On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:12:38 -0600, KWills Shill #3
Post by KWills Shill #3Post by TopazOn Sun, 19 Nov 2017 20:11:37 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai ChangThe only reason why Middle-East concerns us is because of fo
ssil fuel.
That is completely wrong and all the leaders in the Middle East were
more than happy to sell oil to the USA.
The only reason the Middle East concerns you is because the USA is
ruled by Jews.
And your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for this is..?
WHEN A FOREIGN government -- a government which represents the
interests of another people -- can covertly control our government,
the results will be fatal for some of our citizens and tragic for us
all. The foreign government will use the resources of its captive
state to further the interests of the foreign people. It will not
care if it spends half or all of the treasure of its captive people
to advance its aims. The foreign government will not care if the
sons
of the captive nation are slaughtered by the
thousands, as long as the interests of the foreign people are served.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8331 ]
That foreign government is Israel. The captive nation is the United
States of America. And here to talk about the issues surrounding
Jewish Zionist power, its trajectory in the near term, and its
implications for the long-term future is the Director of the
Institute for Historical Review, http://www.ihr.org, Mr. Mark Weber.
When we left our discussion last week, we were talking about the
Zionist attempt to hypocritically use the issue of Iran's nuclear
program as a pretext for war. Let's rejoin that discussion now.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8400 ]
WEBER: The larger problem really is this: The United States is
saying that Iran cannot develop even a peaceful nuclear program, but
the United States sanctions and even supports the development of
nuclear weapons programs in Iran's neighbors Israel, Pakistan, and
India. From the Iranian point of view, it would be foolish not to
have a nuclear program. On one side of Iran is Afghanistan, which is
occupied by the United States -- a nuclear power. Another of Iran's
neighbors is Pakistan, which has developed nuclear weapons. On the
other side of Iran is Iraq, which is occupied by the United States,
which, again, has nuclear weapons. And of course, Iran's biggest
adversary is Israel, which has a nuclear arsenal that has been
estimated at two hundred weapons.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7995 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8228 ]
KAS: So do you believe that Iran is indeed aiming at developing
nuclear weapons?
WEBER: My guess is no better than anyone else's; I don't have any
special insight. All Iran is asking for is the right to develop a
peaceful nuclear energy program, which is their right under
international law and under the treaties that they've signed.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8452 ]
KAS: It seemed very hypocritical to me to see George Bush condemning
Iran for its nuclear development efforts just after returning from
what I would describe as a love-fest with India and Pakistan, both
nuclear powers in the region.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7825 ]
WEBER: I would agree. After India and Pakistan first detonated
nuclear weapons, the United States imposed an embargo and sanctions
on those two countries for a while. That's all been forgotten now,
which is another reason why leaders around the world think that the
lesson to be drawn from the United States' actions is that once you
actually get the weapons, the United States will back down and shut
up. That's the pattern that our government has shown over the years.
Once a country actually has nuclear weapons, the United States seems
to accept it, even in countries it wishes it didn't have such
weapons, such as Pakistan and China.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7543 ]
KAS: What are our chances for averting a wider war in the Middle East?
WEBER: When a patient has an illness, it's important that the doctor
correctly diagnose the problem. In our society it's important that
as many Americans as possible correctly diagnose the problem that we
have. The root cause of these wars is the Jewish and Zionist grip on
our policy.
Recently a major new study was released by an important think tank
that underscored once again the fact that American Middle East
policy is firmly in the grip of what they call the Israel lobby, but
which would more accurately be called the Jewish-Zionist lobby.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8362 ]
As long as our foreign policy and our political life are in this
Jewish-Zionist grip, wars and conflict of this sort will continue,
because it's in the interests of this lobby -- and in the interests
of Israel -- to foment such conflicts in that part of the world.
This is against the interests of not only our people, but of the
entire rest of the world, except for Israel. That's why around the
world there was universal opposition to the war against Iraq. Some
governments went along with it, but the only country where the
population supported the war was Israel, and a war against Iran
would have no popular support except in Israel.
As long as this Jewish-Zionist grip on our foreign policy remains,
we're not going to avoid these kinds of wars and conflicts. So
addressing that problem and increasing public awareness about it is
absolutely a task of the first order. Until that's done, we're just
going to continue to have these tremendous problems.
KAS: Can you tell us the name of the think tank that issued the
report on Jewish power?
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8460 ]
WEBER: The John F. Kennedy School of Government. The report was
issued by two professors, one at the University of Chicago and one
at Harvard University. A summary of it appears in the London Review
of Books, and we'll have it posted on our Web site. It's entitled
The Israel Lobby, and it starts out by saying:
"For the past several decades and especially since the Six-Day War
in 1967, the centerpiece of U.S. Middle Eastern policy has been its
relationship with Israel." It goes on to say, "
the thrust of U.S.
policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics,
and especially the activities of the 'Israel lobby.' Other special
interest groups have managed to skew U.S. foreign policy, but no
lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national
interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans
that U.S. interests and those of the other country -- in this case,
Israel -- are essentially identical."
This paper underscores and emphasizes points that we've made over
and over again, and that the world understands. A summary of the
report reads as follows:
"The centerpiece of U.S. policy is the intimate relationship with
Israel. Though often justified as reflecting shared strategic
interests or compelling moral imperatives, the U.S. commitment to
Israel is due primarily to the activities of the Israel lobby. This
paper describes the various activities that pro-Israel groups have
undertaken in order to shift U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel
direction."
A summary of this very enlightening report also appears in the
latest issue of the London Review of Books. Now the sad fact and the
sad reality is that our political leaders know this, of course, but
it's precisely because of the power of this Israel lobby that they
just do not speak out. This can't be emphasized enough. Right after
the invasion of Iraq Senator Hollings of South Carolina stated
publicly and repeatedly that everyone in Washington in any position
to know what's going on understands that the Iraq war was carried
out first and foremost to secure Israeli interests, but Congress is
too cowardly and too corrupt to publicly acknowledge the fact
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8495 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8496 ]
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com radioaryan.com
