Discussion:
Facebook Bans InfoWars, but Keeps Antifa, Louis Farrakhan
Add Reply
BeamMeUpScotty
2018-08-08 15:27:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....


It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
--
That's Karma
BeamMeUpScotty
2018-08-08 15:33:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....


It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!


BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.

Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
--
That's Karma
Snit
2018-08-08 16:00:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


BeamMeUpScotty
2018-08-08 16:27:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
But the Baker was sued and fined and the laws are there....

And then again the FACEBOOK is counting on other people for content....
are you suggesting that they can change their terms of use and NOT be
sued for deleting stuff that was already published by them?

Can a Bakery that allows you to bake your own cake refuse you service
because you wish to make your cake for your gay wedding? That's what
FACEBOOK is doing.

I'm all for Companies doing what they want, but you can't pick and
choose, if a Bakery has to allow people with all different religious
views in then why wouldn't FACEBOOK? A veiled threat of a terms of
service that will delete them for "hate speech" is unconstitutional
because only the courts can dictate what "hate speech" is. We know this
because it isn't defined in the law, it's up to the justice system to
determine if something is hate speech and a corporation can't do that on
it's own.
--
That's Karma
Snit
2018-08-08 17:00:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
But the Baker was sued and fined and the laws are there....
Actually some of the bakers WON. To be fair, as wrong as the bakers
were, those in places where homosexuality is not a protected class had a
case.

And made a good case as to why sexuality SHOULD be a protected class.
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
And then again the FACEBOOK is counting on other people for content....
are you suggesting that they can change their terms of use and NOT be
sued for deleting stuff that was already published by them?
Do not follow you there. I am saying they have a right to boot people
for not following terms of service.
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Can a Bakery that allows you to bake your own cake refuse you service
because you wish to make your cake for your gay wedding? That's what
FACEBOOK is doing.
How so?
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
I'm all for Companies doing what they want, but you can't pick and
choose, if a Bakery has to allow people with all different religious
views in then why wouldn't FACEBOOK? A veiled threat of a terms of
service that will delete them for "hate speech" is unconstitutional
because only the courts can dictate what "hate speech" is. We know this
because it isn't defined in the law, it's up to the justice system to
determine if something is hate speech and a corporation can't do that on
it's own.
You do not have a right to put up a "Whites Only" sign or the like. And
others are not required to back bigotry and hatred. Nor even deep
misinformation and ignorance.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

http://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
Scout
2018-08-09 02:00:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a company
decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing political view
violate?
Snit
2018-08-09 02:19:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing political
view violate?
Can you explain how your question relates to my comment?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

http://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
Scout
2018-08-09 03:21:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing political
view violate?
Can you explain how your question relates to my comment?
Well, in one case, it's trying to force a company to provide a custom
service they do not offer.

In the other, it's the standard use of a service as provided for everyone
else, except they decide that you're political views are "hate speech".
Perhaps because they hate seeing people express a political view other than
their own.

But that doesn't make that view hate speech.

So......were in the terms of service does it say that your comments have to
conform to the political views of Facebook?
Snit
2018-08-09 15:28:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing
political view violate?
Can you explain how your question relates to my comment?
Well, in one case, it's trying to force a company to provide a custom
service they do not offer.
Because a cake baker never bakes cakes?
Post by Scout
In the other, it's the standard use of a service as provided for
everyone else, except they decide that you're political views are "hate
speech". Perhaps because they hate seeing people express a political
view other than their own.
Which views?
Post by Scout
But that doesn't make that view hate speech.
So......were in the terms of service does it say that your comments have
to conform to the political views of Facebook?
Where did Apple or anyone else say someone was banned for political views?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

http://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
Scout
2018-08-09 22:05:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
BOOK BURNING is a NATURAL extension of the Liberal LEFT. 21st century
BOOK BURNING looks a lot like it did in NAZI GERMANY.
Change the words in Tom Sawyer and tear out and bleachbit the pages of
FACEBOOK. It's all the same. It's against the 1st amendment as are all
Liberals in the end.
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing political
view violate?
Can you explain how your question relates to my comment?
Well, in one case, it's trying to force a company to provide a custom
service they do not offer.
Because a cake baker never bakes cakes?
Nope, they bake the cakes they have in their catalog.

If it's not in their catalog then you can try to negotiate with them to bake
it, but they can refuse to accept any specific custom cake you might want
them to bake.
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
In the other, it's the standard use of a service as provided for everyone
else, except they decide that you're political views are "hate speech".
Perhaps because they hate seeing people express a political view other
than their own.
Which views?
Any
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
But that doesn't make that view hate speech.
So......were in the terms of service does it say that your comments have
to conform to the political views of Facebook?
Where did Apple or anyone else say someone was banned for political views?
Say it, or did it?

Because what they say and what they do can be different things.

I suppose next you're going to tell us that unless a murder confesses to the
crime, then it didn't really occur.
Snit
2018-08-09 22:50:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On 8/9/18 3:05 PM, Scout wrote:
...
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
And if a baker can decide to not bake a cake for gays, why can't a
company decide to not serve someone for breaking terms of service?
Tell me, exactly what term of service does having an opposing
political view violate?
Can you explain how your question relates to my comment?
Well, in one case, it's trying to force a company to provide a custom
service they do not offer.
Because a cake baker never bakes cakes?
Nope, they bake the cakes they have in their catalog.
And what was asked to be made instead? Also, given how there are
multiple bigoted baker cases, which one are you referring to?
Post by Scout
If it's not in their catalog then you can try to negotiate with them to
bake it, but they can refuse to accept any specific custom cake you
might want them to bake.
In at least one of the cases no design was even discussed... it was
merely because the couple were the same sex. Clear bigotry. If someone
wants a cake with, say, a swastika on it, or some other symbol tied to
harm and hatred, then of course it would be fine to not make that.
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
In the other, it's the standard use of a service as provided for
everyone else, except they decide that you're political views are
"hate speech". Perhaps because they hate seeing people express a
political view other than their own.
Which views?
Any
But none you can specifically name. OK.
Post by Scout
Post by Snit
Post by Scout
But that doesn't make that view hate speech.
So......were in the terms of service does it say that your comments
have to conform to the political views of Facebook?
Where did Apple or anyone else say someone was banned for political views?
Say it, or did it?
Because what they say and what they do can be different things.
I suppose next you're going to tell us that unless a murder confesses to
the crime, then it didn't really occur.
Sigh... you do like to play games. The question is if you have ANY
evidence that they banned, say, Alex Jones for views not tied to
violence or open bigotry?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

http://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
Avenging Angel
2018-08-11 12:51:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Snit
Where did Apple or anyone else say someone was banned for political views?
It doesn't matter. We feel like tney did and we are outraged. We need to
co,,it violence against them. Antifa style.

Leper
2018-08-09 01:45:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
Facebook banned InfoWars from its platform, yet many leftist pages
with far worse content still remain.
Facebook’s explanation for the InfoWars ban claims that the site
posts material which “glorifies violence,” and also uses
“dehumanizing language.”
Q: What is worse than a angry black-man?
A: A angry white-man, Alex Jones!
A great job by Facebook. Trump is next.
NAZI/FASCIST RUN FACEBOOK is burning the PAGES of their BOOK that they
don't agree with....
It looks like what happened in Germany and it's happening in the halls
and pages of FACEBOOK!
With the Jew, Zuckerberg doing the burning. Where is the Jewish ACLU on
this? Why are they not screaming there lungs out in court? Is this just
more Jew Superiority?
--
Machiavelli wrote:It is necessary for the state to deal in lies and half
truths,
because people are made up of lies and half truths. Even Princes.' And
certainly, by definition all Ambassadors and politicians
Loading...