Discussion:
US #1 in the World for School Shootings by a HYUGE Margin - MAGA!
Add Reply
#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-05-23 17:28:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
There have been at least 288 school shootings in the United
States since January 1, 2009.
That's 57 times as many shootings as the other six G7 countries
combined.
One schoolgirl at Santa Fe High School said the shooting wasn't a
surprise to her because she believed such a thing could happen at
any moment.
Sadly she was right.
Sadly Democrats are attacking the RIGHTS of the people that didn't
do it
Rights do not expand to be infinite and without regard to the
consequences.
There is no right to massacre the innocents.
RIGHTS extend until they violate another person's RIGHTS

The government can't limit RIGHTS because they feel like it.

Because when the Government creates a law that interferes with RIGHTS
they are no longer RIGHTS. It can't be both a delegated power to the
United States and a RIGHT of the person. Once the Government is
deciding for the person what they can or can't do then the RIGHT no
longer exists.

While you can have a RIGHT to own a muzzle loading RIFLE that is NOT the
same as the RIGHT to keep and bear arms... the RIGHT to keep and bear
arms has been "infringed" or limited so now the RIGHT would be a RIGHT
to a muzzle loader NOT a RIGHT to keep and bear arms.

The problem is the United States has no delegated power to infringe on
the RIGHT to keep and bear arms so the RIGHT of the people to keep and
bear arms still exists. That can't be limited unless there is some way
that owning and bearing arms is a violation of the RIGHTS of others.

Where is the POWER DELEGATED to infringe on MY RIGHT to keep and bear
arms? Prove that I am harming you by owning or carrying arms... SO far I
have not in any way infringed on any of your RIGHTS and should U
threaten you with any arms or do harm you or use them to kidnap you then
you can suggest that I am violating your RIGHTS but until then you have
no evidence that MY keeping and bearing arms is in any way infringing on
your RIGHTS. That means the Government has no power to stop me from
exercising MY RIGHTS.

Being as it is delegated as a RIGHT of the people, it also denies the
States the power to infringe on that RIGHT.

You could propose a new amendment that would change that. That is the
peaceful way to get change or you could do what Democrats do and start a
civil war to get what you want.
--
That's Karma
#BeamMeUpScotty
2018-05-23 17:31:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
There have been at least 288 school shootings in the United
States since January 1, 2009.
That's 57 times as many shootings as the other six G7 countries
combined.
One schoolgirl at Santa Fe High School said the shooting wasn't a
surprise to her because she believed such a thing could happen at
any moment.
Sadly she was right.
Sadly Democrats are attacking the RIGHTS of the people that didn't
do it
Rights do not expand to be infinite and without regard to the
consequences.
There is no right to massacre the innocents.
RIGHTS extend until they violate another person's RIGHTS

The government can't limit RIGHTS because they feel like it.

Because when the Government creates a law that interferes with RIGHTS
they are no longer RIGHTS. It can't be both a delegated power to the
United States and a RIGHT of the person. Once the Government is
deciding for the person what they can or can't do then the RIGHT no
longer exists.

While you can have a RIGHT to own a muzzle loading RIFLE that is NOT the
same as the RIGHT to keep and bear arms... the RIGHT to keep and bear
arms has been "infringed" or limited so now the RIGHT would be a RIGHT
to a muzzle loader NOT a RIGHT to keep and bear arms.

The problem is the United States has no delegated power to infringe on
the RIGHT to keep and bear arms so the RIGHT of the people to keep and
bear arms still exists. That can't be limited unless there is some way
that owning and bearing arms is a violation of the RIGHTS of others.

Where is the POWER DELEGATED to infringe on MY RIGHT to keep and bear
arms? Prove that I am harming you by owning or carrying arms... SO far I
have not in any way infringed on any of your RIGHTS and should U
threaten you with any arms or do harm you or use them to kidnap you then
you can suggest that I am violating your RIGHTS but until then you have
no evidence that MY keeping and bearing arms is in any way infringing on
your RIGHTS. That means the Government has no power to stop me from
exercising MY RIGHTS.

Being as it is delegated as a RIGHT of the people, it also denies the
States the power to infringe on that RIGHT.

You could propose a new amendment that would change that. That is the
peaceful way to get change or you could do what Democrats do and start a
civil war to get what you want.

What Liberals and Democrats seem to be is Federal Supremacists that
believe the Federal Government is superior to any limits placed on it in
the Constitution
--
That's Karma
Loading...