Michio Kaku and BDK

[joeturn]

Loading Image...

[Government Shill #2]

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Shill #2
--
RF signals can not penetrate the van allen belt.The satellites
are below the van allen belt.Therefore none of the pictures taken
from beyond the van allen belt are distroyed by cosmic radiation!
Moon bounce is erroniously described as RF bounced off the surface
of the moon which is incorrect.The signals bounce off the ionosphere
during times when the cosmic radiation is high and while pointing an
array at the moon uses the moon as a cosmic blocker. Thus signals can
be heard above the hetrodyne/probagation.
slowjoe (***@yahoo.com)
alt.conspiracy 08Febr16 (2nd "fixed" version)

[joeturn]

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
--
RF signals can not penetrate the van allen belt.The satellites
are below the van allen belt.Therefore none of the pictures taken
from beyond the van allen belt are distroyed by cosmic radiation!
Moon bounce is erroniously described as RF bounced off the surface
of the moon which is incorrect.The signals bounce off the ionosphere
during times when the cosmic radiation is high and while pointing an
array at the moon uses the moon as a cosmic blocker. Thus signals can
be heard above the hetrodyne/probagation.
alt.conspiracy 08Febr16 (2nd "fixed" version)

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

[Government Shill #2]

Post by joeturn

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Does anyone have any idea what slowjoe's point is here?

Shill #2
--
The moon is simply blocking the Coamic radiation they call hetrodyne
thus allowiling the signal from the ionousphere to not be overwhelmed
with this radiant energy/probagation problem.
slowjoe (***@yahoo.com)
alt.conspiracy 08Febr16

[BDK]

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Does anyone have any idea what slowjoe's point is here?
Shill #2

Nope. As usual.

[Government Shill #2]

Post by BDK

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Does anyone have any idea what slowjoe's point is here?
Shill #2

Nope. As usual.

Phew! I thought I might be missing something. :-)

Shill #2
--
Resonant Frequency,Radio Frequency and Radiant Energy are all one in
the same,Tesla called it aether.
slowjoe (***@yahoo.com)
alt.conspiracy 03Apr12

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by BDK

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Does anyone have any idea what slowjoe's point is here?
Shill #2

Nope. As usual.

My guess, and that's all it is, is that Joe thinks calling people
with a heritage that originates in an Asian country Asian makes no
sense. If I'm correct, his position makes no sense to the rational
mind.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by joeturn

Post by Government Shill #2

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
An Asian guy looks like an Asian guy!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
--
RF signals can not penetrate the van allen belt.The satellites
are below the van allen belt.Therefore none of the pictures taken
from beyond the van allen belt are distroyed by cosmic radiation!
Moon bounce is erroniously described as RF bounced off the surface
of the moon which is incorrect.The signals bounce off the ionosphere
during times when the cosmic radiation is high and while pointing an
array at the moon uses the moon as a cosmic blocker. Thus signals can
be heard above the hetrodyne/probagation.
alt.conspiracy 08Febr16 (2nd "fixed" version)

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

1) Shill #2 isn't American.
2) The Japanese people call themselves Asian. This is, most
probably, due to Japan being a part of Asia.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.

But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.

In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example
(like Steven Hawking):

There are kind of 'science' soap operas on tv and there we find always
the same faces (Hawking, Kaku, Perlmutter, Filipenco and a few others).

These are apparently actors, since they occur in so many shows.

'Real' physicists are not interviewed that often, since they have not
enough fame among the audience and because the subject and the results
of their research is actually too difficult (and too boring) for tv.

So we have the very same 'friendly physicists on duty' in every single
tv-show about fundamental questions of life and nature.

And they always tell the very same nonsense to the defenceless audience ...



TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.
In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example

I like how you dishonestly include yourself (we) in that.
You have PROVED, over and over, that you know almost nothing of
physics.

[...]

[joeturn]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.
In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example
There are kind of 'science' soap operas on tv and there we find always
the same faces (Hawking, Kaku, Perlmutter, Filipenco and a few others).
These are apparently actors, since they occur in so many shows.
'Real' physicists are not interviewed that often, since they have not
enough fame among the audience and because the subject and the results
of their research is actually too difficult (and too boring) for tv.
So we have the very same 'friendly physicists on duty' in every single
tv-show about fundamental questions of life and nature.
And they always tell the very same nonsense to the defenceless audience ...
TH

Now your getting the BIG PICTURE

http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

[BDK]

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.
In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example
There are kind of 'science' soap operas on tv and there we find always
the same faces (Hawking, Kaku, Perlmutter, Filipenco and a few others).
These are apparently actors, since they occur in so many shows.
'Real' physicists are not interviewed that often, since they have not
enough fame among the audience and because the subject and the results
of their research is actually too difficult (and too boring) for tv.
So we have the very same 'friendly physicists on duty' in every single
tv-show about fundamental questions of life and nature.
And they always tell the very same nonsense to the defenceless audience ...
TH

Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.

Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Too fucking crazy stupid..


The stupid never ends on wellaware1.com.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.
Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Well, somehow I like the concept of this website, but not how things are
done in detail.

So many people are just remotely similar looking persons and some
compared person could not possibly be identical.

I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.

here a picture from 1956

http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/

and here one from 1930

Loading Image...


This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.


TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.
Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Well, somehow I like the concept of this website, but not how things are
done in detail.

If it were for purposes of entertainment, it would be great.
However, Eddie appears to honestly believe the bunk he presents.

Post by Thomas Heger
So many people are just remotely similar looking persons and some
compared person could not possibly be identical.
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg

Note that they don't look alike.

Post by Thomas Heger
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

Once again you reply on assumptions. Why not stick with actual
facts? Like the fact that Laura Huxley looks nothing like Eva Braun in
the pictures you link to.
Laura's face is more circular, for one. Her eyes are farther
apart than Eva's. And Laura's chin is more round than Eva's.
I could go on, but that is enough to prove that your "evidence"
fails to support your false assumption.

Post by Thomas Heger
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.

Unity looked nothing like Eva.

[BDK]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.
Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Well, somehow I like the concept of this website, but not how things are
done in detail.

If it were for purposes of entertainment, it would be great.
However, Eddie appears to honestly believe the bunk he presents.

Post by Thomas Heger
So many people are just remotely similar looking persons and some
compared person could not possibly be identical.
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg

Note that they don't look alike.

Post by Thomas Heger
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

Once again you reply on assumptions. Why not stick with actual
facts? Like the fact that Laura Huxley looks nothing like Eva Braun in
the pictures you link to.
Laura's face is more circular, for one. Her eyes are farther
apart than Eva's. And Laura's chin is more round than Eva's.
I could go on, but that is enough to prove that your "evidence"
fails to support your false assumption.

Post by Thomas Heger
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.

Unity looked nothing like Eva.

Whoops, the cat moved the cursor down. My reply was to you.

[BDK]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.
Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Well, somehow I like the concept of this website, but not how things are
done in detail.
So many people are just remotely similar looking persons and some
compared person could not possibly be identical.
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.
TH

Wasn't that Thomas's bit?

[joeturn]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
Now your getting the BIG PICTURE
http://www.wellaware1.com/wellaware1-wall-of-shame-updates-for-wednesday-june-3-2015/

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! A whole lotta crazy from ol' Ed. The funniest page
on the web.
Jerry Stiller is Larry Silverstein?
Kato Kaelin is Ron Goldman?

Well, somehow I like the concept of this website, but not how things are
done in detail.
So many people are just remotely similar looking persons and some
compared person could not possibly be identical.
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.
TH

You have went off the deep end.If you will notice Huxley's wife has. "Betty Davis Eyes".They are two different people but both were actors as was Hitler/Walt/Kermit

[Thomas Heger]

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.
TH

You have went off the deep end.If you will notice Huxley's wife has. "Betty Davis Eyes".They are two different people but both were actors as was Hitler/Walt/Kermit

Yes, actually they do not look that similar.


But there are still a few odd facts about 'Eva Braun':


- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

This kind of swimsuit was at that time only produced in the USA by the
company 'Knudsen'.

- she did something called 'wake-boarding'

this is kind of tugged surfboard, where she stood on.
This is a typical US fun-sport and was entirely unknown in Germany

- she looked and behaved like a lesbian
(difficult to explain this impression)

- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun
(usually you do not film yourself)

- the real Eva Braun was the laboratory assistant of photographer
Hoffman from Munich

How did it happen, that this girl was able to perform a great variety of
artistic stunts?


TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger
I for instance compared the wife of Aldous Huxley and the person
commonly known as 'Eva Brown'.
here a picture from 1956
http://doorofperception.com/2014/09/huxleys-legacy-the-art-of-living-loving-and-dying/
and here one from 1930
http://cdn-04.independent.ie/incoming/article30674749.ece/78b4b/AUTOCROP/h342/evabraun2.jpg
This because I assumed, that 'Hitler' was actually the brother of Aldous
Huxley, named 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.
He did not marry that woman, but she was filmed, when he got visitors
from England. His real spouse was Unity Valkyrie Midfort, who used the
false name 'Eva Braun'. But the person on these 16mmm films is the wife
of Aldous Huxley, not Eva Braun.
TH

You have went off the deep end.If you will notice Huxley's wife has. "Betty Davis Eyes".They are two different people but both were actors as was Hitler/Walt/Kermit

Yes, actually they do not look that similar.

So you lied. Got it.

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

Post by Thomas Heger
This kind of swimsuit was at that time only produced in the USA by the
company 'Knudsen'.
- she did something called 'wake-boarding'
this is kind of tugged surfboard, where she stood on.
This is a typical US fun-sport and was entirely unknown in Germany

This LIE of yours was already exposed and proved.

Post by Thomas Heger
- she looked and behaved like a lesbian
(difficult to explain this impression)

She looked and behaved like one would have expected Hitler's
girlfriend to look and act.

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun
(usually you do not film yourself)

She wasn't always in physical control of the camera.

Post by Thomas Heger
- the real Eva Braun was the laboratory assistant of photographer
Hoffman from Munich
How did it happen, that this girl was able to perform a great variety of
artistic stunts?

Because she practiced them and trained.
You were exposed as a liar in this matter quite some time ago. If
you need, I can provide the quotes and MIDs (allowing those with an
interest to verify). Let me know if you'd like me to use this method
to prove you the liar you are again.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

"1939 - Eva Braun - The German Lakes Vacation"

"1939 Eva Braun Cruising on the SS Milwaukee (HD) "

TH

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
This kind of swimsuit was at that time only produced in the USA by the
company 'Knudsen'.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

"1939 - Eva Braun - The German Lakes Vacation"
http://youtu.be/_0AzTWBdN3A
"1939 Eva Braun Cruising on the SS Milwaukee (HD) "
http://youtu.be/MSgLCwoAX2s

Once again:
All bikinis will be two piece swim suits, but not all two piece
swim suits will be bikinis.
I can post all the details, again, if you NEED to have your lie
completely and thoroughly exposed again. Let me know.

You didn't address the following. Since you didn't offer anything
to show you snipped it, your natural dishonesty is exposed. Again.
Please address the TRUTH I posted, unless this really is
impossible for you.

Post by Thomas Heger
This kind of swimsuit was at that time only produced in the USA by the
company 'Knudsen'.
- she did something called 'wake-boarding'
this is kind of tugged surfboard, where she stood on.
This is a typical US fun-sport and was entirely unknown in Germany

This LIE of yours was already exposed and proved.

Post by Thomas Heger
- she looked and behaved like a lesbian
(difficult to explain this impression)

She looked and behaved like one would have expected Hitler's
girlfriend to look and act.

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun
(usually you do not film yourself)

She wasn't always in physical control of the camera.

Post by Thomas Heger
- the real Eva Braun was the laboratory assistant of photographer
Hoffman from Munich
How did it happen, that this girl was able to perform a great variety of
artistic stunts?

Because she practiced them and trained.
You were exposed as a liar in this matter quite some time ago. If
you need, I can provide the quotes and MIDs (allowing those with an
interest to verify). Let me know if you'd like me to use this method
to prove you the liar you are again.


I'm waiting...

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

"1939 - Eva Braun - The German Lakes Vacation"
http://youtu.be/_0AzTWBdN3A
"1939 Eva Braun Cruising on the SS Milwaukee (HD)"
http://youtu.be/MSgLCwoAX2s

All bikinis will be two piece swim suits, but not all two piece
swim suits will be bikinis.

No!

The term 'bikini' was once the brand name of a certain kind of swim suites.

But this name is now in common use for all two piece female swim suites
of any brand and kinds of design.

So Eva Brown wears a bikini, even if the real bikini was invented in 1946.

Two piece swim suites were in 1939 illegal in Germany (and many other
countries) and only available in the USA.

As far as I can tell the only makers were the company 'Knudsen' in the USA.


...

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun
(usually you do not film yourself)

She wasn't always in physical control of the camera.

'Filming' requires exactly this: physical control of the camera.

This '-ing' endings indicate in the English language, that you do
something.

So filming requires to physically control the camera.

If you just own a camera and someone else is controlling it, you don't
call that 'film making'.

If the person we assume to be 'Eva Braun' is frequently on the films,
than some other 'Eva Braun' was actually filming and our current
understanding of names and personal relations is wrong.

This could easily be the case, since everything happening on the Berghof
was classified and the area was heavily guarded.

So later historians need to interpret pictures (with no sound) and had
to try to figure out, who is who.

In case of 'Eva Braun' they made an obvious mistake, since 'Eva Braun'
was the false identity of Unity Midfort. And actually Unity Midfort was
filming her girlfriend and not Hitlers.


TH

[BDK]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

"1939 - Eva Braun - The German Lakes Vacation"
http://youtu.be/_0AzTWBdN3A
"1939 Eva Braun Cruising on the SS Milwaukee (HD)"
http://youtu.be/MSgLCwoAX2s

All bikinis will be two piece swim suits, but not all two piece
swim suits will be bikinis.

No!
The term 'bikini' was once the brand name of a certain kind of swim suites.
But this name is now in common use for all two piece female swim suites
of any brand and kinds of design.
So Eva Brown wears a bikini, even if the real bikini was invented in 1946.
Two piece swim suites were in 1939 illegal in Germany (and many other
countries) and only available in the USA.
As far as I can tell the only makers were the company 'Knudsen' in the USA.
...

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun
(usually you do not film yourself)

She wasn't always in physical control of the camera.

'Filming' requires exactly this: physical control of the camera.
This '-ing' endings indicate in the English language, that you do
something.
So filming requires to physically control the camera.
If you just own a camera and someone else is controlling it, you don't
call that 'film making'.
If the person we assume to be 'Eva Braun' is frequently on the films,
than some other 'Eva Braun' was actually filming and our current
understanding of names and personal relations is wrong.
This could easily be the case, since everything happening on the Berghof
was classified and the area was heavily guarded.
So later historians need to interpret pictures (with no sound) and had
to try to figure out, who is who.
In case of 'Eva Braun' they made an obvious mistake, since 'Eva Braun'
was the false identity of Unity Midfort. And actually Unity Midfort was
filming her girlfriend and not Hitlers.
TH

There is something seriously wrong with you.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was wearing a Bikini in Germany in the 30th

No she wasn't. This LIE of yours was exposed some time ago. What
do you believe you gain by bringing it up again?

"1939 - Eva Braun - The German Lakes Vacation"
http://youtu.be/_0AzTWBdN3A
"1939 Eva Braun Cruising on the SS Milwaukee (HD)"
http://youtu.be/MSgLCwoAX2s

All bikinis will be two piece swim suits, but not all two piece
swim suits will be bikinis.

No!

YES!
You may LIE about this as often as you wish. The truth will not
be altered.

Post by Thomas Heger
The term 'bikini' was once the brand name of a certain kind of swim suites.

It was? This is news to me. And I expect it will prove to be news
to every honest person.

Post by Thomas Heger
But this name is now in common use for all two piece female swim suites
of any brand and kinds of design.

So you're using the language usage of today for something from
the 30's. How extremely dishonest of you.

Post by Thomas Heger
So Eva Brown wears a bikini, even if the real bikini was invented in 1946.

No, she was not. And no amount of your LYING will ever alter this
truth.

Post by Thomas Heger
Two piece swim suites were in 1939 illegal in Germany (and many other
countries) and only available in the USA.
As far as I can tell the only makers were the company 'Knudsen' in the USA.

Which is irrelevant.

Post by Thomas Heger
...

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
- she was on the picture of the films, which were allegedly made by Eva
Braun (usually you do not film yourself)

She wasn't always in physical control of the camera.

'Filming' requires exactly this: physical control of the camera.

Duh.

Post by Thomas Heger
This '-ing' endings indicate in the English language, that you do
something.

In this context it means someone was doing something.

Post by Thomas Heger
So filming requires to physically control the camera.

Yes.

Post by Thomas Heger
If you just own a camera and someone else is controlling it, you don't
call that 'film making'.

Yes, I do. As does any other honest person.

Post by Thomas Heger
If the person we assume to be 'Eva Braun' is frequently on the films,
than some other 'Eva Braun' was actually filming and our current
understanding of names and personal relations is wrong.

That makes absolutely no sense at all.

Post by Thomas Heger
This could easily be the case, since everything happening on the Berghof
was classified and the area was heavily guarded.
So later historians need to interpret pictures (with no sound) and had
to try to figure out, who is who.

It wasn't very hard to do. It's not as if there were ample
pictures of those filmed to be able to determine who was who.

Post by Thomas Heger
In case of 'Eva Braun' they made an obvious mistake, since 'Eva Braun'
was the false identity of Unity Midfort.

You keep claiming this, yet offer no valid, verifiable evidence.
And since you have already admitted you only ASSUME this, your latest
claim only serves to PROVE how dishonest you are.

Post by Thomas Heger
And actually Unity Midfort was
filming her girlfriend and not Hitlers.

I eagerly await the VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence you will present
for this claim. And you will, unless it's another of your MANY lies.
I'm waiting...

[joeturn]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Post by Thomas Heger
In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example
There are kind of 'science' soap operas on tv and there we find always
the same faces (Hawking, Kaku, Perlmutter, Filipenco and a few others).
These are apparently actors, since they occur in so many shows.
'Real' physicists are not interviewed that often, since they have not
enough fame among the audience and because the subject and the results
of their research is actually too difficult (and too boring) for tv.
So we have the very same 'friendly physicists on duty' in every single
tv-show about fundamental questions of life and nature.
And they always tell the very same nonsense to the defenceless audience ...
TH

[joeturn]

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Post by Thomas Heger
In physics we have a very strange phenomenon and Kaku is one example
There are kind of 'science' soap operas on tv and there we find always
the same faces (Hawking, Kaku, Perlmutter, Filipenco and a few others).
These are apparently actors, since they occur in so many shows.
'Real' physicists are not interviewed that often, since they have not
enough fame among the audience and because the subject and the results
of their research is actually too difficult (and too boring) for tv.
So we have the very same 'friendly physicists on duty' in every single
tv-show about fundamental questions of life and nature.
And they always tell the very same nonsense to the defenceless audience ...
TH

Don't let Japan and China throw you.Kaku and Bruce Lee are the same person if you can pinpoint where Bruce Lee came from that is where his sudinym Kaku comes from. Bruce Lee never died he just reached his peak in movie sales and they killed him off( making the legend)and gave him another identity.Check it out there was never any mention of Kaku till after Bruce Lee quit becoming the box office draw$$$$

[Thomas Heger]

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.

But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.

Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese and Kaku from Japan. And both of these
countries belong to the continent called 'Asia'.

Germans usually do not use the ethnic classification 'Asian' for people
from South East Asia, but would more likely call them 'Chinese', even if
they come from Indonesia or Vietnam.

Japanese people could eventually also be called 'Chinese', since quite a
few Germans are not able to see differences in appearance.

People from the Middle East are mainly called 'Türke' (Turkish) or
'Araber' (Arabian), irrespective of their real origin.

The people from India (and adjacent countries) are called 'Inder', but
only if they wear a Sari or a Turban (otherwise 'Türke').


TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

To compare Michio Kaku with Bruce Lee has some funny aspects.
But somehow I had thought, that Bruce Lee stems from China and Kaku from
Japan.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

Post by Thomas Heger
And both of these
countries belong to the continent called 'Asia'.

Correct.

Post by Thomas Heger
Germans usually do not use the ethnic classification 'Asian' for people
from South East Asia, but would more likely call them 'Chinese', even if
they come from Indonesia or Vietnam.

How very racist. It's not as if it's difficult to tell the
various ethnic groups apart.

Post by Thomas Heger
Japanese people could eventually also be called 'Chinese', since quite a
few Germans are not able to see differences in appearance.

Are you claiming Germans are, by nature, racist?

Post by Thomas Heger
People from the Middle East are mainly called 'Türke' (Turkish) or
'Araber' (Arabian), irrespective of their real origin.
The people from India (and adjacent countries) are called 'Inder', but
only if they wear a Sari or a Turban (otherwise 'Türke').

So Germany is a racist country?
I do hope you're simply expressing your preference to lie with
this post.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
And both of these
countries belong to the continent called 'Asia'.

Correct.

I do appreciate your rare compliments.

Usually you call me 'racist' or 'liar'.

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
Germans usually do not use the ethnic classification 'Asian' for people
from South East Asia, but would more likely call them 'Chinese', even if
they come from Indonesia or Vietnam.

How very racist. It's not as if it's difficult to tell the
various ethnic groups apart.

The term 'race' for ethnic groups was introduced by French nazi
theoretician Count August di Gobineau.

British piece of shit named Houston Steward Chamberlain was responsible
for further distribution, assisted by the nobleman Lord Redescale.

This was the same guy, who owned the 'Lucky Cross' mine in Swastica,
Canada (that with the Nazi-swastica as logo - in 1912).

He was also the father of Clementine Hozier and grandfather of Unity
Midfort. And he was a friend of Richard Wagner (father in law of
Chamberlain). And Unity Midfort was the girlfriend of Hitler and
possibly the one who used the false identity 'Eva Braun'.

The idiocy went further in Germany, where race-studies had been a
'science' (among the Nazis).

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
Japanese people could eventually also be called 'Chinese', since quite a
few Germans are not able to see differences in appearance.

Are you claiming Germans are, by nature, racist?

Well, possibly this is a genetic defect of the nordic arian race.

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
People from the Middle East are mainly called 'Türke' (Turkish) or
'Araber' (Arabian), irrespective of their real origin.
The people from India (and adjacent countries) are called 'Inder', but
only if they wear a Sari or a Turban (otherwise 'Türke').

So Germany is a racist country?

Well, actually not, since 'Türke' does not denote a race (like 'Arian'),
but 'citizen of Turkey'.

Since some Germans are not that good in observation, they call all males
with dark hair and beard 'Türke', if they want to address ethnic
relations (what they don't do that often).

The term 'Araber' is actually used for all kinds of people with roots in
countries ranging from Afghanistan to Morocco.

TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
And both of these
countries belong to the continent called 'Asia'.

Correct.

I do appreciate your rare compliments.
Usually you call me 'racist' or 'liar'.

I've called you racist only when you've posted something racist.
You have been caught lying more times than I am wiling to count.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
Germans usually do not use the ethnic classification 'Asian' for people
from South East Asia, but would more likely call them 'Chinese', even if
they come from Indonesia or Vietnam.

How very racist. It's not as if it's difficult to tell the
various ethnic groups apart.

The term 'race' for ethnic groups was introduced by French nazi
theoretician Count August di Gobineau.

Irrelevant.

Post by Thomas Heger
British piece of shit named Houston Steward Chamberlain was responsible
for further distribution, assisted by the nobleman Lord Redescale.
This was the same guy, who owned the 'Lucky Cross' mine in Swastica,
Canada (that with the Nazi-swastica as logo - in 1912).

The Swastika existed for centuries before the Nazis adopted it.

Post by Thomas Heger
He was also the father of Clementine Hozier and grandfather of Unity
Midfort. And he was a friend of Richard Wagner (father in law of
Chamberlain). And Unity Midfort was the girlfriend of Hitler and
possibly the one who used the false identity 'Eva Braun'.
The idiocy went further in Germany, where race-studies had been a
'science' (among the Nazis).

If the word ethnic is the problem, then I will amend my comment.
It's not as if it's difficult to tell the people of various Asian
countries apart.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
Japanese people could eventually also be called 'Chinese', since quite a
few Germans are not able to see differences in appearance.

Are you claiming Germans are, by nature, racist?

Well, possibly this is a genetic defect of the nordic arian race.

There is no such thing, outside of Nazi propaganda, as the Nordic
Aryan Race.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
People from the Middle East are mainly called 'Türke' (Turkish) or
'Araber' (Arabian), irrespective of their real origin.
The people from India (and adjacent countries) are called 'Inder', but
only if they wear a Sari or a Turban (otherwise 'Türke').

So Germany is a racist country?

Well, actually not, since 'Türke' does not denote a race (like 'Arian'),
but 'citizen of Turkey'.

Aryan isn't a race in the real world.

Post by Thomas Heger
Since some Germans are not that good in observation, they call all males
with dark hair and beard 'Türke', if they want to address ethnic
relations (what they don't do that often).
The term 'Araber' is actually used for all kinds of people with roots in
countries ranging from Afghanistan to Morocco.

Could you re-write that in one of the languages I know?

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians', while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.

This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.

Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??

Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.

You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).

So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.

Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.

So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.

TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians',

Only by the uneducated.

Post by Thomas Heger
while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.

And?

Post by Thomas Heger
This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.
Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Translation: Thomas has been proved wrong again and he wishes to
"run away" from the truth.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??

You're not stupid. Please cease trying to act like you are.

Post by Thomas Heger
Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.

He is of Japanese heritage. This isn't a secret.

Post by Thomas Heger
You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).
So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.
Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.
So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.

Your attempt to divert attention from the truth only serves to
prove you were lying, and that you were fully aware that you were
lying.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians',

Only by the uneducated.

Post by Thomas Heger
while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.

And?

It was you, who said, that Michio Kaku is Asian, while I said, he's
American.

For what purpose do you want to address the nation, where some of his
ancestors were born?

Every single American (besides the native Americans called 'Indians')
have ancestors abroad.


TH

[K Wills]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians',

Only by the uneducated.

Post by Thomas Heger
while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.

And?

It was you, who said, that Michio Kaku is Asian, while I said, he's
American.
For what purpose do you want to address the nation, where some of his
ancestors were born?

In the original, Eddie claims he and Bruce Lee are the same
person. To any honest person, they don't look alike.

Post by Thomas Heger
Every single American (besides the native Americans called 'Indians')
have ancestors abroad.

Thank you Captain Obvious.

You didn't respond to the following. Since you didn't indicate
that you snipped anything, you clearly meant to. Only someone
extremely dishonest would snip without indicating they did so.
Or have you totally lost the ability to be honest with intent?

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger
This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.
Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Translation: Thomas has been proved wrong again and he wishes to
"run away" from the truth.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??

You're not stupid. Please cease trying to act like you are.

Post by Thomas Heger
Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.

He is of Japanese heritage. This isn't a secret.

Post by Thomas Heger
You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).
So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.
Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.
So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.

Your attempt to divert attention from the truth only serves to
prove you were lying, and that you were fully aware that you were
lying.

[joeturn]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians', while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.
This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.
Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??
Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.
You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).
So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.
Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.
So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.
TH

Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

[K Wills]

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians', while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.
This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.
Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??
Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.
You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).
So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.
Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.
So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.
TH

Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.

It wasn't a joke. Originally he thought he had arrived in India.

Post by joeturn
He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.

What is a Vlad Islave III?

Post by joeturn
Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

Why is the ENTER/RETURN key so scary for k00ks like you? What
about its use causes you so much fear?

[joeturn]

Post by K Wills

Post by joeturn

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-call-Japanese-people-Asians

Interesting.
But I don't see the connection to Michio Kaku and Bruce Lee.
Bruce Lee is most likely Chinese

He was.

Post by Thomas Heger
and Kaku from Japan.

Nope. He is of Japanese heritage, but he was born in the U.S.

So he's in fact American, not Asian.

Whereas he is not a Native American, he is, in fact, Asian.

'Native Americans' are usually called 'Indians', while citizens of the
nation called USA are commonly called 'Americans'.
This is certainly a misnomer, but of such universal use, that 'American'
is not 'people settling somewhere on the land-mass which belongs to the
continent of America', but 'citizen of the United States'.
Besides the actual native Americans, ALL of these people have heritage
somewhere else. So it's entirely pointless to address this fact, since
simply everybody (of this group of citizens) has such a feature (without
a small minority called 'Indians').

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Of course, Asian encompasses MANY different countries, since Asia
is a continent.

??
Sure, Michio Kaku has roots somewhere in Asia, he's still American,
since born in the USA.
You certainly know, that people have two parents. This is also the case
for the parents (and so forth).
So for the n-th generations we have 2^n possible origins, were ancestors
could eventually come from.
Four generations - for instance - span over a century and would allow to
connect to 16+8+4+2 countries, which 30 and roughly as much nations Asia
has.
So a few mare generations and you could have (possibly) ancestors in
every country thinkable.
TH

Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.

It wasn't a joke. Originally he thought he had arrived in India.

Post by joeturn
He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.

What is a Vlad Islave III?

Post by joeturn
Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

Why is the ENTER/RETURN key so scary for k00ks like you? What
about its use causes you so much fear?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-kasum/columbus-day-a-bad-idea_b_742708.html

[Thomas Heger]

Post by joeturn

Post by K Wills

Post by joeturn
Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.

It wasn't a joke. Originally he thought he had arrived in India.

Post by joeturn
He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.

What is a Vlad Islave III?

Post by joeturn
Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-kasum/columbus-day-a-bad-idea_b_742708.html

My assumption about settlers in America from the 'Old World' dates far
more back than the Vikings.

I believe, the Phoenicians had trades with America since many thousand
years ago.

It is a complicated system and was carried out in great secrecy, but was
a tremendous success and made the Phoenicians VERY rich and influential.

In the ancient time, the central powers controlled all the trade routes.
And 'control' means 'charging customs'.

E.g. the Romans controlled the trade routes to India over the Nile, the
desert and a port at the Red Sea. They demanded 25% from the stuff
transported along this route.

The Phoenicians did not wanted to pay, so the Romans wanted to destroy
them.

What they were hiding was America and the wealth of natural resources,
they could exploit totally undisturbed.

They told the Indians how to dig for gold, silver, copper and gems and
paid them with glass pearls (or similar).

And they told people, that the Earth is flat and beyond the towers of
Hercules you would drop into the abyss.

The smart people did not really believe this, but most people did. But
they had neither opportunity nor reason to test this assumption. And so
the continent stayed mostly unknown for millennia.

The Phoenicians got very wealthy in the meantime and could protect their
colony by mercenaries ('pirates') against accidental discovery by amateurs.

So all was nice, until the Spanish Kings went too greedy and wanted also
their share.

So America was 'discovered' by Columbus (and subsequent conquistadors).

But of course the Phoenicians did not tell them the tricks of their
trade. Instead they told them about 'El Dorado', what the Spanish are
searching until the present day.

Since they could not find the gold and the native population did not
know, what they are talking about, the Spanish got nuts and wiped out
the Indians.


TH

[K Wills]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by joeturn

Post by K Wills

Post by joeturn
Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.

It wasn't a joke. Originally he thought he had arrived in India.

Post by joeturn
He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.

What is a Vlad Islave III?

Post by joeturn
Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-kasum/columbus-day-a-bad-idea_b_742708.html

My assumption about settlers in America from the 'Old World' dates far
more back than the Vikings.
I believe, the Phoenicians had trades with America since many thousand
years ago.
It is a complicated system and was carried out in great secrecy, but was
a tremendous success and made the Phoenicians VERY rich and influential.
In the ancient time, the central powers controlled all the trade routes.
And 'control' means 'charging customs'.
E.g. the Romans controlled the trade routes to India over the Nile, the
desert and a port at the Red Sea. They demanded 25% from the stuff
transported along this route.
The Phoenicians did not wanted to pay, so the Romans wanted to destroy
them.
What they were hiding was America and the wealth of natural resources,
they could exploit totally undisturbed.
They told the Indians how to dig for gold, silver, copper and gems and
paid them with glass pearls (or similar).
And they told people, that the Earth is flat and beyond the towers of
Hercules you would drop into the abyss.
The smart people did not really believe this, but most people did. But
they had neither opportunity nor reason to test this assumption. And so
the continent stayed mostly unknown for millennia.
The Phoenicians got very wealthy in the meantime and could protect their
colony by mercenaries ('pirates') against accidental discovery by amateurs.
So all was nice, until the Spanish Kings went too greedy and wanted also
their share.
So America was 'discovered' by Columbus (and subsequent conquistadors).
But of course the Phoenicians did not tell them the tricks of their
trade. Instead they told them about 'El Dorado', what the Spanish are
searching until the present day.
Since they could not find the gold and the native population did not
know, what they are talking about, the Spanish got nuts and wiped out
the Indians.

And your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence is..?
Oh yeah. You've already made it clear the Phoenicians did not
come to the Americas.

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
My assumption about settlers in America from the 'Old World' dates far
more back than the Vikings.
I believe, the Phoenicians had trades with America since many thousand
years ago.
It is a complicated system and was carried out in great secrecy, but was
a tremendous success and made the Phoenicians VERY rich and influential.
In the ancient time, the central powers controlled all the trade routes.
And 'control' means 'charging customs'.
E.g. the Romans controlled the trade routes to India over the Nile, the
desert and a port at the Red Sea. They demanded 25% from the stuff
transported along this route.
The Phoenicians did not wanted to pay, so the Romans wanted to destroy
them.
What they were hiding was America and the wealth of natural resources,
they could exploit totally undisturbed.
They told the Indians how to dig for gold, silver, copper and gems and
paid them with glass pearls (or similar).
And they told people, that the Earth is flat and beyond the towers of
Hercules you would drop into the abyss.
The smart people did not really believe this, but most people did. But
they had neither opportunity nor reason to test this assumption. And so
the continent stayed mostly unknown for millennia.
The Phoenicians got very wealthy in the meantime and could protect their
colony by mercenaries ('pirates') against accidental discovery by amateurs.
So all was nice, until the Spanish Kings went too greedy and wanted also
their share.
So America was 'discovered' by Columbus (and subsequent conquistadors).
But of course the Phoenicians did not tell them the tricks of their
trade. Instead they told them about 'El Dorado', what the Spanish are
searching until the present day.
Since they could not find the gold and the native population did not
know, what they are talking about, the Spanish got nuts and wiped out
the Indians.

And your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence is..?
Oh yeah. You've already made it clear the Phoenicians did not
come to the Americas.

Of course the Phoenicians have been in America from about 2000 b.c.,
together with Africans and Egyptians.

The culture the Europeans have destroyed dates back for millions of
years and was more advanced than that of medieval Europe.

History -as we are made to believe- is a bunch of blatant lies.

The nonsense written in the textbooks is so far from the truth, that
it's not even worth to spit on them.

Especially the history of the Americas was very, very remote to what
usually people believe.

So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
about it:

TH

[K Wills]

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 07:39:17 +0200, Thomas Heger <***@web.de>
wrote:

[...]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
Since they could not find the gold and the native population did not
know, what they are talking about, the Spanish got nuts and wiped out
the Indians.

And your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence is..?
Oh yeah. You've already made it clear the Phoenicians did not
come to the Americas.

Of course the Phoenicians have been in America from about 2000 b.c.,
together with Africans and Egyptians.

Nope.

Post by Thomas Heger
The culture the Europeans have destroyed dates back for millions of
years and was more advanced than that of medieval Europe.

So the Europeans were more advanced than the Europeans?

Post by Thomas Heger
History -as we are made to believe- is a bunch of blatant lies.

Yet you can never offer anything more than guesses, ideas,
assumptions and hoaxes for support of this.

Post by Thomas Heger
The nonsense written in the textbooks is so far from the truth, that
it's not even worth to spit on them.
Especially the history of the Americas was very, very remote to what
usually people believe.

I await your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence.

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But if I type 'phoenicians in America' into google's search mask, I get
a bunch of pages. E.g.:

"5 undeniable proofs Phoenicians discovered AMERICA!"

http://blogoftheboss.com/five-undeniable-proofs-phoenicians-discovered-america/

or

"Phoenician's discovered the America's not Christopher Columbus"

or

"Transatlantic crossing: Did Phoenicians beat Columbus by 2000 years?"

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/world/americas/phoenician-christopher-columbus-america-sailboat/

I personally think it's true, because it would make sense. It's easy to
see, that how the Phoenicians behaved would have been really profitable.

So most likely they did what I think they did.


TH

[K Wills]

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

Post by Thomas Heger
But if I type 'phoenicians in America' into google's search mask, I get
"5 undeniable proofs Phoenicians discovered AMERICA!"
http://blogoftheboss.com/five-undeniable-proofs-phoenicians-discovered-america/

The first "proof" isn't proof. It looks nothing like a map of the
world.
The second "proof" is meaningless. A line drawn from one point to
another intersects stuff. Uh, DUH!
The third, the Baal Stone, was PROVED a hoax quite some time ago.
The scratches on the stone do not resemble the known Phoenician
alphabet.
Number four is the Bat Creek Stone. It was confirmed a hoax.
You'll recall my mocking you by citing Robert Mainfort and Mary Kwas
(archaeologists at the University of Arkansas) and how they exposed
the Bat Creek Stone as a forgery,
And finally, number five.
While it is true that there are writings of Diodorus Siculus
mentioning Phoenicians’ discovery of a huge land with navigable
rivers, there is nothing that suggests where this land is. The
Americas aren't ruled out, but it's not 'proof' of the Phoenicians
having come to the Americas.

Post by Thomas Heger
or
"Phoenician's discovered the America's not Christopher Columbus"
http://youtu.be/kv9Kn-Q0TCw

K00k videos are entertain, but they are not evidence. And Glen
Beck is a k00k. Especially since he's regurgitating that which has
been proved a hoax.
Did you notice that he claims the Bat Creek Stone is Block
Hebrew? The Phoenicians didn't write in any form of Hebrew. Certainly
no one who wrote about them claimed they did.

Post by Thomas Heger
or
"Transatlantic crossing: Did Phoenicians beat Columbus by 2000 years?"
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/world/americas/phoenician-christopher-columbus-america-sailboat/
I personally think it's true, because it would make sense.

No it wouldn't.

Post by Thomas Heger
It's easy to
see, that how the Phoenicians behaved would have been really profitable.
So most likely they did what I think they did.

But they didn't. Using "evidence" that has been proved to be
hoaxes won't support your claim.
Do you have anything VALID to present?

[Thomas Heger]

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

Columbus was only on a few Caribbean Islands and never in America.

So he 'discovered' Haiti - if you wish.

But actually the island was already inhabited by a lot of people.

The contribution of Columbus (to progress of mankind) was to wipe out
this population.

But America he had never seen.


TH

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:34:21 +0200, Thomas Heger <***@web.de>
wrote:

Context restored at no additional cost.

Do you really believe your dishonestly snipping away the context
benefits you, Thomas? This is a serious question.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

Columbus was only on a few Caribbean Islands and never in America.

The islands are a part of the Americas. But that doesn't matter
as your delusion (I'll pretend you aren't flat out LYING) is exposed
below.

Post by Thomas Heger
So he 'discovered' Haiti - if you wish.
But actually the island was already inhabited by a lot of people.

Thus my comment, "It's just that some others discovered it before
him."
This is true of the natives of South America as well.

Post by Thomas Heger
The contribution of Columbus (to progress of mankind) was to wipe out
this population.

But he didn't. While many, many indigenous peoples were killed,
and some by Columbus, he couldn't have wiped them out. He was not
welcome in Hispaniola due to his treatment of colonists and natives.
Further, there are Taino people alive today. I can offer cites,
if you want.
What do you believe your LIE gains you? This is a serious
question.

Post by Thomas Heger
But America he had never seen.

History records that on August 14, 1502, he landed on the
American mainland at Puerto Castilla, near Trujillo, Honduras.
I can offer you a cite, proving you wrong, if you'd like. Let me
know if you wish to be proved wrong, again.
If you have anything VALID that will counter the historical
record, please present it. Ideas, guesses, thoughts, assumptions, and
the like will NOT be acceptable.

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
But if I type 'phoenicians in America' into google's search mask, I get
"5 undeniable proofs Phoenicians discovered AMERICA!"
http://blogoftheboss.com/five-undeniable-proofs-phoenicians-discovered-america/

The first "proof" isn't proof. It looks nothing like a map of the
world.
The second "proof" is meaningless. A line drawn from one point to
another intersects stuff. Uh, DUH!
The third, the Baal Stone, was PROVED a hoax quite some time ago.
The scratches on the stone do not resemble the known Phoenician
alphabet.
Number four is the Bat Creek Stone. It was confirmed a hoax.
You'll recall my mocking you by citing Robert Mainfort and Mary Kwas
(archaeologists at the University of Arkansas) and how they exposed
the Bat Creek Stone as a forgery.
And finally, number five.
While it is true that there are writings of Diodorus Siculus
mentioning Phoenicians’ discovery of a huge land with navigable
rivers, there is nothing that suggests where this land is. The
Americas aren't ruled out, but it's not 'proof' of the Phoenicians
having come to the Americas.

Thomas?

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
or
"Phoenician's discovered the America's not Christopher Columbus"
http://youtu.be/kv9Kn-Q0TCw

K00k videos are entertain, but they are not evidence. And Glen
Beck is a k00k. Especially since he's regurgitating that which has
been proved a hoax.
Did you notice that he claims the Bat Creek Stone is Block
Hebrew? The Phoenicians didn't write in any form of Hebrew. Certainly
no one who wrote about them claimed they did.

Thomas?

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
or
"Transatlantic crossing: Did Phoenicians beat Columbus by 2000 years?"
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/28/world/americas/phoenician-christopher-columbus-america-sailboat/
I personally think it's true, because it would make sense.

No it wouldn't.

Post by Thomas Heger
It's easy to
see, that how the Phoenicians behaved would have been really profitable.
So most likely they did what I think they did.

But they didn't. Using "evidence" that has been proved to be
hoaxes won't support your claim.
Do you have anything VALID to present?

That you have nothing valid to offer is noted.

[e***@hotmail.com]

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here. And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!

And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

[joeturn]

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here. And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!
And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

Jethrow You have it wrong Tesla was sent all the patents from the patent office and he decided if they were useful and if so,he got first priority.If those patents could produce free energy then the Government Stooge, Tesla put a halt to its progress by filing for the patent.
Heinrich Hertz got his patent stolen by Tesla

[e***@hotmail.com]

Post by joeturn

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here. And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!
And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

Jethrow You have it wrong Tesla was sent all the patents from the patent office and he decided if they were useful and if so,he got first priority.If those patents could produce free energy then the Government Stooge, Tesla put a halt to its progress by filing for the patent.
Heinrich Hertz got his patent stolen by Tesla

You can provide some evidence of this? What am I saying, of course you can't.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by joeturn

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here. And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!
And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

Jethrow You have it wrong Tesla was sent all the patents from the patent office and he decided if they were useful and if so,he got first priority.If those patents could produce free energy then the Government Stooge, Tesla put a halt to its progress by filing for the patent.
Heinrich Hertz got his patent stolen by Tesla

Please present your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for your claim. If
your claim is true, you'll have no problem producing the evidence for
it.
I'm waiting...

[joeturn]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by joeturn

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here. And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!
And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

Jethrow You have it wrong Tesla was sent all the patents from the patent office and he decided if they were useful and if so,he got first priority.If those patents could produce free energy then the Government Stooge, Tesla put a halt to its progress by filing for the patent.
Heinrich Hertz got his patent stolen by Tesla

Please present your VALID, VERIFIABLE evidence for your claim. If
your claim is true, you'll have no problem producing the evidence for
it.
I'm waiting...
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/rowe-s-and-columns/4440275/Was-Tesla-for-real--or-not-

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/einstein.htm

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by e***@hotmail.com

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger

Post by K Wills

Post by Thomas Heger
So Columbus did not discover America, the continent was not empty and
the Spanish invaders were not niece people.

He did discover America. It's just that some people, the Native
Americans, discovered it before he did.

Post by Thomas Heger
Just type in 'American holocaust' and watch a few of the YouTube videos
http://youtu.be/Qra6pcn4AOE
http://youtu.be/o51LPfrjsqQ
http://youtu.be/oJr6jyPNmZE
http://youtu.be/GCir-NX0zdQ

What, in reality please, does any of that have to do with your
delusions that the Phoenicians visited ancient Americas?

It should show, that Columbus was an evil bastard and that he did not
discover the Americas.

But he did. It's just that some others discovered it before him.

You can't "rediscover" something. Leif Ericsson found America long before Columbus was here.

It's no secret the Vikings were here long before Columbus. And
the Chinese as well. It's thought by some that Saint Brendan visited
before any of them. The evidence is, in reality, non-existent. What
exists is oral history from Ireland. While he could have made the
journey, as proved by Tim Severin, this doesn't prove he actually made
it.
But if they told no one, what good is their discovery?
If I discover something, but tell no one, then you discover this
same thing years later, what rightful claim do I have over the matter?
None, of course.

Post by e***@hotmail.com
And since there were people here when Columbus arrived, he can hardly have "discovered" it. It's like Marconi getting credit for having "invented" wireless radio transmission when he was using equipment invented by and patented by Nikola Tesla!
And, Columbus really does appear to have been an evil bastard.

Some of the Taino might agree, if they were still alive.
It's well known that he, and those under his command, enslaved
many of the Taino. Some of them were mutilated and killed. This, in
part, led to his arrest and return to Spain.
However, he wasn't actually evil. He was a product of his time
and culture. It's easy to judge him by our norms and mores, but it's
not just to do so.

[K Wills]

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT), joeturn <***@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[...]

Post by joeturn

Post by K Wills

Post by joeturn
Native Americans were called Indians as a joke,By Christopher Columbus.

It wasn't a joke. Originally he thought he had arrived in India.

Post by joeturn
He followed in his dads foot steps and was Vlad Islave III.

What is a Vlad Islave III?

Slowjoe, you didn't answer my question.

Post by joeturn

Post by K Wills

Post by joeturn
Queen Isabella sent him on 4 Slave capturing voyages and the joke was made as a trip to find a westward passage to INDIA,hence the captured Native American slaves were called Indians to make people think he went westward to India.

Why is the ENTER/RETURN key so scary for k00ks like you? What
about its use causes you so much fear?

Slowjoe, you didn't answer my question.

Post by joeturn
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-kasum/columbus-day-a-bad-idea_b_742708.html

What, in reality please, does that have to do with the
discussion? It doesn't answer the questions I asked you.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

Now Eddie is venturing into racism? Wow. Just wow.

[BDK]

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

And as always, they don't look much alike, but the do look more alike
than most of Ed's "Actors" do.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

And as always, they don't look much alike, but the do look more alike
than most of Ed's "Actors" do.

Bruce Lee was of Chinese heritage while Dr. Kaku is Japanese.
They look NOTHING alike. Eddie has proved that, to him, they all look
alike. Very racist of him.

[BDK]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

And as always, they don't look much alike, but the do look more alike
than most of Ed's "Actors" do.

Bruce Lee was of Chinese heritage while Dr. Kaku is Japanese.
They look NOTHING alike. Eddie has proved that, to him, they all look
alike. Very racist of him.

To you and me, no, they don't look anything alike, but to the faceblind
and crazy, they do.

[K Wills (Shill #3)]

Post by BDK

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

And as always, they don't look much alike, but the do look more alike
than most of Ed's "Actors" do.

Bruce Lee was of Chinese heritage while Dr. Kaku is Japanese.
They look NOTHING alike. Eddie has proved that, to him, they all look
alike. Very racist of him.

To you and me, no, they don't look anything alike, but to the faceblind
and crazy, they do.

Eddie can't think two people of two completely different ethnic
demographics look alike, can he? I don't want to accept that he really
is that mentally unstable.
Though it is better than his being a racist.

[BDK]

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by BDK

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)

Post by BDK

Post by joeturn
http://www.wellaware1.com/wp-content/uploads/received_10203089400540758.jpeg

And as always, they don't look much alike, but the do look more alike
than most of Ed's "Actors" do.

Bruce Lee was of Chinese heritage while Dr. Kaku is Japanese.
They look NOTHING alike. Eddie has proved that, to him, they all look
alike. Very racist of him.

To you and me, no, they don't look anything alike, but to the faceblind
and crazy, they do.

Eddie can't think two people of two completely different ethnic
demographics look alike, can he?

Shit, he's claimed someone who wasn't even close to be the same person
from just their hairline.

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
I don't want to accept that he really
is that mentally unstable.

I can.

Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Though it is better than his being a racist.

True, but I think that's involed too.