Discussion:
What Really Struck the Twin Towers?
Add Reply
Stuart Wright
2018-06-22 14:17:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.

https://jamesperloff.com/2018/06/22/what-struck-the-twin-towers-revising-my-outlook/
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 15:20:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
The towers were hit by two jet liners. Everything this guy supposes is merely conjunction on his part based on ignorance.

Show me evidence that the Air Force has holographic technology that works, in the open air, and can be not only projected, but moved through the air like a jet liner.

Missiles are very fast, that’s why you can fire one from a jet fighter. In my opinion (and you are free to provide evidence that shows otherwise) a missile could not fly SLOWLY enough to be covered up as a jet liner.

As far as the girders are concerned, the jet liners went through the wall the way an egg goes through an egg slicer! (Although, probably not as neatly.)

Four jet liners were hijacked by terrorists. Two were driven into the Towers, one hit the Pentagon and one was crashed when the passengers, realizing something was going on, tried to take the plane back. No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-22 15:43:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The towers were hit by two jet liners. Everything this guy supposes is merely conjunction on his part based on ignorance.
....
Four jet liners were hijacked by terrorists. Two were driven into the Towers, one hit the Pentagon and one was crashed when the passengers, realizing something was going on, tried to take the plane back. No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.
Are there civilians nearby actually watched and witnessed what crashed
into the 2 buildings? :)

If there was none, then we could only believe in the stories broadcasted
by the news agencies and the US government!

We all should believe so to avoid being probed by or maybe assassinated
by US government. :)

BTW, if you were a witness, stay low and safe! Don't blow whistles until
.... well... I don't know ... that day. haha....
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 16:20:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Are there civilians nearby actually watched and witnessed what crashed
into the 2 buildings? :)

If there was none, then we could only believe in the stories broadcasted
by the news agencies and the US government!

We all should believe so to avoid being probed by or maybe assassinated
by US government. :)

BTW, if you were a witness, stay low and safe! Don't blow whistles until
.... well... I don't know ... that day. haha....
******
It was the World Trade Center in New York City, of course people were out on the Plaza. Also, after the first building was hit, there were lots of people outside watching the fire! (People are funny that way.)
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-22 16:36:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
******
It was the World Trade Center in New York City, of course people were out on the Plaza. Also, after the first building was hit, there were lots of people outside watching the fire! (People are funny that way.)
Then they could have only seen the 2nd plane crash? Nobody really knew
what caused the *FIRST* explosion?

And did the *BLACK* smoke from the first "crash" blocked the 2nd "crash"? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 20:32:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
It was the World Trade Center in New York City, of course people were out on the Plaza. Also, after the first building was hit, there were lots of people outside watching the fire! (People are funny that way.)
Then they could have only seen the 2nd plane crash? Nobody really knew
what caused the *FIRST* explosion?
******

You don’t like to pay attention, do you? People were in the Plaza when the first plane hit.

*****
And did the *BLACK* smoke from the first "crash" blocked the 2nd "crash"? :)
*****
No. The smoke was not moving toward the other Tower when the second plane hit.

Stop reaching conclusions that are not based on facts.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-23 15:02:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
You don’t like to pay attention, do you? People were in the Plaza when the first plane hit.
....
No. The smoke was not moving toward the other Tower when the second plane hit.
Stop reaching conclusions that are not based on facts.
This is not drawing conclusion, but trying to deduce what happened that day.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-23 22:27:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No. The smoke was not moving toward the other Tower when the second plane hit.
Stop reaching conclusions that are not based on facts.
This is not drawing conclusion, but trying to deduce what happened that day.
- show quoted text -
Then stop trying to make deductions that have no basis in fact.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-24 13:56:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Then stop trying to make deductions that have no basis in fact.
True truth can always stand a heated debate, a hearing if not a court
trial! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-24 14:22:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Then stop trying to make deductions that have no basis in fact.
True truth can always stand a heated debate, a hearing if not a court
trial! :)
- show quoted text -
Suspicions that are spun out of whole cloth and have no basis in fact are not true. As such, throwing them into the debate only clouds the issues.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-24 14:33:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Suspicions that are spun out of whole cloth and have no basis in fact are not true. As such, throwing them into the debate only clouds the issues.
Stories are always interesting, no matter how absurd they are! Most
conspiracy theories are interesting ideas and stories.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-24 17:14:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Suspicions that are spun out of whole cloth and have no basis in fact are not true. As such, throwing them into the debate only clouds the issues.
Stories are always interesting, no matter how absurd they are! Most
conspiracy theories are interesting ideas and stories.
******
“Stories” are always interesting. But they should be clearly labeled “stories,” not alternative theories.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-24 17:31:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Stories are always interesting, no matter how absurd they are! Most
conspiracy theories are interesting ideas and stories.
******
“Stories” are always interesting. But they should be clearly labeled “stories,” not alternative theories.
Evil is everywhere. You just cannot ask for that kind of warranty and
guarantee! Sometimes, even those heavily weaponized governments are evil!

Well... good luck! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-24 20:13:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Evil is everywhere. You just cannot ask for that kind of warranty and
guarantee! Sometimes, even those heavily weaponized governments are evil!
****
And that has nothing to do with what brought down the Towers or slammed into the Pentagon and that field.

That is the subject. There is no legitimate evidence that anything other than four hijacked jet liners were involved in 9/11.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 11:36:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
And that has nothing to do with what brought down the Towers or slammed into the Pentagon and that field.
That is the subject. There is no legitimate evidence that anything other than four hijacked jet liners were involved in 9/11.
US Government has declared the official explanation for 9/11. It's time
for the rest of the crowd to explain it differently. Their strange
explanations could be used to film some interesting movies! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 12:14:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
US Government has declared the official explanation for 9/11. It's time
for the rest of the crowd to explain it differently. Their strange
explanations could be used to film some interesting movies! :)
- show quoted text -
Possibly, as long as they don’t try to tell us that they’re the truth!
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 13:43:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
US Government has declared the official explanation for 9/11. It's time
for the rest of the crowd to explain it differently. Their strange
explanations could be used to film some interesting movies! :)
- show quoted text -
Possibly, as long as they don’t try to tell us that they’re the truth!
Do you hate movies and fairy tales? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 14:27:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Do you hate movies and fairy tales? :)
- show quoted text -
No, I love movies and fairy tales. I just don’t expect them to be passed off as the truth.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 15:08:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Do you hate movies and fairy tales? :)
- show quoted text -
No, I love movies and fairy tales. I just don’t expect them to be passed off as the truth.
Truth can only be confirmed by time! ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 16:12:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Truth can only be confirmed by time! ;)
- show quoted text -
Truth is confirmed by evidence. All the available evidence indicates that plane hit the Towers and debris from the falling Tower damaged WTC7 which led to its collapse.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 16:33:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Truth can only be confirmed by time! ;)
Truth is confirmed by evidence. All the available evidence indicates that plane hit the Towers and debris from the falling Tower damaged WTC7 which led to its collapse.
So what happened to the tails of those two planes after hitting the
Towers? How could they disappear so completely? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 17:09:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
So what happened to the tails of those two planes after hitting the
Towers? How could they disappear so completely? :)
*****
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
joeturn
2018-06-26 19:20:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
So what happened to the tails of those two planes after hitting the
Towers? How could they disappear so completely? :)
*****
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 20:29:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
joeturn
2018-06-27 03:16:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-27 07:06:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
- show quoted text -
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
*****
And yet, I see no reason to believe you.
Government Shill #2
2018-06-27 08:12:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
- show quoted text -
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
*****
And yet, I see no reason to believe you.
You're starting to sound like an atheist. :-)

Shill #2
--
This message is smiley captioned for the humour impaired.
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-27 09:52:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2018-06-27 10:12:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
joeturn
2018-06-27 10:21:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=reQZT9Hzvt8
joeturn
2018-06-27 10:59:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=reQZT9Hzvt8
I showed them this at letsrollemforums and the shields there said it was faked footage,But it was real you couls big screen it and control it with your cursor moving the cruise missile back and forth in front of its plume.
That feature is not doable anymore,but you can see someone cropped a red box around it to show you it in flight.That was the third missile strike. two more had already made an impact and the backlash were just starting,before the one inside the red box ever got there.

https://www.metabunk.org/fake-9-11-footage-of-cruise-missile-hitting-pentagon.t2825/
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-27 11:16:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
*****
No, a five year old would believe Mr. Reynolds. A very gullible five year old.
BDK
2018-06-27 14:06:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
*****
No, a five year old would believe Mr. Reynolds. A very gullible five year old.
I'm sitting out this round of "Stupid Joe".
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
joeturn
2018-06-27 16:16:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by joeturn
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
*****
No, a five year old would believe Mr. Reynolds. A very gullible five year old.
I'm sitting out this round of "Stupid Joe".
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Just sit in the truck, I got this BDK
d***@gmail.com
2018-06-28 01:06:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/

<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/

<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>

https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/

<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html

<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
joeturn
2018-06-28 08:12:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/
<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
Your full of more shit than a Christmas turkey.Their were NO PLANES it was a government controlled demolition.Snopes is edited by one of Obamas cronies to tell a lie.to cover up the real truth.All those other sites are feeding you what the Government said happened,which is a lie.Your popular machanics created another falsehood to make the sheeple believe their lies.The old bend-a-beam with kerosene hoax.
joeturn
2018-06-28 08:32:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/
<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
Your full of more shit than a Christmas turkey.Their were NO PLANES it was a government controlled demolition.Snopes is edited by one of Obama's cronies to tell a lie.to cover up the real truth.All those other sites are feeding you what the Government said happened,which is a lie.Your popular mechanics created another falsehood to make the sheeple believe their lies.The old bend-a-beam with kerosene hoax.
The trouble convincing people that there was such a volumingss bend at the same time is time,is outrageous. Here's you snopes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Snopes/comments/471l6s/whats_with_this_byline_for_kim_lacapria/

Here is why the WTC towers were pulled.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_corrosion.html

Did you see the traces of those three missiles hitting the Pentagon yet?
joeturn
2018-06-28 08:44:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/
<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
Your full of more shit than a Christmas turkey.Their were NO PLANES it was a government controlled demolition.Snopes is edited by one of Obama's cronies to tell a lie.to cover up the real truth.All those other sites are feeding you what the Government said happened,which is a lie.Your popular mechanics created another falsehood to make the sheeple believe their lies.The old bend-a-beam with kerosene hoax.
The trouble convincing people that there was such a volumingss bend at the same time is time,is outrageous. Here's you snopes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Snopes/comments/471l6s/whats_with_this_byline_for_kim_lacapria/
Here is why the WTC towers were pulled.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_corrosion.html
Did you see the traces of those three missiles hitting the Pentagon yet?
I had to rewrite this sentence,my pc got a hickup.

The trouble convincing people that there was such a volume of kerosene to cause all the beams in the towers to bend at the same time is time,is outrageous.
joeturn
2018-06-28 09:01:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/
<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
Your full of more shit than a Christmas turkey.Their were NO PLANES it was a government controlled demolition.Snopes is edited by one of Obama's cronies to tell a lie.to cover up the real truth.All those other sites are feeding you what the Government said happened,which is a lie.Your popular mechanics created another falsehood to make the sheeple believe their lies.The old bend-a-beam with kerosene hoax.
The trouble convincing people that there was such a volumingss bend at the same time is time,is outrageous. Here's you snopes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Snopes/comments/471l6s/whats_with_this_byline_for_kim_lacapria/
Here is why the WTC towers were pulled.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_corrosion.html
Did you see the traces of those three missiles hitting the Pentagon yet?
I had to rewrite this sentence,my pc got a hickup.
The trouble convincing people that there was such a volume of kerosene to cause all the beams in the towers to bend at the same time is time,is outrageous.
There was not 3000 people killed in the towers,as they were empty.All the junk you were told about people in the towers using the phone to contact their loved ones,telling them they were ok.Just simply did not happen it was made for TV.
The Gelitin Crew that waved shirts before they threw dummies out the windows,making people think it was jumpers,well they came down the stairway dressed as firemen and survivors. Here is what took place on 9/11/01.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/9-11_wtc_videos.html
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-28 09:21:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
There was not 3000 people killed in the towers,as they were empty.All the junk you were told about people in the towers using the phone to contact their loved ones,telling them they were ok.Just simply did not happen it was made for TV.
******
Go to New York Coty. Make a blog of yourself going up to the firefighters and telling them they were lying about what the did and saw. Find relatives of just SOME of those people reported killed and tell them they’re lying about their grief. Better yet, find a relative of one of the people who are supposed to have jumped and tell them their loved ones threw out “dummies” and snuck out with the firefighters, and they’re lying about having lost those people.

Those people died, you horrible little shit stain! Your theories have no validity whatsoever!
joeturn
2018-06-28 09:49:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
There was not 3000 people killed in the towers,as they were empty.All the junk you were told about people in the towers using the phone to contact their loved ones,telling them they were ok.Just simply did not happen it was made for TV.
******
Go to New York Coty. Make a blog of yourself going up to the firefighters and telling them they were lying about what the did and saw. Find relatives of just SOME of those people reported killed and tell them they’re lying about their grief. Better yet, find a relative of one of the people who are supposed to have jumped and tell them their loved ones threw out “dummies” and snuck out with the firefighters, and they’re lying about having lost those people.
Those people died, you horrible little shit stain! Your theories have no validity whatsoever!
NO NEED GOING anywhere coty,the fireman told what they saw and heard,the demolitions going off and the molten iron from the thermate cutter charges. They saw no dead people nor did the cadaver dogs find any dead people.

Now finding anyone that had a family member killed during the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible.NO one was killed the memorial is made up of fictitious people or some that died before 9/11 example The guy that said lets roll and stormed the cockpit died 3 weeks prior of aids related illness,Mark Bingham
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-28 09:12:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
So, kerosene as an accelerate, initiating a fire that degraded the steel that had already had a multi-ton jet liner smash through it. And which was undergoing the strain of attempt to hold TONS of undamaged upper floors. (Not to mention the fact that there were NO vertical supports between the outer shell and the inner tube.) The idea that this fire could cause the building to collapse is “outrageous.”

But the idea that the government could grab every video signal, and put into each video source an image of a plane at the perfect angle and position to make it look like that plane slammed into the Tower, that they could time it perfectly with the explosion, that they could then set off a series of explosions synchronized with the collapse (something I have never seen in a controlled demolition), THIS is something you consider plausible?
joeturn
2018-06-28 09:38:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
So, kerosene as an accelerate, initiating a fire that degraded the steel that had already had a multi-ton jet liner smash through it. And which was undergoing the strain of attempt to hold TONS of undamaged upper floors. (Not to mention the fact that there were NO vertical supports between the outer shell and the inner tube.) The idea that this fire could cause the building to collapse is “outrageous.”
But the idea that the government could grab every video signal, and put into each video source an image of a plane at the perfect angle and position to make it look like that plane slammed into the Tower, that they could time it perfectly with the explosion, that they could then set off a series of explosions synchronized with the collapse (something I have never seen in a controlled demolition), THIS is something you consider plausible?
That's easy jethrow read this thread about the 16 second cartoon on page #3
http://letsrollforums.com//9-11-video-deception-t23098p3.html
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-28 10:06:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
The reality is that a hijacked plane hit the building. Below are my cites. Photographic and forensic evidence are cited and depicted. Snopes talks about motives as to why some folks don't believe the reality of it, which is actually very nice of them. "This theory suits everyone - There are no Islamic extremists and everyone is happy. It eliminates reality."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
<https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/
<https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/>
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
<https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365662/FBI-pictures-reveal-aftermath-9-11-attack-Pentagon.html>
Your full of more shit than a Christmas turkey.Their were NO PLANES it was a government controlled demolition.Snopes is edited by one of Obama's cronies to tell a lie.to cover up the real truth.All those other sites are feeding you what the Government said happened,which is a lie.Your popular mechanics created another falsehood to make the sheeple believe their lies.The old bend-a-beam with kerosene hoax.
The trouble convincing people that there was such a volumingss bend at the same time is time,is outrageous. Here's you snopes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Snopes/comments/471l6s/whats_with_this_byline_for_kim_lacapria/
Here is why the WTC towers were pulled.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_corrosion.html
Did you see the traces of those three missiles hitting the Pentagon yet?
It is not possible to see something that does not exist. However,
as you PROVE, it is possible to LIE about seeing something that
doesn't exist.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-28 10:05:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psyuckatronic World Dominatress and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
In the five frame release from the FBI you can see evidence of three missiles striking the Pentagon. Morgan Reynolds said in his "What Planes" youtube video that a 6 year old could verify that no planes hit the towers but he underestimated your stupidity.
Still can't get a five-year-old to configure your browser?
That kids think you're too stupid to associate with aside, I'll
answer what I can see.
There is NO evidence of any number of missiles striking the
Pentagon. None.
There is a great deal of evidence that a plane hit it.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2018-06-27 11:16:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

KWills Shill #3
2018-06-28 10:05:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
If the thing that really hit the Towers were really cruise missiles? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ?????
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Nothing hit the twin towers,but three missiles did hit the Pentagon.
If either claim of yours were true, you would have presented the
VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for them. Since they're not true, you've
not done so.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
http://youtu.be/M5HcmTOAGVk
Clinton's miss-speaking is not evidence. Not to the educated
mind.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 22:47:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
****
The planes were much larger than a potato in relation to the girders. Your “French fry” analogy wasn’t too far off. The girders shredded the plane body. The Towers weren’t solid metal, you know.
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-27 09:51:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
So what happened to the tails of those two planes after hitting the
Towers? How could they disappear so completely? :)
*****
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls
of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as
neat.
Bwahhhhaahaha think of a raw potato going through a slicer you get french fries..Now slam that potato into a steel column and you get smush and nothing penetrates.
Have that potato travel at a few hundred miles an hour, coated in
airplane grade aluminum, and it will go through the steel column.
I note you still haven't found a five-year-old to configure your
browser.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 20:27:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
So what happened to the tails of those two planes after hitting the
Towers? How could they disappear so completely? :)
*****
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
The only way to verify your explanation is to re-create the whole
incident in maybe a computer simulation? Or maybe some Star Wars Death
Star models? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 22:54:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The planes were shredded in their passage through the walls of the Towers. Think of an egg going through a slicer, only not as neat.
The only way to verify your explanation is to re-create the whole
incident in maybe a computer simulation? Or maybe some Star Wars Death
Star models? :)
- show quoted text -
That’s what they did. Joe dismissed it as “cartoons.” He’s ignorant that way.
joeturn
2018-06-26 19:33:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Do you hate movies and fairy tales? :)
- show quoted text -
No, I love movies and fairy tales. I just don’t expect them to be passed off as the truth.
You especially like the fairy tale that planes flew into the twin towers.
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 22:50:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
You especially like the fairy tale that planes flew into the twin towers.
*****
I prefer the theory that fits the available facts.

You seem to prefer a paranoid fantasy involving unproven CGI effects and unproven hidden explosives that leave no residue behind. (Yes, they looked.)
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-27 09:52:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Do you hate movies and fairy tales? :)
- show quoted text -
No, I love movies and fairy tales. I just don’t expect them to be passed off as the truth.
You especially like the fairy tale that planes flew into the twin towers.
100% of the available evidence shows they did. If there were any
VALID evidence to the contrary, it would have been presented by now.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-22 16:43:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Are there civilians nearby actually watched and witnessed what crashed
into the 2 buildings? :)
If there was none, then we could only believe in the stories broadcasted
by the news agencies and the US government!
We all should believe so to avoid being probed by or maybe assassinated
by US government. :)
BTW, if you were a witness, stay low and safe! Don't blow whistles until
.... well... I don't know ... that day. haha....
May I remind you all of the case of President John F. Kennedy? Did Mr.
Kennedy read or see something? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
joeturn
2018-06-22 19:01:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Are there civilians nearby actually watched and witnessed what crashed
into the 2 buildings? :)
If there was none, then we could only believe in the stories broadcasted
by the news agencies and the US government!
We all should believe so to avoid being probed by or maybe assassinated
by US government. :)
BTW, if you were a witness, stay low and safe! Don't blow whistles until
.... well... I don't know ... that day. haha....
May I remind you all of the case of President John F. Kennedy? Did Mr.
Kennedy read or see something? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
You must be referring to this

That might have been the reason they made johnson President but JFK was never killed and returned to finish his Presidency as Jimmy Carter and followed their demands to a T
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 20:44:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
That might have been the reason they made johnson President but JFK was never killed and returned to finish his Presidency as Jimmy Carter and followed their demands to a T
*****
You are now officially a loon.
joeturn
2018-06-22 18:23:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The towers were hit by two jet liners. Everything this guy supposes is merely conjunction on his part based on ignorance.
Show me evidence that the Air Force has holographic technology that works, in the open air, and can be not only projected, but moved through the air like a jet liner.
Missiles are very fast, that’s why you can fire one from a jet fighter. In my opinion (and you are free to provide evidence that shows otherwise) a missile could not fly SLOWLY enough to be covered up as a jet liner.
As far as the girders are concerned, the jet liners went through the wall the way an egg goes through an egg slicer! (Although, probably not as neatly.)
Four jet liners were hijacked by terrorists. Two were driven into the Towers, one hit the Pentagon and one was crashed when the passengers, realizing something was going on, tried to take the plane back. No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.
I agree with the egg thingy if you pass a jet through steel it leaves it pieces outside the building.Kerosine wont burn a steel building but exposives caused the WTC to colapse The demolition trucks had a police escort to leave the scene before they were detonated. The whole area was roped off so noone woulsd get hurt.The ones throwing dummies out the windows came down dressed as firemen.
joeturn
2018-06-22 18:42:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The towers were hit by two jet liners. Everything this guy supposes is merely conjunction on his part based on ignorance.
Show me evidence that the Air Force has holographic technology that works, in the open air, and can be not only projected, but moved through the air like a jet liner.
Missiles are very fast, that’s why you can fire one from a jet fighter. In my opinion (and you are free to provide evidence that shows otherwise) a missile could not fly SLOWLY enough to be covered up as a jet liner.
As far as the girders are concerned, the jet liners went through the wall the way an egg goes through an egg slicer! (Although, probably not as neatly.)
Four jet liners were hijacked by terrorists. Two were driven into the Towers, one hit the Pentagon and one was crashed when the passengers, realizing something was going on, tried to take the plane back. No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.
I agree with the egg thingy if you pass a jet through steel it leaves it pieces outside the building.Kerosene wont burn a steel building but controlled demolitions caused the WTC to colapse The demolition trucks had a police escort to leave the scene before they were detonated. The whole area was roped off so no one would get hurt.The ones throwing dummies out the windows came down dressed as firemen.
The b-thing crew were Israeli art students sent here to get the buildings ready for demolition. The were framed for stilling documents and sentenced to secretly remove all the contents from the building; they were there for 2 years.
They jack hammered each floor and removed the steel from all but 17 floors in both towers.
There were plans to dismantle the building in 1968,because they were being eaten up by galvanic corrosion, but Asbestos law suits would have bankrupt the US Government so they planned a terrorist attack and used that plan to go after Saddams oil.No lawsuits were filed and the war was on.$$$$
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 20:34:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I agree with the egg thingy if you pass a jet through steel it leaves it pieces outside the building.Kerosine wont burn a steel building but exposives caused the WTC to colapse The demolition trucks had a police escort to leave the scene before they were detonated. The whole area was roped off so noone woulsd get hurt.The ones throwing dummies out the windows came down dressed as firemen.
*****
None of this has any basis in facts.
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 20:42:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I agree with the egg thingy if you pass a jet through steel it leaves it pieces outside the building.
*****
Really? How many jets have you seen pass through steel buildings?
*****
Kerosine wont burn a steel building but exposives caused the WTC to colapse
*****
Kerosine can be an accelerate which will cause the contents of the building to burn. The fire can (and did) compromise the steel supports to where they couldn’t continue to support the weight of the undamaged portion ABOVE the impact site. There is no evidence of explosives going off in the Towers after the original impacts.
*****
The demolition trucks had a police escort to leave the scene before they were detonated. The whole area was roped off so noone woulsd get hurt.The ones throwing dummies out the windows came down dressed as firemen.
*****
Prove anything was done before the impacts. Prove dummies were thrown out of the buildings. Not; “It has to be,” not “it’s the only solution,” PROVE there were dummies. Produce one pulled from the rubble.
d***@gmail.com
2018-06-23 22:11:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
The towers were hit by two jet liners. Everything this guy supposes is merely conjunction on his part based on ignorance.
Show me evidence that the Air Force has holographic technology that works, in the open air, and can be not only projected, but moved through the air like a jet liner.
Missiles are very fast, that’s why you can fire one from a jet fighter. In my opinion (and you are free to provide evidence that shows otherwise) a missile could not fly SLOWLY enough to be covered up as a jet liner.
As far as the girders are concerned, the jet liners went through the wall the way an egg goes through an egg slicer! (Although, probably not as neatly.)
Four jet liners were hijacked by terrorists. Two were driven into the Towers, one hit the Pentagon and one was crashed when the passengers, realizing something was going on, tried to take the plane back. No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.
+1 to all of this.
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-23 22:29:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
No nonsensical Israeli black-ops were used.

+1 to all of this.
*****
Thank you.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-22 15:47:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
"cloaked missiles"? Unlikely...

There is another conspiracy theory that the 2 buildings were blown up
INTERNALLY! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 16:21:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
"cloaked missiles"? Unlikely...

There is another conspiracy theory that the 2 buildings were blown up
INTERNALLY! :)
- show quoted text -
Slightly less ludicrous than cloaked missiles, but still ludicrous!
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-22 16:33:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
"cloaked missiles"? Unlikely...
There is another conspiracy theory that the 2 buildings were blown up
INTERNALLY! :)
- show quoted text -
Slightly less ludicrous than cloaked missiles, but still ludicrous!
That's exactly why they are conspiracy theories, Your Honor! :)

So there is really no eye-witnesses? Was that planned? Was *ALL* New
York citizens that day in the morning distracted by a lot of things?

What were those planned(?) distractions? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-22 20:29:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
That's exactly why they are conspiracy theories, >Your Honor! :)
And that’s why they should not be prompted!
So there is really no eye-witnesses? Was that >planned? Was *ALL* New
York citizens that day in the morning distracted >by a lot of things?
I’ve already told you, there were people in the Plaza during the first impact. There were MORE people watching in the second impact because they were watching the fire from the FIRST impact.

Now, this is not to say ALL Mew York was in the Plaza. That would be something along the lines of 12 to 15 million people.
What were those planned(?) distractions? :)
There were no “planned distractions.”
Thomas Heger
2018-06-23 11:38:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.

I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.

The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.

Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.

The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.

Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.

This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.

So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).

Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.

There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.

But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.

Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.

TH
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-23 14:44:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
But 100% of the available evidence shows planes hit them and this
lead to the collapse.
Fortunately, you will provide the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for
the claim you present, if your claim is in any way possible.
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
There is no evidence to support her crazy assertions.
Post by Thomas Heger
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
Even if that were true, the steel in the towers was not
destroyed. But, fortunately, you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE
evidence that the steel was actually destroyed and not just weakened
as all available evidence currently shows happened.
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your
impossible delusions.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less
than 1% was not accounted for.
What was not present was likely that which went over the water.
Post by Thomas Heger
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
They didn't go anywhere.
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
100% of the available evidence shows planes hit the towers.
Post by Thomas Heger
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
At least you recognize that.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Thomas Heger
2018-06-24 18:14:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your
impossible delusions.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less
than 1% was not accounted for.
What was not present was likely that which went over the water.
Well, no!

The towers consisted - like most buildings - from about 10% building
materials, like concrete, steel, glass, aluminum, plaster boards,
carpets and other.

Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).

But the material barely covered the street level.

This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to
the cleanup.

Such photos show cars, trucks and ambulances in the rubble. And they
have certainly not flown at the level of the tenth floor.

TH
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-24 20:15:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
*****
This would only be correct if the rubble stayed within the foundations of each Tower. As the rubble spread out throughout the World Trade Center complex, the point is moot.
Thomas Heger
2018-06-25 05:51:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
*****
This would only be correct if the rubble stayed within the foundations of each Tower. As the rubble spread out throughout the World Trade Center complex, the point is moot.
Actually not, because if something falls down, we expect this something
somewhere down.

E.g. we drop a stone from a cliff. Then we expect the stone somewhere
downwards, e.g. at the shore at the the base of that cliff.

But on 9/11 we find something REALLY odd:

Loading Image...


You see a car, parking on the street, covered with dust from the WTC.

So the material of the towers is mostly missing, since otherwise the car
would be covered with a pile of rubble reaching the tenth floor.

But that is not the case, since we can see (besides are parked car) the
columns that formed the outside of the lobby of the towers. They are
easily recognizable, because they have a very particular form.

And the lobby was - of course - at the bottom of the towers.

TH
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-25 09:45:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
*****
This would only be correct if the rubble stayed within the foundations of
each Tower. As the rubble spread out throughout the World Trade Center
complex, the point is moot.
Actually not, because if something falls down, we expect this something
somewhere down.
E.g. we drop a stone from a cliff. Then we expect the stone somewhere
downwards, e.g. at the shore at the the base of that cliff.
https://q.publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Destruction66-1024x663.jpg
You see a car, parking on the street, covered with dust from the WTC.
As you already KNOW, that picture was not taken on 9/11. Further,
the debris was scattered all over the WTC complex and beyond. Some was
found in Harlem.
Post by Thomas Heger
So the material of the towers is mostly missing, since otherwise the car
would be covered with a pile of rubble reaching the tenth floor.
But that is not the case, since we can see (besides are parked car) the
columns that formed the outside of the lobby of the towers. They are
easily recognizable, because they have a very particular form.
And the lobby was - of course - at the bottom of the towers.
And you are, of course, still lying about this for whatever
reason.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-25 09:44:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
You constantly use your baseless assumptions to support your
impossible delusions.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
Only the smallest of fractions of material was not found. Less
than 1% was not accounted for.
What was not present was likely that which went over the water.
Well, no!
Well, yes! This has already been proved, as you know.
Post by Thomas Heger
The towers consisted - like most buildings - from about 10% building
materials, like concrete, steel, glass, aluminum, plaster boards,
carpets and other.
And?
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
But the material barely covered the street level.
Why LIE about this? It's been PROVED, multiple times, that your
claim is nothing but a lie.
If you truly NEED to be proved the pathological liar you are,
again, I can do so.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to
the cleanup.
It's quite visible that there are several stories of debris, as
you already know.
Post by Thomas Heger
Such photos show cars, trucks and ambulances in the rubble. And they
have certainly not flown at the level of the tenth floor.
The pictures you are referencing were taken days AFTER. And you
already KNOW this.
I realize you have a very hard time being honest, but do try.
I note you dishonestly snipped away most of my post. You often do
this rather than face your lying being exposed. It's as if you think
being dishonest will somehow erase your dishonesty.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Thomas Heger
2018-06-27 13:46:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Am 25.06.2018 um 11:44 schrieb KWills Shill #3:
...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
But the material barely covered the street level.
Why LIE about this? It's been PROVED, multiple times, that your
claim is nothing but a lie.
If you truly NEED to be proved the pathological liar you are,
again, I can do so.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to
the cleanup.
It's quite visible that there are several stories of debris, as
you already know.
Actually yes, since there was debris visible. It was also a lot of stuff.

But one million tons of material look different and the pile of rubble
must have been really enormous.

If the material would be ground to dust and compactified into a solid
block, the rubble would have reached roughly the tenth floor.

What we actually see is a pile reaching to the fourth floor. That is
still a lot, but MUCH less then what would be expected.


The hight is clearly visible, since the lobby of the WTC had columns of
a certain form, what makes them easy to identify.

The lobby was about three stories high.

...
TH
joeturn
2018-06-27 16:25:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
But the material barely covered the street level.
Why LIE about this? It's been PROVED, multiple times, that your
claim is nothing but a lie.
If you truly NEED to be proved the pathological liar you are,
again, I can do so.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to
the cleanup.
It's quite visible that there are several stories of debris, as
you already know.
Actually yes, since there was debris visible. It was also a lot of stuff.
But one million tons of material look different and the pile of rubble
must have been really enormous.
If the material would be ground to dust and compactified into a solid
block, the rubble would have reached roughly the tenth floor.
What we actually see is a pile reaching to the fourth floor. That is
still a lot, but MUCH less then what would be expected.
The hight is clearly visible, since the lobby of the WTC had columns of
a certain form, what makes them easy to identify.
The lobby was about three stories high.
...
TH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=QnnXTrw88P4
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-28 10:06:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Since the towers were about 400m high and had about 100 floors, the pile
of rubble had to be a cone of roughly the hight of the tenth floor
(supposed the materials were ground to fine dust and were compacted into
such a pile without any air).
But the material barely covered the street level.
Why LIE about this? It's been PROVED, multiple times, that your
claim is nothing but a lie.
If you truly NEED to be proved the pathological liar you are,
again, I can do so.
Post by Thomas Heger
This is visible in many photos from that day, which were made prior to
the cleanup.
It's quite visible that there are several stories of debris, as
you already know.
Actually yes, since there was debris visible. It was also a lot of stuff.
But one million tons of material look different and the pile of rubble
must have been really enormous.
It was, as you already know.
Post by Thomas Heger
If the material would be ground to dust and compactified into a solid
block, the rubble would have reached roughly the tenth floor.
Only if all of it stayed at the base of each building. But as you
already know, having seen the videos, the debris spread out. Some
reached Harlem.
Post by Thomas Heger
What we actually see is a pile reaching to the fourth floor. That is
still a lot, but MUCH less then what would be expected.
Liar. That is very much what would be expected.
Post by Thomas Heger
The hight is clearly visible, since the lobby of the WTC had columns of
a certain form, what makes them easy to identify.
The lobby was about three stories high.
Which has what to do with you presenting claims you KNOW are not
true?
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2018-06-25 04:30:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Post by Thomas Heger
TH
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-25 09:44:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
100% of the available evidence tells us planes struck them.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
None did disappear.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
On this you are correct.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
No spaceships caused the towers to collapse.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
I don't know about the next country, but there is certainly
nothing to suggest what Thomas is claiming.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Your extreme fear of your enter key aside, none of what you claim
is true. But you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence that it is,
unless you're lying about the matter.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2018-06-25 17:42:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
100% of the available evidence tells us planes struck them.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
None did disappear.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
On this you are correct.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
No spaceships caused the towers to collapse.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
I don't know about the next country, but there is certainly
nothing to suggest what Thomas is claiming.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Your extreme fear of your enter key aside, none of what you claim
is true. But you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence that it is,
unless you're lying about the matter.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Start here K Wills if you can get past you enter key hang up,and be educated.

e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-25 21:40:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Start here K Wills if you can get past you enter key hang up,and be educated.
http://youtu.be/-pFuwRGK9ZY
*****
If you could figure out how to set up your newsreader properly, he wouldn’t have to worry about the ENTER key.
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:30:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Start here K Wills if you can get past you enter key hang up,and be educated.
http://youtu.be/-pFuwRGK9ZY
*****
If you could figure out how to set up your newsreader properly,
he wouldn’t have to worry about the ENTER key.
Sadly, Slowjoe isn't smart enough to figure out how.
That may appear to be an insult, but it's not. It's an accurate
commentary based on his posts.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:29:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
100% of the available evidence tells us planes struck them.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
None did disappear.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
On this you are correct.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
No spaceships caused the towers to collapse.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
I don't know about the next country, but there is certainly
nothing to suggest what Thomas is claiming.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Your extreme fear of your enter key aside, none of what you claim
is true. But you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence that it is,
unless you're lying about the matter.
Start here K Wills if you can get past you enter key hang up,and be educated.
http://youtu.be/-pFuwRGK9ZY
I asked for VALID evidence regarding your lie about thermate. A
video about some art students being pictured naked isn't evidence of
anything except that they were photographed nude for an art project.
Your default admission that you lied is noted, accepted and
appreciated.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2018-06-25 17:56:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
100% of the available evidence tells us planes struck them.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
None did disappear.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
On this you are correct.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
No spaceships caused the towers to collapse.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
I don't know about the next country, but there is certainly
nothing to suggest what Thomas is claiming.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Your extreme fear of your enter key aside, none of what you claim
is true. But you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence that it is,
unless you're lying about the matter.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Here you will be educated on wake vortex.

e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-25 21:57:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.

Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.

I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.

Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.

And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
joeturn
2018-06-26 04:09:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
joeturn
2018-06-26 04:20:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
revisit this thread.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Avid$20Tech$20by$20joeturn/alt.conspiracy/-wBWtlic2v4/dBSWAUZGGuoJ
joeturn
2018-06-26 04:58:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
revisit this thread.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Avid$20Tech$20by$20joeturn/alt.conspiracy/-wBWtlic2v4/dBSWAUZGGuoJ
Also visit the shillshop for info that has not been deleted yet.

http://letsrollforums.com//digital-computer-recreation-9-t22144.html
joeturn
2018-06-26 05:04:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
revisit this thread.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Avid$20Tech$20by$20joeturn/alt.conspiracy/-wBWtlic2v4/dBSWAUZGGuoJ
Also visit the shillshop for info that has not been deleted yet.
http://letsrollforums.com//digital-computer-recreation-9-t22144.html
This is channel 4 with no cartoon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=6lepqPvru_s
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 08:07:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
And, your paranoid ranting are not convincing. In short, I simply don’t believe you.
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:31:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
revisit this thread.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Avid$20Tech$20by$20joeturn/alt.conspiracy/-wBWtlic2v4/dBSWAUZGGuoJ
Also visit the shillshop for info that has not been deleted yet.
http://letsrollforums.com//digital-computer-recreation-9-t22144.html
This is channel 4 with no cartoon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=6lepqPvru_s
I understand you're very, very stupid. But you can't be this
stupid. The camera is on the opposite side of the tower.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:31:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second plane actually saw and recorded.
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in open air holograms that can track like a plane.
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought down the Towers.
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the
collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and
finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in
place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that
couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
No missles were used on the twin towers and NO PLANES hit them either.As you recall Morgen Rynolds,told you he tracked down all the people that susposedly saw planes hit the towers,but it was only one person and that person lied.The recordings you saw were not on live tv.The planes were created out of cartoon software and ented into the tv news later that evening.Search for the channel 4 news and you will see they were not notified to play the cartoon of fake planes crashing into the towers.There was a 17 second break away from the real news ,that was when they played the cartoon by Avidtec.
Please ask a five-year-old to configure your browser. Since it's
clear you're scared of the ENTER key, that is really the only option
left.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:30:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Very well then, joe. You have to tell me what exactly the spectators who
saw the first plane and the people who saw and/or RECORDED the second
plane actually saw and recorded.
There was one video recording of the first plane. When it went
overhead, a camera man, who was filming something else, followed the
plane and recorded it hitting the first tower.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in
open air holograms that can track like a plane.
No reasonable person is buying the hologram claim.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
I’m also not buying a master of economics as an expert in physics.
No one who is a master, or expert, in physics will agree with the
bunk the troofers offer.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Find positive evidence that the planes seen and (one) recorded were
somehow faked. Find positive evidence that “something else” brought
down the Towers.
Cue the crickets.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the
collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and
finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in
place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that
couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
Don't forget the firefighters who stated, well in advance, that
#7 was going to come down due to the damage it sustained.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 20:35:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
There was one video recording of the first plane. When it went
overhead, a camera man, who was filming something else, followed the
plane and recorded it hitting the first tower.
One video? Exactly one? Now that's interesting. :)
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Because I’m not buying missiles, they move too fast, and I don’t believe in
open air holograms that can track like a plane.
No reasonable person is buying the hologram claim.
You can make a missile to look like a big airplane! Remember A-Team?
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
And (before you bring it up) WTC7 was damaged by debris from the
collapsing Tower which caused a fire which burned for hours and
finally compromised the one main vertical support that had been put in
place to counter act the lack of deep set vertical supports that
couldn’t be placed because another structure was under WTC7.
Don't forget the firefighters who stated, well in advance, that
#7 was going to come down due to the damage it sustained.
Whatever happened *after* the crash was no longer relevant?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 23:03:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
There was one video recording of the first plane. When it went
overhead, a camera man, who was filming something else, followed the
plane and recorded it hitting the first tower.
One video? Exactly one? Now that's interesting. :)

Yes. Dumb luck someone happened to be shooting a documentary about a firehouse and were in line to pick up the first plane. It’s not like people just stood around with camcorders in 2001 on the off chance that some spectacular would occur. Today, there’d probably be a dozen or more people that were using their cell phone cameras and would have a chance to catch the crash. (Bear in mind, cell phone cameras aren’t the best cameras to take regular pictures with. Anything hundreds of feet in the air and who knows how far away would have seriously come up low-resolution!)
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 23:16:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
No reasonable person is buying the hologram claim.
You can make a missile to look like a big airplane! Remember A-Team?
*****
Not certain, I remember one where they made a prop plane look like a stolen Russian fighter. And the pilot for “The Lone Gunman” dealt with remote control takeover of a jet liner.

So what?

Both shows have as much to do with reality as “Barney” has to do with studying dinosaurs. Or “The Flintstones” have to do with cave people.
e***@hotmail.com
2018-06-26 23:19:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Don't forget the firefighters who stated, well in advance, that
#7 was going to come down due to the damage it sustained.
Whatever happened *after* the crash was no longer relevant?
- show quoted text -
WTC7 hadn’t collapsed at that point. In testimony, firefighters stated the the building was “bulging” where the debris from the collapsed Tower hit it, and was “creaking and groaning” for hours before actually collapsing.
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-26 09:30:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers
fell and what could have possibly struck them.
Nothing struck them
100% of the available evidence tells us planes struck them.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.
The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest
mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John
Hutchison.
Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams
could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.
But this would not make the steel disappear.
None did disappear.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison
produced on small scale.
Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which
teleported the material into another dimension.
This is an obvious idiotic assumption. THERE ARE NO TIME MACHINES
On this you are correct.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million
tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were
found later.
So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).
I told you where the towers went.It took the Gelitin crew and the b_thing art students 2 years to dissemble the towers and seen the interior down the freight elevator to the garbage dump.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a
spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.
This is more pure bullshit THERE ARE NO SPACESHIPS,you've been watching too much star trak.
No spaceships caused the towers to collapse.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused
the destruction.
Had a blast hit the towers from such a monstrosity,it would have scattered pieces into the next county.
I don't know about the next country, but there is certainly
nothing to suggest what Thomas is claiming.
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible
solutions to the WTC riddle.
Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This
would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.
I call Bull Shit again,here Thomas actually it was a military grade of thermite taken from the AM granades14
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m14-th3.htm
TH3 stands for thermAte.The granades were decommissioned al dissasimble and the thermate w3as kept in a military bunker for safe keeping.
The killing of people inside an armored vehicle,being burnt alive was inhuman and the granades were exposed of in 1994.
Your extreme fear of your enter key aside, none of what you claim
is true. But you will offer the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence that it is,
unless you're lying about the matter.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Here you will be educated on wake vortex.
http://youtu.be/YJU55FzcM2A
Your further admission that you LIED about thermate is noted,
accepted and appreciated.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2018-06-23 14:43:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 07:17:12 -0700, Stuart Wright
Post by Stuart Wright
The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also
said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World
Trade Center Towers and more.
https://jamesperloff.com/2018/06/22/what-struck-the-twin-towers-revising-my-outlook/
Amount of evidence that planes hit the towers: Massive.

Amount of evidence that anything other than planes hit the towers
or caused them to collapse: None.

Come back when you have actual evidence.
--
Shill #3.
Los Angeles Branch.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-06-26 20:33:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Amount of evidence that planes hit the towers: Massive.
Amount of evidence that anything other than planes hit the towers
or caused them to collapse: None.
Come back when you have actual evidence.
Evidences of passengers present in those 4 planes? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Loading...