Discussion:
Is Animal Farm a fiction of conspiracy?
(too old to reply)
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-10 14:22:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Maybe... Meow! >(@.@)<
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-10 15:08:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"Animal Farm" is an allegory for Stalinism. George Orwell was a Communist who felt that Stalin perverted the dream of the "Worker's Paradise." "Animal Farm" is his take on this.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-10 16:21:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
"Animal Farm" is an allegory for Stalinism. George Orwell was a Communist who felt that Stalin perverted the dream of the "Worker's Paradise." "Animal Farm" is his take on this.
That's definitely a very popular conspiracy! No, I don't wanna research
about them. In the end, politics is backed by weapons of mass destruction.

You don't need much readings to understand the cruelty of wars. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-11 02:53:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
"Animal Farm" is an allegory for Stalinism. George Orwell was a Communist who felt that Stalin perverted the dream of the "Worker's Paradise." "Animal Farm" is his take on this.
That's definitely a very popular conspiracy! No, I don't wanna research
about them. In the end, politics is backed by weapons of mass destruction.

You don't need much readings to understand the cruelty of wars. :)
- show quoted text -
A literary critique is not a conspiracy.

If you "don't wanna research," then you might listen to the people who did.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-12 10:10:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
A literary critique is not a conspiracy.
If you "don't wanna research," then you might listen to the people who did.
Not interested in various political and religious ideologies, when in
the end, it's about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-12 11:13:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 18:10:52 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by e***@yahoo.com
A literary critique is not a conspiracy.
If you "don't wanna research," then you might listen to the people who did.
Not interested in various political and religious ideologies, when in
the end, it's about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people.
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-12 14:02:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Obviously when the pig urinated on the plans (that he would later inact, claiming they were his own) that was a weapon of mass destruction.

No, Manny shifts the goal posts when he doesn't have a response
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-12 16:15:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Obviously when the pig urinated on the plans (that he would later
inact, claiming they were his own) that was a weapon of mass
destruction.
Destroying the plans wasn't a weapon of mass destruction.
Post by e***@yahoo.com
No, Manny shifts the goal posts when he doesn't have a response
Agreed.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-12 17:48:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Destroying the plans wasn't a weapon of mass destruction.
*****
That was a joke. Sorry.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-13 13:57:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Destroying the plans wasn't a weapon of mass destruction.
*****
That was a joke. Sorry.
Ah. OK.
I was wondering if it might have been. I took a gamble and, well,
now you know why I don't vacation in Vegas :)
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-13 15:32:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
I took a gamble and, well,
now you know why I don't vacation in Vegas:)
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-12 15:18:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
People claimed that Animal Farm was a reflection of evil communism. I
didn't research on it. I will leave it to readers who are interesting in
politics. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-12 15:42:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
People claimed that Animal Farm was a reflection of evil communism. I
didn't research on it. I will leave it to readers who are interesting in
politics. :)
- show quoted text -
George Orwell was a Communist. He was disappointed in the direction Stalin had taken Communism, and the book reflected that.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-12 16:15:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 23:18:01 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
People claimed that Animal Farm was a reflection of evil communism. I
didn't research on it. I will leave it to readers who are interesting in
politics. :)
So you made a claim and, as ALWAYS, are unable to support it.
I'm not surprised.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-12 18:04:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
So you made a claim and, as ALWAYS, are unable to support it.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-12 19:56:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
So you made a claim and, as ALWAYS, are unable to support it.
I'm not surprised.
My claim is: I don't remember anything special about Animal Farm. My
other replies are reporting what I heard about the title.

That's all.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-13 02:35:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
So you made a claim and, as ALWAYS, are unable to support it.
I'm not surprised.
My claim is: I don't remember anything special about Animal Farm. My
other replies are reporting what I heard about the title.
That's all.
Whatever. I thought Ernie was the walking definition of ignorance until I met you.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-13 12:05:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Whatever. I thought Ernie was the walking definition of ignorance until I met you.
KWills is always asking for evidences. While I don't have money nor
authority to find evidences. I still like to talk about stories I heard.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-13 13:58:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:05:49 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Whatever. I thought Ernie was the walking definition of ignorance until I met you.
KWills is always asking for evidences. While I don't have money nor
authority to find evidences. I still like to talk about stories I heard.
You don't need money to point out your claim of it being
"...about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people." You only need to cite where within the book this happens.
Of course, if doesn't. You simply made it up as you do so much
else.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-15 03:56:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
You don't need money to point out your claim of it being
"...about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people." You only need to cite where within the book this happens.
Of course, if doesn't. You simply made it up as you do so much
else.
What's wrong about trying to explain a conspiracy differently? This
newsgroup is a place for chit-chat!
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-15 08:54:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:56:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
You don't need money to point out your claim of it being
"...about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people." You only need to cite where within the book this happens.
Of course, if doesn't. You simply made it up as you do so much
else.
What's wrong about trying to explain a conspiracy differently? This
newsgroup is a place for chit-chat!
There is nothing wrong with explaining a conspiracy differently.
However, lying and claiming _Animal Farm_ is"...about using weapons of
mass destruction to kill opposition people" isn't discussion. It's
just you lying.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-15 13:51:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
There is nothing wrong with explaining a conspiracy differently.
However, lying and claiming _Animal Farm_ is"...about using weapons of
mass destruction to kill opposition people" isn't discussion. It's
just you lying.
My claim was everything would end up drawing weapons to finish the duel.

I should start questioning your intelligence. You just wanna alter
someone's words to prove that everyone was.. highly mechanized. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-16 09:29:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:51:32 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
There is nothing wrong with explaining a conspiracy differently.
However, lying and claiming _Animal Farm_ is"...about using weapons of
mass destruction to kill opposition people" isn't discussion. It's
just you lying.
My claim was everything would end up drawing weapons to finish the duel.
That was not your claim.
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
I should start questioning your intelligence. You just wanna alter
someone's words to prove that everyone was.. highly mechanized. :)
Here is a C&P of your claim about _Animal Farm_:

Message-ID: <ommjvg$iv1$***@dont-email.me>


"... it's about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people."

Then, in Message-ID: <omnmac$t8o$***@dont-email.me>, you LIED and
stated you were claiming the following:

"My claim is: I don't remember anything special about Animal Farm."

Now you've made up a new claim.
Again, if you're going to lie, don't lie about something to easy
to prove.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-16 11:52:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
....
Now you've made up a new claim.
Again, if you're going to lie, don't lie about something to easy
to prove.
That's your way of forging a conspiracy about me.

Let me repeat that I cannot remember anything important nor special
about Animal Farm. And most political conflicts in physical reality
usually end up as military confrontations.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-17 08:04:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:52:06 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
....
Now you've made up a new claim.
Again, if you're going to lie, don't lie about something to easy
to prove.
That's your way of forging a conspiracy about me.
Please cease lying.
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Let me repeat that I cannot remember anything important nor special
about Animal Farm. And most political conflicts in physical reality
usually end up as military confrontations.
Yet you claimed "... it's about using weapons of mass destruction
to kill opposition people."
Upon what do you base your claim?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:40:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
That was not your claim.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:44:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
There is nothing wrong with explaining a conspiracy differently.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-15 12:50:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
You don't need money to point out your claim of it being
"...about using weapons of mass destruction to kill opposition
people." You only need to cite where within the book this happens.
Of course, if doesn't. You simply made it up as you do so much
else.
What's wrong about trying to explain a conspiracy differently? This
newsgroup is a place for chit-chat!
--
You're not explaining a conspiracy differently, you're muddying the water by making crap up.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-15 13:53:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
What's wrong about trying to explain a conspiracy differently? This
newsgroup is a place for chit-chat!
KWills is a robot programmed to deny everything, because no civilian on
planet could have the money nor resources to prove a conspiracy. I could
accept that. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-16 09:29:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:53:20 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
What's wrong about trying to explain a conspiracy differently? This
newsgroup is a place for chit-chat!
KWills is a robot programmed to deny everything, because no civilian on
planet could have the money nor resources to prove a conspiracy. I could
accept that. :)
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-16 11:46:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
Why don't you help people here to find out? It's cheap to deny
everything. Anyone can do that, not just you.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-17 02:21:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
Why don't you help people here to find out? It's cheap to deny
everything. Anyone can do that, not just you.
Because as far as we can tell, there's nothing to find out.
You think there's something there, it's up to you to do the research to find it.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-17 08:04:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:46:50 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
Why don't you help people here to find out? It's cheap to deny
everything. Anyone can do that, not just you.
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-17 11:19:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked.
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked, too! ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-18 08:11:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:19:17 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked.
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked, too! ;)
You asked for a cite. I provided it. Would you like to try a
different lie?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-17 15:40:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:46:50 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
Why don't you help people here to find out? It's cheap to deny
everything. Anyone can do that, not just you.
Your avoidance fails to answer the question I asked.
Are you serious?


http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:40:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why claim a conspiracy exists if there is no evidence of its
existence?
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-13 13:57:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 03:56:56 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
So you made a claim and, as ALWAYS, are unable to support it.
I'm not surprised.
My claim is: I don't remember anything special about Animal Farm. My
other replies are reporting what I heard about the title.
That's all.
From Message-ID: <omnmac$t8o$***@dont-email.me>

"Not interested in various political and religious ideologies, when in
the end, it's about using weapons of mass destruction to kill
opposition people."

If you're going to lie, lie about something not so easy to prove.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-13 15:32:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
If you're going to lie, lie about something not so easy to prove.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
marston shores
2017-08-12 18:03:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
BDK
2017-08-13 00:50:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-13 13:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-08-13 14:21:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>, shill_num_3
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-13 17:37:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-13 17:40:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was
Oh my, at long last Kenty caves in and fesses up.

About time Kent.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-13 19:04:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was
Oh my, at long last Kenty caves in and fesses up.
*****
Apparently, you don't understand what "even if" means.

He hasn't admitted to anything, just as you've never presented anything but circumstantial evidence to support your claim.
marston shores
2017-08-13 20:06:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-13 20:20:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
*****
You are deluded on so many levels.

"Even if" is not a confession in any real sense.
marston shores
2017-08-14 04:57:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
You are deluded on so many levels.
"Even if" is not a confession in any real sense.
It is. Kenty admitted he's a convicted felon.

You are a race traitor. You are worse than him.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-14 14:15:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
You are deluded on so many levels.
"Even if" is not a confession in any real sense.
It is. Kenty admitted he's a convicted felon.
You are a race traitor. You are worse than him.
No it isn't. You are a fool.
Jesus will have words with you before casting you into Hell for being a hate filled monster.
marston shores
2017-08-14 23:11:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No it isn't. You are a fool.
Jesus will have words with you before casting you into Hell for being a hate filled monster.
I look forward to Jesus's return. He will come and judge the inferior
races. And I will help him if he lets me.
BDK
2017-08-15 07:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No it isn't. You are a fool.
Jesus will have words with you before casting you into Hell for being a hate filled monster.
I look forward to Jesus's return. He will come and judge the inferior
races. And I will help him if he lets me.
What race could possibly be inferior to yours?
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
marston shores
2017-08-13 22:05:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
Wills forgery.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-14 01:16:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
Wills forgery.
I have no reason to believe you.
marston shores
2017-08-14 04:53:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Wills forgery.
I have no reason to believe you.
Yes you do. But as a nigger lover, your soul is lost.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-14 14:13:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Wills forgery.
I have no reason to believe you.
Yes you do. But as a nigger lover, your soul is lost.
No, there is no reason for me to believe that your racist, homophobic posts are forgeries.

Insulting me does not give me any reason to believe you.
marston shores
2017-08-14 23:10:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No, there is no reason for me to believe that your racist, homophobic posts are forgeries.
Insulting me does not give me any reason to believe you.
You will burn in Hell for doubting me.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-16 00:10:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No, there is no reason for me to believe that your racist, homophobic posts are forgeries.
Insulting me does not give me any reason to believe you.
You will burn in Hell for doubting me.
You are not divine. Doubting you will have no effect on my eternal soul.
Having said that, if YOU are going to be in Heaven, burning in Hell would be preferable to spending eternity with you and your ilk.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-15 08:54:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Wills forgery.
I have no reason to believe you.
Yes you do. But as a nigger lover, your soul is lost.
No, there is no reason for me to believe that your racist, homophobic posts are forgeries.
Insulting me does not give me any reason to believe you.
If you check the headers, you'll see that everything matches up.
If Marston isn't the one posting, it means someone is using his
machine and access to post. Not actually impossible, but not very
likely.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:44:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
If Marston isn't the one posting, it means someone is using his
machine and access to post.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-17 02:26:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
If Marston isn't the one posting, it means someone is using his
machine and access to post.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

KWills Shill #3
2017-08-17 08:05:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
If Marston isn't the one posting, it means someone is using his
machine and access to post.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
http://youtu.be/xCtNkGxOwNo

--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-17 15:41:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
If Marston isn't the one posting, it means someone is using his
machine and access to post.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
http://youtu.be/xCtNkGxOwNo
Are you serious?


http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-17 18:28:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Still nothing here that indicates that Kent Wills is posting as K. Wills.
marston shores
2017-08-17 19:02:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Still nothing here that indicates that Kent Wills is posting as K. Wills.
You must be blind to over a decade of evidence and photobucket pics he
has posted here.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-17 19:48:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Unless you can show me KENT WILLS mug shot, and compare it to a photo that K. WILLS has provided to show they're the same person, I fail to see what posted pictures prove.
marston shores
2017-08-17 19:53:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Unless you can show me KENT WILLS mug shot, and compare it to a photo that K. WILLS has provided to show they're the same person, I fail to see what posted pictures prove.
Years of posting and denials by KEnty.

It's him, deal with it.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-17 22:32:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I'm not taking something on your say-so.
marston shores
2017-08-17 22:52:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I'm not taking something on your say-so.
You will. Or you will be cast into hell.

Tell Kenty to post the pictures of Lin in her whore clothing.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-18 00:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I'm not taking something on your say-so.
You will. Or you will be cast into hell.

Tell Kenty to post the pictures of Lin in her whore clothing.
*****
You're a horrible person. If they're letting the likes of you into Heaven, standards must have lapsed.
marston shores
2017-08-18 03:27:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I'm not taking something on your say-so.
You will. Or you will be cast into hell.
Tell Kenty to post the pictures of Lin in her whore clothing.
*****
You're a horrible person. If they're letting the likes of you into Heaven, standards must have lapsed.
Thanks to Rev. Larson, I am as pure as the driven snow.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-18 03:42:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
- show quoted text -
Thanks to Rev. Larson, I am as pure as the driven snow.
*****
You probably believe that. Sad, really.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-18 08:13:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I'm not taking something on your say-so.
You will. Or you will be cast into hell.
Tell Kenty to post the pictures of Lin in her whore clothing.
*****
You're a horrible person. If they're letting the likes of you into
Heaven, standards must have lapsed.
I'd like Marston to explain what pictures he means. Since I've
never had any pictures of Lin in "whore clothing" I can't have ever
made them available.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-18 08:13:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Unless you can show me KENT WILLS mug shot, and compare it to a
photo that K. WILLS has provided to show they're the same person, I
fail to see what posted pictures prove.
I'm amazed that Marston felt it necessary to LIE and claim I've
been posting on alt.conspiracy for a decade. I can't figure out what
he hoped to gain from such a lie.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-08-13 22:58:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
You have Lar$on running your life. He admitted nothing, but you're
programmed to say he did.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-14 09:00:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He hasn't admitted to anything,
Yes he did. Your have the devil in you making you lie.
You have Lar$on running your life. He admitted nothing, but you're
programmed to say he did.
Marston is becoming more unstable. Watch for him to returning to
claiming the posts he's sent are fake.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-14 23:09:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Marston is becoming more unstable. Watch for him to returning to
claiming the posts he's sent are fake.
My posts are real.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-16 00:06:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
Marston is becoming more unstable. Watch for him to returning to
claiming the posts he's sent are fake.
My posts are real.
And yet, you keep claiming at least 10% of them are "Wills fakes."
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-14 08:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was
Oh my, at long last Kenty caves in and fesses up.
*****
Apparently, you don't understand what "even if" means.
Marston understands, but honesty is shunned in Lar$on's cult. And
he's a good cult member.
Post by marston shores
He hasn't admitted to anything, just as you've never presented
anything but circumstantial evidence to support your claim.
Since he has nothing else, he can offer nothing else.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-08-13 22:57:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>, shill_num_3
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He seems to be a true believer/sucker.
Post by KWills Shill #3
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
There is no correlation. He is what he is, a con artist.
Post by KWills Shill #3
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
That's set in stone. Lar$son is a scam artist, nothing else.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-14 09:00:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:57:21 -0400, BDK <***@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He seems to be a true believer/sucker.
It's fairly common with cult members. They have a hard time
accepting the reality that their leader is a fraud.
I didn't want to believe it when I was first told. But I had to
accept the evidence. Well, about 75% of it. After verifying that much
I realized confirming more, while possible, would be over kill.
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
There is no correlation. He is what he is, a con artist.
True. But Marston appears to believe that if I had been convicted
of a burglary, it would somehow erase the truth about his cult leader.
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
That's set in stone. Lar$son is a scam artist, nothing else.
I'm confident that he still is, but since I've not paid attention
to any of his actions for well over a year, I can't claim to KNOW he
is.
If anyone wishes to provide evidence that he's no longer scamming
people, I'll give it an honest review. I've made this offer in the
past. No one has offered anything as of the time I write this.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-14 23:08:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
True. But Marston appears to believe that if I had been convicted
of a burglary, it would somehow erase the truth about his cult leader.
Rev. Larson has no cult. Your lies come from the devil.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-16 00:07:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
True. But Marston appears to believe that if I had been convicted
of a burglary, it would somehow erase the truth about his cult leader.
Rev. Larson has no cult. Your lies come from the devil.
And yet, you talk of him exactly as a cult member would.
eohoe
2017-08-14 06:53:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now, which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens, why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then) to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.

In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.

It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!

Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
Loading Image...
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-14 09:03:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now,
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW? Ok, you probably didn't know of him 15 years ago, but
you have for well over a year.
You really are a very slow learner. And here I though my pointing
out your lack of intellect was just a lame insult. Turns out, it's
100% accurate. Or you're being less than honest in your post.
And who is this "we" of which you write? You are only one person.
If you're hearing voices when no one is around, they're not real.
Post by eohoe
which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens,
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
Is your god really as incompetent as you would have everyone
believe? This is a very serious question.
And why would where I live matter in regards to Lar$on having
been exposed as a con man? I fail to see the connection your mental
illness causes you to see. You'll need to explain it.
Post by eohoe
why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then)
How so? Do you honestly think the TRUTH about Lar$on's scam is
dependant upon where I live? Really?
I'm certain I could live in any state and the truth about
Lar$on's scam would remain the same. But you'll provide the valid,
verifiable evidence that the truth about him is dependant on my state
of residence.
Post by eohoe
to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
Even if I did have such convictions, the TRUTH that Lar$on
scammed people out of their money would not change.
Post by eohoe
In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.
Cite just one example of my lying, thieving, libeling and/or
trolling Lar$on. One is all I ask. Be certain to include the quote and
MID and/or archive link so that those with an interest may verify your
cite.
If you're lying, as you will soon prove you are, you won't offer
the requested cite. None will exist, so you won't be able.
Post by eohoe
It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!
Are you getting the place ready for me? If your posts about your
life are accurate, you've taken up permanent residency at the bottom.
Of course, with your constant lying, it's impossible to know if your
claims about your life are true.
By way of contrast, my life is great.
Did you see the pictures I posted to Facebook from the cruise? I
put a few on Google+ as well, but far more are on Facebook. And since
you screwed up and commented about a post made only to Facebook, you
know how to get to it.
And you can save your time with the lie about the molar post
being on Google+. I'm confident that anyone with an interest already
checked and saw it was never there. Yes, you will LIE and claim it was
deleted while offing nothing but your worthless word to support the
claim. I'm not aware of anyone claiming they believe you.
Hey, would you thank your god for the fantastic weather we had at
each port of call. Since you claim he alters the weather you will have
to believe that he brought about the unseasonably nice conditions we
experienced.
I only wish we had anticipated the nice weather. We packed for
cooler temperatures. Fortunately, less than 30 minutes in Juneau found
all of us with better suited attire. There is no lack of t-shirt
stores near the port :) And they sell shorts too.
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-14 23:10:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW?
There was no con. Bob can save your soul if you will let him.
eohoe
2017-08-16 08:31:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now,
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW? Ok, you probably didn't know of him 15 years ago, but
you have for well over a year.
Here Kentie MISCONSTRUES my comments to make some specious argument--how
intellectually dishonest of you.
Post by KWills Shill #3
You really are a very slow learner. And here I though my pointing
out your lack of intellect was just a lame insult. Turns out, it's
100% accurate. Or you're being less than honest in your post.
Kentie then brings on the Ad hominem attack, how predictable, you psycho!
Post by KWills Shill #3
And who is this "we" of which you write? You are only one person.
If you're hearing voices when no one is around, they're not real.
Gee, there must be more than 1 person reading this absurd screed that
you are throwing out, DUMMY!
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens,
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
It would seem that the Aspie Freak is moving around a bit. We have
confirmation from 'Doc' and the PI he hired to track this dirt bag down,
that Kentie was living in Arkansas sometime after 2005. In fact 'Doc'
contacted his parole office in AR and got a gag order placed on him to
stop Kentie's harassment.

Sometime around 2013 Kentie put out a G+ page claiming to be living in N
Hollywood but no pro online search engine can place him there, this is
obviously an attempt to establish an alibi for his 2 FELONY convictions
in IA back in early 2000's as he now is claiming that he has lived in N
Hollywood since 1998 and has his G+ page to PROVE it, hilarious.

It is possible that Kentie has moved back to Ankeny, IA as seen in this
screen capture from a Phone Detective search?:

Loading Image...

This shows him living in Rogers, AR up until March of this year with him
presently living in Ankeny, IA.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Is your god really as incompetent as you would have everyone
believe? This is a very serious question.
If the Phone Detective is correct then you WERE in Ankeny at the time of
the 5/17 Derecho and you are one big fat LIAR. This could all be
verified by hiring a PI but I don't really care that much, one way or
the other. Certainly, you were NOT living in N Hollywood.
Post by KWills Shill #3
And why would where I live matter in regards to Lar$on having
been exposed as a con man? I fail to see the connection your mental
illness causes you to see. You'll need to explain it.
Kentie misconstrues my comments at the get to set up this false, lame-o
argument--what a POS.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then)
How so? Do you honestly think the TRUTH about Lar$on's scam is
dependant upon where I live? Really?
"You frequently fabricate arguments that your opponents never made.
Then you attack the "straw man" argument as if your opponent made it"
-anonymous quote, 6/6/11

Kentie, is a real POS.
Post by KWills Shill #3
I'm certain I could live in any state and the truth about
Lar$on's scam would remain the same. But you'll provide the valid,
verifiable evidence that the truth about him is dependant on my state
of residence.
POS.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the one who made the alibi, obviously you thought you need one.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Even if I did have such convictions, the TRUTH that Lar$on
scammed people out of their money would not change.
Totally irrelevant you POS.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.
Cite just one example of my lying, thieving, libeling and/or
trolling Lar$on. One is all I ask. Be certain to include the quote and
MID and/or archive link so that those with an interest may verify your
cite.
If you're lying, as you will soon prove you are, you won't offer
the requested cite. None will exist, so you won't be able.
I never said that you were "lying, thieving, libeling and/or trolling
Lar$on"--your LIES.

"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1"
-anonymous quote, 9/22/08
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!
Are you getting the place ready for me? If your posts about your
life are accurate, you've taken up permanent residency at the bottom.
Of course, with your constant lying, it's impossible to know if your
claims about your life are true.
By way of contrast, my life is great.
If you're now getting paid as a TROLL, things would be.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Did you see the pictures I posted to Facebook from the cruise? I
put a few on Google+ as well, but far more are on Facebook. And since
you screwed up and commented about a post made only to Facebook, you
know how to get to it.
And you can save your time with the lie about the molar post
being on Google+. I'm confident that anyone with an interest already
checked and saw it was never there. Yes, you will LIE and claim it was
deleted while offing nothing but your worthless word to support the
claim. I'm not aware of anyone claiming they believe you.
Hey, would you thank your god for the fantastic weather we had at
each port of call. Since you claim he alters the weather you will have
to believe that he brought about the unseasonably nice conditions we
experienced.
I only wish we had anticipated the nice weather. We packed for
cooler temperatures. Fortunately, less than 30 minutes in Juneau found
all of us with better suited attire. There is no lack of t-shirt
stores near the port :) And they sell shorts too.
Who gives a rats ass?
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
Lord Serapis drew this cartoon of you and then sent Hurricane Hermine to
draw attention to it, pretty nifty, eh?

Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-16 09:40:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now,
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW? Ok, you probably didn't know of him 15 years ago, but
you have for well over a year.
Here Kentie MISCONSTRUES my comments to make some specious argument--how
intellectually dishonest of you.
Why are you lying? The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. You
claim "we" get it now.
Since you would have first learned of Lar$on over a year ago, you
were proving how intellectually limited you truly are. Or you were
being dishonest. Either is possible.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
You really are a very slow learner. And here I though my pointing
out your lack of intellect was just a lame insult. Turns out, it's
100% accurate. Or you're being less than honest in your post.
Kentie then brings on the Ad hominem attack, how predictable, you psycho!
Who is Kentie? Since you've openly admitted Kent is a nym/handle,
you KNOW it's not my name in real life.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And who is this "we" of which you write? You are only one person.
If you're hearing voices when no one is around, they're not real.
Gee, there must be more than 1 person reading this absurd screed that
you are throwing out, DUMMY!
Your lying is not the benefit your mental illness makes you
believe it is.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens,
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
It would seem that the Aspie Freak is moving around a bit. We have
confirmation from 'Doc' and the PI he hired to track this dirt bag down,
Dr. Rabbi Daniel "Doc Savage" Goldblum was a bigger liar than
you. And that is saying something.
And, again, I've posted his name. Do you think I'll actually go
to prison without a trial or even a hearing? He claimed I would. If
you believe his claims, you MUST believe all of them.
Post by eohoe
that Kentie was living in Arkansas sometime after 2005. In fact 'Doc'
contacted his parole office in AR and got a gag order placed on him to
stop Kentie's harassment.
Odd that this happened AFTER I stated I was done with him and
ceased even acknowledging his posts.
How do you explain away this TRUTH?
Post by eohoe
Sometime around 2013 Kentie put out a G+ page claiming to be living in N
Hollywood but no pro online search engine can place him there, this is
obviously an attempt to establish an alibi for his 2 FELONY convictions
in IA back in early 2000's as he now is claiming that he has lived in N
Hollywood since 1998 and has his G+ page to PROVE it, hilarious.
It is possible that Kentie has moved back to Ankeny, IA as seen in this
As you know, but are too scared to admit, I moved to North
Hollywood in 1998. I've been back to Iowa for the occasional visit,
but that's all.
Post by eohoe
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/kwills2.jpg
This shows him living in Rogers, AR up until March of this year with him
presently living in Ankeny, IA.
So your claim that I currently live in Arkansas was another of
your MANY lies?
I note you didn't address the point of my comment. Here it is
again so that you can address the TRUTH that you've been exposed for
the pathological LIAR you are:

If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Is your god really as incompetent as you would have everyone
believe? This is a very serious question.
If the Phone Detective is correct then you WERE in Ankeny at the time of
the 5/17 Derecho and you are one big fat LIAR.
Make up your mind. Was I in Iowa or Arkansas at the time. You've
claimed both. It's impossible for both of your claims, that you state
you PROVED, to be true. Both can be lies. One must be.
Post by eohoe
his could all be
verified by hiring a PI but I don't really care that much, one way or
the other. Certainly, you were NOT living in N Hollywood.
I certainly was.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And why would where I live matter in regards to Lar$on having
been exposed as a con man? I fail to see the connection your mental
illness causes you to see. You'll need to explain it.
Kentie misconstrues my comments at the get to set up this false, lame-o
argument--what a POS.
Your continued lying is not benefiting you. The discussion was,
and is, about Lar$on.
Will you answer the question, or does the mere thought of offing
anything honest scare you as much as you are presenting?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then)
How so? Do you honestly think the TRUTH about Lar$on's scam is
dependant upon where I live? Really?
"You frequently fabricate arguments that your opponents never made.
Then you attack the "straw man" argument as if your opponent made it"
-anonymous quote, 6/6/11
Kentie, is a real POS.
You're the one who think your constant lying benefits you.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
I'm certain I could live in any state and the truth about
Lar$on's scam would remain the same. But you'll provide the valid,
verifiable evidence that the truth about him is dependant on my state
of residence.
POS.
Point of sale? :)
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the one who made the alibi, obviously you thought you need one.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Even if I did have such convictions, the TRUTH that Lar$on
scammed people out of their money would not change.
Totally irrelevant you POS.
Not so. The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. As such, my
pointing out your dishonest position that the TRUTH about his is
somehow dependent on where I live is relevant.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.
Cite just one example of my lying, thieving, libeling and/or
trolling Lar$on. One is all I ask. Be certain to include the quote and
MID and/or archive link so that those with an interest may verify your
cite.
If you're lying, as you will soon prove you are, you won't offer
the requested cite. None will exist, so you won't be able.
I never said that you were "lying, thieving, libeling and/or trolling
Lar$on"--your LIES.
You did, as seen above.
I do appreciate your default admission that you were lying.
Again.
Post by eohoe
"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1"
-anonymous quote, 9/22/08
Your lying, or using the claims of a man so mentally ill he was
institutionalized, is not a benefit.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!
Are you getting the place ready for me? If your posts about your
life are accurate, you've taken up permanent residency at the bottom.
Of course, with your constant lying, it's impossible to know if your
claims about your life are true.
By way of contrast, my life is great.
If you're now getting paid as a TROLL, things would be.
My life is great. There's no escaping it.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Did you see the pictures I posted to Facebook from the cruise? I
put a few on Google+ as well, but far more are on Facebook. And since
you screwed up and commented about a post made only to Facebook, you
know how to get to it.
Allen? Did you see the pictures from the cruise that your god, if he
exists, ensured my family and I got to enjoy?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And you can save your time with the lie about the molar post
being on Google+. I'm confident that anyone with an interest already
checked and saw it was never there. Yes, you will LIE and claim it was
deleted while offing nothing but your worthless word to support the
claim. I'm not aware of anyone claiming they believe you.
Hey, would you thank your god for the fantastic weather we had at
each port of call. Since you claim he alters the weather you will have
to believe that he brought about the unseasonably nice conditions we
experienced.
I only wish we had anticipated the nice weather. We packed for
cooler temperatures. Fortunately, less than 30 minutes in Juneau found
all of us with better suited attire. There is no lack of t-shirt
stores near the port :) And they sell shorts too.
Who gives a rats ass?
You do. If your claims about your god are real and he really does
exist, then it's been proved, more times than I am willing to count,
he really, really LOVES me. At the same time, he HATES you. Most, but
certainly not all, things in my life keep working to benefit me. If
your claims about your life are true, he keep working to make your
life miserable.
The reality is no deity has ever had anything to do with either.
But if you believe the stuff you post, you will believe your god loves
me and hates you.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
Lord Serapis drew this cartoon of you and then sent Hurricane Hermine to
draw attention to it, pretty nifty, eh?
Since it never happened, no. I don't look like a land mass. Not
to the mentally sound.
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.

What pathological lies will you post to try, and fail, to divert
attention from the TRUTH I've posted? Time will tell what you, the
Pharaoh of Failure will offer.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:42:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa?
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
eohoe
2017-08-17 12:29:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now,
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW? Ok, you probably didn't know of him 15 years ago, but
you have for well over a year.
Here Kentie MISCONSTRUES my comments to make some specious argument--how
intellectually dishonest of you.
Why are you lying? The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. You
claim "we" get it now.
You're twisting in the wind again, Kentie. Think you can misconstrue
your way out of what you can't lie your way out of? Apparently so, but
you aren't persuading anyone else who's got half a brain which is more
than you've got.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Since you would have first learned of Lar$on over a year ago, you
were proving how intellectually limited you truly are. Or you were
being dishonest. Either is possible.
Always trying to change the subject, eh Kentie? How devious of you!
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
You really are a very slow learner. And here I though my pointing
out your lack of intellect was just a lame insult. Turns out, it's
100% accurate. Or you're being less than honest in your post.
Kentie then brings on the Ad hominem attack, how predictable, you psycho!
Who is Kentie? Since you've openly admitted Kent is a nym/handle,
you KNOW it's not my name in real life.
"We" know who you are Kentie. Kent B. Wills, the "World Famous Garage
Burglar." Bwahahahahahahahah...........
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And who is this "we" of which you write? You are only one person.
If you're hearing voices when no one is around, they're not real.
Gee, there must be more than 1 person reading this absurd screed that
you are throwing out, DUMMY!
Your lying is not the benefit your mental illness makes you
believe it is.
Here, the Aspie Freak breaks out his "Mental Illness" Ad Hominem
attack--it's a regular cliche for that POS.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens,
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
It would seem that the Aspie Freak is moving around a bit. We have
confirmation from 'Doc' and the PI he hired to track this dirt bag down,
Dr. Rabbi Daniel "Doc Savage" Goldblum was a bigger liar than
you. And that is saying something.
And, again, I've posted his name. Do you think I'll actually go
to prison without a trial or even a hearing? He claimed I would. If
you believe his claims, you MUST believe all of them.
Since the gag order on you was placed thru your Parole office in
Arkansas, it was only enforceable until the term of your parole ran out
which was some time around 2009.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
that Kentie was living in Arkansas sometime after 2005. In fact 'Doc'
contacted his parole office in AR and got a gag order placed on him to
stop Kentie's harassment.
Odd that this happened AFTER I stated I was done with him and
ceased even acknowledging his posts.
How do you explain away this TRUTH?
You were "done with him"? You mean that you, the Internet Stalker and
Harasser, had moved on to other targets? That's rare!
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Sometime around 2013 Kentie put out a G+ page claiming to be living in N
Hollywood but no pro online search engine can place him there, this is
obviously an attempt to establish an alibi for his 2 FELONY convictions
in IA back in early 2000's as he now is claiming that he has lived in N
Hollywood since 1998 and has his G+ page to PROVE it, hilarious.
It is possible that Kentie has moved back to Ankeny, IA as seen in this
As you know, but are too scared to admit, I moved to North
Hollywood in 1998. I've been back to Iowa for the occasional visit,
but that's all.
So, everything you have posted since 1998 has been a lie then? Lets see
what you've been telling everyone else about your place of residence:

"Somehow I missed this, and I live in the Des Moines area (I live in
Ankeny, roughly seven miles north of Des Moines)." -Kentie, 2/27/98

" I started out there, but transferred to Drake University in Des Moines
because of its reputation as a teacher college. A reputation that is
well earned, I might add.
I've been in the Des Moines area ever since, with the frequent
visit to NW Arkansas :)
If not for Lindsay's job, I would move to Arkansas in a heart beat,
but it took her a while to get on with the Fifth Judicial District
Court, and God only knows how long it would take to get a similar career
in Benton County, presuming she even could." -Kentie, 8/15/04

"We live in Iowa most of the year, but own a vacation home in
Arkansas. If my sig says "WOOOO PIG SOOIE!!!" you know I'm in
Arkansas. .... I teach American History to middle school children.
Lindsay is a Psychologist with the Fifth Judicial District in Iowa. We
both own rental properties around Des Moines, Iowa." -Kentie, 1/11/05

"My name is Kent Wills and Iowa, USA is my primary residence. I
also have a home in NW Arkansas, USA." -Kentie, 2/12/05

"My name is Kent Wills. I live near Des Moines, Iowa in the USA.
I teach American History to middle school children. I have a wife,
Lindsay, who is a psychologist with the Fifth Judicial District in Des
Moines." -Kentie, 3/4/05

"I teach American History. Lindsay is a Psychologist. We both
own rental properties all over the Des Moines metro area."
-Kentie, 3/7/05

"You'll see me mention Lindsay a lot. She's a psychologist
working for the Fifth Judicial District in Des Moines, Iowa. We met
at a Mensa meeting in 1993." -Kentie, 5/6/06

Anyway you slice it, you're a Pathological LIAR. You still want to tell
us that you live in N Hollywood and have since 1998!

"Doc" hire the PI who tracked you down in AR sometime time around 2006
where he got the Parole office to put a gag order on you. Apparently
you have resided there up until recently.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/kwills2.jpg
This shows him living in Rogers, AR up until March of this year with him
presently living in Ankeny, IA.
So your claim that I currently live in Arkansas was another of
your MANY lies?
No lies, just following the evidence trail.
Post by KWills Shill #3
I note you didn't address the point of my comment. Here it is
again so that you can address the TRUTH that you've been exposed for
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas?
Apparently, you were in Iowa on 5/17 for the Derecho. You challenged me
to a fight for that date but wouldn't give me your home address.
Bwahahahahahah.......... If you ever gave out your real address there'd
be people lined up around the block to get a piece of you.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why, according to you, did your god cause flooding in Iowa to punish me
if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW where I am?
It wasn't a flood Kentie but a Derecho and according to Phone Detective
you WERE living in Iowa and not Arkansas at the time.

BTW, your god ain't jack!
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Is your god really as incompetent as you would have everyone
believe? This is a very serious question.
If the Phone Detective is correct then you WERE in Ankeny at the time of
the 5/17 Derecho and you are one big fat LIAR.
Make up your mind. Was I in Iowa or Arkansas at the time. You've
claimed both. It's impossible for both of your claims, that you state
you PROVED, to be true. Both can be lies. One must be.
Why don't YOU tell US?
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
his could all be
verified by hiring a PI but I don't really care that much, one way or
the other. Certainly, you were NOT living in N Hollywood.
I certainly was.
Bwahahahahahaha.............
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And why would where I live matter in regards to Lar$on having
been exposed as a con man? I fail to see the connection your mental
illness causes you to see. You'll need to explain it.
Kentie misconstrues my comments at the get to set up this false, lame-o
argument--what a POS.
Your continued lying is not benefiting you. The discussion was,
and is, about Lar$on.
Will you answer the question, or does the mere thought of offing
anything honest scare you as much as you are presenting?
I wasn't discussing Lar$on, never was, but you want to twist it into
something else, psycho!
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then)
How so? Do you honestly think the TRUTH about Lar$on's scam is
dependant upon where I live? Really?
"You frequently fabricate arguments that your opponents never made.
Then you attack the "straw man" argument as if your opponent made it"
-anonymous quote, 6/6/11
Kentie, is a real POS.
You're the one who think your constant lying benefits you.
"You know Mr. Wills you are amazing on how fast you can shovel bullshit.
No matter HOW red handed you are caught in LYING you always come back to
your claims that YOU have proved your opponent is the liar."
-anonymous quote, 12/19/07
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
I'm certain I could live in any state and the truth about
Lar$on's scam would remain the same. But you'll provide the valid,
verifiable evidence that the truth about him is dependant on my state
of residence.
POS.
Point of sale? :)
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the one who made the alibi, obviously you thought you need one.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the "World Famous Garage Burglar" that needs the alibi to
maintain any semblance of credibility here on Usenet. Too bad for you
that you got tripped up by your online postings from the early 2000s on.
You're a convicted FELON and pathological LIAR.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Even if I did have such convictions, the TRUTH that Lar$on
scammed people out of their money would not change.
Totally irrelevant you POS.
Not so. The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. As such, my
pointing out your dishonest position that the TRUTH about his is
somehow dependent on where I live is relevant.
Twisting in the wind Kentie, twisting in the wind.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.
Cite just one example of my lying, thieving, libeling and/or
trolling Lar$on. One is all I ask. Be certain to include the quote and
MID and/or archive link so that those with an interest may verify your
cite.
If you're lying, as you will soon prove you are, you won't offer
the requested cite. None will exist, so you won't be able.
I never said that you were "lying, thieving, libeling and/or trolling
Lar$on"--your LIES.
You did, as seen above.
I do appreciate your default admission that you were lying.
Again.
Anyone can look above and see that I DIDN'T say any such thing.

"No matter HOW red handed you are caught in LYING you always come back
to your claims that YOU have proved your opponent is the liar."
-Kentie 12/19/07

That was almost 10yrs ago and you haven't changed your modus operandi
one iota. Still casing garages to rob I bet.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1"
-anonymous quote, 9/22/08
Your lying, or using the claims of a man so mentally ill he was
institutionalized, is not a benefit.
You're the Aspie retard around here. Tough being you, eh?
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!
Are you getting the place ready for me? If your posts about your
life are accurate, you've taken up permanent residency at the bottom.
Of course, with your constant lying, it's impossible to know if your
claims about your life are true.
By way of contrast, my life is great.
If you're now getting paid as a TROLL, things would be.
My life is great. There's no escaping it.
So you admit it, you are a paid TROLL.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Did you see the pictures I posted to Facebook from the cruise? I
put a few on Google+ as well, but far more are on Facebook. And since
you screwed up and commented about a post made only to Facebook, you
know how to get to it.
"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1" -anonymous quote, 9/22/08
Post by KWills Shill #3
Allen? Did you see the pictures from the cruise that your god, if he
exists, ensured my family and I got to enjoy?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And you can save your time with the lie about the molar post
being on Google+. I'm confident that anyone with an interest already
checked and saw it was never there. Yes, you will LIE and claim it was
deleted while offing nothing but your worthless word to support the
claim. I'm not aware of anyone claiming they believe you.
Hey, would you thank your god for the fantastic weather we had at
each port of call. Since you claim he alters the weather you will have
to believe that he brought about the unseasonably nice conditions we
experienced.
I only wish we had anticipated the nice weather. We packed for
cooler temperatures. Fortunately, less than 30 minutes in Juneau found
all of us with better suited attire. There is no lack of t-shirt
stores near the port :) And they sell shorts too.
Who gives a rats ass?
You do. If your claims about your god are real and he really does
exist, then it's been proved, more times than I am willing to count,
he really, really LOVES me. At the same time, he HATES you. Most, but
certainly not all, things in my life keep working to benefit me. If
your claims about your life are true, he keep working to make your
life miserable.
Who knows, maybe it's just more phony claims from a mentally deranged
idiot just like your Aruba fantasies.
Post by KWills Shill #3
The reality is no deity has ever had anything to do with either.
But if you believe the stuff you post, you will believe your god loves
me and hates you.
I believe that you're a very sick individual and who should be under
strict supervision in a controlled environment.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
Lord Serapis drew this cartoon of you and then sent Hurricane Hermine to
draw attention to it, pretty nifty, eh?
Since it never happened, no.
Sure it did, the eye wall of Hurricane Hermine came ashore right over
Wills Point on 9/2/16.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Hermine
Post by KWills Shill #3
I don't look like a land mass. Not to the mentally sound.
That's a cartoon of you looking over your shoulder at the DEMONS about
to possess you. I'm sure that most people would call that a reasonably
accurate description. Doesn't look good for you any way you look at it
which would explain your DENIAL.

http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
What pathological lies will you post to try, and fail, to divert
attention from the TRUTH I've posted? Time will tell what you, the
Pharaoh of Failure will offer.
Hey, the Jews and their lackeys tried to co-opt me on Catalina Is. in
1964 by framing me for statutory rape with a 14yr old virgin behind the
Great Seal of the US which is a symbolic representation of Caesarion.
If they're trying to co-opt me as Pharaoh de jeur then I must be Pharaoh
de jeur.

Since their scheme backfired on them, the only failure was the failure
of those Devils to co-opt Pharaoh de jeur.

--

Donate to the Serapeum Fund for a COSMIC future
https://www.gofundme.com/5e3pab9w
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-18 08:13:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
He's losing my interest too, but not completely, yet.
If he could come up with something new, it might be different.
He's yet to explain how if the claims he makes of me were true, it
would change the TRUTH that Lar$on was exposed as a con man.
The truth Marston hates is that even if I have a conviction for
burglary, his cult leader was still exposed for the con man he was
(and likely is). There is nothing that can alter that.
Oh, we get it now,
Lar$on's con game was exposed over 15 years ago. And you are only
getting it NOW? Ok, you probably didn't know of him 15 years ago, but
you have for well over a year.
Here Kentie MISCONSTRUES my comments to make some specious argument--how
intellectually dishonest of you.
Why are you lying? The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. You
claim "we" get it now.
You're twisting in the wind again, Kentie. Think you can misconstrue
your way out of what you can't lie your way out of? Apparently so, but
you aren't persuading anyone else who's got half a brain which is more
than you've got.
BDK and I were discussing Bob Lar$on. No amount of your lying
will ever alter this truth.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Since you would have first learned of Lar$on over a year ago, you
were proving how intellectually limited you truly are. Or you were
being dishonest. Either is possible.
Always trying to change the subject, eh Kentie? How devious of you!
You're the one who is claiming your post wasn't about Lar$on in a
discussion about Lar$on.
What do you believe you gain from your lying and projection?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
You really are a very slow learner. And here I though my pointing
out your lack of intellect was just a lame insult. Turns out, it's
100% accurate. Or you're being less than honest in your post.
Kentie then brings on the Ad hominem attack, how predictable, you psycho!
Who is Kentie? Since you've openly admitted Kent is a nym/handle,
you KNOW it's not my name in real life.
"We" know who you are Kentie. Kent B. Wills, the "World Famous Garage
Burglar." Bwahahahahahahahah...........
You've openly admitted you KNOW I am not. Are you claiming you
lied when you admitted Kent was a nym/handle?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And who is this "we" of which you write? You are only one person.
If you're hearing voices when no one is around, they're not real.
Gee, there must be more than 1 person reading this absurd screed that
you are throwing out, DUMMY!
Your lying is not the benefit your mental illness makes you
believe it is.
Here, the Aspie Freak breaks out his "Mental Illness" Ad Hominem
attack--it's a regular cliche for that POS.
When, in reality please, have you done this?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
which is why you had to move to Arkansas to get away
from any potential irate citizens,
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas? Why, according to you, did your god cause
flooding in Iowa to punish me if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW
where I am?
It would seem that the Aspie Freak is moving around a bit. We have
confirmation from 'Doc' and the PI he hired to track this dirt bag down,
Dr. Rabbi Daniel "Doc Savage" Goldblum was a bigger liar than
you. And that is saying something.
And, again, I've posted his name. Do you think I'll actually go
to prison without a trial or even a hearing? He claimed I would. If
you believe his claims, you MUST believe all of them.
Since the gag order on you was placed thru your Parole office in
Arkansas, it was only enforceable until the term of your parole ran out
which was some time around 2009.
You have a line for everything, huh?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
that Kentie was living in Arkansas sometime after 2005. In fact 'Doc'
contacted his parole office in AR and got a gag order placed on him to
stop Kentie's harassment.
Odd that this happened AFTER I stated I was done with him and
ceased even acknowledging his posts.
How do you explain away this TRUTH?
You were "done with him"? You mean that you, the Internet Stalker and
Harasser, had moved on to other targets? That's rare!
Your lying about me is not the benefit you believe it to be.
I publicly stated I was done interacting with Doc. I told him he
could have the last word in the matter, if he wanted it. He could post
anything he wished, secure in the knowledge that if it were exposed as
a lie, it wouldn't be from me. Two days later he posted his lie about
a gag order.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Sometime around 2013 Kentie put out a G+ page claiming to be living in N
Hollywood but no pro online search engine can place him there, this is
obviously an attempt to establish an alibi for his 2 FELONY convictions
in IA back in early 2000's as he now is claiming that he has lived in N
Hollywood since 1998 and has his G+ page to PROVE it, hilarious.
It is possible that Kentie has moved back to Ankeny, IA as seen in this
As you know, but are too scared to admit, I moved to North
Hollywood in 1998. I've been back to Iowa for the occasional visit,
but that's all.
So, everything you have posted since 1998 has been a lie then?
No.
Post by eohoe
Lets see
[snip of items long ago discussed.]

Once again, there are mentally ill people, such as you, on
Usenet. Keeping them thinking I'm in Iowa was wise. Especially since
not all of the mentally ill are as poor as you. Some might be able to
afford the cost of travel.
Do you need me to type that out again, but slower so you can keep
up?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/kwills2.jpg
This shows him living in Rogers, AR up until March of this year with him
presently living in Ankeny, IA.
So your claim that I currently live in Arkansas was another of
your MANY lies?
No lies, just following the evidence trail.
You keep claiming I live in different places. Your evidence tail
isn't very trustworthy.
Hey, maybe the Jews are moving me back and forth just to mess
with you. Maybe they'll move me to College Park, Georgia tomorrow,
then back to Arkansas on Monday followed by Ankeny on Thursday.
Yeah, it would be a lot of time on planes, but maybe *I* get all
the airline miles.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
I note you didn't address the point of my comment. Here it is
again so that you can address the TRUTH that you've been exposed for
If I am in Arkansas, why did you LIE and claim you proved that I
live in Iowa? I can post the quotes and MID for several of the times
you claimed to PROVE (emphasis yours) that I'm in Iowa if you'd like
to refresh your memory.
Why did you proclaim that Share-Da-Piss sent a wind storm for me
in Iowa if I'm in Arkansas?
Apparently, you were in Iowa on 5/17 for the Derecho.
Nope. I was in California.
Post by eohoe
You challenged me
to a fight for that date but wouldn't give me your home address.
Because your god, if he exists, would ensure you got to the
proper house.
Post by eohoe
Bwahahahahahah.......... If you ever gave out your real address there'd
be people lined up around the block to get a piece of you.
I suppose it's *possible* some really die hard "The 4400" fans
might want to look up one of the extras from "The Wrath of Graham" for
an autograph, but it's not too likely.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Why, according to you, did your god cause flooding in Iowa to punish me
if I'm in Arkansas? Wouldn't a god KNOW where I am?
It wasn't a flood Kentie but a Derecho and according to Phone Detective
you WERE living in Iowa and not Arkansas at the time.
If you're going to lie, and you are, ensure you lie about that
which can't be proved.

"You're a real nit wit you know that? When I posted on 6/20 that you
had "called down the thunder" I set off a chain reaction that resulted
in a cluster of Lightning storm events that includes the 6/24-6/25
Thunderstorm and flooding in Iowa and Des Moines."

Message-ID: <mnc8fu$2bh$***@speranza.aioe.org>

Since you have PROVED you lack the intellect required to make use
of MIDs, here's a link to your post:

https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.conspiracy/XD-fg2XQnks/RnFn8yN7uukJ

How will you lie your way out of this one?
Post by eohoe
BTW, your god ain't jack!
I don't have a god, so you're right.
Wow. Something honest and accurate from you. How refreshing.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Is your god really as incompetent as you would have everyone
believe? This is a very serious question.
If the Phone Detective is correct then you WERE in Ankeny at the time of
the 5/17 Derecho and you are one big fat LIAR.
Make up your mind. Was I in Iowa or Arkansas at the time. You've
claimed both. It's impossible for both of your claims, that you state
you PROVED, to be true. Both can be lies. One must be.
Why don't YOU tell US?
Your avoidance, while expected, does not tell us which of your
claims you wish to admit was and is a lie.
Will you be man enough to admit both claims are lies?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
his could all be
verified by hiring a PI but I don't really care that much, one way or
the other. Certainly, you were NOT living in N Hollywood.
I certainly was.
Bwahahahahahaha.............
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And why would where I live matter in regards to Lar$on having
been exposed as a con man? I fail to see the connection your mental
illness causes you to see. You'll need to explain it.
Kentie misconstrues my comments at the get to set up this false, lame-o
argument--what a POS.
Your continued lying is not benefiting you. The discussion was,
and is, about Lar$on.
Will you answer the question, or does the mere thought of offing
anything honest scare you as much as you are presenting?
I wasn't discussing Lar$on, never was, but you want to twist it into
something else, psycho!
The discussion BDK and I were having was about Lar$on. You joined
the conversation, as was and is your right. Your OBSESSION with me
doesn't alter that the discussion was about Lar$on.
But your offering PROOF that you MUST post about me, to the near
exclusion of all else, is noted, accepted and appreciated. I don't
believe I am worthy of such devotion, but it is nice that you believe
I am the single more important aspect of Usenet.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
why you claim to be living in N
Hollywood since '98 (thus invalidating everything you've written since
then)
How so? Do you honestly think the TRUTH about Lar$on's scam is
dependant upon where I live? Really?
"You frequently fabricate arguments that your opponents never made.
Then you attack the "straw man" argument as if your opponent made it"
-anonymous quote, 6/6/11
Kentie, is a real POS.
You're the one who think your constant lying benefits you.
"You know Mr. Wills you are amazing on how fast you can shovel bullshit.
No matter HOW red handed you are caught in LYING you always come back to
your claims that YOU have proved your opponent is the liar."
-anonymous quote, 12/19/07
Your further PROOF that you're a real life COWARD is noted.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
I'm certain I could live in any state and the truth about
Lar$on's scam would remain the same. But you'll provide the valid,
verifiable evidence that the truth about him is dependant on my state
of residence.
POS.
Point of sale? :)
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
to give you an alibi on Usenet for your FELONY convictions in IA,
etc., etc., etc.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the one who made the alibi, obviously you thought you need one.
You're under the impression that I require an alibi.
You're the "World Famous Garage Burglar" that needs the alibi to
maintain any semblance of credibility here on Usenet. Too bad for you
that you got tripped up by your online postings from the early 2000s on.
You're a convicted FELON and pathological LIAR.
Yet to make the claim you are ALWAYS reduced to lying. Always.
How do you explain away this well documented TRUTH?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Even if I did have such convictions, the TRUTH that Lar$on
scammed people out of their money would not change.
Totally irrelevant you POS.
Not so. The discussion was, and is, about Lar$on. As such, my
pointing out your dishonest position that the TRUTH about his is
somehow dependent on where I live is relevant.
Twisting in the wind Kentie, twisting in the wind.
You are. It's nice that you can admit it. This is a very good
sign.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
In other words, you're just a LYING, THIEVING douche bag who's been shit
posting for the last 20 or so years, LIBELING, TROLLING and HARANGUING
your way as you go.
Cite just one example of my lying, thieving, libeling and/or
trolling Lar$on. One is all I ask. Be certain to include the quote and
MID and/or archive link so that those with an interest may verify your
cite.
If you're lying, as you will soon prove you are, you won't offer
the requested cite. None will exist, so you won't be able.
I never said that you were "lying, thieving, libeling and/or trolling
Lar$on"--your LIES.
You did, as seen above.
I do appreciate your default admission that you were lying.
Again.
Anyone can look above and see that I DIDN'T say any such thing.
You were given two options. Provide the requested evidence or
admit you lied. Since you offered no evidence, you admitted, by
default, that you lied.
Even one as stump stupid as you consistently PROVE yourself to be
should be able to follow this.
Post by eohoe
"No matter HOW red handed you are caught in LYING you always come back
to your claims that YOU have proved your opponent is the liar."
-Kentie 12/19/07
Your further PROOF that you're a COWARD is noted.
Post by eohoe
That was almost 10yrs ago and you haven't changed your modus operandi
one iota. Still casing garages to rob I bet.
Your claim suggests I stated. Why present something you KNOW is
not true?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1"
-anonymous quote, 9/22/08
Your lying, or using the claims of a man so mentally ill he was
institutionalized, is not a benefit.
You're the Aspie retard around here. Tough being you, eh?
If so, I would like to request more toughness, please.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
It's a long way down to the bottom but some how I'm sure you'll
eventually get there, MORON!
Are you getting the place ready for me? If your posts about your
life are accurate, you've taken up permanent residency at the bottom.
Of course, with your constant lying, it's impossible to know if your
claims about your life are true.
By way of contrast, my life is great.
If you're now getting paid as a TROLL, things would be.
My life is great. There's no escaping it.
So you admit it, you are a paid TROLL.
Huh?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Did you see the pictures I posted to Facebook from the cruise? I
put a few on Google+ as well, but far more are on Facebook. And since
you screwed up and commented about a post made only to Facebook, you
know how to get to it.
"Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Rule #2: See rule #1" -anonymous quote, 9/22/08
I can't know, but Ed may be able to verify my claim. We're
Facebook friends. If he's looked at the pictures, he can verify my
claim. We don't interact too much on Facebook, so Ed may not have seen
them.
I sent a link to my Facebook page to Shill #2. If he has a
Facebook account, and wishes to look, he'll also be able to verify.
The pictures are public. A Facebook account is required to view them,
but one does not need to be one of my Facebook friends.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Allen? Did you see the pictures from the cruise that your god, if he
exists, ensured my family and I got to enjoy?
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
And you can save your time with the lie about the molar post
being on Google+. I'm confident that anyone with an interest already
checked and saw it was never there. Yes, you will LIE and claim it was
deleted while offing nothing but your worthless word to support the
claim. I'm not aware of anyone claiming they believe you.
Hey, would you thank your god for the fantastic weather we had at
each port of call. Since you claim he alters the weather you will have
to believe that he brought about the unseasonably nice conditions we
experienced.
I only wish we had anticipated the nice weather. We packed for
cooler temperatures. Fortunately, less than 30 minutes in Juneau found
all of us with better suited attire. There is no lack of t-shirt
stores near the port :) And they sell shorts too.
Who gives a rats ass?
You do. If your claims about your god are real and he really does
exist, then it's been proved, more times than I am willing to count,
he really, really LOVES me. At the same time, he HATES you. Most, but
certainly not all, things in my life keep working to benefit me. If
your claims about your life are true, he keep working to make your
life miserable.
Who knows, maybe it's just more phony claims from a mentally deranged
idiot just like your Aruba fantasies.
What Aruba fantasies? What can you offer to counter the evidence
I've presented of past visits to Aruba?
BTW, I'll be going again in April of 2018. Yes, the family will
be with me, if that matters.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
The reality is no deity has ever had anything to do with either.
But if you believe the stuff you post, you will believe your god loves
me and hates you.
I believe that you're a very sick individual and who should be under
strict supervision in a controlled environment.
The evidence that, if your god exists, Share-Da-Piss loves me is
cumulative and undeniable.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
Lord Serapis drew this cartoon of you and then sent Hurricane Hermine to
draw attention to it, pretty nifty, eh?
Since it never happened, no.
Sure it did, the eye wall of Hurricane Hermine came ashore right over
Wills Point on 9/2/16.
Not that. Your claim that your incompetent god drew a cartoon of
me never happened.
Post by eohoe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Hermine
Post by KWills Shill #3
I don't look like a land mass. Not to the mentally sound.
That's a cartoon of you looking over your shoulder at the DEMONS about
to possess you.
Only in the mind of the mentally ill.
Post by eohoe
I'm sure that most people would call that a reasonably
accurate description. Doesn't look good for you any way you look at it
which would explain your DENIAL.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
I don't see anything that looks like anyone looking over their
shoulder. Maybe you could use a paint program to outline it so that
the mentally sound people can see it.
Post by eohoe
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by eohoe
Don't look back, the DEMONS may be gaining.
http://eohoe.tripod.com/images/willspoint.jpg
Your additional PROOF that you are scared of reality is noted,
accepted and appreciated. Since it's become one of your Asperger's
patterns, you will continue to offer this proof.
What pathological lies will you post to try, and fail, to divert
attention from the TRUTH I've posted? Time will tell what you, the
Pharaoh of Failure will offer.
Hey, the Jews and their lackeys tried to co-opt me on Catalina Is. in
1964 by framing me for statutory rape with a 14yr old virgin behind the
Great Seal of the US which is a symbolic representation of Caesarion.
You've never offered any evidence that, if the girl propositioned
you, the Jews were involved.
And, if she did proposition you, it speaks more to her mental
health problems than anything. There would have to be something wrong
for a 14 year old girl to seek sex with an adult male.
Post by eohoe
If they're trying to co-opt me as Pharaoh de jeur then I must be Pharaoh
de jeur.
Since they are not, you must not be.
Post by eohoe
Since their scheme backfired on them, the only failure was the failure
of those Devils to co-opt Pharaoh de jeur.
According to you, your dad is still alive. Setting aside the
reality that you're not in line to be Pharaoh, his being alive means
you CAN'T be Pharaoh de jeur. It's impossible. Pharonic law never has
allowed for abdication. Transfer of power and authority can only occur
by the sitting Pharaoh's death.
On the plus side, we now know what lies you will offer.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-13 15:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Please cite where within the book_Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.
https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
like most people, he knows how to spend his money without the help of
Lar$on or any other con artist preacher.
I've taken to ignoring Marston. I may return to exposing Marston
for the k00k he is. Time will tell.
Says the man who corrupted a minor into a garage burglar.

The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-15 13:55:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Why don't you cite "cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a
concept is NOT shown", Your Robotic A.I.? Note the word "NOT"!!! :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-15 23:09:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Why don't you cite "cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a
concept is NOT shown", Your Robotic A.I.? Note the word "NOT"!!! :)
- show quoted text -
A negative cannot be proven. You came up with the idea, it is your task to support it.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-16 11:55:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
- show quoted text -
A negative cannot be proven. You came up with the idea, it is your task to support it.
I bet to differ, if you think in mathematics.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-17 02:22:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by e***@yahoo.com
- show quoted text -
A negative cannot be proven. You came up with the idea, it is your task to support it.
I bet to differ, if you think in mathematics.
But we're talking literature and conspiracy, not mathematics. So your argument is invalid.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-16 09:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 21:55:23 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is
shown.
Why don't you cite "cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a
concept is NOT shown", Your Robotic A.I.? Note the word "NOT"!!! :)
From the first page to the last page.
See how easy that was. You asked for a cite and I gave it. Now
offer your cite that shows where within the book _Animal Farm_ your
claim can be found.
If you'd rather admit you were caught in another lie, that is
acceptable.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-16 11:57:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
From the first page to the last page.
See how easy that was. You asked for a cite and I gave it. Now
offer your cite that shows where within the book _Animal Farm_ your
claim can be found.
If you'd rather admit you were caught in another lie, that is
acceptable.
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is NOT
shown! :)

I don't have time nor the mood to read Animal Farm again. I don't
research political nor military ideologies neither.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-17 02:24:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by KWills Shill #3
From the first page to the last page.
See how easy that was. You asked for a cite and I gave it. Now
offer your cite that shows where within the book _Animal Farm_ your
claim can be found.
If you'd rather admit you were caught in another lie, that is
acceptable.
Please cite where within the book _Animal Farm_ such a concept is NOT
shown! :)
It is impossible to tell you that something ISN'T in a book!
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
I don't have time nor the mood to read Animal Farm again. I don't
research political nor military ideologies neither.
If you are too lazy to go through the book (it's not very long) that's not our problem.
marston shores
2017-08-16 15:41:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
From the first page to the last page.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
Loading...