Discussion:
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
(too old to reply)
Rocky
2013-02-15 14:45:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
07 - The Key

Published on May 29, 2012

The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.

Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.



---------------------------------------

Dang that was one good video.

Rocky
Freedom Man
2013-02-15 18:32:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking the
truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Rocky
2013-02-15 19:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?

Rocky
george152
2013-02-15 22:40:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Still making stupid claims eh ?
henry.mcintosh
2013-02-15 23:40:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Rocky
Thus spake the "gullible fool"
the man
2013-02-17 13:44:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Rocky
Another fly in the ointment.
When will there be a real investigation?
The gov's ;I Say So. doesn't fly with me.
--
Karma ; what a concept!
BDK
2013-02-17 14:31:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <georgewk10-***@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
@yahoo.com says...
Post by the man
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Rocky
Another fly in the ointment.
When will there be a real investigation?
The gov's ;I Say So. doesn't fly with me.
Troofer's claims don't fly with sane people.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
george152
2013-02-17 19:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Post by the man
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Rocky
Another fly in the ointment.
When will there be a real investigation?
The gov's ;I Say So. doesn't fly with me.
Troofer's claims don't fly with sane people.
That's why the conspiracy kooks keep wanking about the same long ago
discredited claims.
They cannot accept the fact that 911 happened, we know how it happened
and we've moved on
Freedom Man
2013-02-17 20:19:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want -
making all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we
were told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through wings?
Rocky
Videos are fallible and easily altered. EYEWITNESSES are far less so.
A friend of mine SAW the second plane strike the tower.
I HEARD that second plane strike the tower.
But YOU claim that the towers were not hit by aircraft at all!
Maybe YOU do not exist, but are a creation of some coverup shill that posts
here??
Government Shill #2
2013-02-17 20:43:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want -
making all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we
were told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing at
one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through
wings?
Rocky
Videos are fallible and easily altered. EYEWITNESSES are far less so.
A friend of mine SAW the second plane strike the tower.
I HEARD that second plane strike the tower.
But YOU claim that the towers were not hit by aircraft at all!
Maybe YOU do not exist, but are a creation of some coverup shill that posts
here??
Oh dear, Rocky. You're cover is busted. Return to Shill Central for a new Poster ID pack. We might as well run you through the Shill refresher when you're back here too. New techniques have been devised since your last visit.

--
Shill #2
Head, Human Resources
Shill Central
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-17 20:57:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Fri, Feb 15, 2013, 1:53pm (EST-1) From:
***@att.net (Rocky)
"Freedom Man" <***@4eva.com> wrote in message news:kfluuh$a7j$***@dont-email.me...
"Rocky" <***@att.net> wrote in message news:hvWdnUKC1sZ21IPMnZ2dnUVZ_j-***@giganews.com...
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want -
making all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower. I HEARD the
second plane strike the tower. Yes, demolition explosives brought down
all three buildings, but that was AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft
- not necessarily the planes we were told they were, but aircraft of
some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing
at one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through
wings?
Rocky

===================

Don't forget there are dozens of still images of Flight 175 aproaching
the South Tower taken from multiple angles, and not one of them exhibits
wing fading.

Also, a piece of the fuselage of Flight 175 was found on he roof of
WTC5.

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
joeturn
2013-02-18 01:13:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking
the truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want -
making all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower. I HEARD the
second plane strike the tower. Yes, demolition explosives brought down
all three buildings, but that was AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft
- not necessarily the planes we were told they were, but aircraft of
some kind.
Don't forget that a lot of videos of Flight 175 show a see through wing
at one time or the other and how many jets in real life have see through
wings?
Rocky
===================
Don't forget there are dozens of still images of Flight 175 aproaching
the South Tower taken from multiple angles, and not one of them exhibits
wing fading.
Also, a piece of the fuselage of Flight 175 was found on he roof of
WTC5.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.


george152
2013-02-18 03:40:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.
Well, it resembles English
Government Shill #2
2013-02-18 03:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by george152
Post by joeturn
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.
Well, it resembles English
Only superficially.
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-18 10:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.
http://youtu.be/U5kScVAlHUg
Look at your own video Joe. Look at the trail of smoke rising from the tower and actually bent in the wind up there. There is no way no sizable amount of gas could be up there and have just the wings vanish. If the plane were a holographic projection, the entire thing would be wavering with the gas cloud in a breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving too fast for the camera to contrast the silver wings against the silver background of the tower.
joeturn
2013-02-18 14:42:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.
http://youtu.be/U5kScVAlHUg
Look at your own video Joe. Look at the trail of smoke rising from the tower and actually bent in the wind up there. There is no way no sizable amount of gas could be up there and have just the wings vanish. If the plane were a holographic projection, the entire thing would be wavering with the gas cloud in a breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving too fast for the camera to contrast the silver wings against the silver background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was
it flying slower than the wings?There was a vortice of wind near the
building and this vortice swept away the stonium niobate cloud.this is
why the wings did not have enough background to support a perfect
hologram.

Now if you saw the Evan Fairbanks video of the itsy bitsy plane on the
windshield that plane did not loose its wings because he captured a
reflection of the hologram being projected onto the windshield.

This is way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the
truck,I got this!
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-18 15:17:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 6:42am (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (joeturn)
On Feb 18, 5:10=A0am, ***@hotmail.com wrote:
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a wingles
plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know they were
watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to support the
holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the cloud disapating.

Look at your own video Joe. Look at the trail of smoke rising from the
tower and actually bent in the wind up there. There is no way no sizable
amount of gas could be up there and have just the wings vanish. If the
plane were a holographic projection, the entire thing would be wavering
with the gas cloud in a breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving
too fast for the camera to contrast the silver wings against the silver
background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was it
flying slower than the wings?

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =


No, stupid. The fuselage is quite a bit larger than the wings- especialy
when you are seeing the wings from the side. It occupies a lot more
pixels.

You don;t know anything about NTSC video images, do you?
--------------------------------

There was a vortice of wind near the building and this vortice swept
away the stonium niobate cloud.this is why the wings did not have enough
background to support a perfect hologram.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Where were thess hologram projectors? Where did this nonexistant gas
cloud come from? How did 'they' produce a hologram visible- undistorted-
for nearly 360 degrees (a physical impossibility, BTW)? In the air
currents around the towers (primarily updrafts near the buildings), why
didn't his cloud of gas dissipate immrdiately?
----------------------------

Now if you saw the Evan Fairbanks video of the itsy bitsy plane on the
windshield that plane did not loose its wings because he captured a
reflection of the hologram being projected onto the windshield.
This is way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the
truck,I got this!

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Can you translate this into English? Most of us don;t speak kOOkese.

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
Rocky
2013-02-18 19:58:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a wingles
plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know they were
watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to support the
holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the cloud disapating.
http://youtu.be/U5kScVAlHUg
Look at your own video Joe. Look at the trail of smoke rising from the
tower and actually bent in the wind up there. There is no way no sizable
amount of gas could be up there and have just the wings vanish. If the
plane were a holographic projection, the entire thing would be wavering
with the gas cloud in a breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving
too fast for the camera to contrast the silver wings against the silver
background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was it
flying slower than the wings?
==================
No, stupid. The fuselage is quite a bit larger than the wings- especialy
when you are seeing the wings from the side. It occupies a lot more
pixels.
You don;t know anything about NTSC video images, do you?
Not this again. NTSC wouldn't cause that and NTSC wouldn't cause WTC7 to
fall at free fall speed for over 2.5 seconds either.
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
--------------------------------
There was a vortice of wind near the building and this vortice swept
away the stonium niobate cloud.this is why the wings did not have enough
background to support a perfect hologram.
==================
Where were thess hologram projectors? Where did this nonexistant gas
cloud come from? How did 'they' produce a hologram visible- undistorted-
for nearly 360 degrees (a physical impossibility, BTW)? In the air
currents around the towers (primarily updrafts near the buildings), why
didn't his cloud of gas dissipate immrdiately?
All that matters is Flight 175 did not act like a real jet and Flight 11
could have been just one video edit.
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
----------------------------
Now if you saw the Evan Fairbanks video of the itsy bitsy plane on the
windshield that plane did not loose its wings because he captured a
reflection of the hologram being projected onto the windshield.
This is way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the
truck,I got this!
==================
Can you translate this into English? Most of us don;t speak kOOkese.
ROTFLMAO You have done a very good job at talking like a kook when you
mentioned NTSC where it didn't belong above.

If you are so smart why don't you just find where Popular Mechanics explains
why one wing of Flight 175 became transparent in so many different videos.

Rocky
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-18 20:23:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 1:58pm (EST-1) From:
***@att.net (Rocky)
"Padraigh ProAmerica" <***@webtv.net> wrote in message news:8979-5122461E-***@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net...
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 6:42am (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (joeturn)
On Feb 18, 5:10 am, ***@hotmail.com wrote: You idiot why would the
guilty want to post still pictures of a wingles plane before it makes
impact? They did not want people to know they were watching a hologram
and that the stonium niobate cloud to support the holigram had
disepated. Here is a video that shows the cloud disapating.
http://youtu.be/U5kScVAlHUg Look at your own video Joe.
Look at the trail of smoke rising from the tower and actually bent in
the wind up there. There is no way no sizable amount of gas could be up
there and have just the wings vanish. If the plane were a holographic
projection, the entire thing would be wavering with the gas cloud in a
breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving too fast for the camera
to contrast the silver wings against the silver background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was it
flying slower than the wings?
==================
No, stupid. The fuselage is quite a bit larger than the wings- especialy
when you are seeing the wings from the side. It occupies a lot more
pixels.
You don;t know anything about NTSC video images, do you?
Not this again. NTSC wouldn't cause that and NTSC wouldn't cause WTC7 to
fall at free fall speed for over 2.5 seconds either.

=====================

Stay on subject, cretin.

Part of my college education was in NTSC television, theory and
practice.

Becuase of the extreme range from the camera to the fast-moving
aircraft, not all the image was pickde up each scan. This is called an
artifact, and is well understood in the electronics community. Only
wackadoodles like you have a probelm with the truth.

--------------------------------

There was a vortice of wind near the building and this vortice swept
away the stonium niobate cloud.this is why the wings did not have enough
background to support a perfect hologram.
==================
Where were thess hologram projectors? Where did this nonexistant gas
cloud come from? How did 'they' produce a hologram visible- undistorted-
for nearly 360 degrees (a physical impossibility, BTW)? In the air
currents around the towers (primarily updrafts near the buildings), why
didn't his cloud of gas dissipate immrdiately?
All that matters is Flight 175 did not act like a real jet and Flight 11
could have been just one video edit.

==================
And Dolly Parton could have portrayed George W. Bush later at Ground
Zero- and it's just as likely.

----------------------------

Now if you saw the Evan Fairbanks video of the itsy bitsy plane on the
windshield that plane did not loose its wings because he captured a
reflection of the hologram being projected onto the windshield. This is
way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the truck,I
got this!
==================
Can you translate this into English? Most of us don;t speak kOOkese.
ROTFLMAO You have done a very good job at talking like a kook when you
mentioned NTSC where it didn't belong above.
If you are so smart why don't you just find where Popular Mechanics
explains why one wing of Flight 175 became transparent in so many
different videos.
Rocky

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
joeturn
2013-02-19 05:16:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
guilty want to post still pictures of a wingles plane before it makes
impact? They did not want people to know they were watching a hologram
and that the stonium niobate cloud to support the holigram had
disepated. Here is a video that shows the cloud
at your own video Joe.
Look at the trail of smoke rising from the tower and actually bent in
the wind up there. There is no way no sizable amount of gas could be up
there and have just the wings vanish. If the plane were a holographic
projection, the entire thing would be wavering with the gas cloud in a
breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving too fast for the camera
to contrast the silver wings against the silver background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was it
flying slower than the wings?
==================
No, stupid. The fuselage is quite a bit larger than the wings- especialy
when you are seeing the wings from the side. It occupies a lot more
pixels.
You don;t know anything about NTSC video images, do you?
Not this again. NTSC wouldn't cause that and NTSC wouldn't cause WTC7 to
fall at free fall speed for over 2.5 seconds either.
=====================
Stay on subject, cretin.
Part of my college education was in NTSC television, theory and
practice.
Becuase of the extreme range from the camera to the fast-moving
aircraft, not all the image was pickde up each scan. This is called an
artifact, and is well understood in the electronics community. Only
wackadoodles like you have a probelm with the truth.
--------------------------------
There was a vortice of wind near the building and this vortice swept
away the stonium niobate cloud.this is why the wings did not have enough
background to support a perfect hologram.
==================
Where were thess hologram projectors? Where did this nonexistant gas
cloud come from? How did 'they' produce a hologram visible- undistorted-
for nearly 360 degrees (a physical impossibility, BTW)? In the air
currents around the towers (primarily updrafts near the buildings), why
didn't his cloud of gas dissipate immrdiately?
All that matters is Flight 175 did not act like a real jet and Flight 11
could have been just one video edit.
==================
And Dolly Parton could have portrayed George W. Bush later at Ground
Zero- and it's just as likely.
----------------------------
Now if you saw the Evan Fairbanks video of the itsy bitsy plane on the
windshield that plane did not loose its wings because he captured a
reflection of the hologram being projected onto the windshield. This is
way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the truck,I
got this!
==================
Can you translate this into English? Most of us don;t speak kOOkese.
ROTFLMAO You have done a very good job at talking like a kook when you
mentioned NTSC where it didn't belong above.
If you are so smart why don't you just find where Popular Mechanics
explains why one wing of Flight 175 became transparent in so many
different videos.
Rocky
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.

Where was this projector you say! Well you can get its elevation and
its direction from the windshield reflection based on Evan being in
front of the windsheild means the projector was behind him and using
the reflection as a mirrowed image you can see it did not come from
the south tower at all.
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-19 05:33:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
Post by joeturn
Where was this projector you say! Well you can get its elevation and
its direction from the windshield reflection based on Evan being in
front of the windsheild means the projector was behind him and using
the reflection as a mirrowed image you can see it did not come from
the south tower at all.
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual 360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
joeturn
2013-02-19 06:28:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
He was comparing apples to oranges by stating NTSC created the
reflection on the windshield.Why he jumped on that bandwagon is
because he has confronted me once before with his claim that the
suposed plane at the pentagram out ran the securty cameras because of
the distance between frames.That was bull shit then and it is bull
shit now.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Where was this projector you say! Well you can get its elevation and
its direction from the windshield reflection based on Evan being in
front of the windsheild means the projector was behind him and using
the reflection as a mirrowed image you can see it did not come from
the south tower at all.
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual 360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
I'de say the projector was on the car hood and within 5 feet of Evan
Fairbanks video camera which was slightly above the projector.Where do
you think it was now that you know it was a projected hologram.Also
keep in mind Evin said he caught something out the corner of his eye
then he looked up and caught the whole plane minus a wing or two clear
the buildings then dissapear into the tower. So what cught his eye
before the fake plane got into view.Could it have been another
reflection in some of the other windows adjacent the tower?

Some think the projector was on the top of a building nearest him,but
I think not?

Jethrow just because Paragraph says he's an expert in the NTSC field
doesn't make it so.He's been caught in so many lies you cant give him
the credit to even tell just one truth!
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-19 09:49:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
He was comparing apples to oranges by stating NTSC created the
reflection on the windshield.Why he jumped on that bandwagon is
because he has confronted me once before with his claim that the
suposed plane at the pentagram out ran the securty cameras because of
the distance between frames.That was bull shit then and it is bull
shit now.
I'll have to reread the message, but I thought he was talking about the wings. However, you raise a point. WHY is it impossible for the plane to outrun the security camera when the camera was shooting at far slower than 24 fps (or even 18 fbs)?
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual 360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
I'de say the projector was on the car hood and within 5 feet of Evan
Fairbanks video camera which was slightly above the projector.Where do
you think it was now that you know it was a projected hologram.Also
keep in mind Evin said he caught something out the corner of his eye
then he looked up and caught the whole plane minus a wing or two clear
the buildings then dissapear into the tower. So what cught his eye
before the fake plane got into view.Could it have been another
reflection in some of the other windows adjacent the tower?
So, you're suggesting that the projector was on a car hood and could project a perfect image hundreds of feet into the air visible from virtually all directions? And you believe that? More importantly, you expect US to believe it?
Post by joeturn
Some think the projector was on the top of a building nearest him,but
I think not?
Are you asking us if you think this? Because I really can't tell what you think... or if.
Post by joeturn
Jethrow just because Paragraph says he's an expert in the NTSC field
doesn't make it so.He's been caught in so many lies you cant give him
the credit to even tell just one truth!
Maybe, but his responses certainly sound like someone who knows what he's talking about. Unlike yours which sound like the lunatic ravings of a nonsensical mind.
joeturn
2013-02-19 16:33:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
He was comparing apples to oranges by stating NTSC created the
reflection on the windshield.Why he jumped on that bandwagon is
because he has confronted me once before with his claim that the
suposed plane at the pentagram out ran the securty cameras because of
the distance between frames.That was bull shit then and it is bull
shit now.
I'll have to reread the message, but I thought he was talking about the wings. However, you raise a point. WHY is it impossible for the plane to outrun the security camera when the camera was shooting at far slower than 24 fps (or even 18 fbs)?
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual 360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
I'de say the projector was on the car hood and within 5 feet of Evan
Fairbanks video camera which was slightly above the projector.Where do
you think it was now that you know it was a projected hologram.Also
keep in mind Evin said he caught something out the corner of his eye
then he looked up and caught the whole plane minus a wing or two clear
the buildings then dissapear into the tower. So what cught his eye
before the fake plane got into view.Could it have been another
reflection in some of the other windows adjacent the tower?
So, you're suggesting that the projector was on a car hood and could project a perfect image hundreds of feet into the air visible from virtually all directions? And you believe that? More importantly, you expect US to believe it?
Jethrow google 3d hologram/stronium barium niobate. The google pyramid
over Moscow.


Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Some think the projector was on the top of a building nearest him,but
I think not?
Are you asking us if you think this? Because I really can't tell what you think... or if.
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its
reflection off the windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your
imagination. There were 2 other faked videos showing its aproach from
different locations but those cant capture the holograms projecter in
action like Evin Fairbanks did!
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Jethrow just because Paragraph says he's an expert in the NTSC field
doesn't make it so.He's been caught in so many lies you cant give him
the credit to even tell just one truth!
Maybe, but his responses certainly sound like someone who knows what he's talking about. Unlike yours which sound like the lunatic ravings of a nonsensical mind.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He is an old advasary of mine from alt.google poker.He is a self
proclaimed expert in every field imaginable.Google "Building a case
for 911" by joeturn then watch Jerry n Vegas perform.
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-19 18:41:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 8:33am (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (joeturn)
On Feb 19, 4:49=A0am, ***@hotmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:28:39 AM UTC-5, joeturn wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:33=A0am, ***@hotmail.com wrote:
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video
standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on
American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's
worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and
decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
He was comparing apples to oranges by stating NTSC created the
reflection on the windshield.Why he jumped on that bandwagon is because
he has confronted me once before with his claim that the suposed plane
at the pentagram out ran the securty cameras because of the distance
between frames.That was bull shit then and it is bull shit now.
I'll have to reread the message, but I thought he was talking about the
wings. However, you raise a point. WHY is it impossible for the plane to
outrun the security camera when the camera was shooting at far slower
than 24 fps (or even 18 fbs)?
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual
360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
I'de say the projector was on the car hood and within 5 feet of Evan
Fairbanks video camera which was slightly above the projector.Where do
you think it was now that you know it was a projected hologram.Also keep
in mind Evin said he caught something out the corner of his eye then he
looked up and caught the whole plane minus a wing or two clear the
buildings then dissapear into the tower. So what cught his eye before
the fake plane got into view.Could it have been another reflection in
some of the other windows adjacent the tower?
So, you're suggesting that the projector was on a car hood and could
project a perfect image hundreds of feet into the air visible from
virtually all directions? And you believe that? More importantly, you
expect US to believe it?
Jethrow google 3d hologram/stronium barium niobate. The google pyramid
over Moscow.

Some think the projector was on the top of a building nearest him,but I
think not?
Are you asking us if you think this? Because I really can't tell what
you think... or if.
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
Jethrow just because Paragraph says he's an expert in the NTSC field
doesn't make it so.He's been caught in so many lies you cant give him
the credit to even tell just one truth!
Maybe, but his responses certainly sound like someone who knows what
he's talking about. Unlike yours which sound like the lunatic ravings of
a nonsensical mind.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He is an old advasary of mine from alt.google poker.He is a self
proclaimed expert in every field imaginable.Google "Building a case for
911" by joeturn then watch Jerry n Vegas perform.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Rave on, loon.

I've never even been to alt.google.poker.

There are many areas I'm weak in, but throughout life I've educated
myself in several areas besides what I studied in school. They just
happen to be areas in which you are breathtakingly ignorant.

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-19 19:47:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its
reflection off the windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your
imagination. There were 2 other faked videos showing its aproach from
different locations but those cant capture the holograms projecter in
action like Evin Fairbanks did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree hologram, which is not possible.
joeturn
2013-02-20 05:32:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its
reflection off the windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your
imagination. There were 2 other faked videos showing its aproach from
different locations but those cant capture the holograms projecter in
action like Evin Fairbanks did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree hologram, which is not possible.
There were lies upon lines by paid informants.67.000 people sae
airplanes on television not in real live time.The plane tracks were
overlays cut into the national feeds at a precise moment,except for a
few stations that did not have access to the plane feed,their programs
aired live without any planes,now imagine how some feeds did not show
any planes at all. Now I do believe some people did tell what they
thought was to truth but saw a hologram with wings that just came and
went.Evan Fairbanks stubled upon this hologram in progress .They
hollowed and told him to get the fuck out of here,that is when he
figured out what was going on and pointed the camera up at the
building.

No videos show an impact of a real passenger plane as it just melted
into the building and the hole healed itself back up before the blast
took effect.Some show a squib of a thermate cutter charge igniting
before the plane gets to the building,this was said by some idiots
that the plane fired a rocket to knock a hole in the building to
enable the planes entry.That to was misimformation as it was the
cutter charge Squib they saw flashing not a rocket,

Keep in mind that there were NO PLANES at the towers nor at the
Pentagram and you will be able to see what really happened!
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-20 09:04:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
There were lies upon lines by paid informants.67.000 people sae
airplanes on television not in real live time.The plane tracks were
overlays cut into the national feeds at a precise moment,except for a
few stations that did not have access to the plane feed,their programs
aired live without any planes,now imagine how some feeds did not show
any planes at all. Now I do believe some people did tell what they
thought was to truth but saw a hologram with wings that just came and
went.Evan Fairbanks stubled upon this hologram in progress .They
hollowed and told him to get the fuck out of here,that is when he
figured out what was going on and pointed the camera up at the
building.
You really don't understand how video works. Well, that goes to say, since you don't seem to understand very much of anything.

There has to be "lies" because people are saying things you don't want to hear. Ever think that maybe they're NOT lying and you're just wrong?
Post by joeturn
No videos show an impact of a real passenger plane as it just melted
into the building and the hole healed itself back up before the blast
took effect.Some show a squib of a thermate cutter charge igniting
before the plane gets to the building,this was said by some idiots
that the plane fired a rocket to knock a hole in the building to
enable the planes entry.That to was misimformation as it was the
cutter charge Squib they saw flashing not a rocket,
I have see one video which someone claimed "proved" holograms were used. Said video showed the plane slamming into a solid silver surface which didn't look like the surface of the WTC at all. So if the video in question couldn't show the resolution of a series of aluminum beams and windows, why should I trust it?

I've also heard; why didn't the plane crash against the steel beams of the WTC and bounce off? Why doesn't a hard boiled egg get crushed when you bring an egg slicer down on top of it?
Post by joeturn
Keep in mind that there were NO PLANES at the towers nor at the
Pentagram and you will be able to see what really happened!
I have seen what really happened. This madness is yours and yours alone.
joeturn
2013-02-20 06:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its
reflection off the windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your
imagination. There were 2 other faked videos showing its aproach from
different locations but those cant capture the holograms projecter in
action like Evin Fairbanks did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow

Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,

Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.


joeturn
2013-02-20 06:41:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its
reflection off the windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your
imagination. There were 2 other faked videos showing its aproach from
different locations but those cant capture the holograms projecter in
action like Evin Fairbanks did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
presintation

bwaaahahahaaa

http://blip.tv/september-clues/synched-out-new-4130148
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-20 09:08:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
presintation
bwaaahahahaaa
http://blip.tv/september-clues/synched-out-new-4130148
Wait a minute? Are you making fun of your OWN spelling now?
joeturn
2013-02-25 01:27:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
presintation
bwaaahahahaaa
http://blip.tv/september-clues/synched-out-new-4130148
Wait a minute? Are you making fun of your OWN spelling now?
No just luring Shit # 2.I had to go chase her down and ask her how to
spell presintation.I'll find her reply and put both threads to geather
soon enough.It is not fare to keep show stoppers locked away in the HU
section!
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-20 09:12:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
http://blip.tv/september-clues/synched-out-new-4130148
OK, couldn't get past the first paragraph.

I want these people to go up to the "actors" playing bereaved family and tell them the building was empty and they're paid shills. But give me advance warning before you do because I want to video the results and put them on YouTube.

BTW, nothing is an "established fact" just because someone puts it on their webpage multiple times.
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-20 09:07:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
I'm not going to make fun of you for your spelling.

I'm going to ask why you haven't written Channel 4 and asked THEM why the plane doesn't show up on their video.

I'm going to say they had a bad angle.
joeturn
2013-02-25 01:23:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel
4 presintation.
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
I'm not going to make fun of you for your spelling.
I'm going to ask why you haven't written Channel 4 and asked THEM why the plane doesn't show up on their video.
I'm going to say they had a bad angle.
It is from the same helicopter feed you idiot the angle is the same
the only change was made later on when they were told to ediit their
earlier footage to enclude a plane cartoon. hopping the mistake would
simply be forgotten or covered up with cannon fodder.

SAME angle insinc means the timing was precise yet one includes a
plane coming from out of right field then making a 90 degree turn
within 300 feet in impact the west face.They managed it but it changed
the whole background smudged the buildings faces and cleared huricane
Erins approch in the skyline.

Do you honestly think they would tell the truth an incriminate them
selves with aiding and abiding domesetic terrorist commit war crimes?
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-20 13:39:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 10:08pm (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (joeturn)
On Feb 19, 2:47=A0pm, ***@hotmail.com wrote:
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
presintation.


=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.

Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.

I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
joeturn
2013-02-25 01:56:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
So why did I call it channel 4

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=+channel+4+shows+no+plane+911&fr=chr-tyc9

Now did you see a plane?
joeturn
2013-02-25 02:34:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citizen-a-disarmed-man-is-a-subject/
joeturn
2013-03-07 22:20:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.



joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
On Feb 19, 3:24 pm, Government Shill #2 <***@gmail.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie

http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D

Reply Reply to author Forward



joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
On Feb 19, 6:12 pm, joeturn <***@yahoo.com> wrote:

- Show quoted text -

Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
henry.mcintosh
2013-03-07 23:34:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
Reply Reply to author Forward
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
joeturn
2013-03-08 15:41:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by henry.mcintosh
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
    More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
    Reply     Reply to author      Forward
joeturn
View profile
    More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
So tell us Henry Macin tooth.How did you get your masters degree in
sniffing dried mouse droppings?
the man
2013-03-09 01:35:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by henry.mcintosh
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
Reply Reply to author Forward
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried
mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
Well, It's time for a real investigation on What Really Happened.
The "official" story is a fantasy .
Didn't happen that way , for sure!
--
Karma ; what a concept!
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-03-09 15:18:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Fri, Mar 8, 2013, 5:35pm (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (the=A0man)
In article <7c44e21c-046b-4eed-af8a-***@googlegroups.com>,
"henry.mcintosh" <***@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:20:06 PM UTC, joeturn wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:34=A0pm, joeturn <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Feb 20, 8:39=A0am, ***@webtv.net (Padraigh ProAmerica) wrote:
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 10:08pm (EST-3) From:
***@yahoo.com (joeturn)
On Feb 19, 2:47=A0pm, ***@hotmail.com wrote: No as I stated I
believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/3Dn9DrbqB9CVY
d
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0More options Feb
19, 6:12 pm
On Feb 19, 3:24 pm, Government Shill #2 <***@gmail.com> wrote:
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Reply =A0 =A0 Reply to author =A0 =A0
Forward
joeturn
View profile
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0More options Feb
20, 1:58 am
On Feb 19, 6:12 pm, joeturn <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing
dried mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
Well, It's time for a real investigation on What Really Happened. The
"official" story is a fantasy .
Didn't happen that way , for sure!

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Then get going and do your own investigation.

Since all the evidence supports the 'official' (truthful) story, any
investigation not run by the toofer kOOks won't satisfy you.
--
Karma ; what a concept!

--
"When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?."--

John Maynard Keynes
BDK
2013-03-09 15:25:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <georgewk10-***@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
@yahoo.com says...
Post by the man
Post by henry.mcintosh
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
Reply Reply to author Forward
joeturn
View profile
More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried
mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
Well, It's time for a real investigation on What Really Happened.
The "official" story is a fantasy .
Didn't happen that way , for sure!
A waste of time and money. Sane people know what happened. What the
money should be used for is a study into the causes and cure of
troofery. You poor bastards need help.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
joeturn
2013-03-10 01:26:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Post by the man
Post by henry.mcintosh
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There
were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin
Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which
indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
  More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
    Reply     Reply to author      Forward
joeturn
View profile
  More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried
mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
Well, It's time for a real investigation on What Really Happened.
The "official" story is a fantasy .
Didn't happen that way , for sure!
A waste of time and money. Sane people know what happened. What the
money should be used for is a study into the causes and cure of
troofery. You poor bastards need help.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
The US Government will put you in jail if you try to prove their
findings untrue!

Any lawyer knows if they go against the United States Government, they
themselves will be tried for treason and hanging till dead will be
their fate!

IT IS WRITTEN SO SHALL IT BE.No court,judge or lawyer in the United
States will hold such proceedings against the federal government of
the USA

Kuala Lumpur has already held judgement and has declared 911 was an
inside job.

Now 75percent of the world knows 911 was a psyops

Do you think those 75 percent are sane or smart as your definition of
sane is different from the rest of the world.
joeturn
2013-03-10 01:41:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Post by the man
Post by henry.mcintosh
Post by joeturn
Post by Padraigh ProAmerica
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"
No as I stated I believe the hologram projector was below Evin
Fairbanks
camera lens in order for his camera to pick up its reflection off the
windshield .This 360 degree is a figment of your imagination. There
were
2 other faked videos showing its aproach from different locations but
those cant capture the holograms projecter in action like Evin
Fairbanks
did!
The 360 degree argument is that people all around NYC saw planes flying
through the air. You believe these planes were holograms which
indicates
that the projector had to be able to present a virtual 360 degree
hologram, which is not possible.
Jethrow
Some major tv channels were given a 17 second cutout to play the faked
plane.They heard a beep beep this let them know when to play the 17
second plane cartoon then after its supposed crash they went back to
live feed. How ever some of the stations were not sent the 17 second
cartoon to play so they did not have the 17 second cutout and what
happened is what you got NO PLANE,
Take yours and Paragraphs self proclaimed expertise,use NTSC,if you
want
to and explain how the whole plane did not show up on the channel 4
http://youtu.be/n9DrbqB9CVY
==================
Please give us a RELIABLE link for this outrageous claom.
Not a YouTube video. A fixed, reliable link naming the TV stations that
didn;t get the feed.
I'd be willing to wager you can't, becuase this NEVER HAPPENED.
--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--
LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-to-nra-an-armed-man-is-a-citi...
As promised I have chosen now to join two threads together.I give
credit where credit is due and Government Shit #2 has give specifics
about the engines used in the 911 movie.Here I am giving her praise.
joeturn
View profile
  More options Feb 19, 6:12 pm
- Show quoted text -
Kean Eye there shit#2 I thought the engine hub flew there on its own
but there was no mention of a 727 being highjacked that day.So it is
appearant they just used it as a prop from the flatbed covered over by
the blue tarp for the 911 movie
http://rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT8D
    Reply     Reply to author      Forward
joeturn
View profile
  More options Feb 20, 1:58 am
- Show quoted text -
Happy to report that you have solveded another part of the 911 movie
props.The jet engine said to be from flight 175 that hit the south
tower,found at the corner of Churh St and Murray was from a 737 and
since there were no 737s reported highjacked on 911.this engine also
was a prop for the movie. Shit #2 how do you spell presintation? TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFM_International_CFM56
So there you are ladies & gentlemen, the above post shows that sniffing dried
mouse droppings can make your brain fail.
Well, It's time for a real investigation on What Really Happened.
The "official" story is a fantasy .
Didn't happen that way , for sure!
A waste of time and money. Sane people know what happened. What the
money should be used for is a study into the causes and cure of
troofery. You poor bastards need help.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
The US Government will put you in jail if you try to prove their
findings untrue!
Any lawyer knows if they go against the United States Government, they
themselves will be tried for treason and hanging till dead will be
their fate!
IT IS WRITTEN SO SHALL IT BE.No court,judge or lawyer in the United
States will hold such proceedings against the federal government of
the USA
Kuala Lumpur has already held judgement and has declared 911 was an
inside job.
Now 75percent of the world knows 911 was a psyops
Do you think those 75 percent are sane or smart as your definition of
sane is different from the rest of the world.
PS this is for tumi draging I know you could not find this on your own
so I decided to post you the link. you are welcomed in advance.

http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/update-from-the-kuala-lumpur-war-crimes-tribunal
george152
2013-02-19 19:09:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
With all those years of NTSC tv work you have confused yourself.You
see a video camera takes pictures in interlaced format which you think
is the same thing as NTSC so you must think PAL is in progressive
format.This NTSC has nothing what so ever to do with the video camera
that Evan Fair Banks captured the 3d hologram in progress with at all.
Do you even understand what NTSC and PAL are? They are the video standards used in America (NTSC) and Europe (PAL) Any video you see on American television is going to be in the NTSC format. If the man's worked in it and you haven't, then I'm going to go for an assumption and decide that he knows what he's talking about and you don't.
Post by joeturn
Where was this projector you say! Well you can get its elevation and
its direction from the windshield reflection based on Evan being in
front of the windsheild means the projector was behind him and using
the reflection as a mirrowed image you can see it did not come from
the south tower at all.
So give us a location. Where was this projector that projected a virtual 360 degree hologram (which isn't possible.)
And we get more ignorant waffle from slowjoe :(
The news videos show the aircraft impact.
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-19 19:51:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
Not this again. NTSC wouldn't cause that and NTSC wouldn't cause WTC7 to
fall at free fall speed for over 2.5 seconds either.
NTSC wouldn't have anything to do with the collapse of WTC7. Nobody here brought up WTC7 in relation to NTSC. Period. NTSC WOULD have to do with how video images are presented. So WHY in your opinion wouldn't NTSC cause a problem with the presentation of a video image?
e***@hotmail.com
2013-02-19 05:27:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by joeturn
You idiot why would the guilty want to post still pictures of a
wingles plane before it makes impact? They did not want people to know
they were watching a hologram and that the stonium niobate cloud to
support the holigram had disepated. Here is a video that shows the
cloud disapating.
http://youtu.be/U5kScVAlHUg
Look at your own video Joe. Look at the trail of smoke rising from the tower and actually bent in the wind up there. There is no way no sizable amount of gas could be up there and have just the wings vanish. If the plane were a holographic projection, the entire thing would be wavering with the gas cloud in a breeze that strong. The plane is simply moving too fast for the camera to contrast the silver wings against the silver background of the tower.
Jethrow why didn't the silver fuselage dissapeer as did the wings,was
it flying slower than the wings?There was a vortice of wind near the
building and this vortice swept away the stonium niobate cloud.this is
why the wings did not have enough background to support a perfect
hologram.
Because the silver fuselage was larger and more easily captured by the video than the wings.

You can't have it both ways, if the cloud was being swept away, ALL of the "hologram" should have been affected. Instead, we just get the wings vanishing into the background of the tower.
Post by joeturn
This is way too complicated for you to understand,just get back in the
truck,I got this!
No, the sad thing is you THINK you understand something that's WAY out of your depths!
dmaster
2013-02-18 18:00:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 7:13:34 PM UTC-6, joeturn wrote:
... stonium niobate cloud ...
I think that about sums it up. }:)

Dan (Woj...)
the man
2013-02-16 15:44:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Freedom Man
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
It is gullible fools like you, Rocky, that give ALL seeking and speaking the
truth about 9/11 a bad name.
You are doing exactly what the denialists and coverup shills want - making
all of us look like loons!
A friend of mine SAW the second the plane strike the tower.
I HEARD the second plane strike the tower.
Yes, demolition explosives brought down all three buildings, but that was
AFTER the towers were hit by aircraft - not necessarily the planes we were
told they were, but aircraft of some kind.
and said planes not only had remote control hardware , it would explain
how they made banking turns not allowed by on-board computers.
Maybe time for a real investigation.
Experts Urging Broader Inquiry In Towers' Fall
2001-12-25, New York Times
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FB3E550C768EDDAB099
4D94...

Saying that the current investigation into how and why the twin towers
fell on Sept. 11 is inadequate, some of the nation's leading structural
engineers and fire-safety experts are calling for a new, independent and
better-financed inquiry that could produce the kinds of conclusions
vital for skyscrapers and future buildings nationwide. Experts critical
of the current effort ... point out that the current team of 20 or so
investigators has no subpoena power and little staff support and has
even been unable to obtain basic information like detailed blueprints of
the buildings that collapsed. Some structural engineers have said that
one serious mistake has already been made ... the decision to rapidly
recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses that held up the buildings.
Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of
the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that
they had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions
that prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster
site and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to
the police and fire departments. Members have been threatened with
dismissal for speaking to the press.

Note: Our website has over 30 full articles posted from the New York
Times. This is the only article for which the Times threatened to sue us
if we didn't remove it. We were allowed to replace it with this short
summary. For more on this, click here. For more reliable news articles
suggesting a major cover-up of 9/11, click here.
--
Karma ; what a concept!
joeturn
2013-02-16 17:02:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Yes Rocky if you take the misile attack at the Pentagram and the
planes out of the equation the NIST report will be proven to be a
lie.This means the government shills will all be exposed as they are
hired to keep the fake terrorist attack alive by declaring planes
killed 3000 people on US soil,this was a requirement to declare the
war for Sadams oil.So far the Terrorist have been proven alive and on
the governments payrole for black opps.Most of them are still alive
the others were compute generated intities.

Flight 175 surprisingly made radio contact after its faked crash.CNN
showed it still airborne using flight tracker while the south tower
was smoking.

Ed Chairina had an interview with Jim Fetzer,but Fetzer refused to air
the interview because he shedded the light of multiple actors that
were cast to play the roles in the 911 FEMA drill.The last thing
Fetzer wants is an end to his money making gimmack to keep the 911
fiasco alive.If Chairinis imformation was allowed to be aired the 911
saga would be over and Fertzer would be out of a job.Jim Fetzer is one
of the reasons I got involved with the 911 saga and my findings shows
where Fetzer is still pushing nuclear ot particle beam use.His
statement was that the concrete turned to powder and that normal
explosives could not do such a thing.

Well I have showed why the concrete turned to powder as I found out in
my own research that all but 17 floors were build out of insitu
concrete very light an meant to crumble when it was to be demolished
with explosives.The galvanic corrosion in the towers also eat away the
bonding agent in the 17 mechanical floors so powder is easily
explained.

The idea of a Tesla Weapon used is impossible becaused,Teslas
Holowitzer would be a sudden single explosion and there would not be a
collapse sequence just a blast that would send pieces into the next
counties.

The reason that WTC I and II left such a small pile of debree was
because of the bathtub it was built in just for that specific
reason.it all fell down into the bathtub leaving a small amount above
the ground

Tumi Dragin will be along any minute now with the blue prints that
prove the bathtub,the 17 mechanical floors and the insitu floor
panels.

Go ahead an show them Tumi
joeturn
2013-02-17 02:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.

Ok tumi heres your last chance!

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html
joeturn
2013-02-17 02:22:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm

Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.

They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.

You go Tumi tell'em!
Warhol
2013-02-17 02:49:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too will show up on this one... wait and see.

But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.


BDK
2013-02-17 14:33:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <b1faa26c-a043-434f-94ff-fa4e44f9d192
@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>, ***@hotmail.com says...
Post by Warhol
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too will show up on this one... wait and see.
Of course, and after reading the nonsense below...I can't think of any
needed comments.
Post by Warhol
But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.
http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A
I don't want to see your ears, but your brain would be a fascinating
study in what made you so batshit crazy.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
sean
2013-02-19 02:25:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too will show up on this one... wait and see.

But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.

http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A

-------------------------------------------------

Lol, there is no NOW, it's amazing that some paranoid people still believe
that to this day when we have not seen any evidence of this mystical NOW. Is
it the Jews? Is it the Jesuites? Is it the reptilians? It's also interesting
to see fools who still believe no planes were used when we have eye
witnesses who saw planes and they were caught on film. How long can people
keep up insanity? Mine only lasted a few years...
Warhol
2013-02-18 18:38:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too  will show up on this one... wait and see.
But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.
http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A
-------------------------------------------------
Lol, there is no NOW, it's amazing that some paranoid people still believe
that to this day when we have not seen any evidence of this mystical NOW. Is
it the Jews? Is it the Jesuites? Is it the reptilians? It's also interesting
to see fools who still believe no planes were used when we have eye
witnesses who saw planes and they were caught on film. How long can people
keep up insanity? Mine only lasted a few years...
If I told you who... you won't believe... so.

But the NWO exist... they are promising you pleasure Island in
tomorrow land


Tony Dragon
2013-02-18 19:53:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Warhol
Post by Warhol
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too will show up on this one... wait and see.
But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.
http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A
-------------------------------------------------
Lol, there is no NOW, it's amazing that some paranoid people still believe
that to this day when we have not seen any evidence of this mystical NOW. Is
it the Jews? Is it the Jesuites? Is it the reptilians? It's also interesting
to see fools who still believe no planes were used when we have eye
witnesses who saw planes and they were caught on film. How long can people
keep up insanity? Mine only lasted a few years...
If I told you who... you won't believe... so.
But the NWO exist... they are promising you pleasure Island in
tomorrow land
http://youtu.be/nAPZ-04OKbg
Barking....
Padraigh ProAmerica
2013-02-18 20:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key"

Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Mon, Feb 18, 2013, 7:53pm (EST+5) From:
***@btinternet.com (Tony=A0Dragon)
On 18/02/2013 18:38, Warhol wrote:
On Feb 18, 8:25 am, "sean" <***@gmail.com> wrote:
"Warhol" wrote in message news:b1faa26c-a043-434f-94ff-***@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 17, 3:22 am, joeturn <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Feb 16, 9:14 pm, joeturn <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Feb 15, 9:45 am, "Rocky" <***@att.net> wrote:
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.

---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant do
any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson board
all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to finish
them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too will show up on this one... wait and see.
But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create their
NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1.... and
then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people what
do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains, it was
controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it was a
terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime they
lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have been
warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe... even I
could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did it...
and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.
http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A
----------------------------------------------
Lol, there is no NOW, it's amazing that some paranoid people still
believe that to this day when we have not seen any evidence of this
mystical NOW. Is it the Jews? Is it the Jesuites? Is it the reptilians?
It's also interesting to see fools who still believe no planes were used
when we have eye witnesses who saw planes and they were caught on film.
How long can people keep up insanity? Mine only lasted a few years...
If I told you who... you won't believe... so.
But the NWO exist... they are promising you pleasure Island in
tomorrow land
http://youtu.be/nAPZ-04OKbg
Barking....

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Baying.

When I was a kid, many years ago, "they" were the Council on Foreign
Relations, The Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers.

Nowdays it's the New World Order, the Freemasons, the Jooz, the
Illuminatti...

The more things change, the more they remain the same.

--
"A man who can own a gun is a citizen. A man who cannot own a gun is a
subject."--

LTC Allen West, USA, (Ret.)
Warhol
2013-02-19 00:49:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tony Dragon
Post by Warhol
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hidequotedtext -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!
and BDK too  will show up on this one... wait and see.
But people 911 is already solved... we all know they did to create
their NWO... just as they declared the asteroids now as enemy N* 1....
and then they will tell you there are aliens coming... and you people
what do you do??? Blah blah... we all know there where no airplains,
it was controlled Pull down, an inside job of all those who told us it
was a terrorist attack... Lies upon lies upon lies... and in meantime
they lead you to their brave new world they baptized NWO... you have
been warned long ago of the conspiracy... nobody could not believe...
even I could not believe they would able to deceive me... but they did
it... and when you all shall wake up... it will be to late.
http://youtu.be/DrFjNeSEx7A
-------------------------------------------------
Lol, there is no NOW, it's amazing that some paranoid people still believe
that to this day when we have not seen any evidence of this mystical NOW. Is
it the Jews? Is it the Jesuites? Is it the reptilians? It's also interesting
to see fools who still believe no planes were used when we have eye
witnesses who saw planes and they were caught on film. How long can people
keep up insanity? Mine only lasted a few years...
If I told you who... you won't believe... so.
But the NWO exist... they are promising you pleasure Island in
tomorrow land
http://youtu.be/nAPZ-04OKbg
Barking....
Honky Tonk Badonkadonk...


joeturn
2013-02-17 03:26:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Tumi notice they had the precast in situ floor panels stacked four
high on a flat bed trailor,very light pickings huh.




joeturn
2013-02-17 14:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
Still no help from Tumi Dragin.Well That was to be expected Tumi cant
do any research and cant keep the files I sent her.
Ok tumi heres your last chance!
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/godfrey.htm
Tumi will be along momintarily with the description of in situ floor
panels.
They dont have any rebar in them,they are some what like a gypson
board all chalk with no backing,grooved to allow a 1 inch cover to
finish them.
You go Tumi tell'em!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Tumi notice they had the precast in situ floor panels stacked four
high on a flat bed trailor,very light pickings huh.
http://youtu.be/__gUjUv1vvw
http://youtu.be/KCbu3CvD3h8 Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2013/01/ed-charini.html?showComment=1361106059895#c6094325727437387448
Rocky
2015-09-08 10:39:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
bump

07 - The Key

Published on May 29, 2012

The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.

Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.

http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds

---------------------------------------

Dang that was one good video.

Rocky
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2015-09-08 18:13:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
bump
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
No, the key to "solving 9/11" is intelligence and rational thought,
two things a bat shit crazy lunatic stalker like you does not possess.
--
Jim Pennino
gilber34
2015-09-08 20:46:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
Post by Rocky
bump
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
No, the key to "solving 9/11" is intelligence and rational thought,
two things a bat shit crazy lunatic stalker like you does not possess.
rocky is bat-shit crazy, micro nukes,

like a hillary carrying around her server, telling everyone she is our
leader.
joeturn
2018-03-01 20:53:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
I have to add that years later I found out that there was NO holigram projected in a stoniun cloud,but it was an overlayed video made by cartoon software they broke away from the live feed for 17 seconds to show their cartoon of fake plane strikes.
All the people that claim they saw the planes hit the towers were paid actors to con the sheeple
KWills Shill #3
2018-03-02 10:52:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
07 - The Key
Published on May 29, 2012
The key to solving 9/11 is something called a "key". Understanding video
compositing technology, both its capabilities AND limitations, proves no
planes, and therefore proves demolition.
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
http://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds
---------------------------------------
Dang that was one good video.
Rocky
I have to add that years later I found out that there was NO holigram projected in a stoniun cloud,but it was an overlayed video made by cartoon software they broke away from the live feed for 17 seconds to show their cartoon of fake plane strikes.
All the people that claim they saw the planes hit the towers were paid actors to con the sheeple
Are you claiming you're the pathological liar who posted here
under the name Roger?


Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-***@giganews.com>
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2018-03-02 11:17:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by joeturn
Post by Rocky
Ace Baker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who has an ORIGINAL QUALITY
9/11 airplane video.
I have to add that years later I found out that there was NO holigram projected in a stoniun cloud,but it was an overlayed video made by cartoon software they broke away from the live feed for 17 seconds to show their cartoon of fake plane strikes.
All the people that claim they saw the planes hit the towers were paid actors to con the sheeple
911 is just a betrayal of trust. And ISIS was always about killing
civilians. There is no key, but guns. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Loading...