Chesapeake that can shoot down MiGs
hundreds of clics away. I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles. The PENTAGON!!! Puh-lease. If Washington
D.C. didn't have SA capabilities, nowhere did.
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
That would be a reasonable expanation if this was the USSR.
I remember reading that an accidental nuclear launch would
more likely happen in the US than USSR.
Post by Matthew L. Martin
Commanders in
the US military have the latitude to make that decision and face a Court
Martial if they were out of line. It appears that none were willing to take
the risk.
Well, that's in addition to the top-down order than never came.

--oTTo--
Father Haskell
2010-01-21 22:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
Post by Matthew L. Martin
Post by Otto Bahn
Post by Otto Bahn
<How do you "fake" a plane crash? If the Tower fell because of
<explosives, why were there no explosives heard at the beginning of the
<collapse?
1. How much of the steel support was taken out by the impact?
2. I spent a summer applying foam insulation to steel supports.
The impact shook most of it off. It was not designed for
such a thing.
<
<I think you're agreeing with me, I certainly don't believe either
<Tower (or 7) was brought down by explosives.
Seven might have been, with them not wanting to have to explain
it.  I don't really care either way, just as flight 93 might
have been shot down as some reported.  It doesn't really matter,
high command was paralyzed -- it is SOP for fighters to trail
hijacked planes.  Shooting them down was new territory, and
Bush was reading a story about goats.
Hell, they have ships in the Chesapeake that can shoot down MiGs
hundreds of clics away.  I seriously doubt the Pentagon had no
surface to air missiles.  The PENTAGON!!! Puh-lease.  If Washington
D.C. didn't have SA capabilities, nowhere did.
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
That would be a reasonable expanation if this was the USSR.
I remember reading that an accidental nuclear launch would
more likely happen in the US than USSR.
That depended on who drank more, Brezhnev or Nixon.
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 01:16:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Otto Bahn
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Wrong.

They didn't shoot because all the hijacked planes had crashed before
any fighters got close to them.
Rev. 11D Meow!
2010-01-21 02:56:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Otto Bahn
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Wrong.
They didn't shoot because all the hijacked planes had crashed before
any fighters got close to them.
Which fully explains how flight 93 debris was smeared over 8 miles of
PA.

Flight 93 was shot down by the USofA military, no doubt about it.
Iarnrod
2010-01-21 03:48:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Otto Bahn
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Wrong.
They didn't shoot because all the hijacked planes had crashed before
any fighters got close to them.
Which fully explains how flight 93 debris was smeared over 8 miles of
PA.
It wasn't, shit-for-brains.
Post by Rev. 11D Meow!
Flight 93 was shot down by the USofA military, no doubt about it.
Nope. Proven fact: The crash was eyewitnessed. Sorry, shit-for-brains.

<sips Victory Iced Tea>
Rev. Charlie Freemanson
2010-01-21 03:44:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Otto Bahn
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Wrong.
They didn't shoot because all the hijacked planes had crashed before any
fighters got close to them.

Iarnrod
2010-01-21 03:49:49 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 20, 8:44 pm, "Rev. Charlie Freemanson"
Post by Rev. Charlie Freemanson
Post by Iarnrod
Post by Otto Bahn
They didn't shoot because the order never came.
Wrong.
They didn't shoot because all the hijacked planes had crashed before any
fighters got close to them.
http://youtu.be/pnBCvZeULdA
Wow, you douchebags are REALLY pwned by me! What luzers!!! THANKS!
Mark
2010-01-19 16:49:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by rincewind
How do you "fake" a plane crash?
"Im going to buy a plane"...I'm training to be a pilot (2007-to date, no
license)...I'm going to buy an estate and put in a landing strip....

The more I learn about building airplanes, the less I want to buy
something sealed in fiberglass, or covered in sheet metal 30 yrs. ago.
Mark, one who wired and plumbed his own house.

And, a lot of kit planes end up under dusty tarps unfinished too.
It's a jet...the price is about 39k. I'm ready to order.

http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/pages_en/Farnborough2008_en.htm
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
William Hung
2010-01-19 21:56:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by rincewind
How do you "fake" a plane crash?
"Im going to buy a plane"...I'm training to be a pilot (2007-to date, no
license)...I'm going to buy an estate and put in a landing strip....
The more I learn about building airplanes, the less I want to buy
something sealed in fiberglass, or covered in sheet metal 30 yrs. ago.
Mark, one who wired and plumbed his own house.
And, a lot of kit planes end up under dusty tarps unfinished too.
It's a jet...the price is about 39k. I'm ready to order.
http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/pages_en/Farnborough2008_en.htm
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My websitehttp://www.hosanna1.com/
0000
Edward A. Falk
2010-01-19 22:27:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
And, a lot of kit planes end up under dusty tarps unfinished too.
It's a jet...the price is about 39k. I'm ready to order.
http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/pages_en/Farnborough2008_en.htm
A jet? Then that big prop in the back must be one helluva ram air
turbine.
--
-Ed Falk, ***@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
Mark
2010-01-20 00:34:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward A. Falk
Post by Mark
And, a lot of kit planes end up under dusty tarps unfinished too.
It's a jet...the price is about 39k. I'm ready to order.
http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/pages_en/Farnborough2008_en.htm
A jet? Then that big prop in the back must be one helluva ram air
turbine.
Yes it is.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
rincewind
2010-01-20 22:59:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark
Post by rincewind
How do you "fake" a plane crash?
"Im going to buy a plane"...I'm training to be a pilot (2007-to date, no
license)...I'm going to buy an estate and put in a landing strip....
Good luck guy.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...