Discussion:
Was Adolf Hitler an ISIS member?
(too old to reply)
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-07-30 14:49:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-07-30 15:59:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That would be like asking if Mozart was a member of the Beatles!
Topaz
2017-07-31 10:04:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
ADOLF HITLER
SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL
SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936

. . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible
for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen
who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power
of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the
less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave -
the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in
1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that
followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours
all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds
survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than
40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk
whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were
sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never
done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted
themselves to the cause of Germany.

In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood
also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never
dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched
with us.

And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first
conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for
Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world:
a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to
her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even
at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power,
precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the
Oder, at Köpenick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always
the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then
stab or shoot him down.

That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these
crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is
responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the
first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a
title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in
Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that
for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself
perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power
which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but
against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand
the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You
have not fallen in vain!

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-03 21:49:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
...and he became a megalomaniacal tyrant bent on destroying Germany's "enemies," whether they were foreigners or German citizens he just didn't approve of.
Actually that is a lot of Jewish horse poop, they control the media.
*****
Actually, that's a lot of right wing paranoid horse poop. Like most of what you spew.
Topaz
2017-08-04 20:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:

"The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter
to Mr. Balfour (see page 25), denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan,
which if not checked by the combined action of the European powers,
would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of
that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities
of Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organized and maintained for
some time a merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia.
In Germany the Jews, Liebknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg,
etc., made a desperate bid for power. These and other similar
convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own way just
frustated the onslaughts.

In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in the
endeavour to expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one,
however, did a political leader and group arise, who grasped to the
full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the
mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world
Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National
Socialist Party of Germany.

Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organized
revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact.
We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded
over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of
supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men
everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for
themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek
truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which
they cannot shirk.

To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer
idleness, if for no worse reason."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-04 21:22:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer
idleness, if for no worse reason."
*****
To accept, unquestioningly, the point of view of people who mark Jews as their scapegoats for no other reason than that they're saying what you want to hear is to embrace evil.
Topaz
2017-08-05 09:20:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany
By Eckart Verlag

The Government of the new Germany have found themselves compelled
to adopt certain legal measures , with the help of which a certain
limitation is to be imposed upon the position of authority exercised
by Jews in all spheres of public life.

The steady and constantly increasing excessive introduction of
foreigners , into the life of the German people in politics, science
and culture by a racially foreign minority who push aside the original
inhabitants of the country; a process which assumed particularly
menacing forms because this constantly spreading minority infected the
healthy and untainted mass of the people with the spirit of
disintegration and bolshevism.

And thus the legislative policy of the new government which arises
from the profound indignation and resentment of the German people
against a presumptuous foreign rule is also the product of facts that
lie in the nature of Jewry itself.

The Stock Exchanges have got completely into the hands of the
Jews. For example, the Board of Directors of the Berlin Stock
Exchange consisted exclusively of Jews.

Conditions are exactly the same in the economic branches known as
the "cultural complex" by which is meant the theatre, cinema, radio,
education, training and instruction, etc.
In this case also there are six times as many Jews as others.

In this way we arrive at the result that there has been a really
alarming introduction of foreigners into leading positions in German
economic life by Jewry.

It must be noted in this condition that this only refers to
professing Jews, while the hundreds of thousands of baptized Jews and
dissenters of Jewish race escape inclusion in these statistics.

The ideal of "rootlessness" is proclaimed without any ballast of
tradition or piety, while the ideals of other peoples are
lightheartedly ridiculed.

German Jewry had established its main headquarters in the press.
This instrument for the domination of public opinion had passed almost
entirely in their hands, and they utilized it to the full.
A publisher would have to had to have a fair amount of intrepidity
if he published anything that might have caused a Jew to frown. In
addition to this, there was the enormous economic pressure that the
Jews has at their disposal for dealing with such opponents, and this
too was applied ruthlessly until their opponents were annihilated.
Even newspapers that were independent of Jewry were exposed to
this pressure which was applied through the advertisements pages. The
local Jewish organizations were only too ready to start and
advertising boycott, whenever anything in the text of the paper
displeased them.

Of all the newspapers published in German, those belonging to the
Ullstein press stood at the head of the list, as regards numbers and
size. In 1932 the "Berliner Morgenpost" had a circulation of over
1,000,000. Among the Jews on the editorial staff were Robolsky (chief
editor), Mendel, Bernstein, Breisacher, Deutsch, Falk, Glflck, Loeb,
and Mandel.

The "Vossische Zeitung" (circulation 75,000 - 90,000) was run by
Jews whose numbers included Georg Bernhard (chief editor), Elbau
(alias Mandelbaum), Misch, Guttman, Bernauer, Caspary, Goldstein,
Salomon, Osborn, Schulvater, Wiesenthal, and Eloesser.

The staff of the "B. Z. am Mittag" (circulation ca. 160,000)
included such Jews as Hollering, Falk, Jakobsohn, Kiaulehn, Muhsam,
Hackenberger, and others.

For the "Tempo" (circulation 125,000) mention may be made of
Gutmann, Jacobi, Lackmann, Lustig, and Zuckerkandl.

The country population was worked upon through the "Gruene Post"
(circulation 920,000), founded by the Jew Richard Katz.

The "Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung" had a circulation of
1,750,000, while it's effect was mainly based upon the attraction of
sensational novels. The chief editor was a Jew named Korff.

The firm of Ullstein have their own news-service in the most
important towns in all parts of the world. They were represented by
the following Jews; L. Stahl in Paris, R. Lewisohn in London, E.
Wallenberg in New York, J. Birnbaum in Warsaw, W. Stein in Moscow, K.
Lahm in Vienna, and W. Neumann in Prague.

During the last decades of the past century the Ullstein press
fought hard on behalf of Marxist social democracy.

When the Bolshevist Soviet film "Cruiser Potemkin" came to Berlin,
Alfred Kerr hailed it as "a marvel, a marvel!" as if it were one of
the eternal creations of art of all nations and times.

The Jews span their web round the "Vorwarts", the principle organ
of the Social Democratic party, whose staff included the following
Jews: Stampfer (chief editor), Lepere, Geyer, Schiff, Bernstein,
Schikowski, and Karstadt; while Friedlander, Rabold, Kersten, and
Hurtig were on the staff of the "Welt am Abend", the Communist evening
paper.

But the true German nation was condemned to immobility and silence,
and a Swedish rightly described them as a "people with severed vocal
chords".

What Germany has witnessed since the so-called revolution of 1918,
in the way of corruption scandals, whose prime authors were all Jews
without exception, probably exceeds in extent and number anything that
has so far occurred in the economic history of all nations.

The labor movement when it came into being about the middle of the
nineteenth century was at first non-political in character, and aimed
at improving the living conditions of the new class of industrial
workmen. There was an entire absence of any definite political dogma.
There was, therefore, for a long time a possibility of the labor
movement in Germany associating itself with the government.

A form of government would then have arisen which might perhaps
have been comparable to the present National Socialist system, and no
period of Marxism and class struggle would have intervened.

A Jew is therefore to blame for the fact that out of the labor
movement in the whole world an endeavor arose aimed at overturning the
existing order in all countries, and thus became the greatest danger
that has so far threatened world culture.

The further history of Marxism was also characterized by the
intellectual leadership of Jews.

The October revolution in Russia did not only place Jews like
Trotsky (Bronstein), Sinovieff (Apfelbaum), and Radek (Sobelsohn) in
the leading positions in the new Communist state, but even the
intermediate and subordinate positions of authority, down to that of
the humblest police official, were very frequently occupied by Jews.

Nothing is more characteristic than the fact that, after the
revolution of 1918, nearly all the leaders of radical, semi-Bolshevist
and wholly Bolshevist Socialism were Jews. First of all there were the
people's representative Hugo Haase, the leader of the "independent"
Socialists, and, alongside him, the lawyer Karl Liebknecht and the
authoress Rosa Luxemburg, the two leader of the "Spartakus League".

The Social Democratic Jewish member of the Reichstag Dr. Oskar
Cohn, who was appointed Under Secretary of the State in the German
ministry of justice in November 1918, was in the pay of the Moscow
Soviet Propaganda Department.

If these Jewish elements had had their way, Germany would have
followed the example of Russia at that time, and Europe would have
been into the hands of Bolshevism.

What other people in the world would have put up with these
instances of treacherous interference by racially foreign elements or
even regarded them for so long with patience?

The most dangerous of the German Communists was also a Jew, a man
named Hans Kippenberger. He was the founder and cold-blooded organizer
of the cunningly developed murder organization of the Communist Party.

Whenever such Communist assassins were sent for trial, the defense
was undertaken by Jewish lawyers.











www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-05 09:34:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Embracing evil.
Topaz
2017-08-06 10:29:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The Black War On White Americans
An Overview of U.S. Crime!

"What image do you have of racial violence in the U.S.? What type of
person do you think commits interracial or "hate" crime? If you get
your information from the mass media (TV, radio, major newspapers, and
popular magazines), you probably have an image of a vicious, ignorant,
gun-loving, hate-filled, skinhead, Klansman, or militiaman - all white
of course, that is a completely false stereotype. The truth is exactly
the opposite!

The media, protected class minorities, and anti-white politicians
expect you to twist in anguish over black-on-black crime or the rare
but well-publicized white-on-black crime, but they never mention the
much greater amount of black-on-white crime? Yes, blacks commit more
crime against whites (1.58 million crimes per year) than they do
against other blacks (1.34 million crimes per year)! It's a virtual
war of black criminals and white victims!

You'll never read the facts in the national media! Why? Paul Sheehan,
an Australian reporter, dug out the following information for an
article in the Sydney Morning Herald , May 2, 1995. Sheehan based his
statistics on crime data compiled by the FBI and partially reported
each year in The FBI Uniform Crime Report . These reports can be
researched at the FBI's website, www.fbi.gov. Since the FBI doesn't
distinguish between Hispanics and whites, Sheehan's statistics don't
adequately reflect the black-white crime situation. Only about 10-15%
of Hispanics are white, with the rest being Indian or a mixture of
white, American Indian, and blacks. Hispanic crime rates are almost as
high as black crime rates. This means that the data Sheehan compiled
on inter-racial crime is probably grossly understated since a
considerable portion of the "white against black" crime actually is
Hispanic against black crime. (Information about this aspect of
inter-racial crime will be presented in a related article.) Here is
the information Sheehan uncovered in his analysis of the FBI's crime
reports:

Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites
in 1992.
In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and
non-violent crimes against whites.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder than whites under 18.
About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites,
although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than
whites.
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white
neighborhoods.
Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were
committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by
whites against blacks.
Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million)
are black against white.
In the past 20 years, violent crime increased four times faster than
the population.
In the last 30 years (1964-94), more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial murders compared to 38,000 killed in Korea and 58,000 in
Vietnam. Sheehan commented that the contents of his article could not
possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media. In
the last 50 years, the white part of the American population has
declined from 90% to 72%. The U.S. now has about 33 million blacks and
25 million Hispanics (legal and illegal). By the year 2050, American
whites will be a minority, just 49%. By 2100, whites will be 25% of
the population. What will life for whites be like in the future? The
United States of America A white country in 1776 A Third World country
in 2076!"




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-06 14:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
The Black War On White Americans
An Overview of U.S. Crime!
"What image do you have of racial violence in the U.S.? What type of
person do you think commits interracial or "hate" crime? If you get
your information from the mass media (TV, radio, major newspapers, and
popular magazines), you probably have an image of a vicious, ignorant,
gun-loving, hate-filled, skinhead, Klansman, or militiaman - all white
of course, that is a completely false stereotype. The truth is exactly
the opposite!
The media, protected class minorities, and anti-white politicians
expect you to twist in anguish over black-on-black crime or the rare
but well-publicized white-on-black crime, but they never mention the
much greater amount of black-on-white crime? Yes, blacks commit more
crime against whites (1.58 million crimes per year) than they do
against other blacks (1.34 million crimes per year)! It's a virtual
war of black criminals and white victims!
You'll never read the facts in the national media! Why? Paul Sheehan,
an Australian reporter, dug out the following information for an
article in the Sydney Morning Herald , May 2, 1995. Sheehan based his
statistics on crime data compiled by the FBI and partially reported
each year in The FBI Uniform Crime Report . These reports can be
researched at the FBI's website, www.fbi.gov. Since the FBI doesn't
distinguish between Hispanics and whites, Sheehan's statistics don't
adequately reflect the black-white crime situation. Only about 10-15%
of Hispanics are white, with the rest being Indian or a mixture of
white, American Indian, and blacks. Hispanic crime rates are almost as
high as black crime rates. This means that the data Sheehan compiled
on inter-racial crime is probably grossly understated since a
considerable portion of the "white against black" crime actually is
Hispanic against black crime. (Information about this aspect of
inter-racial crime will be presented in a related article.) Here is
the information Sheehan uncovered in his analysis of the FBI's crime
Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites
in 1992.
In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and
non-violent crimes against whites.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder than whites under 18.
About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites,
although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than
whites.
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white
neighborhoods.
Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were
committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by
whites against blacks.
Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million)
are black against white.
In the past 20 years, violent crime increased four times faster than
the population.
In the last 30 years (1964-94), more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial murders compared to 38,000 killed in Korea and 58,000 in
Vietnam. Sheehan commented that the contents of his article could not
possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media. In
the last 50 years, the white part of the American population has
declined from 90% to 72%. The U.S. now has about 33 million blacks and
25 million Hispanics (legal and illegal). By the year 2050, American
whites will be a minority, just 49%. By 2100, whites will be 25% of
the population. What will life for whites be like in the future? The
United States of America A white country in 1776 A Third World country
in 2076!"
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
I take it back. You're not "embracing" evil, You're in bed with evil and you're not the "top!"

There have been lots of people writing lots of nasty, bigoted, evil books. That you can quote large amounts from them does not make them right. It just makes you look worse.
Topaz
2017-08-07 10:44:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
By Shaun Walker.

The point is that all we actually seek is White
self-determination in our own territory, like every other race.
How much more reasonable can that be?

No one questions the self-determination Indians have on their
reservations. No one questions the right to self-determination for the
Eskimos (Inuit) in the far North of Canada. Hell no. The Canadian
government has even passed laws to grant the Eskimos control over
a vast expanse of territory which the non-Whites claimed.

This model exists throughout the world: everywhere you go, you
will find assorted non-White races and groups all successfully
claiming their right to self determination, all with the support
of the liberals and even other non-Whites.

The Palestinians are a case in point. Most politically-prominent
Negroes in America support the Palestinians having a separate
state, and object to the Palestinians being ruled by the Zionist
Jewish state. And rightly so. In this demand, they are joined by
the White extreme left-wing of the political spectrum.

Yet, you will not find one of these White extremist left-wingers
supporting the concept of a territory for White people in which
they can have self-determination. Liberal hypocrisy is as
boundless as time.

If we, or anyone else who supports White self-determination,
raises the issue of White separatism with any of these non-White
groups, or the left-wingers of any race, we are dismissed as
"White supremacists" or "haters" or what-ever word they like to
use at that moment in time.

But honestly, we don't care much about what they call us. We know
what we need, and we work day and night to achieve it. Why should
we be ashamed of being White? On the contrary, we are proud of
our race, the race that has produced every single great
scientific innovation on the planet. Our race has produced all
the greatest works of art, and it is our aesthetic norms that
dominate the entire world

White nationalists who look at this fact closely, can quickly become
discouraged and come to the conclusion that White separatist activity
is pointless. But they are forgetting an important message given to us
by our founder, Dr. William Pierce. He told us, in no uncertain terms,
that when we work for our new society, we should not be discouraged by
what we see around us.

We work, Dr. Pierce said, not for what it is now - otherwise we
would be conservatives - but rather we work for what can be.
Dr. Pierce used the analogy of a garden, overrun with weeds. A
gardener, who sees only weeds, might give up without even trying.
A visionary, who sees the blades of grass and roses lying half
submerged in the weeds, and who conceptualizes a grand garden,
free of weeds and sprouting new life, the re-growth of Nature's
glory, is the true carrier of our racial renewal and the rebirth
of our Aryan Folk.

No, we are not conservatives who seek to preserve the existing
order. To hell with the existing order - it is corrupt, decadent,
and must fall. We don't want to preserve the obviously failed,
existing social construct; we wish to see a new society, in which
merit and merit alone determines political leadership, not with
how the current establishment promotes the best liars to the top.
We do not seek to maintain the existing raceless order, or to go
back to the days of segregation. We know and understand fully
that segregation, as well-intentioned as it might have been, was
a recipe for disaster.

We don't seek to rule over anybody but ourselves, and we need
racial separation in our own areas, and not segregation within a
joint area. That is the only solution.

No sir, conservatives we are not. We are revolutionaries in the
true sense of the word: we seek to remodel the world in a new
image, to cast down the lies and racial treason of the old order,
and to return to the eternal laws of race as our guiding light.
Only with the full understanding of race, acceptance of racial
differences and geographic separation, can we avoid racial
conflict.

Yes, you heard me correctly: we seek a world without racial
conflict, where each race is free to achieve whatever it may,
within its own space, without interference from outside.
This goal is really this ironic, to the extreme that the solution
to the racial problem which we seek, is in fact the only manner
in which the racial harmony which the liberals so desperately
desire, can be achieved.

We know and understand this eternal truth. Birds of a feather
flock together, as should you and I. We have our goal clearly laid out
in front of us. We are resolute in our intention to see the flowering
garden of our glorious race instead of the Jew-ridden, race-mixed weed
patch, and we work unceasingly for our goal.

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2017-07-31 10:02:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
No, ISIS is Jewish false flag.

ISIS = false flag

UN: Proven Ties Between ISIS And Israel

Posted by Sean Adl-Tabatabai

A new report from the UN reveals that the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF)
maintained regular contact with members of ISIS since May 2013. The UN
identified contact with IDF forces and ISIS soldiers. - See more at:
http://yournewswire.com/un-proven-ties-between-isis-and-israel/#sthash.X4jhsvpa.dpuf

- See more at:
http://yournewswire.com/un-proven-ties-between-isis-and-israel/#sthash.X4jhsvpa.dpuf

Documented Proof ISIS Is a Creation of The United States of America


http://www.tomatobubble.com/id872.html
By destroying ancient Christian sites, and by murdering contemporary
Christians themselves, the godless Israeli attack dog known as 'ISIS'
is killing two birds with one stone. Christians suffer while Muslims
takes the blame. Only the deluded devotees of Sulzberger's Slimes and
the rest of the piranha press actually believe that the mercenary scum
of ISIS are real Muslims. True Muslims do not murder, rape and loot.
Nor do they oppress Christians. Indeed the Koran venerates Jesus as a
Holy Prophet and commands Muslims to respect Christians.

Please see this very important youtube video:



Even before the documentation, it was obvious that "moderate" ISIS was
only attacking things Israel hates. Syria, Russia, France (France
wants to recognize Palestine; Bibi publicly warned that that was a
"grave error" about a week before Charlie Hebdo), Christians, Europe
and Hamas. It was also clear that we knew about the con that was going
on, because the USA were not attacking them at all, although the USA
were certainly pretending to be at war with them. Then Russia came
along...
Christopher Helms


by Dean Obeidallah
Denounce ISIS? Muslims despise ISIS. (At least those who aren't
pathological.)
True, ISIS is compromised of people who claim to be Muslims. But the
number one victim of this barbaric terror group is Muslims. That's
undisputed. ISIS has killed thousands of Muslims across the Middle
East, including beheading Sunni Muslims in Iraq for failing to pledge
loyalty to them, executing Imams for not submitting to them, and even
killing an Imam in Iraq for simply denouncing them.
And just a few days before the brutal terrorist assault in Paris, ISIS
launched a coordinated terrorist attack in Beirut, killing 43 and
wounding 239 people who were primarily if not exclusively Muslims.
However, in contrast to Paris, American media outlets barely covered
the Beirut attack. Apparently Muslims being killed by ISIS doesn't
attract enough ratings for U.S. media outlets to justify "full team"
or even quarter team coverage.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Moroney
2017-08-01 13:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <***@gmail.com> writes:


That's real dumb. Although both Hitler and ISIS were truly wickedly evil,
murdering their perceived enemies in extremely cruel ways in their quests
for world domination, how could someone who died in 1945 possibly be a
member of an organization that didn't even exist until a few years ago?
And Hitler certainly was never a Muslim, in particular not one of
the extreme nut Muslims that are members of groups like ISIS.
Topaz
2017-08-01 21:26:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"He was born into humble circumstances, the son of an obscure civil
servant in a remote corner of a crumbling empire, yet his name
resounds throughout the world to this day.

He was rejected by the universities of his time for formal enrollment
in art and in architecture, and yet he erected mighty buildings and
monuments, and today a simple postcard that he drew in ink or charcoal
fetches staggering sums at auction.

He fought as a front line soldier through all four years of the
greatest war in history up to that time, never rising above the rank
of corporal, but he won both of his country's highest decorations for
bravery under fire and rose to command the mightiest armies on earth.
Almost unique in the history of his century, he was not a lawyer or an
aristocrat or a man of inherited wealth and privilege, but a man who
once earned his daily bread with the labor of his hands, and yet he
conquered politics and rose to the leadership of the most brilliant
and creative nation on earth. So that his people might travel across
the land he loved quickly and cheaply, he created a simple and sturdy
automobile still in use today, and a network of highways that still
spans Germany. His game and forestry laws are still in force, and are
praised by ecologists as a model of environmental protection. His
economic program received the sincerest form of flattery from the
loathsome Roosevelt, who stole it and copied it into the context of
the American Depression as his own.

Every man who ever met him personally, even those who became his
bitterest enemies, spoke of him forever afterwards with awe and
admiration. His courtesy and his gallantry toward women were
legendary. With his power and his prestige he could have had any woman
he wanted, but the woman he chose as his life's partner, and who
eventually died by his side, was a simple and humble daughter of the
people.

He did not drink. He did not smoke. He was a lifelong lover of animals
and children and was happiest in the company of toddlers rather than
statesmen and soldiers, and no one ever overheard him use a profane
word or tell a smutty joke. He lifted his people up from the mud of
defeat and despair and alien domination, and he died trying to do the
same for all of us.

To this day, his memory is kept green by the Aryan peoples of Germany
and the world, even though it means prison, and in some countries
death, to honor him or his legacy within the sight or hearing of the
tyrant. He has been slandered, vilified, lied about, cursed,
distorted, and damned every day since his death by the most powerful
and evil tyranny mankind has ever known, and yet his name and his
Symbol cannot be suppressed by force or by propaganda. As we begin
this new Millennium, his book is read and his name is on more lips
than ever before and his image and his strength fills the hearts of a
whole new generation of young Aryan men and women."


"When your mother has grown older,
When her dear, faithful eyes
no longer see life as they once did,
When her feet, grown tired,
No longer want to carry her as she walks -

Then lend her your arm in support,
Escort her with happy pleasure.
The hour will come when, weeping, you
Must accompany her on her final walk.

And if she asks you something,
Then give her an answer.
And if she asks again, then speak!
And if she asks yet again, respond to her,
Not impatiently, but with gentle calm.

And if she cannot understand you properly
Explain all to her happily.
The hour will come, the bitter hour,
When her mouth asks for nothing more."

Those lines were written by Adolf Hitler, in 1923."


In the Thicket of the Forest at Artois
"It was in the thicket of the Artois Wood.
Deep in the trees, on blood-soaked ground,
Lay stretched a wounded German warrior,
And his cries rang out in the night.
In vain ... no echo answered his plea ...
Will he bleed to death like a beast,
That shot in the gut dies alone?

Then suddenly ...
Heavy steps approach from the right
He hears how they stamp on the forest floor ...
And new hope springs from his soul.
And now from the left ...
And now from both sides ...

Two men approach his miserable bed
A German it is, and a Frenchman.
And each watches the other with distrustful glance, And threatening
they aim their weapons.
The German warrior asks:
"What do you do here?"
"I was touched by the needy one's call for help."
"It's your enemy!"
"It is a man who suffers."

And both, wordless, lowered their weapons.
Then entwined their hands
And, with muscles tensed, carefully lifted
The wounded warrior, as if on a stretcher,
And carried him through the woods.

'Til they came to the German outposts.
"Now it is over. He will get good care."
And the Frenchman turns back toward the woods.
But the German grasps for his hand,
Looks, moved, into sorrow-dimmed eyes
And says to him with earnest foreboding:
"I know not what fate holds for us,
Which inscrutably rules in the stars.
Perhaps I shall fall, a victim of your bullet.
Maybe mine will fell you on the sand
For indifferent is the chance of battles.

Yet, however it may be and whatever may come:
We lived these sacred hours,
Where man found himself in man ...
And now, farewell! And God be with you!"

Adolf Hitler, 1916


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-03 00:50:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
...and he became a megalomaniacal tyrant bent on destroying Germany's "enemies," whether they were foreigners or German citizens he just didn't approve of.

George Lucas got a lot of flack for showing young Anakin Skywalker as a cute kid and heroic. However, he knew that evil doesn't burst out of the womb that way, it has to carefully breed inside a person, choking his better instincts in hate and fear. That's what happened with your "Fureher."
Topaz
2017-08-03 20:31:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
...and he became a megalomaniacal tyrant bent on destroying Germany's "enemies," whether they were foreigners or German citizens he just didn't approve of.
Actually that is a lot of Jewish horse poop, they control the media.


The Enigma of Hitler

by Leon Degrelle

The mountains of Hitler books based on blind hatred and ignorance do
little to describe or explain the most powerful man the world has ever
seen. How, I ponder, do these thousands of disparate portraits of
Hitler in any way resemble the man I knew? The Hitler seated beside
me, standing up, talking, listening. It has become impossible to
explain to people fed fantastic tales for decades that what they have
read or heard on television just does not correspond to the truth.

People have come to accept fiction, repeated a thousand times over, as
reality. Yet they have never seen Hitler, never spoken to him, never
heard a word from his mouth. The very name of Hitler immediately
conjures up a grimacing devil, the fount of all of one's negative
emotions. Like Pavlov's bell, the mention of Hitler is meant to
dispense with substance and reality. In time, however, history will
demand more than these summary judgments.

Hitler is always present before my eyes: as a man of peace in 1936, as
a man of war in 1944. It is not possible to have been a personal
witness to the life of such an extraordinary man without being marked
by it forever. Not a day goes by but Hitler rises again in my memory,
not as a man long dead, but as a real being who paces his office
floor, seats himself in his chair, pokes the burning logs in the
fireplace.

The first thing anyone noticed when he came into view was his small
mustache. Countless times he had been advised to shave it off, but he
always refused: people were used to him the way he was.
He was not tall -- no more than was Napoleon or Alexander the Great.
Hitler had deep blue eyes that many found bewitching, although I did
not find them so. Nor did I detect the electric current his hands were
said to give off. I gripped them quite a few times and was never
struck by his lightening.

His face showed emotion or indifference according to the passion or
apathy of the moment. At times he was as though benumbed, saying not a
word, while his jaws moved in the meanwhile as if they were grinding
an obstacle to smithereens in the void. Then he would come suddenly
alive and launch into a speech directed at you alone, as though he
were addressing a crowd of hundreds of thousands at Berlin's Tempelhof
airfield. Then he became as if transfigured. Even his complexion,
otherwise dull, lit up as he spoke. And at such times, to be sure,
Hitler was strangely attractive and as if possessed of magic powers.
Anything that might have seemed too solemn in his remarks, he quickly
tempered with a touch of humour. The picturesque world, the biting
phrase were at his command. In a flash he would paint a word-picture
that brought a smile, or come up with an unexpected and disarming
comparison. He could be harsh and even implacable in his judgments and
yet almost at the same time be surprisingly conciliatory, sensitive
and warm.

After 1945 Hitler was accused of every cruelty, but it was not in his
nature to be cruel. He loved children. It was an entirely natural
thing for him to stop his car and share his food with young cyclists
along the road. Once he gave his raincoat to a derelict plodding in
the rain. At midnight he would interrupt his work and prepare the food
for his dog Blondi.

He could not bear to eat meat, because it meant the death of a living
creature. He refused to have so much as a rabbit or a trout sacrificed
to provide his food. He would allow only eggs on his table, because
egg-laying meant that the hen had been spared rather than killed.
Hitler's eating habits were a constant source of amazement to me. How
could someone on such a rigorous schedule, who had taken part in tens
of thousands of exhausting mass meetings from which he emerged bathed
with sweat, often losing two to four pounds in the process; who slept
only three to four hours a night; and who, from 1940 to 1945, carried
the whole world on his shoulders while ruling over 380 million
Europeans: how, I wondered, could he physically survive on just a
boiled egg, a few tomatoes, two or three pancakes, and a plate of
noodles? But he actually gained weight!

He drank only water. He did not smoke and would not tolerate smoking
in his presence. At one or two o'clock in the morning he would still
be talking, untroubled, close to his fireplace, lively, often amusing.
He never showed any sign of weariness. Dead tired his audience might
be, but not Hitler.

He was depicted as a tired old man. Nothing was further from the
truth. In September 1944, when he was reported to be fairly doddering,
I spent a week with him. His mental and physical vigor were still
exceptional. The attempt made on his life on July 20th had, if
anything, recharged him. He took tea in his quarters as tranquilly as
if we had been in his small private apartment at the chancellery
before the war, or enjoying the view of snow and bright blue sky
through his great bay window at Berchtesgaden.

At the very end of his life, to be sure, his back had become bent, but
his mind remained as clear as a flash of lightening. The testament he
dictated with extraordinary composure on the eve of his death, at
three in the morning of April 29, 1945, provides us a lasting
testimony. Napoleon at Fontainebleau was not without his moments of
panic before his abdication. Hitler simply shook hands with his
associates in silence, breakfasted as on any other day, then went to
his death as if he were going on a stroll. When has history ever
witnessed so enormous a tragedy brought to its end with such iron self
control?

Hitler's most notable characteristic was ever his simplicity. The most
complex of problems resolved itself in his mind into a few basic
principles. His actions were geared to ideas and decisions that could
be understood by anyone. The laborer from Essen, the isolated farmer,
the Ruhr industrialist, and the university professor could all easily
follow his line of thought. The very clarity of his reasoning made
everything obvious.

His behaviour and his life style never changed even when he became the
ruler of Germany. He dressed and lived frugally. During his early days
in Munich, he spent no more than a mark per day for food. At no stage
in his life did he spend anything on himself. Throughout his 13 years
in the chancellery he never carried a wallet or ever had money of his
own.

Hitler was self-taught and made no attempt to hide the fact. The smug
conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many
flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had
acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more
than thousands of diploma-decorated academics.

I don't think anyone ever read as much as he did. He normally read one
book every day, always first reading the conclusion and the index in
order to gauge the work's interest for him. He had the power to
extract the essence of each book and then store it in his
computer-like mind. I have heard him talk about complicated scientific
books with faultless precision, even at the height of the war.
His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He was readily familiar with
the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex
for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of
Buddha, Confucius and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, and
Savonarola; of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare
and Goethe; and analytical writers such as Renan and Gobineau,
Chamberlain and Sorel.

He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato.
He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for
a long time carried a pocked edition of Schopenhauer with him.
Nietzsche taught him much about the willpower.

His thirst for knowledge was unquenchable. He spend hundreds of hours
studying the works of Tacitus and Mommsen, military strategists such
as Clausewitz, and empire builders such as Bismark. Nothing escaped
him: world history or the history of civilizations, the study of the
Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy and all the masterpieces of
Homer, Sophocles, Horace, Ovid, Titus Livius and Cicero. He knew
Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary.

His knowledge also extended to mechanics. He knew how engines worked;
he understood the ballistics of various weapons; and he astonished the
best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology.
The universality of Hitler's knowledge may surprise or displease those
unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact: Hitler was one
of the most cultivated men of this century. Many times more so than
Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity; or than Pierre Lavaal, with him
mere cursory knowledge of history; of than Roosevelt; or Eisenhower,
who never got beyond detective novels.

Even during his earliest years, Hitler was different than other
children. He had an inner strength and was guided by his spirit and
his instincts.

He could draw skillfully when he was only eleven years old. His
sketches made at that age show a remarkable firmness and liveliness.
He first paintings and watercolors, created at age 15, are full of
poetry and sensitivity. One of his most striking early works,
'Fortress Utopia,' also shows him to have been an artist of rare
imagination. His artistic orientation took many forms. He wrote poetry
from the time he was a lad. He dictated a complete play to his sister
Paula who was amazed at his presumption. At the age of 16, in Vienna,
he launched into the creation of an opera. He even designed the stage
settings, as well as all the costumes; and, of course, the characters
were Wagnerian heroes.

More than just an artist, Hitler was above all an architect. Hundreds
of his works were notable as much for the architecture as for the
painting. From memory alone he could reproduce in every detail the
onion dome of a church or the intricate curves of wrought iron.
Indeed, it was to fulfill his dream of becoming an architect that
Hitler went to Vienna at the beginning of the century.

When one sees the hundreds of paintings, sketches and drawings he
created at the time, which reveal his mastery of three dimensional
figures, it is astounding that his examiners at the Fine Arts Academy
failed him in two successive examinations. German historian Werner
Maser, no friend of Hitler, castigated these examiners: "All of his
works revealed extraordinary architectural gifts and knowledge. The
builder of the Third Reich gives the former Fine Arts Academy of
Vienna cause for shame."

In his room, Hitler always displayed an old photograph of his mother.
The memory of the mother he loved was with him until the day he died.
Before leaving this earth, on April 30, 1945, he placed his mother's
photograph in front of him. She had blue eyes like his and a similar
face. Her maternal intuition told her that her son was different from
other children. She acted almost as if she knew her son's destiny.
When she died, she felt anguished by the immense mystery surrounding
her son.

Throughout the years of his youth, Hitler lived the life of a virtual
recluse. He greatest wish was to withdraw from the world. At heart a
loner, he wandered about, ate meager meals, but devoured the books of
three public libraries. He abstained from conversations and had few
friends.

It is almost impossible to imagine another such destiny where a man
started with so little and reached such heights. Alexander the great
was the son of a king. Napoleon, from a well-to-do family, was a
general at 24. Fifteen years after Vienna, Hitler would still be an
unknown corporal. Thousands of others had a thousand times more
opportunity to leave their mark on the world.

Hitler was not much concerned with his private life. In Vienna he had
lived in shabby, cramped lodgings. But for all that he rented a piano
that took up half his room, and concentrated on composing his opera.
He lived on bread, milk, and vegetable soup. His poverty was real. He
did not even own an over-coat. He shoveled streets on snowy days. He
carried luggage at the railway station. He spent many weeks in
shelters for the homeless. But he never stopped painting or reading.
Despite his dire poverty, Hitler somehow managed to maintain a clean
appearance. Landlords and landladies in Vienna and Munich all
remembered him for his civility and pleasant disposition. His
behaviour was impeccable. His room was always spotless, his meager
belongings meticulously arranged, and his clothes neatly hung or
folded. He washed and ironed his own clothes, something which in those
days few men did. He needed almost nothing to survive, and money from
the sale of a few paintings was sufficient to provide for all his
needs.

Impressed by the beauty of the church in a Benedictine monastery where
he was part of the choir and served as an altar boy, Hitler dreamt
fleetingly of becoming a Benedictine monk. And it was at that time,
too, interestingly enough, that whenever he attended mass, he always
had to pass beneath the first swastika he had ever seen: it was graven
in the stone escutcheon of the abbey portal.

Hitler's father, a customs officer, hoped the boy would follow in his
footsteps and become a civil servant. His tutor encouraged him to
become a monk. Instead the young Hitler went, or rather fled, to
Vienna. And there, thwarted in his artistic aspirations by the
bureaucratic mediocrities of academia, he turned to isolation and
meditation. Lost in the great capital of Austria-Hungary, he searched
for his destiny.

During the first 30 years of Hitler's life, the date April 20, 1889,
meant nothing to anyone. He was born on that day in Braunau, a small
town in the Inn valley. During his exile in Vienna, he often thought
of his modest home, and particularly of his mother. When she fell ill,
he returned home from Vienna to look after her. For weeks he nursed
her, did all the household chores, and supported her as the most
loving of sons. When she finally died, on Christmas eve, his pain was
immense. Wracked with grief, he buried his mother in the little
country cemetery. "I have never seen anyone so prostrate with grief,"
said his mother's doctor, who happened to be Jewish.

Hitler had not yet focused on politics, but without his rightly
knowing, that was the career to which he was most strongly called.
Politics would ultimately blend with his passion for art. People, the
masses, would be the clay the sculptor shapes into an immortal form.
The human clay would become for him a beautiful work of art like one
of Myron's marble sculptures, a Hans Makart painting, or Wagner's Ring
Trilogy.

His love of music, art and architecture had not removed him from the
political life and social concerns of Vienna. In order to survive, he
worked as a common laborer sided by side with other workers. He was a
silent spectator, but nothing escaped him: not the vanity and egoism
of the bourgeoisie, not the moral and material misery of the people,
nor yet the hundreds of thousands of workers who surged down the wide
avenues of Vienna with anger in their hearts.

He had also been taken aback by the growing presence in Vienna of
bearded Jews wearing caftans, a sight unknown in Linz. "How can they
be Germans?" he asked himself. He read the statistics: in 1860 there
were 69 Jewish families in Vienna; 40 years later there were 200,000.
They were everywhere. He observed their invasion of the universities
and the legal and medical professions, and their takeover of the
newspapers.

Hitler was exposed to the passionate reactions of the workers to this
influx, but the workers were not alone in their unhappiness. There
were many prominent persons in Austria and Hungary who did not hide
their resentment at what they believed was an alien invasion of their
country. The mayor of Vienna, a Christian-Democrat and a powerful
orator, was eagerly listened to by Hitler.

Hitler was also concerned with the fate of the eight million Austrian
Germans kept apart from Germany, and thus deprived of their rightful
German nationhood. He saw Emperor Franz Josef as a bitter and petty
old man unable to cope with the problems of the day and the
aspirations of the future.

Quietly, the young Hitler was summing things up in his mind.
First: Austrians were part of Germany, the common fatherland.
Second: The Jews were aliens within the German community.
Third: Patriotism was only valid if it was shared by all classes. The
common people with whom Hitler had shared grief and humiliation were
just as much a part of the fatherland as the millionaires of high
society.

Fourth: Class war would sooner or later condemn both workers and
bosses to ruin in any country. No country could survive class war;
only cooperation between workers and bosses can benefit the country.
Workers must be respected and live with decency and honor. Creativity
must never be stifled.

When Hitler later said that he had formed his social and political
doctrine in Vienna, he told the truth. Ten years later his
observations made in Vienna would become the order of the day.
Thus Hitler was to live for several years in the crowded city of
Vienna as a virtual outcast, yet quietly observing everything around
him. His strength came from within. He did not rely on anyone to do
his thinking for him. Exceptional human beings always feel lonely amid
the vast human throng. Hitler saw his solitude as a wonderful
opportunity to meditate and not to be submerged in a mindless sea. In
order not to be lost in the wastes of a sterile desert, a strong soul
seeks refuge within himself. Hitler was such a soul.

The lightning in Hitler's life would come from the word.
All his artistic talent would be channeled into his mastery of
communication and eloquence. Hitler would never conceive of popular
conquests without the power of the word. He would enchant and be
enchanted by it. He would find total fulfillment when the magic of his
words inspired the hearts and minds of the masses with whom he
communed.

He would feel reborn each time he conveyed with mystical beauty the
knowledge he had acquired in his lifetime.

Hitler's incantory eloquence will remain, for a very long time, a vast
field of study for the psychoanalyst. The power of Hitler's word is
the key. Without it, there would never have been a Hitler era.

Did Hitler believe in God? He believed deeply in God. He called God
the Almighty, master of all that is known and unknown.

Propagandists portrayed Hitler as an atheist. He was not. He had
contempt for hypocritical and materialistic clerics, but he was not
alone in that. He believed in the necessity of standards and
theological dogmas, without which, he repeatedly said, the great
institution of the Christian church would collapse. These dogmas
clashed with his intelligence, but he also recognized that it was hard
for the human mind to encompass all the problems of creation, its
limitless scope and breathtaking beauty. He acknowledged that every
human being has spiritual needs.

The song of the nightingale, the pattern and color of a flower,
continually brought him back to the great problems of creation. No one
in the world has spoken to me so eloquently about the existence of
God. He held this view not because he was brought up as a Christian,
but because his analytical mind bound him to the concept of God.
Hitler's faith transcended formulas and contingencies. God was for him
the basis of everything, the ordainer of all things, of his Destiny
and that of all others.
Post by e***@yahoo.com
George Lucas got a lot of flack for showing young Anakin Skywalker as a cute kid and heroic. However, he knew
that evil doesn't burst out of the womb that way, it has to carefully breed inside a person, choking his better
instincts in hate and fear. That's what happened with your "Fureher."
You have your head up a Jews aft end.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Nobody
2017-08-07 02:16:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
"He was born into humble circumstances, the son of an obscure civil
servant in a remote corner of a crumbling empire, yet his name
resounds throughout the world to this day.
The "obscure civil servant" was half Jewish, of course.
Post by Topaz
He did not drink. He did not smoke. He was a lifelong lover of animals
and children and was happiest in the company of toddlers rather than
statesmen and soldiers, and no one ever overheard him use a profane
word or tell a smutty joke.
So what happened? Why did a man who loved children and animals become so
truly and thoroughly evil, to this day rightly considered the
personification of evil incarnate? How could a lover of children send so
many children to the gas chambers?
Post by Topaz
He lifted his people up from the mud of
defeat and despair and alien domination,
He tried to destroy his people, and white people in general, having the
whites of Central Europe (Germany) attack those of Western Europe in
war, and the Central Europe whites attack the Eastern Europe whites,
meanwhile ordering the mass death of 6 million other whites because they
were the wrong kind of whites. And at the end he ordered the flooding
of the Berlin subway tunnels because "his people" were using them as
bomb shelters...

...
Post by Topaz
And now, farewell! And God be with you!"
Adolf Hitler, 1916
How could a writer of that turn so thoroughly evil?
Topaz
2017-08-07 10:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Nobody
The "obscure civil servant" was half Jewish, of course.
The question of Mr. Hitler's ancestry is dealt with at the beginning
of Ian Kershaw's 840+ page book entitled Hitler (Harmondsworth,
Penguin: 1998).

<begin quote at p. 7>
The third possibility is that Adolf Hitler's grandfather was Jewish.
Rumours to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s,
and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press
during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name Huttler was Jewish,
'revealed' that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in
Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron
Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly
spent
some time as a servant. But the most serious speculation about
Hitler's supposed Jewish background has occurred since the Second
World War and is directly traceable to the memoirs of the leading Nazi
lawyer and Governor General of Poland, Hans Frank, dictated in his
Nuremburg cell while awaiting the hangman...


Allegedly commissioned by Hitler to look into his family history,
Frank reportedly discovered that Maria Anna Shicklgruber had given
birth to her child while serving as a cook in the home of a Jewish
family called Grankenberger in Graz...

Frank's story gained wide circulation in the 1950s. But it simply does
not stand up. There was no Jewish family called Frankenberger in Graz
during the 1880s. In fact, there were no Jews at all in the whole of
Styria at that time, since Jews were not permitted in that part of
Austria until the 1860s. A family named Frankenreiter did live there,
but was not Jewish . . . Hans Frank's memoirs, dictated at a time of
when he was waiting for the hangman and plainly undergoing a
psychological crisis, are full of inaccuracies and have to be used
with caution. With regard to the story of Hitler's grandfather,
whoever he was, he was not a Jew from Graz.

The only serious contenders for the paternity of Hitler's father
remain, therefore, Johann Georg Hiedler and Johann Nepomuk Hiedler (or
Huttler).

<end quote>




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-07 19:51:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Nobody
Post by Topaz
"He was born into humble circumstances, the son of an obscure civil
servant in a remote corner of a crumbling empire, yet his name
resounds throughout the world to this day.
The "obscure civil servant" was half Jewish, of course.
If his grandfather was Jewish, then he would be at best one quarter Jewish.

His followers deny this, but they would have to, wouldn't they?

Jefferson's descendants still deny those people who claim to be descendants of Th. Jefferson and his slave. They refuse to allow any DNA testing to settle the matter, they've just decided it's incorrect.

Crazy A's followers are the same way.
Topaz
2017-08-08 21:11:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Here are some quotes from the book "Kampfzeit", (period of
struggle), by Hans Hinkel:

"Faster than lightening a lie about us spread throughout the country,
spread in every attic room where poor people lived by newspapers owned
or obedient to the opponent. It took a week of work by us National
Socialists to deal with a three-line lie in an opposing newspaper. As
soon as one lie was dealt with, a hundred more sprang up. Like a
hydra, the opponent's horror stories about National Socialism and its
supporters spread. There was not a speech by the Führer or his
associates that was not immediately twisted and tastefully served up
to the gullible Michael at breakfast or dinner. Adolf Hitler had "spat
out the communion wafer." Hermann Göring was smuggling opium or
morphine. Robert Ley has "lost a 'v'" in his name Pastor Münchmeyer
was guilty of "moral crimes" in Borkum. We often would have laughed
had we not hourly learned the amazing gullibility of millions of
German citizens who were trapped in the enemy's web of lies. The only
answer was for everyone to set to work with the people, going
everywhere to fight, speak and educate. Sooner or later the opponent
would have to face us and be revealed as a liar to the public."

"The city was like an upset anthill on that cold winter night. Roland
Freisler ran out from the chattering council meeting and went with us
to the nearby Friedrich Square where we spoke with the starving
masses. We forgot the middle class niceties! We had to stop Moscow
from winning over these citizens driven crazy by hunger, making them
wiling subjects of the insane ideas of Bolshevism"

"Only a few weeks later, I needed an escort to leave or return to my
apartment. Several loyal S.A. men had to be with me all the time,
since Communist unemployed men, unscrupulously incited against us
National Socialists, wanted to attack me now that they knew who I was.
Every day I joined the unemployed who demonstrated in the large
courtyard of the labor office on Giesberg Street. More than once I had
to be met by party members at the Kassel train station to protect me
from lurking Communist terror troops. It was the same or worse for all
of our prominent Kassel party members and S.A. men, just as for the
storm troops of our movement who risked their lives every day and
every hour in every city and every village of Germany. The enemy
naturally was particularly after us speakers. According to the law, we
had to be unarmed. We would have been in deep trouble if a body search
had found a weapon! A nail file was thought to be a weapon. Later even
a party badge, since it had a long needle!"

"The attempts of our party comrades to hold a National Socialist
meeting failed a half dozen times or more. Most meetings were made
impossible by the thousand-fold numerical superiority of the opponent,
or else broken up before they could finish. Our protective service
-every party member in each local group belongs - is still too weak in
most areas to stand up against the red avalanche, driven more and more
by the Communists. One National Socialist against five hundred or even
a thousand citizens, that is how it always is there!"

"After I had spoken about twenty minutes, a worker jumped up on a
table and called upon the "comrades" to leave the meeting of the
"Fascist band." Several dozen start singing the "Internationale" and
we have no choice but to overpower the growling of the comrades with
"Deutschland, Deutschland über alles." Another several hundred leave
the hall. The singing quieted down and peace was slowly restored. I
spoke to several hundred people at the end, all that were left of the
more than a thousand who were there to start."
"For years now we speakers have been traveling through every Gau in
Germany. I speak primarily in Saxony, Brandenburg, Hessen-Nassau and
in the West. We see that even red Saxony is streaming more and more to
National Socialism. The meetings are difficult, but always
successful."

"For how long? When would this hard battle end? When would more
Germans wake up? When would hundreds of thousands finally be ready to
march into battle behind the banner of National Socialism?! - None of
us thinks about the "when." Forward! - Only forward! Each heart won
over is a victory! The day will come...!"



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Thomas Heger
2017-08-07 20:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
I personally think, that the German Kanzler (the 'Fuehrer') and the
Austrian painter were two different people.

The German Kanzler was imho a British spy, who had the real name Noel
Trevenen Huxley.

It's a little difficult to show the connections between Hitler and the
Huxley family, but actually possible:


Julian Huxley was head of an organization called 'Eugenics', who tried
to apply the faulty concepts of Charles Darwin on people.

'Darwin's bulldog' was Thomas Henry Huxley. This guy belonged to the so
called 'X-Club' and had friendly relations to Count Auguste di Gobineau.

This Frenchmen brought us the idea of racism and supremacy of the arian
race.

From there the idea was copied by another Englishman named Houston
Steward Chamberlain.

This was the son in law of Richard Wagner.

Hitler the Kanzler lived in the same house as Richard Wagners daughter
Isolde Beidler (Munich, Prinzregentenplatz 16).

Hitler had close relations to her mother Cosima Wagner - whom he called
'mother'. Unlikely, that Hitler didn't knew the Wagners in the same house.

But Isolde Beidler died long before Hitler ever appeared on the public
space. Possibly they meat much earlier than we think, possibly since
1913, when Julian Huxley was in Munich for a year (possibly still under
his original name).

Hitler had also close relations to Winifried Wagner and her children
look suspiciously like Hitler. This is even more convincing as her
husband was gay.

Winifried Wagner was actually English and born as Winifried Marjory
Williams in Hastings. (She was allegedly working for the MI6 since the
age of ten - wrote Greg Hallet in his book 'Hitler was a British agent')

But the connections do not end there.

Hitler's girlfriend (Unity Valkyrie Midfort) was the niece of Churchill
and the granddaughter of Lord Redscale.

Unitie's sister Diana later married the head of the British Union of
Fascists (Sir Oswald Mosley) - in Berlin, in the home of Joseph Goebbels.

This is insofar interesting as this Lord was the father of Clementine
Hozier and that the wife of Churchill. Redscale was also a close friend
of Richard Wagner.

He owned a goldmine in the nice Canadian town 'Swastika', which had in
1912 a real Nazi Swastika as its logo.

Redscale was also publisher of the pamphlets of Houston Steward Chamberlain.

Another connection between Hitler and the Huxleys was Ludwig Wittgenstein.

This was a schoolmate of the real Hitler and also gay. He was also of
the same age.

Wittgenstein was a member of the so called 'Apostles' of Cambridge,
together with Bertrand Russel and Aldous Huxley.

Betrand Russel is now in various ways connected with the rise of socialism.


And so forth....

TH
Thomas Heger
2017-08-08 20:48:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Auguste di Gobineau
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_de_Gobineau

"..but is today most remembered for developing the theory of the Aryan
master race and helping to legitimise racism by scientific racist theory
and racial demography."

So, what has Gobineau to do with Hitler?

Well, there was this idiotic concept of the 'Arian race', with what the
'Fuehrer' was annoying the people of Germany (and elsewhere).

Apparently he got that from Gobineau, but not directly. Instead Hitler
was a follower of Houston Steward Chamberlain.

That guy wrote all the 'theoretical' stuff and was the center of the
Nazi-movement in Munich.

Most likely his family had similar ideas about 'race' as he had. That
family was in case that of the Wagners, since Chamberlain was the
husband of a daughter of Richard Wagner.

Hitlers girlfriend Unity had her second name Valkyrie after the Opera of
Wagner. She was actually born in Swastika, Canada.

This is certainly just coincidence. Also the relations of uncle Winston
to 'Eugenics' was at least questionable.

Winston Churchill was the son of 'Bertie' (later known as Edward the
7th) and Jenny Jerome.

She was quite promiscuous, even in modern standards. Her father had the
nickname 'King of Wallstreet'.

Churchill was involved in various serious events, like the campaign in
Gallipoli, the Second Boer war or the Battle of Omdurman.

A guy named Greg Hallet wrote a book about his relations to Stalin
called 'Stalins British training'.

There he wrote, that Churchill organized - as kind of training - for
'Koba' (->Stalin) the so called Sydney Street siege.





TH
Topaz
2017-08-08 21:15:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Some National Socialists may have said "Herrenvolk"

"'Herrenvolk' can be translated into "noble race" and/or "superior
race". Yet for some reason the English speaking translators chose and
made popular the term 'master race.'"

Heidi

Rudolf Hess, on May 25, 1948, was asked by Dr. Maurice Walsh, U.S.
psychiatrist, if he believed in a Master Race. Hess smiled and replied
that "he had never used the expression", and that they were not used
in Germany.

The speeches of National Socialists are known. All you have to do is
put "Hitler speeches" or "Goebbels Speeches" in your search engine.
But apparently "master race" is not to be found in them anywhere.

The closest thing in Mein Kampf is at the end of the book and simply
tells the truth:

"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself
to the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must
one day become ruler of the Earth."

Goebbels wrote:
"The German nation will be the intellectual leader of civilized
humanity."
Joseph Goebbels, "Das Jahr 2000," Das Reich, 25 February 1945, pp.
1-2.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Thomas Heger
2017-08-09 09:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
Some National Socialists may have said "Herrenvolk"
"'Herrenvolk' can be translated into "noble race" and/or "superior
race". Yet for some reason the English speaking translators chose and
made popular the term 'master race.'"
not quite...

'Volk' in German means 'people' in English.

'Rasse' in German is not exactly the same word as 'race' in English.

'race' is actually a cluster of items, that share a certain feature,
while the German equivalent is only used for living things.

'human races' is actually an invention of Auguste di Gobineau and
Charles Darwin.

Meant is the set of people, which share a certain obvious feature, that
is inherited genetically.

'Volk' in is used to address the citizens of a nation as one entity.

So 'Deutsches Volk' means 'sum of all citizens of Germany'. This has
nothing to do with genetics or 'race'.

Therefore the English phrase 'master race' could be interpreted as 'set
of all masters', irrespective of genetic relations, ethnicity or
citizenship.

There the people of Germany are by no means a 'master race'.

Some Germans are possibly smart or noble, but not all.


TH
Thomas Heger
2017-08-09 17:06:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
The closest thing in Mein Kampf is at the end of the book and simply
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself
to the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must
one day become ruler of the Earth."
Hitler quoted Darwin and the British movement called 'Eugenics'.

Proponents of Eugenics had been, for instance Teddy Roosevelt, Winston
Churchill, George Bernhard Shaw or Alexander Graham Bell.

But that doesn't make things better.

Instead some of the elitists had been dumb as bricks.


So killing the idiots would also wipe out the proponents of Eugenics.



TH
Topaz
2017-08-09 21:12:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Hitler quoted Darwin and the British movement called 'Eugenics'.
Proponents of Eugenics had been, for instance Teddy Roosevelt, Winston
Churchill, George Bernhard Shaw or Alexander Graham Bell.
But that doesn't make things better.
Instead some of the elitists had been dumb as bricks.
So killing the idiots would also wipe out the proponents of Eugenics.
Far from being "evil," eugenics is actually the most beneficial and
humane discipline ever devised by the mind of man. In fact, eugenics
is the only viable long-term solution to all our social problems. As
I said on this program in 1993, eugenics is the only way to a better
world. Science has shown us that genetic structure is by far the
greatest determinant of intelligence, character, and behavior.
Unfortunately, those with the best genetic inheritance tend to have
the fewest children-and those with the lowest intelligence,
lowest potential, and worst character tend to have the most
children. This leads to a genetic deterioration of the race that
gets worse with each passing generation. No amount of education, no
laws, and no increase in the power of the police or of the state can
counter this degeneration.

Eugenics is simply the idea that we should humanely use our social
policies to encourage as much as possible the birth of children with
good genetic qualities and to discourage as much as possible the
birth of children with poor genetic qualities. Some of this could be
done with the more advanced techniques of modern reproductive
science, such as allowing surrogate mothers to carry genius-level
children in large numbers or encouraging the voluntary use of egg
banks and sperm banks to propagate the best children that our race
can possibly produce.

But most eugenics would be simple and basic and just good common
Sense. There could be endless variations on the theme of tax
deductions, tax credits, and interest-free loans extended to
families of good genetic inheritance to encourage them to give the
priceless gift of their children-most of whom will grow up into
highly-evolved creative problem-solvers-to our society. How can
that be "evil"?

It's not evil. It's really the ultimate good. After a few
generations of eugenics-after a few generations of ten times the
number of problem-solvers and culture-creators being born, and a
tenth of the number of problem-makers and culture destroyers being
born, we would have a very different world indeed. An infinitely
better world.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-09 23:40:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and civility of the alt.right!
Thomas Heger
2017-08-10 17:55:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and civility of the alt.right!
The emphasis on 'WE decide'.

Proponents of Eugenics were mainly British aristocrats and US oligarchs.


For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.

We had other connections between Eugenics and the German Nazi party,
like the grandfather of Hitler's girlfriend Lord Mitford or Julian Huxley.

My assumption was, that the Brits had exchanged the real Hitler (gay,
skinny, poor, dumb) against an athletic, smart skirt-chaser.

Fitting would be the brother of Aldous Huxley named Noel Trevenen Huxley.

This guy had allegedly committed suicide in 1914. As reason was assumed:
skirt-chasing.

But did you know, that ALL of Hitler's girlfriends had (allegedly)
committed suicide?

There had been:

Mitsy
Geli Raubal
Magda Goebbels
Eva Braun
Unity Mitford

who all died by suicide (allegedly)


So I distrust the British history writers and try to find out, what is
more likely.

And most likely 'Hitler' was replaced.

Among the many reasons to believe so is his famous square mustache:

On the 1st of August 1914 Hitler was first photographed with such a
beard on the Odeonsplatz in Munich.

There exist another photo of Hitler from the 26th of that same August,
when Hitler went to war in Flanders. Then he had a beard with very long
tips.


TH
Topaz
2017-08-10 20:27:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
The emphasis on 'WE decide'.
Proponents of Eugenics were mainly British aristocrats and US oligarchs.
That is suspect because there are a lot of Jews in those groups.
Post by Thomas Heger
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
He was a very great man and paid his workers much more than he
needed to.
Post by Thomas Heger
We had other connections between Eugenics and the German Nazi party,
like the grandfather of Hitler's girlfriend Lord Mitford or Julian Huxley.
My assumption was, that the Brits had exchanged the real Hitler (gay,
skinny, poor, dumb) against an athletic, smart skirt-chaser.
My assumption is that you are a stupid worthless asshole.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-10 23:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
He was a very great man and paid his workers much more than he needed to.
*****
He also invented the five day work week botactions on the theory that if his workers have more money and time off, they'll buy his cars to go places.

He was very smart, but his altruism was based on dollars and cents.

He was also a rabid anti-Semite who saw Jew conspiracies every where.
Topaz
2017-08-11 21:01:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Post by Thomas Heger
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
He was a very great man and paid his workers much more than he needed to.
*****
He also invented the five day work week botactions on the theory that if his workers have more money and time off, they'll buy his cars to go places.
He was very smart, but his altruism was based on dollars and cents.
The Jews control your media and your mind.
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He was also a rabid anti-Semite who saw Jew conspiracies every where.
Here are some quotes from "The Shadow of Zog" by Israel Shamir:

Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
segment of our culture and body politic". And he quotes Benjamin
Ginsberg's "The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State":

"Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and
they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade's corporate
mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2 % of the nation's
population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The
chief executive officers of the three major television networks and
the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the
nation's largest newspaper chain and the most influential single
newspaper, the New York Times".

Is it a conspiracy of Jews to steal the Republic? No, no conspiracy is
necessary. In Jules Verne's juvenile novel, Children of Captain Grant,
a villain leads the captain's ship astray by placing a magnet brick
beneath the compass. The magnet does not conspire: it constrains the
compass. The sheer mass of self-involved Jews in the media acts in a
similar way and draws the superpower off its normal course. For the
media is the nerve system of a modern state. Modern democracy in
practice in a very complicated society can be compared to a
sophisticated computer. Its machinery can function successfully on one
condition: there is a free flow of information across the system.
While every input is instinctively checked and sieved on one
criterion, whether it is good for Jews..

Thus, concentration of Jews in the media created the distortion. A
takeover of every other part of industry or trade would be noticed and
reported in the media; but there is no remedy for media takeover...

Gandhi could be condemned as 'racist', for he 'noticed' the privileged
position of the British in India. By PC logic, a good American should
reply to Mahatma: yes, there are some rich and powerful Brits in
India, but there are also poor Tommy Atkinses, governesses, honest
administrators, writers like Kipling and Orwell. On the other hand,
there are powerful and rich Rajas, important Brahmins. How do you
dare, sir, to demand 'de-colonisation'! This is sheer anti-English
racism!

An old Indian Air Force officer Joe Thomas actually reminded that,
"while the population of the US today is approximately the same as the
population of India a century ago, the British in India never numbered
more than 50,000 and still ruled India. They did not rule India by
force but by dominating Indian discourse. Indians fought for the
British and put down rebellions. During the two world wars, millions
of Indians fought as volunteers for Britain. If such a tiny group
could control India, then it is not strange that 100 times that number
can influence the United States"...


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Thomas Heger
2017-08-14 19:29:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Post by Thomas Heger
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
He was a very great man and paid his workers much more than he needed to.
*****
He also invented the five day work week botactions on the theory that if his workers have more money and time off, they'll buy his cars to go places.
He was very smart, but his altruism was based on dollars and cents.
He was also a rabid anti-Semite who saw Jew conspiracies every where.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Hunger_March
quote

"Harry Bennett, head of Ford security, drove up in a car, opened a
window, and fired a pistol into the crowd. Immediately, the car was
pelted with rocks, and Bennett was injured. He then got out of the car,
and continued firing at the retreating marchers. Dearborn police and
Ford security men then opened fire on the retreating marchers with
machine guns."


http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Labor/L_Overview/1941Strike_Rouge.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/opinion/recalling-henry-ford-the-not-so-good-capitalist.html

quote

"In December 1937, the company was found in violation of the Wagner Act
and was ordered to cease interfering with workers’ efforts to unionize.
In 1941, when wages at Ford were in fact lower than the average wage for
the industry, Henry Ford continued to insist that “we do not intend to
submit to any union.”

Finally, in the spring of 1941 — after violent strikes, brutal assaults
by Ford agents and government pressure — Ford and his company
capitulated and agreed to a union shop. Ford workers were finally able
to negotiate a contract."

TH
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-14 21:35:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Post by Thomas Heger
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
He was a very great man and paid his workers much more than he needed to.
*****
He also invented the five day work week botactions on the theory that if his workers have more money and time off, they'll buy his cars to go places.
He was very smart, but his altruism was based on dollars and cents.
He was also a rabid anti-Semite who saw Jew conspiracies every where.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Hunger_March
quote
"Harry Bennett, head of Ford security, drove up in a car, opened a
window, and fired a pistol into the crowd. Immediately, the car was
pelted with rocks, and Bennett was injured. He then got out of the car,
and continued firing at the retreating marchers. Dearborn police and
Ford security men then opened fire on the retreating marchers with
machine guns."
http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Labor/L_Overview/1941Strike_Rouge.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/opinion/recalling-henry-ford-the-not-so-good-capitalist.html
quote
"In December 1937, the company was found in violation of the Wagner Act
and was ordered to cease interfering with workers’ efforts to unionize.
In 1941, when wages at Ford were in fact lower than the average wage for
the industry, Henry Ford continued to insist that “we do not intend to
submit to any union.”
Finally, in the spring of 1941 — after violent strikes, brutal assaults
by Ford agents and government pressure — Ford and his company
capitulated and agreed to a union shop. Ford workers were finally able
to negotiate a contract."
TH
As I said, he was a genius; "Just because you're a genius, doesn't mean you're a smart guy!"
Topaz
2017-08-15 20:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
"Harry Bennett, head of Ford security, drove up in a car, opened a
window, and fired a pistol into the crowd. Immediately, the car was
pelted with rocks, and Bennett was injured. He then got out of the car,
and continued firing at the retreating marchers. Dearborn police and
Ford security men then opened fire on the retreating marchers with
machine guns."
http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Labor/L_Overview/1941Strike_Rouge.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/opinion/recalling-henry-ford-the-not-so-good-capitalist.html
quote
"In December 1937, the company was found in violation of the Wagner Act
and was ordered to cease interfering with workers’ efforts to unionize.
In 1941, when wages at Ford were in fact lower than the average wage for
the industry, Henry Ford continued to insist that “we do not intend to
submit to any union.”
Finally, in the spring of 1941 — after violent strikes, brutal assaults
by Ford agents and government pressure — Ford and his company
capitulated and agreed to a union shop. Ford workers were finally able
to negotiate a contract."
TH
How do we know these quotes aren't a lot of Jewish horse manure?
Anyway unions are a bunch of Communists. It's good to help the workers
though.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-16 00:14:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
Post by Thomas Heger
"Harry Bennett, head of Ford security, drove up in a car, opened a
window, and fired a pistol into the crowd. Immediately, the car was
pelted with rocks, and Bennett was injured. He then got out of the car,
and continued firing at the retreating marchers. Dearborn police and
Ford security men then opened fire on the retreating marchers with
machine guns."
http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Labor/L_Overview/1941Strike_Rouge.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/opinion/recalling-henry-ford-the-not-so-good-capitalist.html
quote
"In December 1937, the company was found in violation of the Wagner Act
and was ordered to cease interfering with workers’ efforts to unionize.
In 1941, when wages at Ford were in fact lower than the average wage for
the industry, Henry Ford continued to insist that “we do not intend to
submit to any union.”
Finally, in the spring of 1941 — after violent strikes, brutal assaults
by Ford agents and government pressure — Ford and his company
capitulated and agreed to a union shop. Ford workers were finally able
to negotiate a contract."
TH
How do we know these quotes aren't a lot of Jewish horse manure?
Anyway unions are a bunch of Communists. It's good to help the workers
though.
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
How do we know your pro-Adolf books aren't a load of Fascist horse manure?
Topaz
2017-08-16 20:52:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
How do we know your pro-Adolf books aren't a load of Fascist horse manure?
It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
Mein Kampf:

"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.

"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.

"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.

"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.

"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."

" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.

"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I had formerly looked at in a different light."

"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-17 00:25:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Nice dodge on my question which was; How do we know the pro-Hitler books you keep excerpting from aren't just a load of Fascist horse manure?
Thomas Heger
2017-08-17 19:45:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Nice dodge on my question which was; How do we know the pro-Hitler books you keep excerpting from aren't just a load of Fascist horse manure?
They are most likely.

E.g. I assume, that 'Mein Kampf' is actually a translation of an English
text, which was only translated by Hitler and Hess.

The reason to think are actually the frequent quote from 'My Struggle'
by 'Topaz'.

After looking up the same piece of text in the German version I found,
the German version contains certain errors, which are typical for people
with English as a first language, that try to write German.

E.g. the book circles around 'Arian race' or 'German people', but mixes
different concepts about the meaning of the word 'German'.

This can only be done in English, since the German language has
different words for what 'The German' could mean.

English uses the singular for 'people of Germany', while in German it is
'Die Deutschen' (in plural).

The people that speak German have no German word, since that is not
regarded as necessary to express. But you definitely do not call them
'Deutsche' if they are not German citizens, but for instance Austrians
or Swiss.

But 'My Struggle' confuses the different meanings and it is hard to
figure out, what Hitler actually had in mind.

There are other inconsistencies in this book.

Hitler complains about his father, who would not allow him to become a
painter and sent hin to a 'Realschule' (middle school), what would
prevent him from studing arts..

But the real Hitler was attending an Austrian school in Linz, that is
called 'Realgymnasium' (Realgymnasium Steinstrasse in Linz).

This school is one of those, that ended with the exam needed to study at
a university ('Matura') That 'Matura' is Austrian. The German word for
this type of graduation is 'Abitur'.

What Hitler actually describes is the German school system, where
'Realschule' is the middle (of three types) of schools.

But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.

The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.

To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).

But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.

There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.

This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.

Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).


TH
Topaz
2017-08-17 20:28:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
They are most likely.
E.g. I assume, that 'Mein Kampf' is actually a translation of an English
text, which was only translated by Hitler and Hess.
I assume that you are an idiot.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
joeturn
2017-08-18 06:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Nice dodge on my question which was; How do we know the pro-Hitler books you keep excerpting from aren't just a load of Fascist horse manure?
They are most likely.
E.g. I assume, that 'Mein Kampf' is actually a translation of an English
text, which was only translated by Hitler and Hess.
The reason to think are actually the frequent quote from 'My Struggle'
by 'Topaz'.
After looking up the same piece of text in the German version I found,
the German version contains certain errors, which are typical for people
with English as a first language, that try to write German.
E.g. the book circles around 'Arian race' or 'German people', but mixes
different concepts about the meaning of the word 'German'.
This can only be done in English, since the German language has
different words for what 'The German' could mean.
English uses the singular for 'people of Germany', while in German it is
'Die Deutschen' (in plural).
The people that speak German have no German word, since that is not
regarded as necessary to express. But you definitely do not call them
'Deutsche' if they are not German citizens, but for instance Austrians
or Swiss.
But 'My Struggle' confuses the different meanings and it is hard to
figure out, what Hitler actually had in mind.
There are other inconsistencies in this book.
Hitler complains about his father, who would not allow him to become a
painter and sent hin to a 'Realschule' (middle school), what would
prevent him from studing arts..
But the real Hitler was attending an Austrian school in Linz, that is
called 'Realgymnasium' (Realgymnasium Steinstrasse in Linz).
This school is one of those, that ended with the exam needed to study at
a university ('Matura') That 'Matura' is Austrian. The German word for
this type of graduation is 'Abitur'.
What Hitler actually describes is the German school system, where
'Realschule' is the middle (of three types) of schools.
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
TH
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
Thomas Heger
2017-08-18 19:08:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
TH
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
From your 'exchange theories' is the Kermit-equals-Adolf-theory the
least likely one.

But I have also an interesting theory. Actually it is not my invention,
but I like it anyhow:


There is a German historian named Karl-Heinz Ohlig, who had shown, that
the person the Christians call 'Jesus' and the one the Muslims call
'Mohamed' were the same person. This was actually a Jew, who belonged to
a Jewish sect called (in Greek) 'Essenoi' .

They settled in the City Qumran at the dead sea.

From 'Qumran' we have now 'Qu'ran' and from the Aramaic title 'Mahmed'
('the one to be praised') came 'Mohamed'.

That was the same person, which the Greek called 'Iesus' ('mahmed').

The early Christians spoke Aramaic and lived mainly in Syria.

They were prosecuted by the Romans, because they didn't accept the
decisions of the Conzil of Nizea.

So the Romans hired the Sarazens to fight against the Christians, what
they did.

The 'Christians went to the City Merv at the Silk Road in the Empire of
the Sassanides.

The Arabs conquered the City and the entire empire of the Sassanides and
kept the religion of the so called 'Arians' (early Christian sect),
because they were quite successful.

Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.

This made the originally Jewish Prophet an Arabian prophet and a
Christian Messias at the same time.

Mainly for political reason the original believe was altered by the then
ruling powers:

in case of Islam by the Sarazens (Arabs)
in the case of Christianity by the Romans

The Romans fused their polytheism and the Roman version of Zaroastrism
into the new religion and created something, the early Christians didn't
accept.

TH
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-19 09:03:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
TH
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
From your 'exchange theories' is the Kermit-equals-Adolf-theory the
least likely one.
But I have also an interesting theory. Actually it is not my invention,
There is a German historian named Karl-Heinz Ohlig, who had shown, that
the person the Christians call 'Jesus' and the one the Muslims call
'Mohamed' were the same person.
If you ignore that they existed roughly 600 years apart.
Post by Thomas Heger
This was actually a Jew, who belonged to
a Jewish sect called (in Greek) 'Essenoi' .
They settled in the City Qumran at the dead sea.
The Romans destroyed the city around the year 68CE. Before that
happened, the city was inhabited by numerous peoples. Mostly Jews, not
Christians. Although Christians were officially seen by Rome as a sect
of the Jewish faith at the time.
Post by Thomas Heger
From 'Qumran' we have now 'Qu'ran' and from the Aramaic title 'Mahmed'
('the one to be praised') came 'Mohamed'.
According to Strong's Concordance, Shabach is Aramaic for Praise.
For "the one to be praised" you would write, Halal as the title.
Though Halal is a bit closer to Hebrew than typical Aramaic. It was
likely adopted into the Aramaic language, keeping the same meaning.
Post by Thomas Heger
That was the same person, which the Greek called 'Iesus' ('mahmed').
The only references to mahmed I can find deal with music. Maybe
you spelled it wrong?
That aside, the Greeks called the person we know as Jesus,
Iesous. Nothing else.
Post by Thomas Heger
The early Christians spoke Aramaic and lived mainly in Syria.
During the Apostolic Age and the Ante-Nicene Period, 1 to ~325 CE
(or AD for those who want that), Christians were found in and around
the Mediterranean Sea, Jerusalem, Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth,
Thessalonica, Cyprus, Crete, and Rome.
Many different languages were spoken, as you already know from a
past discussion we had.
Post by Thomas Heger
They were prosecuted by the Romans, because they didn't accept the
decisions of the Conzil of Nizea.
Actually, persecution came much later. Initially Rome viewed
Christians as a sect of the Jewish faith. As such, they were afforded
the same rights and privileges as the Jews. It was in year 98, when
emperor Nerva decreed that Christians did not have to pay the annual
tax upon the Jews, that the break was made "official."
Post by Thomas Heger
So the Romans hired the Sarazens to fight against the Christians, what
they did.
I will presume you meant Saracens.
Originally it was used to describe people who lived in Arab
territory, but were not ethnic Arabs themselves (despite similar Asian
heritage). It wasn't until the 12th century that it came to mean Arabs
as well. Though some Greeks used it this way as early as the 8th
century.
At no time did Rome hire them for anything. In fact, they were
often at odds. The Romans did have respect for their military
capabilities. Even so, they were classified among the barbarian
peoples of the world and wouldn't have been hired for anything.
Post by Thomas Heger
The 'Christians went to the City Merv at the Silk Road in the Empire of
the Sassanides.
There is evidence of Nestorian Christianity being present along
the Silk Road.
Post by Thomas Heger
The Arabs conquered the City and the entire empire of the Sassanides and
kept the religion of the so called 'Arians' (early Christian sect),
because they were quite successful.
As you probably already know, the word Arian was named after
Arius, a teacher in the early 4th century.
Arius believed that Jesus was a created being with divine
qualities, but was not god made flesh. He based this on passages like
Matthew 24:36 (If Jesus is God, he should know the date and time) and
John 4:6 (a god shouldn't get tired from walking).
At no time were the early Christians called Arians, since the
term did not yet exist.
Post by Thomas Heger
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
So now you're claiming the Jews were the Arians? If you study
Islam and Judaism, you'll note they are very similar. And neither
accepts Jesus as the savior (Arius did believe Jesus to be the
savior). Both religions view him as a prophet only.
Post by Thomas Heger
This made the originally Jewish Prophet an Arabian prophet and a
Christian Messias at the same time.
Nope. As I proved to you many months ago, Muhammad was born about
600 years after Jesus was to have died.
Post by Thomas Heger
Mainly for political reason the original believe was altered by the then
in case of Islam by the Sarazens (Arabs)
in the case of Christianity by the Romans
The Romans fused their polytheism and the Roman version of Zaroastrism
into the new religion and created something, the early Christians didn't
accept.
Well, technically that's correct. I'll give you that.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Thomas Heger
2017-08-19 17:24:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
TH
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
From your 'exchange theories' is the Kermit-equals-Adolf-theory the
least likely one.
But I have also an interesting theory. Actually it is not my invention,
There is a German historian named Karl-Heinz Ohlig, who had shown, that
the person the Christians call 'Jesus' and the one the Muslims call
'Mohamed' were the same person.
If you ignore that they existed roughly 600 years apart.
No.

Religions are stories, not about historic facts.

If you want to find out, what had really happened in that time, the
religion is telling about, you had to find independent sources.

The 'churches' are -generally speaking- not an unbiased witness, but
kind of a party in a struggle for what they regard as truth.

Since we have also 'history is written by the victors', we need to be
extra careful, if dealing with religious stories, written by victorious
powers.

In case of Rome we had to be super-careful, since Romans have a long
history of fabricating things.

Also other winners of wars are no good witnesses, but we need to listen
to independent sources as well.

Here I quote the German historian Karl Heinz Ohlig, who wrote this:

http://inarah.de/sammelbaende-und-artikel/inarah-band-4/geschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen/

This is - of course - all in German (what I can read, btw), so I ask
Google for a translation:

https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Finarah.de%2Fsammelbaende-und-artikel%2Finarah-band-4%2Fgeschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen%2F&edit-text=

This is a very interesting text and explains, why I think, that 'Jesus'
and 'Mohamed' were the very same person, hence had not lived at a
different times.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
This was actually a Jew, who belonged to
a Jewish sect called (in Greek) 'Essenoi' .
They settled in the City Qumran at the dead sea.
The Romans destroyed the city around the year 68CE. Before that
happened, the city was inhabited by numerous peoples. Mostly Jews, not
Christians. Although Christians were officially seen by Rome as a sect
of the Jewish faith at the time.
Well, the Romans killed most of the Jews. The last Jews committed
suicide at Massada.

But why actually had the Romans done that?

They apparently wanted to control the minds of the people and with the
Jews it didn't work.

Similar the Nazis tried to brainwash the people of Germany and Jews
didn't listen.

So Nazis were acting in the traditions of Rome.

That is not at all a secret, since the Nazis showed a lot of
Roman-style costumes on their various parades.

The question is: were are the Romans now (today)?

(Only idiots believe, that empire vanished without a trace).
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
From 'Qumran' we have now 'Qu'ran' and from the Aramaic title 'Mahmed'
('the one to be praised') came 'Mohamed'.
According to Strong's Concordance, Shabach is Aramaic for Praise.
For "the one to be praised" you would write, Halal as the title.
Though Halal is a bit closer to Hebrew than typical Aramaic. It was
likely adopted into the Aramaic language, keeping the same meaning.
Sorry, but Aramaic is among the many thing that I'm not familiar with.

So you tell tell me a lot about the meanings of Aramaic words and I had
to believe you.

But I have quote a text (see above) of Karl Heinz Ohlig, who wrote, the
Jewish sect had someone without name, but with the title 'mahmed', who
is called 'Jesus' by the Christians.

If or if not this is the case, I cannot tell you. And therefore there is
no point in showing me, how fluent you are in Aramaic.

(That is a beautiful language btw.)
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
That was the same person, which the Greek called 'Iesus' ('mahmed').
The only references to mahmed I can find deal with music. Maybe
you spelled it wrong?
Well, maybe. I have certainly limits in orthography of Aramaic.
Post by KWills Shill #3
That aside, the Greeks called the person we know as Jesus,
Iesous. Nothing else.
Another language that I cannot speak (or write) is actually ancient
Greek. So forgive me, if I make a few spelling errors.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
The early Christians spoke Aramaic and lived mainly in Syria.
During the Apostolic Age and the Ante-Nicene Period, 1 to ~325 CE
(or AD for those who want that), Christians were found in and around
the Mediterranean Sea, Jerusalem, Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth,
Thessalonica, Cyprus, Crete, and Rome.
Many different languages were spoken, as you already know from a
past discussion we had.
Post by Thomas Heger
They were prosecuted by the Romans, because they didn't accept the
decisions of the Conzil of Nizea.
Actually, persecution came much later. Initially Rome viewed
Christians as a sect of the Jewish faith. As such, they were afforded
the same rights and privileges as the Jews. It was in year 98, when
emperor Nerva decreed that Christians did not have to pay the annual
tax upon the Jews, that the break was made "official."
???

As far as I know, the Romans prosecuted early Christians very much.They
also used unusual methods to decimate Christianity, like 'feeding to lions'.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
So the Romans hired the Sarazens to fight against the Christians, what
they did.
I will presume you meant Saracens.
Ok, another spelling error. But in this case I used the German spelling
for the Saracens (Sarazenen in German).
Post by KWills Shill #3
Originally it was used to describe people who lived in Arab
territory, but were not ethnic Arabs themselves (despite similar Asian
heritage). It wasn't until the 12th century that it came to mean Arabs
as well. Though some Greeks used it this way as early as the 8th
century.
At no time did Rome hire them for anything. In fact, they were
often at odds. The Romans did have respect for their military
capabilities. Even so, they were classified among the barbarian
peoples of the world and wouldn't have been hired for anything.
Post by Thomas Heger
The 'Christians went to the City Merv at the Silk Road in the Empire of
the Sassanides.
There is evidence of Nestorian Christianity being present along
the Silk Road.
Post by Thomas Heger
The Arabs conquered the City and the entire empire of the Sassanides and
kept the religion of the so called 'Arians' (early Christian sect),
because they were quite successful.
As you probably already know, the word Arian was named after
Arius, a teacher in the early 4th century.
Arius believed that Jesus was a created being with divine
qualities, but was not god made flesh. He based this on passages like
Matthew 24:36 (If Jesus is God, he should know the date and time) and
John 4:6 (a god shouldn't get tired from walking).
At no time were the early Christians called Arians, since the
term did not yet exist.
This addresses the problem of proper naming of ancient groups. Usually
we use names invent far later than such groups have existed and in
languages, the groups in question did not speak.

E.g. 'Iesous' is Greek and the person called that way did not speak
Greek, hence had (most likely) no Greek name.

So we have to keep in mind, such names are symbols we use today and do
not match to names used in ancient times.

There are names used by people themselves to address their own group and
names used by other to address that group. And those names usually are
different.

But these pre-Nicea early Christians are often called 'Arians' (or
Nestorians).
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
So now you're claiming the Jews were the Arians? If you study
Islam and Judaism, you'll note they are very similar. And neither
accepts Jesus as the savior (Arius did believe Jesus to be the
savior). Both religions view him as a prophet only.
No, I have not written that. The person the Christians call 'Jesus' (and
the Muslims 'Mohamed') was actually a Jew from the sect of the Essener.

..

TH
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-19 21:14:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
From your 'exchange theories' is the Kermit-equals-Adolf-theory the
least likely one.
But I have also an interesting theory. Actually it is not my invention,
There is a German historian named Karl-Heinz Ohlig, who had shown, that
the person the Christians call 'Jesus' and the one the Muslims call
'Mohamed' were the same person.
If you ignore that they existed roughly 600 years apart.
No.
Yes.
Post by Thomas Heger
Religions are stories, not about historic facts.
Agreed. But we do have the historical fact regarding when Mohamed
was born. And it was about 600 years AFTER Jesus was to have died.
Post by Thomas Heger
If you want to find out, what had really happened in that time, the
religion is telling about, you had to find independent sources.
Like people who recorded when Mohamed was born, you mean?
Post by Thomas Heger
The 'churches' are -generally speaking- not an unbiased witness, but
kind of a party in a struggle for what they regard as truth.
Since we have also 'history is written by the victors', we need to be
extra careful, if dealing with religious stories, written by victorious
powers.
In case of Rome we had to be super-careful, since Romans have a long
history of fabricating things.
How racist of you.
Post by Thomas Heger
Also other winners of wars are no good witnesses, but we need to listen
to independent sources as well.
http://inarah.de/sammelbaende-und-artikel/inarah-band-4/geschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen/
This is - of course - all in German (what I can read, btw), so I ask
https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Finarah.de%2Fsammelbaende-und-artikel%2Finarah-band-4%2Fgeschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen%2F&edit-text=
This is a very interesting text and explains, why I think, that 'Jesus'
and 'Mohamed' were the very same person, hence had not lived at a
different times.
But they lived in different times, roughly 600 years apart,
meaning they cannot be the same person. It's impossible.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
This was actually a Jew, who belonged to
a Jewish sect called (in Greek) 'Essenoi' .
They settled in the City Qumran at the dead sea.
The Romans destroyed the city around the year 68CE. Before that
happened, the city was inhabited by numerous peoples. Mostly Jews, not
Christians. Although Christians were officially seen by Rome as a sect
of the Jewish faith at the time.
Well, the Romans killed most of the Jews. The last Jews committed
suicide at Massada.
But why actually had the Romans done that?
They apparently wanted to control the minds of the people and with the
Jews it didn't work.
That makes no sense. The Jews were treated as equal to the Romans
in matters of politics.
Post by Thomas Heger
Similar the Nazis tried to brainwash the people of Germany and Jews
didn't listen.
So Nazis were acting in the traditions of Rome.
This should prove funny.
Post by Thomas Heger
That is not at all a secret, since the Nazis showed a lot of
Roman-style costumes on their various parades.
They did?
I must have missed the pictures and films showing the Nazi
soldiers wearing Galeas, Greaves, and Lorica.
You will, of course, link to the pictures and/or video showing
this.
Post by Thomas Heger
The question is: were are the Romans now (today)?
In Rome. Duh.
Post by Thomas Heger
(Only idiots believe, that empire vanished without a trace).
When, in reality please, has anyone claimed they did?
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
From 'Qumran' we have now 'Qu'ran' and from the Aramaic title 'Mahmed'
('the one to be praised') came 'Mohamed'.
According to Strong's Concordance, Shabach is Aramaic for Praise.
For "the one to be praised" you would write, Halal as the title.
Though Halal is a bit closer to Hebrew than typical Aramaic. It was
likely adopted into the Aramaic language, keeping the same meaning.
Sorry, but Aramaic is among the many thing that I'm not familiar with.
I'm not an expert, but I am able to look up things. I think you
would be able as well.
Post by Thomas Heger
So you tell tell me a lot about the meanings of Aramaic words and I had
to believe you.
You're free to verify, if you wish. If necessary or desired, I
can post links to on-line sources that will confirm my claims.
I'm not asking you to take my word for it. I don't have to.
Post by Thomas Heger
But I have quote a text (see above) of Karl Heinz Ohlig, who wrote, the
Jewish sect had someone without name, but with the title 'mahmed', who
is called 'Jesus' by the Christians.
But there was no such person.
Post by Thomas Heger
If or if not this is the case, I cannot tell you. And therefore there is
no point in showing me, how fluent you are in Aramaic.
I'm not fluent. I know only a few words.
Post by Thomas Heger
(That is a beautiful language btw.)
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
That was the same person, which the Greek called 'Iesus' ('mahmed').
The only references to mahmed I can find deal with music. Maybe
you spelled it wrong?
Well, maybe. I have certainly limits in orthography of Aramaic.
Post by KWills Shill #3
That aside, the Greeks called the person we know as Jesus,
Iesous. Nothing else.
Another language that I cannot speak (or write) is actually ancient
Greek. So forgive me, if I make a few spelling errors.
You could try doing some fact checking. You're not stupid, so I
know you can do it.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
The early Christians spoke Aramaic and lived mainly in Syria.
During the Apostolic Age and the Ante-Nicene Period, 1 to ~325 CE
(or AD for those who want that), Christians were found in and around
the Mediterranean Sea, Jerusalem, Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth,
Thessalonica, Cyprus, Crete, and Rome.
Many different languages were spoken, as you already know from a
past discussion we had.
Post by Thomas Heger
They were prosecuted by the Romans, because they didn't accept the
decisions of the Conzil of Nizea.
Actually, persecution came much later. Initially Rome viewed
Christians as a sect of the Jewish faith. As such, they were afforded
the same rights and privileges as the Jews. It was in year 98, when
emperor Nerva decreed that Christians did not have to pay the annual
tax upon the Jews, that the break was made "official."
???
As far as I know, the Romans prosecuted early Christians very much.They
also used unusual methods to decimate Christianity, like 'feeding to lions'.
Then you know nothing of history.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
So the Romans hired the Sarazens to fight against the Christians, what
they did.
I will presume you meant Saracens.
Ok, another spelling error. But in this case I used the German spelling
for the Saracens (Sarazenen in German).
Ok. So long as we're discussing the same people.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Originally it was used to describe people who lived in Arab
territory, but were not ethnic Arabs themselves (despite similar Asian
heritage). It wasn't until the 12th century that it came to mean Arabs
as well. Though some Greeks used it this way as early as the 8th
century.
At no time did Rome hire them for anything. In fact, they were
often at odds. The Romans did have respect for their military
capabilities. Even so, they were classified among the barbarian
peoples of the world and wouldn't have been hired for anything.
Post by Thomas Heger
The 'Christians went to the City Merv at the Silk Road in the Empire of
the Sassanides.
There is evidence of Nestorian Christianity being present along
the Silk Road.
Post by Thomas Heger
The Arabs conquered the City and the entire empire of the Sassanides and
kept the religion of the so called 'Arians' (early Christian sect),
because they were quite successful.
As you probably already know, the word Arian was named after
Arius, a teacher in the early 4th century.
Arius believed that Jesus was a created being with divine
qualities, but was not god made flesh. He based this on passages like
Matthew 24:36 (If Jesus is God, he should know the date and time) and
John 4:6 (a god shouldn't get tired from walking).
At no time were the early Christians called Arians, since the
term did not yet exist.
This addresses the problem of proper naming of ancient groups. Usually
we use names invent far later than such groups have existed and in
languages, the groups in question did not speak.
E.g. 'Iesous' is Greek and the person called that way did not speak
Greek, hence had (most likely) no Greek name.
He is called Jesus in English. It's assured he didn't speak
English.
Post by Thomas Heger
So we have to keep in mind, such names are symbols we use today and do
not match to names used in ancient times.
Then why did you use a name that does not match to a name used in
ancient times?
Post by Thomas Heger
There are names used by people themselves to address their own group and
names used by other to address that group. And those names usually are
different.
But these pre-Nicea early Christians are often called 'Arians' (or
Nestorians).
Before your post, I have never seen the Ante-Nicene Period people
referred to as Arian. And I can find no reference for them being
called such.
I have found reference to Christians of the Post-Nicene Era
(325-451 CE) being compared to Arius' beliefs. But even they were not
called Arians.
By chance, did you mean Aryans, with a y?
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
So now you're claiming the Jews were the Arians? If you study
Islam and Judaism, you'll note they are very similar. And neither
accepts Jesus as the savior (Arius did believe Jesus to be the
savior). Both religions view him as a prophet only.
No, I have not written that. The person the Christians call 'Jesus' (and
the Muslims 'Mohamed') was actually a Jew from the sect of the Essener.
Ah. I see it now.
Except that Mohamed wasn't Jewish. As such, he would never be
called Arian.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Thomas Heger
2017-08-20 11:38:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Am 19.08.2017 um 23:14 schrieb KWills Shill #3:
..
Post by KWills Shill #3
Before your post, I have never seen the Ante-Nicene Period people
referred to as Arian. And I can find no reference for them being
called such.
I have found reference to Christians of the Post-Nicene Era
(325-451 CE) being compared to Arius' beliefs. But even they were not
called Arians.
By chance, did you mean Aryans, with a y?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
So now you're claiming the Jews were the Arians? If you study
Islam and Judaism, you'll note they are very similar. And neither
accepts Jesus as the savior (Arius did believe Jesus to be the
savior). Both religions view him as a prophet only.
No, I have not written that. The person the Christians call 'Jesus' (and
the Muslims 'Mohamed') was actually a Jew from the sect of the Essener.
Ah. I see it now.
Except that Mohamed wasn't Jewish. As such, he would never be
called Arian.
'Mohamed' is derived from the Aramaic word 'mahmed' in the centuries
after the Essenoi were defeated (like the other Jews in Palistine) by
the Romans.

So, 'Mohamed' is actually derived from a title 'mahmed' ('the one to be
praised').

This was apparently done by the Arabs in the 9th century, when the Islam
developed as a new independent religion.

But to understand from what this religion has developed, you need to go
backwards in time and analyze the origin of their stories and myth.

E.g. the Quran speaks about 'children of Israel' and mentions certain
events also mentioned in the bible.

There are very few recognizable places in the Quran. One is actually
Sodom and Gomorrah and the rock called 'Lot's wife'.

So 'Dead Sea' would be a safe bet for the origin of these stories, what
fit to Qumran.

There are also these odd similarities between Muslims and Jews (like
circumcision or ban of pork).

We therefore have a set of connections between Judaism and Islam, which
makes the ideas of Karl Heinz Ohlig quite plausible.

TH
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-20 14:53:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
..
Post by KWills Shill #3
Before your post, I have never seen the Ante-Nicene Period people
referred to as Arian. And I can find no reference for them being
called such.
I have found reference to Christians of the Post-Nicene Era
(325-451 CE) being compared to Arius' beliefs. But even they were not
called Arians.
By chance, did you mean Aryans, with a y?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism
So then you were 100% wrong in your claim. I'm glad we got that
cleared up, and via the evidence you provided.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
So now you're claiming the Jews were the Arians? If you study
Islam and Judaism, you'll note they are very similar. And neither
accepts Jesus as the savior (Arius did believe Jesus to be the
savior). Both religions view him as a prophet only.
No, I have not written that. The person the Christians call 'Jesus' (and
the Muslims 'Mohamed') was actually a Jew from the sect of the Essener.
Ah. I see it now.
Except that Mohamed wasn't Jewish. As such, he would never be
called Arian.
'Mohamed' is derived from the Aramaic word 'mahmed' in the centuries
after the Essenoi were defeated (like the other Jews in Palistine) by
the Romans.
No, it's not. He was not named from anything Aramaic. I already
proved that claim of yours wrong.
Post by Thomas Heger
So, 'Mohamed' is actually derived from a title 'mahmed' ('the one to be
praised').
But, as I showed, mahmed is not "the one to be praised."
I can't find any reference to mahmed being an Aramaic word. I
have found the word muhammad in Aramaic. It *can* be used as a title
for one who is worthy of praise. However, the claim of a connection is
based on The Song of Solomon, which was written in Hebrew, so it's not
very likely the Aramaic word was intended
In Hebrew muhammad means desirable, or pleasurable.
Post by Thomas Heger
This was apparently done by the Arabs in the 9th century, when the Islam
developed as a new independent religion.
Mohamed was named Mohamed long before he became the founder of
Islam.
Post by Thomas Heger
But to understand from what this religion has developed, you need to go
backwards in time and analyze the origin of their stories and myth.
Or read a history book.
Post by Thomas Heger
E.g. the Quran speaks about 'children of Israel' and mentions certain
events also mentioned in the bible.
Islam and Judaism are very similar. So much so that some have
claimed Mohamed simply copied Judaism, changing some items to better
fit his desires and views.
Post by Thomas Heger
There are very few recognizable places in the Quran. One is actually
Sodom and Gomorrah and the rock called 'Lot's wife'.
I am aware of the rock formation called "Lot's Wife," but it's a
random rock formation. According to the Bible, she was turned into a
pillar of salt. Over the thousands of years since this was to have
happened, erosion would have occurred. A pillar of salt the size of a
human would no longer exist.
Further, the rock formation is located very near the Dead Sea
while Sodom was to have been located in the southern region of Canaan.
The distance, while not great, is such that there would have been no
point in looking back. She would have been too far away to see any
part of the city. And it would have taken a few days to travel by
foot.
According to Genesis 19: 20-22, Lot, his wife and daughters only
traveled as far as Zoar, which was one night's travel by foot and
still on the plains. According to verse 26, it was from here that
Lot's wife looked back.
While it's fine to call the rock formation Lot's Wife, it can't
possibly be her.
Post by Thomas Heger
So 'Dead Sea' would be a safe bet for the origin of these stories, what
fit to Qumran.
Except that there is more than enough evidence to prove Islam was
developed in Mecca, in modern day Saudi Arabia. The Dead Sea is
located between Jordan and Israel.
This proves your position impossible.
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also these odd similarities between Muslims and Jews (like
circumcision or ban of pork).
We therefore have a set of connections between Judaism and Islam, which
makes the ideas of Karl Heinz Ohlig quite plausible.
Only if you ignore the actual evidence and accept that which is
very much impossible.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Thomas Heger
2017-08-22 17:19:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Am 20.08.2017 um 16:53 schrieb KWills Shill #3:
...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Thomas Heger
There are very few recognizable places in the Quran. One is actually
Sodom and Gomorrah and the rock called 'Lot's wife'.
I am aware of the rock formation called "Lot's Wife," but it's a
random rock formation. According to the Bible, she was turned into a
pillar of salt. Over the thousands of years since this was to have
happened, erosion would have occurred. A pillar of salt the size of a
human would no longer exist.
Further, the rock formation is located very near the Dead Sea
while Sodom was to have been located in the southern region of Canaan.
The distance, while not great, is such that there would have been no
point in looking back. She would have been too far away to see any
part of the city. And it would have taken a few days to travel by
foot.
According to Genesis 19: 20-22, Lot, his wife and daughters only
traveled as far as Zoar, which was one night's travel by foot and
still on the plains. According to verse 26, it was from here that
Lot's wife looked back.
While it's fine to call the rock formation Lot's Wife, it can't
possibly be her.
Post by Thomas Heger
So 'Dead Sea' would be a safe bet for the origin of these stories, what
fit to Qumran.
Except that there is more than enough evidence to prove Islam was
developed in Mecca, in modern day Saudi Arabia. The Dead Sea is
located between Jordan and Israel.
This proves your position impossible.
Post by Thomas Heger
There are also these odd similarities between Muslims and Jews (like
circumcision or ban of pork).
We therefore have a set of connections between Judaism and Islam, which
makes the ideas of Karl Heinz Ohlig quite plausible.
Only if you ignore the actual evidence and accept that which is
very much impossible.
Here I quote a piece of the translation (by google.translator) of the
German text of Karl Heinz Ohlig:


http://inarah.de/sammelbaende-und-artikel/inarah-band-4/geschichte-rueckwaerts-gelesen/

"The Koran does not provide support for the traditional exposition of
the founding period of Islam. The one mentioned in him by Allah is, for
example, Moses, Jesus, or a man or prophet without a name. Only in four
passages (pg. 48.20, 47.2, 33.40, and 3.144) is there mention of
mu?Ammad , but only in one passage (p. 33.40) -is this also uncertain-an
Arab prophet is. [3]

(A valley floor of) Mecca is mentioned only once, without closer
emphasis and without reference to a Mohammed (pp. 48, 24). It remains
unclear whether this refers to the Arabic Mecca or a Mecca between Ur in
Chalceda and Harran, where it places the oldest preserved geographical
map. [4] Three times Medina is mentioned (p. 63.8, 9, 101 and 9, 120),
which can be called simply city.

Other places in the tradition of the Arabian peninsula are probably to
be understood differently from what is commonly supposed: the unknown
Bakka (p. 3,96.97) is usually, without any plausible explanation,
equated with Mecca; According to Christoph Luxenberg, however, it means
only (some) holy district, which can be anywhere in a sanctuary. [5] No
one has yet been able to discover the place of Badr (p. 3.123),
according to tradition, a decisive battle under the leadership of
Mohammed, the beginning of all subsequent military successes; Here, too,
the philological explanation of Luxenberg is illuminated (in old
manuscripts, the word begins with an "Ain, which was later read out to a
B"), and also fits into the context: According to Christoph Luxenberg,
But as much as power (and comprehends the angels of the angels mentioned
in the following verse 124).

Sura 37, 133-138, tells the story of Lot, who was saved with his family
(Gen 19, Sodom and Gomorrah). Verses 137 and 138 say, without the
senseless additions of Rudi Parets:

"137 You now pass by them (ie the remains of their former dwellings), in
the morning 138 and in the evening (at night)."

These verses give the impression that listeners are passing through the
remnants of destruction every day; It looks as if they leave their house
in the morning and return home in the evening. At least this passage can
only have arisen in the vicinity of Sodom and Gomorrah in southern
Palestine. However, it is not important enough - it is also supported by
no other Quranic statements - to suggest the emergence of the Koran in
Palestine. But surely this applies to the origin of this piece of text. "

To me this sounds very plausible. It's also very possible, that e.g. the
Romans and the Arabs altered these stories 'a bit'.

There would be obvious benefits, if they would have modified these
scripts in favor of their own believes.

The Roman demi-god 'Mithras' seems to be woven into the early
Christian religion and there is certainly reason, why the Arians
disagreed with such modification.

Also plausible would be Roman prosecution of dissidents and the escape
of the early Christians along the Silk-Road.

These are all very plausible assumptions, even if this would not prove them.


TH
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-08-22 18:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Draw a tree diagram to explain the relationship between various
religious doctrines? That would make it easier to continue the discussion.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-22 19:48:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
But it would be absolutely useless on a text based system like this.
joeturn
2017-08-21 06:39:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by joeturn
Post by Thomas Heger
But Linz is a town in Austria, with Austrian schools according to
Austrian laws.
The university Hitler where wanted to study had the nickname 'die
Technik' (the technic), because it was formerly a school for technicians.
To this university belongs also the arts department of Vienna's
university (in 1912).
But the German version contains the illogic naming of the university as
'Schule der Technik', while 'Technik' was only the nickname.
There are other errors and inconsistencies. Especially the German
version is very hard to read, because of poor writing skills of the author.
This is not the case for the English version, which far better written.
Actually there exist at least three different English translations and
my statements refer to earliest one, that was publish about 1933 in
London (have to look up the publisher. As far as I remember it was
Noetide Press - or something similar).
TH
Keep in mind Kermit Roosevelt spoke English.You have proven that it is not a real German transcript but English. Throwing in that he was not allowed to be an artist,threw people off course.However he was an artist his "Eyes and Ears" quote still lives as a magazine in Disney land/World
From your 'exchange theories' is the Kermit-equals-Adolf-theory the
least likely one.
But I have also an interesting theory. Actually it is not my invention,
There is a German historian named Karl-Heinz Ohlig, who had shown, that
the person the Christians call 'Jesus' and the one the Muslims call
'Mohamed' were the same person. This was actually a Jew, who belonged to
a Jewish sect called (in Greek) 'Essenoi' .
They settled in the City Qumran at the dead sea.
From 'Qumran' we have now 'Qu'ran' and from the Aramaic title 'Mahmed'
('the one to be praised') came 'Mohamed'.
That was the same person, which the Greek called 'Iesus' ('mahmed').
The early Christians spoke Aramaic and lived mainly in Syria.
They were prosecuted by the Romans, because they didn't accept the
decisions of the Conzil of Nizea.
So the Romans hired the Sarazens to fight against the Christians, what
they did.
The 'Christians went to the City Merv at the Silk Road in the Empire of
the Sassanides.
The Arabs conquered the City and the entire empire of the Sassanides and
kept the religion of the so called 'Arians' (early Christian sect),
because they were quite successful.
Around the year 850 the Arabs turned the believe system of the Arians
around and relocated the story from the Dead Sea to the Arabian peninsula.
This made the originally Jewish Prophet an Arabian prophet and a
Christian Messias at the same time.
Mainly for political reason the original believe was altered by the then
in case of Islam by the Sarazens (Arabs)
in the case of Christianity by the Romans
The Romans fused their polytheism and the Roman version of Zaroastrism
into the new religion and created something, the early Christians didn't
accept.
TH
http://www.sabbathcovenant.com/christianitythegreatdeception/IesousinGreek.htm
Topaz
2017-08-17 20:27:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Nice dodge on my question which was; How do we know the pro-Hitler books you keep excerpting from aren't just a load of Fascist horse manure?
My post proved that your Jewish controlled media are the liars.
If you don't get it, it is only because you are stupid. Here is more
proof:

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:

"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
joeturn
2017-08-18 06:37:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Nice dodge on my question which was; How do we know the pro-Hitler books you keep excerpting from aren't just a load of Fascist horse manure?
My post proved that your Jewish controlled media are the liars.
If you don't get it, it is only because you are stupid. Here is more
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
All Propaganda created by the Masons/our powers that be,the Illuminati/United Nations/CRF to bring about three world wars and carried out by American actors.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-10 23:57:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and civility of the alt.right!
The emphasis on 'WE decide'.

Proponents of Eugenics were mainly British aristocrats and US oligarchs.


For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.

We had other connections between Eugenics and the German Nazi party,
like the grandfather of Hitler's girlfriend Lord Mitford or Julian Huxley.

My assumption was, that the Brits had exchanged the real Hitler (gay,
skinny, poor, dumb) against an athletic, smart skirt-chaser.

Fitting would be the brother of Aldous Huxley named Noel Trevenen Huxley.

This guy had allegedly committed suicide in 1914. As reason was assumed:
skirt-chasing.

But did you know, that ALL of Hitler's girlfriends had (allegedly)
committed suicide?

There had been:

Mitsy
Geli Raubal
Magda Goebbels
Eva Braun
Unity Mitford

who all died by suicide (allegedly)


So I distrust the British history writers and try to find out, what is
more likely.

And most likely 'Hitler' was replaced.

Among the many reasons to believe so is his famous square mustache:

On the 1st of August 1914 Hitler was first photographed with such a
beard on the Odeonsplatz in Munich.

There exist another photo of Hitler from the 26th of that same August,
when Hitler went to war in Flanders. Then he had a beard with very long
tips.


TH
*****
As a theory, this is slightly less insane than the one where Adolf Hitler AND Walt Disney were the same man, a relative of FDR's named Kermit Roosevelt.
Thomas Heger
2017-08-11 16:34:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and civility of the alt.right!
The emphasis on 'WE decide'.
Proponents of Eugenics were mainly British aristocrats and US oligarchs.
For instance we had Henry Ford, who was a pretty mean anti-Semite and
personal fried with Hitler.
We had other connections between Eugenics and the German Nazi party,
like the grandfather of Hitler's girlfriend Lord Mitford or Julian Huxley.
My assumption was, that the Brits had exchanged the real Hitler (gay,
skinny, poor, dumb) against an athletic, smart skirt-chaser.
Fitting would be the brother of Aldous Huxley named Noel Trevenen Huxley.
skirt-chasing.
But did you know, that ALL of Hitler's girlfriends had (allegedly)
committed suicide?
Mitsy
Geli Raubal
Magda Goebbels
Eva Braun
Unity Mitford
who all died by suicide (allegedly)
So I distrust the British history writers and try to find out, what is
more likely.
And most likely 'Hitler' was replaced.
On the 1st of August 1914 Hitler was first photographed with such a
beard on the Odeonsplatz in Munich.
There exist another photo of Hitler from the 26th of that same August,
when Hitler went to war in Flanders. Then he had a beard with very long
tips.
TH
*****
As a theory, this is slightly less insane than the one where Adolf Hitler AND Walt Disney were the same man, a relative of FDR's named Kermit Roosevelt.
The idea was actually inspired by 'Topaz', who often quotes 'My Struggle'.

After comparing his quotes with the same passage in the German version I
came to to the conclusion, that the German version is a translation of
the English version and not the other way round.

Since I'm German and can - of course- speak German, I can read the
German version. But this book was banned in Germany since the war and it
was not easy to get a copy.

But now the author is dead for more than 70 years (actually Hitler was
neither the author, nor did he die in 1945) it is possible to obtain
copies of this book in Germany.

I assume, the book was actually written by (or in vicinity) of the
'Tavistock Intitute for Human Relations'.

'Tavistock' is a town in Cornwall, were the Russel family owns the title
'Lord of Tavistock'.

It is also a county in Canada, where we find the town 'Swastika'.

Among the Russels we had Bertrand Russel, who was a main proponent of
Socialism.

He was also a member of the 'Apostles', together with Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Wittgenstein was now schoolmate of Hitler, who was also gay. They are
also of the same age.

Now I had the idea, those 'Apostels' had created sinister plots and
needed the appropriate idiot as 'bad guy'. So Wittgenstein had the idea
of his former boy-friend and all the 'Apostles' laughed their ass off.
So the MI6 captured him at the front in Flanders and send someone else back.

That spy had injuries from gas at the eyes and so the wrong 'Hitler' was
sent to hospital in Beelitz Heilstätten until the war was over.

Noel Trevenen Huxley was at that time trained in German language and
behavior in the house of Isolde Beidler in Munich (Prinzregentplatz 16),
to were his brother Julian brought him in 1913. (Julian Huxley was head
of 'Eugenics' and Naval intelligence officer).

After the war the men from the hospital was released and exchanged for
the real spy, who made rapid career in the Nazi party, due to massive
financial support from England (and USA).


TH
Topaz
2017-08-11 21:20:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"The text of this web page was originally published by the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a pamphlet titled "Homosexuals:
Victims of the Nazi Era".

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
100 Raoul Walenberg Place SW,
Washington D.C. 20024-2150.

As part of the Nazis' attempt to purify German society and propagate
an "Aryan master race," they condemned homosexuals as "socially
aberrant." Soon after taking office on January 30, 1933, Hitler banned
all homosexual and lesbian organizations. Brownshirted storm troopers
raided the institutions and gathering places of homosexuals. Greatly
weakened and driven underground, this subculture had flourished in the
relative freedom of the 1920s, in the pubs and cafes of Berlin,
Hamburg, Munich, Bremen, and other cities."
http://www.holocaust-trc.org/homosx.htm



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Thomas Heger
2017-08-12 07:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
"The text of this web page was originally published by the United
Victims of the Nazi Era".
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
100 Raoul Walenberg Place SW,
Washington D.C. 20024-2150.
As part of the Nazis' attempt to purify German society and propagate
an "Aryan master race," they condemned homosexuals as "socially
aberrant." Soon after taking office on January 30, 1933, Hitler banned
all homosexual and lesbian organizations. Brownshirted storm troopers
raided the institutions and gathering places of homosexuals. Greatly
weakened and driven underground, this subculture had flourished in the
relative freedom of the 1920s, in the pubs and cafes of Berlin,
Hamburg, Munich, Bremen, and other cities."
http://www.holocaust-trc.org/homosx.htm
As you see, it was not illegal to be gay in Germany - at least until the
Nazis came along.

But being gay was a crime in England. This is possible to see at the
fate of Alan Turing.

Turing should have been a national hero for breaking the 'Enigma'-Code,
what was essential for the allies to win the war.

But this was not what happened. Instead he was prosecuted and died of
unsuccessful attempts of a 'therapy'.

So we have clear indications, that prosecution of gay people were not
common practice in Germany, but was in the UK.

So, what was actually the plan about it?

Certainly 'purification of the race' is blatant nonsense, since most
gays have no children anyway (mainly because they are gay).


TH
Topaz
2017-08-12 09:35:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
GAY MILITANT INTENT: OUR KIDS

From Concerned Women From America
by Beverly LaHaye

Dear Concerned American,
What I am about to tell you in this letter is so outrageous you may
find it hard to believe. I was astounded myself. I could not believe
that our nation had fallen so far. But the reports here are true. I
have warned many times that our children are under attack. Now I'm
writing to sound the alarm that the situation is even worse than I
thought. I'll tell you more details in a moment, but here's just a
sample of what I've discovered:
Cross-dressing promoted to grade-school children Graphic instruction
in "gay" sex taught to teenage boys and girls Armed guards posted to
keep parents out of high school assemblies led by radical homosexual
activists A book - published by a taxpayer-funded university - that
endorses sex between children and adults!

I've warned about this for many years. Now the evidence is beyond
dispute: there is an evil scheme aimed at destroying our children. The
attack comes on many fronts. It aims to expose children to sex at
earlier and earlier ages... to rob them of their innocence and open
them up to immoral and unhealthy practices... to set them up to accept
messages of
"safe sex" and homosexuality... to usher them into becoming advocates
for - and ultimately participants in - sexual promiscuity, sodomy,
bisexuality, and transgenderism.
These reports confirm my worst fears about this scheme. The time is
short! Radical homosexual activists have long said, "Whoever controls
the schools, controls the future." If they can convince the next
generation that homosexuality is "just another lifestyle," there will
be no stopping them. Even more chilling: If they can lure a whole
generation of young people to explore "alternative" sexual behavior...
to discover their "gay side"...
they will have a whole new generation of young, willing sex partners.
Their first step is to promote gender confusion. Nothing I have ever
seen promises to confuse kids more than a lesson guide obtained and
given to me by one of the researchers here at CWA.
GRADE SCHOOL LESSON PROMOTES CROSS-DRESSING The Gay, Lesbian, and
Straight Education Network, also known as "GLSEN, is pushing a
grade-school curriculum book that promotes cross-dressing. This book
was created by a homosexual parents group at the Buena Vista
Elementary School in San Francisco. It includes a lesson based on a
children's book titled "Jesse's Dream Skirt."
As incredible as it sounds, this is real! The story is about a young
boy named Jesse who likes trying on his mother's dresses, and dreams
of a skirt "that whirled, twirled, flowed and glowed, and felt soft
inside." Jesse's mom helps him make a skirt, and he wears it to
daycare, where his classmates make fun of him. The daycare teacher,
Bruce, gathers the
children together and says, "Jesse loves his skirt. Why are some of
you making fun of him?" A girl says, "Well, I wear pants. Why can't
Jesse wear a skirt?"
A boy, Mike, says that one day his mother let him dress up in her old
dresses and hats. "It was a lot of fun," he said, until his father
came in and yelled at him, saying, "Take off that dress, I don't want
my son to be a sissy!" Mike told his daycare classmates, "I don't
know, - I still don't see what was wrong with it." The children and
their teacher discuss the issue and most of the children end up liking
Jesse's skirt. Some even start making dresses themselves. The book
ends with Jesse twirling around in his "dream skirt," with his
boy-style underwear showing. The companion lesson plan says the "key
message" of "Jesse's Dream Skirt" is: "Respect means keeping our minds
open. Having open minds means giving people freedom to be who they
want to be." I don't know what's worse: encouraging boys to wear
dresses, or the negative portrayal of Mike's father. Children who
study "Jesse's Dream Skirt" are getting the message that their
parents' view of morality cannot be trusted. Lest you think this sort
of insanity is restricted to California, take a loot at this next
report, straight from the Midwest. Armed Security Guard Ejects Mother
of Student from School Assembly on Homosexuality
This really made me angry when I heard about it! The incident took
place in St. Louis, Missouri last year just after school had started
for fall. Debra Loveless, whose daughter attends Metro High School,
heard that GLESEN was conducting a school-sponsored assembly. Loveless
had told school officials that she considered the event inappropriate.
When she tried to view it for herself, she was escorted out of the
assembly by an armed security guard. (Just for wanting to view it!)
Can you believe the arrogance of those school administrators! We may
never know all of what those dear young people were exposed to during
that assembly. But if GLSEN's past performance is any indication, the
material was corrupting an destructive. GLESEN has produced some of
the most foul "educational" material in the dishonorable history of
sex education. Two years ago, CWA uncovered a pornographic teaching
session conducted in Massachusetts by GLSEN. During that workshop,
homosexual instructors indoctrinated children as young
as 14 years old. The children heard detailed descriptions of
perverted sex acts, including the dangerous practice known in
homosexual slang as "fisting." After it was exposed, that session
sparked outrage across the nation. It was such a scandal that it
became known as "Fistgate." GLSEN leaders responded by becoming much
more secretive. Apparently this has led them to keep parents out of
their workshops like the one in St. Louis.
So it has come to this. Our tax dollars foot the bill for homosexual
propaganda to poison our children's minds and defile their hearts.
And when parents want to find out what's going on, they get thrown out
of public schools by armed guards! It's time for parents and
grandparents to stand up and fight to protect our children. We can't
think that just because it hasn't happened in our school yet that it
never will! The radical homosexual activists won't stop with just the
California schools. They won't stop with just the big city
schools. They won't stop until they have reached every school in the
nation.
DANGEROUS NEW BOOK PROVIDES ACADEMIC "COVER" FOR PEDOPHILES AND CHILD
MOLESTERS
The University of Minnesota Press has just published Judith Levine's
Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. This
book includes such outrageous statements as, "Sex is not harmful to
children... There are many ways even the smallesst children can
partake of it."

On another page, the author gushes over a "lush and mysterious" photo
of a "naked 3- or 4-year-old." Quoting a variety of pedophiles,
Levine says children are not necessarily harmed by sex with adults.
She also advocates that America adopt a law like Holland's that
legalizes sex between adults and children as young as 12! It's
unbelievable, but this book is defended by the liberal media elite.
I'm shocked and heartbroken. But we should not be surprised.
America's standards of sexual morality have been belittled as
"taboos," and been worn down step by step. Today, almost nothing is
off limits. Sex between adults and children is just the next barrier
to be torn down. How long will it take these radical activists to
achieve their next evil objective? Our grade-school children are
already being taught that cross-dressing is just wonderful
self-expression. Graphic details of perverted sex practices are
already being taught to high school children, and parents are being
locked out of assemblies taught by radical homosexual activists. We
must - and we can - stop this. NOW! I grieve for our children and
grandchildren. And I fear for our nation if we do not stand up to
this assault of immorality and defeat it...

I've learned that GLSEN now boasts a budget of 3.5 million and a
membership of more than 1,200 homosexual-activist educators. Their
mission is to promote homosexuality and gender confusion in the
schools under any guise that works.

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Thomas Heger
2017-08-12 11:15:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
GAY MILITANT INTENT: OUR KIDS
From Concerned Women From America
by Beverly LaHaye
Dear Concerned American,
What I am about to tell you in this letter is so outrageous you may
find it hard to believe. I was astounded myself. I could not believe
that our nation had fallen so far. But the reports here are true. I
have warned many times that our children are under attack. Now I'm
writing to sound the alarm that the situation is even worse than I
thought. I'll tell you more details in a moment, but here's just a
Cross-dressing promoted to grade-school children Graphic instruction
in "gay" sex taught to teenage boys and girls Armed guards posted to
keep parents out of high school assemblies led by radical homosexual
activists A book - published by a taxpayer-funded university - that
endorses sex between children and adults!
I've warned about this for many years. Now the evidence is beyond
dispute: there is an evil scheme aimed at destroying our children. The
attack comes on many fronts. It aims to expose children to sex at
earlier and earlier ages... to rob them of their innocence and open
them up to immoral and unhealthy practices... to set them up to accept
messages of
"safe sex" and homosexuality... to usher them into becoming advocates
for - and ultimately participants in - sexual promiscuity, sodomy,
bisexuality, and transgenderism.
Sex and politics are two separate realms and politicians should keep out
of what is not their business.

So certain activities are illegal, like rape or child abuse. But the
rest is more or less a private issue of adults, that are ideally married
to each other.

What sex is not, that is a political question and politicians should
stick to other subjects, about what they have a right to speak.


TH
Topaz
2017-08-13 10:31:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Thomas Heger
Sex and politics are two separate realms and politicians should keep out
of what is not their business.
Sodomites make society uncool and the government should stop it.
Post by Thomas Heger
So certain activities are illegal, like rape or child abuse. But the
rest is more or less a private issue of adults, that are ideally married
to each other.
What sex is not, that is a political question and politicians should
stick to other subjects, about what they have a right to speak.
Libertarian BS. They are the same as liberals in my book.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2017-08-10 20:25:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and civility of the alt.right!
You talk about people you don't know. The National Socialists had
tons of compassion and civility. But those with severe and heriditary
defects should be sterilized. People on welfare have many children
while the taxpayers can't afford children. The future is grim without
eugenics. The beginning of the movie "Idiocracy" is true.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-11 00:37:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You talk about people you don't know. The National Socialists had
tons of compassion and civility. But those with severe and heriditary
defects should be sterilized. People on welfare have many children
while the taxpayers can't afford children. The future is grim without
eugenics. The beginning of the movie "Idiocracy" is true.
*****
Lots of compassion and civility there.

The only "compassion and civility" I've ever seen from National Socialists has been toward the members of groups they approve of. Everybody else can die off, and they appear to be happy to help.
Topaz
2017-08-11 21:22:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
The only "compassion and civility" I've ever seen from National Socialists has been toward the members of groups they approve of. Everybody else can die off, and they appear to be happy to help.
You see only what the Jews show you.

There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.

Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":

"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."

"When Matsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."

Here is a quote from Steven Spielberg, "film is the greatest weapon
in the world".

Jewish control of the media:
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and
chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American
Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David
Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory
Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers,
appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant"
(Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the
world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the
World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of
Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, CEO. Miramax Films.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp.,
owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly
identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his
"mentor."
ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe
and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post.
Honored by Honest Reporting.com, website monitoring "anti-Israel
media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA
Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV
Producers, appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert on
domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times
network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle
East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal
Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which
represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer
and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL-
TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
BARBARA WALTERS, Host, ABC's 20-20
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of
CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San
Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has
Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REMNICK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker
SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications,
includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group,
includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement;
American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more
than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television
programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.
LAWRENCE KIRSHBAUM, CEO, AOL-Time Warner Book Group



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Moroney
2017-08-11 03:33:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's
sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it
would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and
civility of the alt.right!
You talk about people you don't know. The National Socialists had
tons of compassion and civility.
Only to those on their "approved" list, of course.

If the Nazis really believed in eugenics for the betterment of people,
they would have bred Jews left and right to try to produce more of the
intelligent Jewish scientists, not gassing them.
Topaz
2017-08-11 21:23:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 03:33:12 +0000 (UTC),
Post by Michael Moroney
Post by Topaz
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's
sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it
would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and
civility of the alt.right!
You talk about people you don't know. The National Socialists had
tons of compassion and civility.
Only to those on their "approved" list, of course.
If the Nazis really believed in eugenics for the betterment of people,
they would have bred Jews left and right to try to produce more of the
intelligent Jewish scientists, not gassing them.
Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany
By Eckart Verlag

The Government of the new Germany have found themselves compelled
to adopt certain legal measures , with the help of which a certain
limitation is to be imposed upon the position of authority exercised
by Jews in all spheres of public life.

The steady and constantly increasing excessive introduction of
foreigners , into the life of the German people in politics, science
and culture by a racially foreign minority who push aside the original
inhabitants of the country; a process which assumed particularly
menacing forms because this constantly spreading minority infected the
healthy and untainted mass of the people with the spirit of
disintegration and bolshevism.

And thus the legislative policy of the new government which arises
from the profound indignation and resentment of the German people
against a presumptuous foreign rule is also the product of facts that
lie in the nature of Jewry itself.

The Stock Exchanges have got completely into the hands of the
Jews. For example, the Board of Directors of the Berlin Stock
Exchange consisted exclusively of Jews.

Conditions are exactly the same in the economic branches known as
the "cultural complex" by which is meant the theatre, cinema, radio,
education, training and instruction, etc.
In this case also there are six times as many Jews as others.

In this way we arrive at the result that there has been a really
alarming introduction of foreigners into leading positions in German
economic life by Jewry.

It must be noted in this condition that this only refers to
professing Jews, while the hundreds of thousands of baptized Jews and
dissenters of Jewish race escape inclusion in these statistics.

The ideal of "rootlessness" is proclaimed without any ballast of
tradition or piety, while the ideals of other peoples are
lightheartedly ridiculed.

German Jewry had established its main headquarters in the press.
This instrument for the domination of public opinion had passed almost
entirely in their hands, and they utilized it to the full.
A publisher would have to had to have a fair amount of intrepidity
if he published anything that might have caused a Jew to frown. In
addition to this, there was the enormous economic pressure that the
Jews has at their disposal for dealing with such opponents, and this
too was applied ruthlessly until their opponents were annihilated.
Even newspapers that were independent of Jewry were exposed to
this pressure which was applied through the advertisements pages. The
local Jewish organizations were only too ready to start and
advertising boycott, whenever anything in the text of the paper
displeased them.

Of all the newspapers published in German, those belonging to the
Ullstein press stood at the head of the list, as regards numbers and
size. In 1932 the "Berliner Morgenpost" had a circulation of over
1,000,000. Among the Jews on the editorial staff were Robolsky (chief
editor), Mendel, Bernstein, Breisacher, Deutsch, Falk, Glflck, Loeb,
and Mandel.

The "Vossische Zeitung" (circulation 75,000 - 90,000) was run by
Jews whose numbers included Georg Bernhard (chief editor), Elbau
(alias Mandelbaum), Misch, Guttman, Bernauer, Caspary, Goldstein,
Salomon, Osborn, Schulvater, Wiesenthal, and Eloesser.

The staff of the "B. Z. am Mittag" (circulation ca. 160,000)
included such Jews as Hollering, Falk, Jakobsohn, Kiaulehn, Muhsam,
Hackenberger, and others.

For the "Tempo" (circulation 125,000) mention may be made of
Gutmann, Jacobi, Lackmann, Lustig, and Zuckerkandl.

The country population was worked upon through the "Gruene Post"
(circulation 920,000), founded by the Jew Richard Katz.

The "Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung" had a circulation of
1,750,000, while it's effect was mainly based upon the attraction of
sensational novels. The chief editor was a Jew named Korff.

The firm of Ullstein have their own news-service in the most
important towns in all parts of the world. They were represented by
the following Jews; L. Stahl in Paris, R. Lewisohn in London, E.
Wallenberg in New York, J. Birnbaum in Warsaw, W. Stein in Moscow, K.
Lahm in Vienna, and W. Neumann in Prague.

During the last decades of the past century the Ullstein press
fought hard on behalf of Marxist social democracy.

When the Bolshevist Soviet film "Cruiser Potemkin" came to Berlin,
Alfred Kerr hailed it as "a marvel, a marvel!" as if it were one of
the eternal creations of art of all nations and times.

The Jews span their web round the "Vorwarts", the principle organ
of the Social Democratic party, whose staff included the following
Jews: Stampfer (chief editor), Lepere, Geyer, Schiff, Bernstein,
Schikowski, and Karstadt; while Friedlander, Rabold, Kersten, and
Hurtig were on the staff of the "Welt am Abend", the Communist evening
paper.

But the true German nation was condemned to immobility and silence,
and a Swedish rightly described them as a "people with severed vocal
chords".

What Germany has witnessed since the so-called revolution of 1918,
in the way of corruption scandals, whose prime authors were all Jews
without exception, probably exceeds in extent and number anything that
has so far occurred in the economic history of all nations.

The labor movement when it came into being about the middle of the
nineteenth century was at first non-political in character, and aimed
at improving the living conditions of the new class of industrial
workmen. There was an entire absence of any definite political dogma.
There was, therefore, for a long time a possibility of the labor
movement in Germany associating itself with the government.

A form of government would then have arisen which might perhaps
have been comparable to the present National Socialist system, and no
period of Marxism and class struggle would have intervened.

A Jew is therefore to blame for the fact that out of the labor
movement in the whole world an endeavor arose aimed at overturning the
existing order in all countries, and thus became the greatest danger
that has so far threatened world culture.

The further history of Marxism was also characterized by the
intellectual leadership of Jews.

The October revolution in Russia did not only place Jews like
Trotsky (Bronstein), Sinovieff (Apfelbaum), and Radek (Sobelsohn) in
the leading positions in the new Communist state, but even the
intermediate and subordinate positions of authority, down to that of
the humblest police official, were very frequently occupied by Jews.

Nothing is more characteristic than the fact that, after the
revolution of 1918, nearly all the leaders of radical, semi-Bolshevist
and wholly Bolshevist Socialism were Jews. First of all there were the
people's representative Hugo Haase, the leader of the "independent"
Socialists, and, alongside him, the lawyer Karl Liebknecht and the
authoress Rosa Luxemburg, the two leader of the "Spartakus League".

The Social Democratic Jewish member of the Reichstag Dr. Oskar
Cohn, who was appointed Under Secretary of the State in the German
ministry of justice in November 1918, was in the pay of the Moscow
Soviet Propaganda Department.

If these Jewish elements had had their way, Germany would have
followed the example of Russia at that time, and Europe would have
been into the hands of Bolshevism.

What other people in the world would have put up with these
instances of treacherous interference by racially foreign elements or
even regarded them for so long with patience?

The most dangerous of the German Communists was also a Jew, a man
named Hans Kippenberger. He was the founder and cold-blooded organizer
of the cunningly developed murder organization of the Communist Party.

Whenever such Communist assassins were sent for trial, the defense
was undertaken by Jewish lawyers.











www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Moroney
2017-08-12 12:14:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 03:33:12 +0000 (UTC),
Post by Michael Moroney
Post by Topaz
Post by e***@yahoo.com
That may be YOUR idea. The basic story I get from people is; "let's
sterilize those we feel are unfit to have children." If you think it
would go otherwise, you are vastly overestimating the compassion and
civility of the alt.right!
You talk about people you don't know. The National Socialists had
tons of compassion and civility.
Only to those on their "approved" list, of course.
If the Nazis really believed in eugenics for the betterment of people,
they would have bred Jews left and right to try to produce more of the
intelligent Jewish scientists, not gassing them.
<snip Nazi propaganda>

Nothing about eugenics, Jewish scientists or even being compassionate and
civil only to those on the "approved" list...

Someone once quipped that the Manhattan Project had 'more Jews per square
inch than any synagogue'... the life story of so many of these and other
physics/science greats of the early/mid 20th century was so similar...born
in/lived in central/east Europe, escaped to the West in the 1930s/40s when
the Nazis took control of their homeland to avoid persecution/being sent
to the camps, did all their later work in the West. No Manhattan Project
for Adolf, although he did have the awesome rocket scientists.
Topaz
2017-08-13 10:41:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC),
Post by Michael Moroney
Nothing about eugenics, Jewish scientists or even being compassionate and
civil only to those on the "approved" list...
Someone once quipped that the Manhattan Project had 'more Jews per square
inch than any synagogue'... the life story of so many of these and other
physics/science greats of the early/mid 20th century was so similar...born
What good is their being smart if they are an enemy race?
Post by Michael Moroney
in/lived in central/east Europe, escaped to the West in the 1930s/40s when
the Nazis took control of their homeland to avoid persecution/being sent
to the camps, did all their later work in the West. No Manhattan Project
for Adolf, although he did have the awesome rocket scientists.
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:

"In my eyes the charge against Judaism became a grave one the
moment I discovered the Jewish activities in the Press, in art, in
literature and the theatre. All unctuous protests were now more or
less futile. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the
hideous productions of the cinema and theatre, and study the names of
the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become
permanently adamant on Jewish questions. Here was a pestilence, a
moral pestilence, with which the public was being infected. It was
worse that the Black Plague of long ago. And in what mighty doses
this poison was manufactured and distributed. Naturally, the
lower the moral and intellectual level of such an author of artistic
products the more inexhaustible his fecundity. Sometimes it went so
far that one of these fellows, acting like a sewage pump, would shoot
his filth directly in the face of other members of the human race. In
this connection we must remember there is no limit to the number of
such people. One ought to realize that for one Goethe, Nature may
bring into existence ten thousand such despoilers who act as the
worst kind of germ-carriers in poisoning human souls. It was a
terrible thought, and yet it could not be avoided, that the greater
number of the Jews seemed specially destined by Nature to play this
shameful part.

"And is it for this reason that they can be called the chosen
people? "I began then to investigate carefully the names of all the
fabricators of these unclean products in public cultural life. The
result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude
which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews. Though my feelings
might rebel a thousand times, reason now had to draw its own
conclusions. "The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature,
artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the
account of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation-
that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be
admitted. Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with
that fact before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser
grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style
became still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as
entirely shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation
of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain
more falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.

"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed
to me now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand
things which I had formerly looked at in a different light."

"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried
to read articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but
in doing so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about
learning something of the people who wrote and published this
mischievous stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were
Jews. I recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism,
and then I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race-
the Social Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well
as the secretaries of the Trades Unions and the street agitators.
Everywhere the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never
forget the row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and
others. One fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien
race held in its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party
with whose minor representatives I had been disputing for months
past."




www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-13 13:54:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That you can quote an insane, hateful man saying insane, hateful things does not validate him or you.

No matter what your paranoid fantasies, Hitler will continue to stand in the annals of history as an insane madman who brought Europe to the brink of destruction.

You will stand in the annals of history as an anonymous little shit who could quote hateful people as if they were valid sources.
Topaz
2017-08-13 17:15:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The Enigma of Hitler

by Leon Degrelle

The mountains of Hitler books based on blind hatred and ignorance do
little to describe or explain the most powerful man the world has ever
seen. How, I ponder, do these thousands of disparate portraits of
Hitler in any way resemble the man I knew? The Hitler seated beside
me, standing up, talking, listening. It has become impossible to
explain to people fed fantastic tales for decades that what they have
read or heard on television just does not correspond to the truth.

People have come to accept fiction, repeated a thousand times over, as
reality. Yet they have never seen Hitler, never spoken to him, never
heard a word from his mouth. The very name of Hitler immediately
conjures up a grimacing devil, the fount of all of one's negative
emotions. Like Pavlov's bell, the mention of Hitler is meant to
dispense with substance and reality. In time, however, history will
demand more than these summary judgments.

Hitler is always present before my eyes: as a man of peace in 1936, as
a man of war in 1944. It is not possible to have been a personal
witness to the life of such an extraordinary man without being marked
by it forever. Not a day goes by but Hitler rises again in my memory,
not as a man long dead, but as a real being who paces his office
floor, seats himself in his chair, pokes the burning logs in the
fireplace.

The first thing anyone noticed when he came into view was his small
mustache. Countless times he had been advised to shave it off, but he
always refused: people were used to him the way he was.
He was not tall -- no more than was Napoleon or Alexander the Great.
Hitler had deep blue eyes that many found bewitching, although I did
not find them so. Nor did I detect the electric current his hands were
said to give off. I gripped them quite a few times and was never
struck by his lightening.

His face showed emotion or indifference according to the passion or
apathy of the moment. At times he was as though benumbed, saying not a
word, while his jaws moved in the meanwhile as if they were grinding
an obstacle to smithereens in the void. Then he would come suddenly
alive and launch into a speech directed at you alone, as though he
were addressing a crowd of hundreds of thousands at Berlin's Tempelhof
airfield. Then he became as if transfigured. Even his complexion,
otherwise dull, lit up as he spoke. And at such times, to be sure,
Hitler was strangely attractive and as if possessed of magic powers.
Anything that might have seemed too solemn in his remarks, he quickly
tempered with a touch of humour. The picturesque world, the biting
phrase were at his command. In a flash he would paint a word-picture
that brought a smile, or come up with an unexpected and disarming
comparison. He could be harsh and even implacable in his judgments and
yet almost at the same time be surprisingly conciliatory, sensitive
and warm.

After 1945 Hitler was accused of every cruelty, but it was not in his
nature to be cruel. He loved children. It was an entirely natural
thing for him to stop his car and share his food with young cyclists
along the road. Once he gave his raincoat to a derelict plodding in
the rain. At midnight he would interrupt his work and prepare the food
for his dog Blondi.

He could not bear to eat meat, because it meant the death of a living
creature. He refused to have so much as a rabbit or a trout sacrificed
to provide his food. He would allow only eggs on his table, because
egg-laying meant that the hen had been spared rather than killed.
Hitler's eating habits were a constant source of amazement to me. How
could someone on such a rigorous schedule, who had taken part in tens
of thousands of exhausting mass meetings from which he emerged bathed
with sweat, often losing two to four pounds in the process; who slept
only three to four hours a night; and who, from 1940 to 1945, carried
the whole world on his shoulders while ruling over 380 million
Europeans: how, I wondered, could he physically survive on just a
boiled egg, a few tomatoes, two or three pancakes, and a plate of
noodles? But he actually gained weight!

He drank only water. He did not smoke and would not tolerate smoking
in his presence. At one or two o'clock in the morning he would still
be talking, untroubled, close to his fireplace, lively, often amusing.
He never showed any sign of weariness. Dead tired his audience might
be, but not Hitler.

He was depicted as a tired old man. Nothing was further from the
truth. In September 1944, when he was reported to be fairly doddering,
I spent a week with him. His mental and physical vigor were still
exceptional. The attempt made on his life on July 20th had, if
anything, recharged him. He took tea in his quarters as tranquilly as
if we had been in his small private apartment at the chancellery
before the war, or enjoying the view of snow and bright blue sky
through his great bay window at Berchtesgaden.

At the very end of his life, to be sure, his back had become bent, but
his mind remained as clear as a flash of lightening. The testament he
dictated with extraordinary composure on the eve of his death, at
three in the morning of April 29, 1945, provides us a lasting
testimony. Napoleon at Fontainebleau was not without his moments of
panic before his abdication. Hitler simply shook hands with his
associates in silence, breakfasted as on any other day, then went to
his death as if he were going on a stroll. When has history ever
witnessed so enormous a tragedy brought to its end with such iron self
control?

Hitler's most notable characteristic was ever his simplicity. The most
complex of problems resolved itself in his mind into a few basic
principles. His actions were geared to ideas and decisions that could
be understood by anyone. The laborer from Essen, the isolated farmer,
the Ruhr industrialist, and the university professor could all easily
follow his line of thought. The very clarity of his reasoning made
everything obvious.

His behaviour and his life style never changed even when he became the
ruler of Germany. He dressed and lived frugally. During his early days
in Munich, he spent no more than a mark per day for food. At no stage
in his life did he spend anything on himself. Throughout his 13 years
in the chancellery he never carried a wallet or ever had money of his
own.

Hitler was self-taught and made no attempt to hide the fact. The smug
conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many
flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had
acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more
than thousands of diploma-decorated academics.

I don't think anyone ever read as much as he did. He normally read one
book every day, always first reading the conclusion and the index in
order to gauge the work's interest for him. He had the power to
extract the essence of each book and then store it in his
computer-like mind. I have heard him talk about complicated scientific
books with faultless precision, even at the height of the war.
His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He was readily familiar with
the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex
for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of
Buddha, Confucius and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, and
Savonarola; of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare
and Goethe; and analytical writers such as Renan and Gobineau,
Chamberlain and Sorel.

He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato.
He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for
a long time carried a pocked edition of Schopenhauer with him.
Nietzsche taught him much about the willpower.

His thirst for knowledge was unquenchable. He spend hundreds of hours
studying the works of Tacitus and Mommsen, military strategists such
as Clausewitz, and empire builders such as Bismark. Nothing escaped
him: world history or the history of civilizations, the study of the
Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy and all the masterpieces of
Homer, Sophocles, Horace, Ovid, Titus Livius and Cicero. He knew
Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary.

His knowledge also extended to mechanics. He knew how engines worked;
he understood the ballistics of various weapons; and he astonished the
best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology.
The universality of Hitler's knowledge may surprise or displease those
unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact: Hitler was one
of the most cultivated men of this century. Many times more so than
Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity; or than Pierre Lavaal, with him
mere cursory knowledge of history; of than Roosevelt; or Eisenhower,
who never got beyond detective novels.

Even during his earliest years, Hitler was different than other
children. He had an inner strength and was guided by his spirit and
his instincts.

He could draw skillfully when he was only eleven years old. His
sketches made at that age show a remarkable firmness and liveliness.
He first paintings and watercolors, created at age 15, are full of
poetry and sensitivity. One of his most striking early works,
'Fortress Utopia,' also shows him to have been an artist of rare
imagination. His artistic orientation took many forms. He wrote poetry
from the time he was a lad. He dictated a complete play to his sister
Paula who was amazed at his presumption. At the age of 16, in Vienna,
he launched into the creation of an opera. He even designed the stage
settings, as well as all the costumes; and, of course, the characters
were Wagnerian heroes.

More than just an artist, Hitler was above all an architect. Hundreds
of his works were notable as much for the architecture as for the
painting. From memory alone he could reproduce in every detail the
onion dome of a church or the intricate curves of wrought iron.
Indeed, it was to fulfill his dream of becoming an architect that
Hitler went to Vienna at the beginning of the century.

When one sees the hundreds of paintings, sketches and drawings he
created at the time, which reveal his mastery of three dimensional
figures, it is astounding that his examiners at the Fine Arts Academy
failed him in two successive examinations. German historian Werner
Maser, no friend of Hitler, castigated these examiners: "All of his
works revealed extraordinary architectural gifts and knowledge. The
builder of the Third Reich gives the former Fine Arts Academy of
Vienna cause for shame."

In his room, Hitler always displayed an old photograph of his mother.
The memory of the mother he loved was with him until the day he died.
Before leaving this earth, on April 30, 1945, he placed his mother's
photograph in front of him. She had blue eyes like his and a similar
face. Her maternal intuition told her that her son was different from
other children. She acted almost as if she knew her son's destiny.
When she died, she felt anguished by the immense mystery surrounding
her son.

Throughout the years of his youth, Hitler lived the life of a virtual
recluse. He greatest wish was to withdraw from the world. At heart a
loner, he wandered about, ate meager meals, but devoured the books of
three public libraries. He abstained from conversations and had few
friends.

It is almost impossible to imagine another such destiny where a man
started with so little and reached such heights. Alexander the great
was the son of a king. Napoleon, from a well-to-do family, was a
general at 24. Fifteen years after Vienna, Hitler would still be an
unknown corporal. Thousands of others had a thousand times more
opportunity to leave their mark on the world.

Hitler was not much concerned with his private life. In Vienna he had
lived in shabby, cramped lodgings. But for all that he rented a piano
that took up half his room, and concentrated on composing his opera.
He lived on bread, milk, and vegetable soup. His poverty was real. He
did not even own an over-coat. He shoveled streets on snowy days. He
carried luggage at the railway station. He spent many weeks in
shelters for the homeless. But he never stopped painting or reading.
Despite his dire poverty, Hitler somehow managed to maintain a clean
appearance. Landlords and landladies in Vienna and Munich all
remembered him for his civility and pleasant disposition. His
behaviour was impeccable. His room was always spotless, his meager
belongings meticulously arranged, and his clothes neatly hung or
folded. He washed and ironed his own clothes, something which in those
days few men did. He needed almost nothing to survive, and money from
the sale of a few paintings was sufficient to provide for all his
needs.

Impressed by the beauty of the church in a Benedictine monastery where
he was part of the choir and served as an altar boy, Hitler dreamt
fleetingly of becoming a Benedictine monk. And it was at that time,
too, interestingly enough, that whenever he attended mass, he always
had to pass beneath the first swastika he had ever seen: it was graven
in the stone escutcheon of the abbey portal.

Hitler's father, a customs officer, hoped the boy would follow in his
footsteps and become a civil servant. His tutor encouraged him to
become a monk. Instead the young Hitler went, or rather fled, to
Vienna. And there, thwarted in his artistic aspirations by the
bureaucratic mediocrities of academia, he turned to isolation and
meditation. Lost in the great capital of Austria-Hungary, he searched
for his destiny.

During the first 30 years of Hitler's life, the date April 20, 1889,
meant nothing to anyone. He was born on that day in Braunau, a small
town in the Inn valley. During his exile in Vienna, he often thought
of his modest home, and particularly of his mother. When she fell ill,
he returned home from Vienna to look after her. For weeks he nursed
her, did all the household chores, and supported her as the most
loving of sons. When she finally died, on Christmas eve, his pain was
immense. Wracked with grief, he buried his mother in the little
country cemetery. "I have never seen anyone so prostrate with grief,"
said his mother's doctor, who happened to be Jewish.

Hitler had not yet focused on politics, but without his rightly
knowing, that was the career to which he was most strongly called.
Politics would ultimately blend with his passion for art. People, the
masses, would be the clay the sculptor shapes into an immortal form.
The human clay would become for him a beautiful work of art like one
of Myron's marble sculptures, a Hans Makart painting, or Wagner's Ring
Trilogy.

His love of music, art and architecture had not removed him from the
political life and social concerns of Vienna. In order to survive, he
worked as a common laborer sided by side with other workers. He was a
silent spectator, but nothing escaped him: not the vanity and egoism
of the bourgeoisie, not the moral and material misery of the people,
nor yet the hundreds of thousands of workers who surged down the wide
avenues of Vienna with anger in their hearts.

He had also been taken aback by the growing presence in Vienna of
bearded Jews wearing caftans, a sight unknown in Linz. "How can they
be Germans?" he asked himself. He read the statistics: in 1860 there
were 69 Jewish families in Vienna; 40 years later there were 200,000.
They were everywhere. He observed their invasion of the universities
and the legal and medical professions, and their takeover of the
newspapers.

Hitler was exposed to the passionate reactions of the workers to this
influx, but the workers were not alone in their unhappiness. There
were many prominent persons in Austria and Hungary who did not hide
their resentment at what they believed was an alien invasion of their
country. The mayor of Vienna, a Christian-Democrat and a powerful
orator, was eagerly listened to by Hitler.

Hitler was also concerned with the fate of the eight million Austrian
Germans kept apart from Germany, and thus deprived of their rightful
German nationhood. He saw Emperor Franz Josef as a bitter and petty
old man unable to cope with the problems of the day and the
aspirations of the future.

Quietly, the young Hitler was summing things up in his mind.
First: Austrians were part of Germany, the common fatherland.
Second: The Jews were aliens within the German community.
Third: Patriotism was only valid if it was shared by all classes. The
common people with whom Hitler had shared grief and humiliation were
just as much a part of the fatherland as the millionaires of high
society.

Fourth: Class war would sooner or later condemn both workers and
bosses to ruin in any country. No country could survive class war;
only cooperation between workers and bosses can benefit the country.
Workers must be respected and live with decency and honor. Creativity
must never be stifled.

When Hitler later said that he had formed his social and political
doctrine in Vienna, he told the truth. Ten years later his
observations made in Vienna would become the order of the day.
Thus Hitler was to live for several years in the crowded city of
Vienna as a virtual outcast, yet quietly observing everything around
him. His strength came from within. He did not rely on anyone to do
his thinking for him. Exceptional human beings always feel lonely amid
the vast human throng. Hitler saw his solitude as a wonderful
opportunity to meditate and not to be submerged in a mindless sea. In
order not to be lost in the wastes of a sterile desert, a strong soul
seeks refuge within himself. Hitler was such a soul.

The lightning in Hitler's life would come from the word.
All his artistic talent would be channeled into his mastery of
communication and eloquence. Hitler would never conceive of popular
conquests without the power of the word. He would enchant and be
enchanted by it. He would find total fulfillment when the magic of his
words inspired the hearts and minds of the masses with whom he
communed.

He would feel reborn each time he conveyed with mystical beauty the
knowledge he had acquired in his lifetime.

Hitler's incantory eloquence will remain, for a very long time, a vast
field of study for the psychoanalyst. The power of Hitler's word is
the key. Without it, there would never have been a Hitler era.

Did Hitler believe in God? He believed deeply in God. He called God
the Almighty, master of all that is known and unknown.

Propagandists portrayed Hitler as an atheist. He was not. He had
contempt for hypocritical and materialistic clerics, but he was not
alone in that. He believed in the necessity of standards and
theological dogmas, without which, he repeatedly said, the great
institution of the Christian church would collapse. These dogmas
clashed with his intelligence, but he also recognized that it was hard
for the human mind to encompass all the problems of creation, its
limitless scope and breathtaking beauty. He acknowledged that every
human being has spiritual needs.

The song of the nightingale, the pattern and color of a flower,
continually brought him back to the great problems of creation. No one
in the world has spoken to me so eloquently about the existence of
God. He held this view not because he was brought up as a Christian,
but because his analytical mind bound him to the concept of God.
Hitler's faith transcended formulas and contingencies. God was for him
the basis of everything, the ordainer of all things, of his Destiny
and that of all others.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-13 17:45:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Whatever he might have been like as a person, as a political leader he was a horrible man who brought the world to disaster. He is seen as a monster and he deserves the reputation.
Topaz
2017-08-14 10:06:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
the bad side won the war.

An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels

One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.

It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.

That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.

It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.

Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.

Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.

That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.

The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.



www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
joeturn
2017-08-17 01:35:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
joeturn
2017-08-17 01:48:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
This will give you the blue print for three world wars.

e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-17 02:18:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
BDK
2017-08-17 03:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-17 08:05:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
I just realized there hasn't been anything new from face blind
Eddie is quite a while. Maybe he's finally getting the professional
help he kept proving he needed.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-08-17 14:19:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>, shill_num_3
@gmx.com says...
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
I just realized there hasn't been anything new from face blind
Eddie is quite a while. Maybe he's finally getting the professional
help he kept proving he needed.
Or he's too deteriorated to keep shoveling the stuff out.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
joeturn
2017-08-18 05:52:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
I just realized there hasn't been anything new from face blind
Eddie is quite a while. Maybe he's finally getting the professional
help he kept proving he needed.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
His new radio broadcast has them digging up fake bones in Aruba.








KWills Shill #3
2017-08-18 08:14:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
I just realized there hasn't been anything new from face blind
Eddie is quite a while. Maybe he's finally getting the professional
help he kept proving he needed.
His new radio broadcast has them digging up fake bones in Aruba.
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
Post by joeturn
http://youtu.be/mHDVD6uX8U0
http://youtu.be/EVHAePzBVJE
http://youtu.be/ex6yTApiMEc
http://youtu.be/rBd3v-ZY-gU
I made it nearly one minute.
If it's of any consolation, that's longer than some of the k00k
video's Luke has posted.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-18 13:25:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
It was determined that you're a sinner who need Rev. Larson in your life.
BDK
2017-08-18 15:05:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
It was determined that you're a sinner who need Rev. Larson in your life.
It's been determined that the "Reverend" Lar$on was, and probably is, a
con artist.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-19 08:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
It was determined that you're a sinner who need Rev. Larson in your life.
It's been determined that the "Reverend" Lar$on was, and probably is, a
con artist.
He most certainly was. Of this there is no doubt. I've not paid
any attention to him in years, so it's POSSIBLE he's straightened up
his act. Possible, but not real likely.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-18 17:42:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
It was determined that you're a sinner who need Rev. Larson in your life.
-forgery-
marston shores
2017-08-18 20:22:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
It was determined that you're a sinner who need Rev. Larson in your life.
-forgery-
I didn't post that. Kenty did.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-18 21:50:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I didn't post that. Kenty did.
*****
Somehow using your IP address?
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-19 09:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
I didn't post that. Kenty did.
*****
Somehow using your IP address?
It's amazing how I am somehow able to access Marston's computer
and post as him. Especially since he's in Colorado (or so he's claimed
in the past).
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-19 20:17:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
I didn't post that. Kenty did.
*****
Somehow using your IP address?
It's amazing how I am somehow able to access Marston's computer
and post as him.
It might be if you had, but you have not.

All you do is fire up Thunderbird and aioe, not much talent there, kenty.
Post by KWills Shill #3
Especially since he's in Colorado (or so he's claimed
in the past).
Virtual communication knows little geographic limits.

And Bob can cast out your demons, seek his help.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-19 20:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You know nothing of IP addresses, do you marston?
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-20 11:42:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
You know nothing of IP addresses, do you marston?
I suggested he contact the server and file a complaint. If the
posts are forgeries (they aren't, of course) aioe can block the IP for
the legitimate user.
Either the posts are Marston's or whomever is forging them
travels more than I do.
Or, I suppose, Marston is too stump stupid to follow a simple
suggestion.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-20 11:54:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I think he's reached "Ernie-level."
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-20 14:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I think he's reached "Ernie-level."
Definitely.
Marston posts to alt.baldspot on rare occasion. His most recent
post was asking Ernie to post his pictures in the proper order. As you
will know, that was a waste of time.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-20 18:39:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I think he's reached "Ernie-level."
Definitely.
Marston posts to alt.baldspot on rare occasion. His most recent
post was asking Ernie to post his pictures in the proper order. As you
will know, that was a waste of time.
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-20 14:49:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 06:42:28 -0500, KWills Shill #3
Post by KWills Shill #3
aioe can block the IP for
the legitimate user.
That should be "...block the IP for the illegitimate users."
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-08-20 18:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 06:42:28 -0500, KWills Shill #3
Post by KWills Shill #3
aioe can block the IP for
the legitimate user.
That should be "...block the IP for the illegitimate users."
The demons have you under their full control Kentucci.

Seek out Bob's help:

https://www.boblarson.org/religious-events/

He can cast those demons out forever!
marston shores
2017-08-20 18:38:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@yahoo.com
You know nothing of IP addresses, do you marston?
I suggested he contact the server and file a complaint. If the
posts are forgeries (they aren't, of course) aioe can block the IP for
the legitimate user.
Either the posts are Marston's or whomever is forging them
travels more than I do.
Or, I suppose, Marston is too stump stupid to follow a simple
suggestion.
Oh stop it Kenty, everyone knows it's you.
joeturn
2017-08-21 07:06:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
I love faceblind people's insane ravings.
I just realized there hasn't been anything new from face blind
Eddie is quite a while. Maybe he's finally getting the professional
help he kept proving he needed.
His new radio broadcast has them digging up fake bones in Aruba.
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
Post by joeturn
http://youtu.be/mHDVD6uX8U0
http://youtu.be/EVHAePzBVJE
http://youtu.be/ex6yTApiMEc
http://youtu.be/rBd3v-ZY-gU
I made it nearly one minute.
If it's of any consolation, that's longer than some of the k00k
video's Luke has posted.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
The bones are not Natalie Holloway's bones Natalie was played by Chelsea Clinton and she is very much alive. Of coarse they will be declared Natlie's, but that's just to discredit Ed Chairini's findings.

They will go to any links to give Ed a bad name.He has caught them numerous times creating faked events.
KWills Shill #3
2017-08-21 09:18:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:06:53 -0700 (PDT), joeturn <***@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[...]
Post by joeturn
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by joeturn
His new radio broadcast has them digging up fake bones in Aruba.
The bones are real, of course. Whether they are Natalee's has yet
to be determined.
Post by joeturn
http://youtu.be/mHDVD6uX8U0
http://youtu.be/EVHAePzBVJE
http://youtu.be/ex6yTApiMEc
http://youtu.be/rBd3v-ZY-gU
I made it nearly one minute.
If it's of any consolation, that's longer than some of the k00k
video's Luke has posted.
The bones are not Natalie Holloway's bones Natalie was played by Chelsea Clinton and she is very much alive.
DNA testing will determine if they are, or are not, Natalee.
Natalee was not played by anyone other than herself. The rants of
a man who clearly has face blindness, Eddie, mean nothing.
Post by joeturn
Of coarse they will be declared Natlie's, but that's just to discredit Ed Chairini's findings.
Natalee may be alive. She may be dead. It's not possible for any
of us to know at this time. If the bones found are hers, then we will
know she is dead. If they are not her, then there is still hope,
however small, that she is still alive.
Eddie obviously suffers from prosopagnosia. The evidence of this
is overwhelming.
Post by joeturn
They will go to any links to give Ed a bad name.He has caught them numerous times creating faked events.
Yet he can offer no actual evidence of them doing so. All he can
do is claim person A looks like person B. The problem is that they
don't look alike.
What is it about the ENTER key that causes you, and other k00ks,
such fear? As I was able to prove while in Seattle, WA, it is possible
to use the ENTER key when posting via Google, so it's not a case of
the key not functioning.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
joeturn
2017-08-17 04:04:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
And Father Caughlin. While looking at my first youtube in this thread look to the right side and watch that actor based video of Kermit's other characters



This has not been proven wrong yet
joeturn
2017-08-17 04:10:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Would that explain why he tried to kill all Jews in Germany?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
I honestly think World War II was an actor based event designed by the controlling elite(the way the richest stayed rich was making war)To the victor goes the spoils of war and the victors were the ones that gained wealth in this travesty.The Banksters,that financed it are still capitalizing on interest$$$
The first Banksters were the Knights Templar They now go by The Freed Masons.
After being driven out of Europe they reopened their war business and corrupt financing.
They made World War Two happen for revenge and of coarse for the money.
Adolf Hitler was played by Kermit Roosevelt.Acting was an old family tradition$$$$ Go to youtube and pull up Austawich Exposed,then watch its update on the dallas goldbug channel.Then visit his site Wellaware1.com and see his radio programs. Just give him 2 hours of your time.You wont view the world as you once did.
You're not going to suggest that Kermit Roosevelt was playing BOTH Adolph Hitler AND Walt Disney?
And Father Caughlin. While looking at my first youtube in this thread look to the right side and watch that actor based video of Kermit's other characters

http://youtu.be/SDQJX1rvjRY

This has not been proven wrong yet

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.conspiracy/hitler$20walt$20disney$20kermit$20roosevelt%7Csort:relevance/alt.conspiracy/ahrZ2FzJrUg/Hmlp4lvXqZ8J
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-17 18:30:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
It's too insane to be proven wrong. Adolph Hitler and Walt Disney are on opposite sides of the world. They were seen in their respective environments. How, pray tell, did Hitler run rallies while Disney was running a studio?
joeturn
2017-08-18 06:15:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
It's too insane to be proven wrong. Adolph Hitler and Walt Disney are on opposite sides of the world. They were seen in their respective environments. How, pray tell, did Hitler run rallies while Disney was running a studio?
With assistance.
The same way they made the lunar landing in the MGM studio in London with the backdrop of Space Oddisy by Stanley Kubrick /Disney land in California.With the right back drop you would believe you were Alice in Wonderland.
So what did you think his brother Roy was doing during Kermits trips to Germany?
Loading...