Discussion:
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
(too old to reply)
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-03 20:55:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica

I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.

August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm

http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
Government Shill #2
2017-08-03 21:02:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?

Shill #2
--
"I dreamed a bunch of things that made no sense..."
Andrew Luke Nichols
alt.conspiracy - 29 March 2017
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-03 22:02:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.

Luke
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
"I dreamed a bunch of things that made no sense..."
Andrew Luke Nichols
alt.conspiracy - 29 March 2017
Government Shill #2
2017-08-03 22:07:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.

This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?

Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
BDK
2017-08-04 00:26:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
Shill #2
The nutters set the bar for proof of their Gawd awfully low. It's sad,
like LOOkey's life.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-04 00:34:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
Shill #2
The nutters set the bar for proof of their Gawd awfully low. It's sad,
like LOOkey's life.
Not much better than Romans who divined the will of the gods from pigs entrails
and the flight of a bird.

Shill #2
--
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever
believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
Richard Dawkins (1941 - ), "The Root of All Evil"
BDK
2017-08-04 14:27:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
Shill #2
The nutters set the bar for proof of their Gawd awfully low. It's sad,
like LOOkey's life.
Not much better than Romans who divined the will of the gods from pigs entrails
and the flight of a bird.
Shill #2
Maybe he's going to move up to tea leaves before he checks out.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 01:42:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.

I think that's pretty aweseom myself.

Luke
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-04 02:32:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.

As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 02:52:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.

I'll let you try it.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-04 02:59:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 10:02:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I saw Military everywhere.

A lot can happen in 3 seconds.

You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.

And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
Michael Moroney
2017-08-04 11:09:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I
saw Military everywhere.
A lot can happen in 3 seconds.
You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.
And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
Luke, why are you calling Satan "a perfect LORD" for giving you that
dream? You really do worship Satan, don't you.
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 11:51:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Moroney
Post by a***@gmail.com
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I
saw Military everywhere.
A lot can happen in 3 seconds.
You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.
And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
Luke, why are you calling Satan "a perfect LORD" for giving you that
dream? You really do worship Satan, don't you.
Most assuredly I do not.
Michael Moroney
2017-08-04 18:53:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Michael Moroney
Post by a***@gmail.com
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I
saw Military everywhere.
A lot can happen in 3 seconds.
You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.
And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
Luke, why are you calling Satan "a perfect LORD" for giving you that
dream? You really do worship Satan, don't you.
Most assuredly I do not.
So why do you keep using terms like "a perfect LORD" or "the LORD"
when referring to Satan?
BDK
2017-08-04 14:25:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I saw Military everywhere.
A lot can happen in 3 seconds.
You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.
And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
And you're kind of the rottenest banana in the pile.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-04 22:07:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I know where I was at. I was above the Earth above One of the Poles. I saw Military everywhere.
A lot can happen in 3 seconds.
You got to remember, you have a perfect LORD interacting with an imperfect human.
If this god is perfect, why can't he give everyone precise information
simultaneously? Why does he pick on an ex-acid fiend, and give him "visions"
that convey no real information?

And, why is this god, who has pre-ordained everything, now giving you a vague
heads-up on what's about to happen? Whatever you do can't change the way things
are going to go down, and this god wouldn't want you to change them anyway.

Your story is full of shit.
Post by a***@gmail.com
And we all know humans aren't the smartest bananas in the bunch.
Speak for yourself.

Shill #2
--
"I'm not a Smart man."
andrew luke nichols
alt.conspiracy - 05 April 2017
BDK
2017-08-04 14:24:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-04 22:08:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.

Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-05 03:13:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.

But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.

Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.

That is your thinking.

It's dangerous thinking too.

For you and your family.

It's almost child abuse to raise your children not believing in JEHOVAH.

Luke
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
Government Shill #2
2017-08-05 03:19:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
No. There is no evidence for god's existence, therefore god does not exist.

Change my mind. Show me the evidence that convinced you he does exit. I'll
weight your evidence and decide.
Post by a***@gmail.com
It's dangerous thinking too.
Why? No reason to be scared of something which doesn't exist.
Post by a***@gmail.com
For you and your family.
It's almost child abuse to raise your children not believing in JEHOVAH.
Almost. If you actual child abuse raise children in the fear of going to hell
for all eternity. *That* is child abuse.

This is child abuse!


Shill #2
--
God is "...arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and
proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive,
bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal,
genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic,
capriciously malevolent bully."
Richard Dawkins
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-05 04:14:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
No. There is no evidence for god's existence, therefore god does not exist.
Change my mind. Show me the evidence that convinced you he does exit. I'll
weight your evidence and decide.
You need to get out of adult thinking and think like a child. Then, look around you. You'll see God everywhere.

Luke
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
It's dangerous thinking too.
Why? No reason to be scared of something which doesn't exist.
Post by a***@gmail.com
For you and your family.
It's almost child abuse to raise your children not believing in JEHOVAH.
Almost. If you actual child abuse raise children in the fear of going to hell
for all eternity. *That* is child abuse.
This is child abuse! http://youtu.be/i3VbKEJYdv8
Shill #2
--
God is "...arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and
proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive,
bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal,
genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic,
capriciously malevolent bully."
Richard Dawkins
Government Shill #2
2017-08-05 04:57:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
No. There is no evidence for god's existence, therefore god does not exist.
Change my mind. Show me the evidence that convinced you he does exit. I'll
weight your evidence and decide.
You need to get out of adult thinking and think like a child. Then, look around you. You'll see God everywhere.
You need to *grow up!*

Shill #2
--
Instead of being born again, why not just grow up?
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-05 05:07:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
No. There is no evidence for god's existence, therefore god does not exist.
Change my mind. Show me the evidence that convinced you he does exit. I'll
weight your evidence and decide.
You need to get out of adult thinking and think like a child. Then, look around you. You'll see God everywhere.
You need to *grow up!*
Shill #2
--
Instead of being born again, why not just grow up?
Matthew 18:3 King James Version (KJV)

3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-05 05:15:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
So, you had a 3 second vision, about which you don't know where you were, you
don't know when the vision was, and you don't know what was going on, and we are
supposed to accept this as a true vision from your lord?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Shill #2
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
No. There is no evidence for god's existence, therefore god does not exist.
Change my mind. Show me the evidence that convinced you he does exit. I'll
weight your evidence and decide.
You need to get out of adult thinking and think like a child. Then, look around you. You'll see God everywhere.
You need to *grow up!*
Shill #2
--
Instead of being born again, why not just grow up?
Matthew 18:3 King James Version (KJV)
3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
It's a book. A book mashed together by medieval priests, based on stories
invented by goat herders. Why should a give a fuck what it says?

There's a reason most children grow out of having invisible friends. Their
brains develop. For some reason some people never make the disconnect and carry
on believing in invisible beings for the rest of their lives. Sadly, you seem to
be one of the latter.

Shill #2
--
You need to get out of adult thinking and think like a child.
Andrew Luke Nichols
alt.conspiracy - 05 August 2017
Michael Moroney
2017-08-05 17:08:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by BDK
Acid flashback!
The most likely answer.
Acid is long gone man.
No, acid flashbacks may happen for the rest of your life.
Post by a***@gmail.com
But you use that as a crutch to deny the existence of God.
Luke made mistakes before He was saved. God must not exist.
That is your thinking.
It's dangerous thinking too.
For you and your family.
It's almost child abuse to raise your children not believing in JEHOVAH.
Luke, if you are always pushing people to be "saved", and you say you
certainly don't worship Satan, why do you always praise Satan as "the
perfect LORD" or "the Spirit" whenever Satan sends you a dream or
hallucination?
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-04 10:43:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
- show quoted text -
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.

I'll let you try it.
*****
I don't get, or try to justify, three second visions.
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 10:56:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
- show quoted text -
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
I'll let you try it.
*****
I don't get, or try to justify, three second visions.
BDK and Shill #312 has known me on here the longest.

They'll be the first to tell you, I'm not perfect and make mistakes.

I've said stuff in the past, I wish I wouldn't have.

But since Sept 21, 2008, I have tried to tell the truth.

And if I say, I have a 3 second vision and am suppose to put what all I saw into words, I will make mistakes.

I'm a human being. Not a god.

Luke
BDK
2017-08-04 14:26:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by e***@yahoo.com
- show quoted text -
You try to sum up a 3 second vision.
I'll let you try it.
*****
I don't get, or try to justify, three second visions.
BDK and Shill #312 has known me on here the longest.
They'll be the first to tell you, I'm not perfect and make mistakes.
Shit, everything about you is a mistake.
Post by a***@gmail.com
I've said stuff in the past, I wish I wouldn't have.
Some of it was GOLD, Jerry, GOLD!
Post by a***@gmail.com
But since Sept 21, 2008, I have tried to tell the truth.
And if I say, I have a 3 second vision and am suppose to put what all I saw into words, I will make mistakes.
I'm a human being. Not a god.
Luke
Acid bad, LOOkey.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
BDK
2017-08-04 14:23:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
You don't know where you were.
You don't know when the vision was.
You don't know what was going on.
As a vision, it doesn't seem to have anything really going for it.
Well, let's be honest here, neither does LOOkey himself.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Government Shill #2
2017-08-04 02:56:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
I think that you are delusional.

Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
BDK
2017-08-04 14:23:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
So, totally useless as a warning then? Right.
This god of yours is pretty piss weak if he can't even give you good, useful
information. Isn't it supposed to be all powerful? Surely it could inform you in
a better way than it has done so far?
He took me to the future, hung me a few miles about the Circle of the Earth, and showed me what's going to happen.
I think that's pretty aweseom myself.
Luke
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
- Doris Egan
Sounds like an acid flashback. Sorry LOOkey, you lose again.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-08-04 00:17:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
When?
I'm not sure. This Vision hit me out of the blue.
Luke
Then it's completely undependable. .
Michael Moroney
2017-08-04 01:12:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic,
or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of
Military Troops.
Why do you call Satan "the Spirit", Luke? Is it because you worship him?
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-04 10:54:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
More on the Vision:

Looked like they were standing in a circle, around some sort of "Henge."
e***@yahoo.com
2017-08-04 13:54:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
- show quoted text -
More on the Vision:

Looked like they were standing in a circle, around some sort of "Henge."
*****
Oh! I get it! For some reason, your brain flashed on a scene from Howard Hawk's film; "The Thing From Another World." And augmented it.
a***@gmail.com
2017-08-05 22:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
Loading Image...
Government Shill #2
2017-09-08 21:53:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Hey Andrew Luke Nichols! Are you lurking here? How did this prediction you made
last month work out?
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-08 23:39:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 07:53:45 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Hey Andrew Luke Nichols! Are you lurking here? How did this prediction you made
last month work out?
You know it happened. But the evil Satanic, Illuminati, Counsel
on Foreign Relations, International House of Pancakes cabal is keeping
news of it suppressed.
Oh, Dick Smith Foods is in on it too. Just want to show some love
for Graham :)
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Government Shill #2
2017-09-08 23:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 07:53:45 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Hey Andrew Luke Nichols! Are you lurking here? How did this prediction you made
last month work out?
You know it happened. But the evil Satanic, Illuminati, Counsel
on Foreign Relations, International House of Pancakes cabal is keeping
news of it suppressed.
Oh, Dick Smith Foods is in on it too. Just want to show some love
for Graham :)
LQTM. -)
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
marston shores
2017-09-09 13:17:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
e***@hotmail.com
2017-09-09 14:56:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
marston shores
2017-09-09 22:17:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
I did prove it. Your lying proves you are being controlled by demons.

Bob can rid you of them. He's just a skype call away. And you'll
understand why you should never have had sex with the subhuman.

Bob can wash away your sin of race mixing, if you will let him.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-09 22:56:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
I did prove it. Your lying proves you are being controlled by demons.
Bob can rid you of them. He's just a skype call away. And you'll
understand why you should never have had sex with the subhuman.
Bob can wash away your sin of race mixing, if you will let him.
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.

What do the other members of Lar$on's cult think of your racist
views?
What do the other members of Lar$on's cult think of your claim
that Lar$on is the messiah?

About Bob Larson:
">He works hard at scamming gullible suckers, yes he does.
"Yes he does."
Marston agreeing that Lar$on scams people in Message-ID:
<onlk8g$31i$***@gioia.aioe.org>


"Shut up, gook! You have no right to demand anything."
Marston Shores, racist and Bob Larson supporter,
in Message-ID: <oogthh$1fvn$***@gioia.aioe.org>

"Whites and niggers should never mix! It's against God's will."
Marston Shores, racist and Bob Larson supporter,
in Message-ID: <o7ljuj$1ah7$***@gioia.aioe.org>

"Japan is full of gooks and gook lovers. When Jesus returns, he will
judge them as he will all the inferior races.
Praise God!"
Marston Shores, racist and Bob Larson supporter,
in Message-ID: <oogt9n$1fvn$***@gioia.aioe.org>

"I am proud to be a racist."
Marston Shored, racist and Bob Larson supporter,
Message-ID: <oem0sa$n6v$***@gioia.aioe.org>

"You probably have the mark of Cain (dark skin) on you now."
Marston Shored, racist and Bob Larson supporter,
in Message-ID: <oem0q3$n6v$***@gioia.aioe.org>


"I lied about the pictures."
Marston Shores admitting he lied about the pictures he claimed I
posted in Message-ID: <o2kkih$146k$***@gioia.aioe.org>

Me:Once again you PROVE that, for you, lying is as natural as
breathing. Not that this was ever in question.

Marston Shores: Indeed.

Marston Shores actually admitting lying is very easy for him in
Message-ID:<ol03uq$1mi0$***@gioia.aioe.org>

Moe: I'm glad I decided to be Pagan. The Goddess is way more
compassionate than that sadist.

Marston: There is no "Goddess", that's Satan deceiving you.

Me: And you would know, since you worship Satan.

Marston: That I would, heathen.

Marston Shores openly admitting he worships Satan in
Message-ID: <l62pt1$jvs$***@speranza.aioe.org>

Marston Shores claims Bob Lar$on is christ:
"I will make
sure of that for as long as you deny that Bob Larson can save your
immortal soul."
Message-ID: <o48bu9$tq6$***@gioia.aioe.org>


"You need to go to Bob Larson for salvation, Kentucci"
Marston Shores claiming Bob Larson is the savior in
Message-ID: <o2rktu$amb$***@gioia.aioe.org>


"You need Bob Larson in your life. He can save your soul."
Marston Shores claiming Bob Larson is the savior. Again.
Message-ID: <o2rl1g$amb$***@gioia.aioe.org>
marston shores
2017-09-10 14:34:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
BDK
2017-09-10 15:50:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
You're a hero of the stupid.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-10 19:09:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-09-10 20:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
marston shores
2017-09-11 01:34:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect.
I am. I am white. I am Christian.

I AM PERFECT!
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-11 09:02:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-09-11 20:10:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-12 08:44:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-09-12 12:01:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
At the one we would watch, everyone was all dressed up and you would see
everything from High Hillbilly on men to the 1960 Sears catalog on the
women. Then there was the kids. The preacher looked like some sort of
Vegas lounge singer, complete with Jerry Lewis type of oiled hair.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-13 09:25:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:01:46 -0400, BDK <***@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
At the one we would watch, everyone was all dressed up and you would see
everything from High Hillbilly on men to the 1960 Sears catalog on the
women. Then there was the kids. The preacher looked like some sort of
Vegas lounge singer, complete with Jerry Lewis type of oiled hair.
That would have been great to see.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
BDK
2017-09-13 19:35:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
[...]
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
At the one we would watch, everyone was all dressed up and you would see
everything from High Hillbilly on men to the 1960 Sears catalog on the
women. Then there was the kids. The preacher looked like some sort of
Vegas lounge singer, complete with Jerry Lewis type of oiled hair.
That would have been great to see.
I remember this one guy, dressed in a western style suit, powder blue,
with a huge matching hat, huge black cowboy boots, with the biggest
bible I've ever seen in his arms going in there. That's the guy who
comes to mind every time I think about it. The woman who comes to mind
is a 40~ year old wearing a below the knee brown skirt with a bright
yellow blouse, and her hair was in a giant beehive deal. She had a look
alike mom and daughter, too. Another guy we called Conway Twitty because
he had the same hair, and there was a George Jones flat topped looking
old guy too.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?
q=tbn:ANd9GcRLH0HcxpP0cDs06vyACoIORBq4GNpPFEcL2RO-IpuOZDZY6kh7OQ

Loading Image...
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-09-13 21:53:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I went to boring Roman Catholic Churches. Nothing like that.
BDK
2017-09-13 23:20:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I went to boring Roman Catholic Churches. Nothing like that.
You didn't have a wanna be priest who wore a giant cross and a robe to
church?

We had one, he worked in a drug store and wore the same get up he wore
to church. He was at every abortion protest in the area. Where did he
live? You can guess, in his parent's basement.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-09-14 00:26:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.

Catholic Church has living quarters for the priests in the rectory. Visited once, not spartan, but not opulent either.
BDK
2017-09-14 12:56:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.
Post by e***@yahoo.com
Catholic Church has living quarters for the priests in the rectory. Visited once, not spartan, but not opulent either.
He lived, and still does, in his parent's basement. He's like 55 years
old. The kOOk is strong in him.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
e***@yahoo.com
2017-09-14 13:51:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.

I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.

He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
BDK
2017-09-14 16:47:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.
I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.
He wasn't a priest, he just dressed kind of like one, and he seems to
want to be one. This has been going on over 35 years at this point. The
first time I noticed him was about 1982, when I saw him at the drug
store he's been working at since high school.
Post by BDK
He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
He was there every Sunday at mass, at the church he went to his entire
life. He went to grade school there too. And he went to one of the
Catholic high schools, of course. He goes by the name Hieromonk now.
What a whackjob.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
BDK
2017-09-14 17:00:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by BDK
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.
I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.
He wasn't a priest, he just dressed kind of like one, and he seems to
want to be one. This has been going on over 35 years at this point. The
first time I noticed him was about 1982, when I saw him at the drug
store he's been working at since high school.
Post by BDK
He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
He was there every Sunday at mass, at the church he went to his entire
life. He went to grade school there too. And he went to one of the
Catholic high schools, of course. He goes by the name Hieromonk now.
What a whackjob.
Wow, I looked for him and found him, he's converted to Orthodoxy, and
has become what he wanted to be all along, a priest! And to think the
Catholic church rejected him..
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-15 09:59:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.
I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.
He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
He certainly wasn't an ordained priest.
If I'm understanding BDK correctly, the guy pretended to be a
Catholic priest.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-09-15 13:08:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
He certainly wasn't an ordained priest.
Are you serious?

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
BDK
2017-09-15 15:03:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by e***@yahoo.com
He had a robe and a large cross, but you're talking people who look like Elvis or some Country/Weatern star. Nothing like that.
No, the guy with the cross wore robes like some sort of sci-fi priest
and had a huge silver cross around his neck. He looked more like he
belonged in one of those "knights of the round table" recreation things.
He didn't go to the hillbilly church, he was Catholic through and
through.
I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.
He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
He certainly wasn't an ordained priest.
If I'm understanding BDK correctly, the guy pretended to be a
Catholic priest.
I guess I should go back and read the posts, as you seem to be totally
confused. He wasn't pretending or claiming to be a priest, he just
dressed like some old timey one, and had the giant cross around his
neck. I was surprised when I found out he became an Orthodox priest
about 10 years ago. There's a pic of him in almost the same outfit he
wore before, but now he has the headgear that goes with the job.

Hilarious.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
marston shores
2017-09-15 18:17:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
I guess I should go back and read the posts, as you seem to be totally
confused.
Kenty is very confused. Look at how he refuses to accept the salvation
and grace Rev. Larson offers. Only someone confused would do so.
BDK
2017-09-16 02:35:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by BDK
I guess I should go back and read the posts, as you seem to be totally
confused.
Kenty is very confused. Look at how he refuses to accept the salvation
and grace Rev. Larson offers. Only someone confused would do so.
You have no room to talk about anyone, as you're a member of the cult of
Lar$on. You're a brainwashed idiot.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-16 08:13:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:03:45 -0400, BDK <***@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@yahoo.com
I'm not arguing with you about your priest. I'm telling you that the priests in the churches I went to in New York, Newport, and Providence did not dress that way, nor did they live in their parents basement.
He may have considered himself "Catholic," but I doubt he was part of any legitimate branch of the church.
He certainly wasn't an ordained priest.
If I'm understanding BDK correctly, the guy pretended to be a
Catholic priest.
I guess I should go back and read the posts, as you seem to be totally
confused. He wasn't pretending or claiming to be a priest, he just
dressed like some old timey one, and had the giant cross around his
neck. I was surprised when I found out he became an Orthodox priest
about 10 years ago. There's a pic of him in almost the same outfit he
wore before, but now he has the headgear that goes with the job.
Hilarious.
I may have misunderstood.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@hotmail.com
2017-09-13 03:06:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
When I went to church. I dressed up. Not a suit so much, but a nice shirt and slacks. I tried not to judge, but why would you go to church in a ripped up t-shirt and jeans?
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-13 09:26:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by BDK
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You have yet to offer anything to support a claim that "race
mixing" is a sin.
God put the races in different places on the earth for a reason. To keep
everyone separate. Satan brought them together to destroy God's perfect
white race.
Whereas the god you mention is fictional, he could not have put
anyone anywhere.
There is no such thing as a perfect race.
That someone like Marston even exists proves us white people aren't
perfect. Go to any bible thumping church and you can see even more
proof. Wow.
Christians are fond of saying they aren't perfect, just forgiven.
Even the white ones.
At the closest whacked out godder church to me, it's like seeing a freak
show with dozens and dozens of freaks. We used to get ice cream nearby
and sit and watch them go in on Wed night. Great entertainment.
There are some "come as you are" churches around us. They at
least give the impression they walk the walk in addition to talking
the talk.
When I went to church. I dressed up. Not a suit so much, but a nice
shirt and slacks. I tried not to judge, but why would you go to church in
a ripped up t-shirt and jeans?
I didn't, and wouldn't if I still attended. But not everyone has
a selection of suits to chose from. For some, a ripped up t-shirt and
jeans is all they have.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-09-13 13:33:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
- show quoted text -
I didn't, and wouldn't if I still attended. But not everyone has
a selection of suits to chose from. For some, a ripped up t-shirt and
jeans is all they have.
****
Didn't I say "no suits?" Nice shirt and slacks. It's not that hard.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-14 09:08:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
- show quoted text -
I didn't, and wouldn't if I still attended. But not everyone has
a selection of suits to chose from. For some, a ripped up t-shirt and
jeans is all they have.
****
Didn't I say "no suits?" Nice shirt and slacks. It's not that hard.
Sure. But what about people who are so poor, they lack even that?
The "dress code" was something that always bothered me about
churches. Why would it matter how a person is dressed when worshiping?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@yahoo.com
2017-09-14 09:53:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
There was no "dress code." Nobody stood at the door and checked to see if you were properly dressed. It was just my impression that one should dress up a little for church.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-15 09:58:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@yahoo.com
There was no "dress code." Nobody stood at the door and checked
to see if you were properly dressed. It was just my impression that
one should dress up a little for church.
I didn't mean it to apply to your example. If I did give that
impression, and it seems I did, I apologize.
However, there are churches where someone who isn't dressed
nicely will not be allowed in.
Back when I was a Christian, I came to really like the song
linked below. It basically holds a mirror up to many of the churches
out there.
It's in Spanish, so knowing the language will help. But if you
don't, no worries. They include Portuguese subtitles :D


--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-09-15 13:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
I didn't mean it to apply to your example.
Are you serious?

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
marston shores
2017-09-11 01:34:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Whereas the god you mention is fictional
I will enjoy watching Rev Larson send you to Hell for your lying!
e***@hotmail.com
2017-09-09 23:43:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
I did prove it. Your lying proves you are being controlled by demons.
Bob can rid you of them. He's just a skype call away. And you'll
understand why you should never have had sex with the subhuman.
Bob can wash away your sin of race mixing, if you will let him.
No, you gave us circumstantial evidence at best. Nothing more.

You should talk to someone about your horrible bigotry. It's the 21st Century, pick up with the times.
marston shores
2017-09-10 14:35:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No, you gave us circumstantial evidence at best. Nothing more.
You are a sinner. You committed the sin of race mixing. I don't know if
even Rev. Larson can remove that stain from you. Why not ask him to try?
e***@hotmail.com
2017-09-10 15:48:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by e***@hotmail.com
No, you gave us circumstantial evidence at best. Nothing more.
You are a sinner. You committed the sin of race mixing. I don't know if
even Rev. Larson can remove that stain from you. Why not ask him to try?
Notice how you shifted the focus to avoid acknowledging the fact that all you've offered is circumstantial evidence of your claims?

I noticed it.
marston shores
2017-09-11 01:40:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
I noticed it.
I noticed your demons are in full control.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-09 22:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
Not for a lack of being asked over the years.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-09-10 14:33:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
Not for a lack of being asked over the years.
And I proved it over the years.
KWills Shill #3
2017-09-10 19:09:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by marston shores
Post by KWills Shill #3
You know it happened.
I know this happened, felon!
But you can't seem to prove K. Wills is the person who did it!
Not for a lack of being asked over the years.
And I proved it over the years.
And yet, no one has seen this proof. Odd that.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
marston shores
2017-09-11 01:33:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
And yet, no one has seen this proof.
Are you serious?

Here it is again. Your fellow demon lover, Eddie, Eddie, Bed so Wetty,
will be here to defend you, lying about what this proves.

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/DefaultFrame
( Start a case search here. )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/SelectFrame
( Trial Court - Case Search )
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ESAWebApp/TrialSimpFrame
( Wills (Tab key) Kent (Tab key) Bradley (Search) )

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768

Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768
Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 39 Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004 Duration TDD/SDD * 01/16/2009
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk Probation C Felony
Polk
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's
driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied
structure" whether or not a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute '[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling'
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
"burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:

The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .

4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case.
Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
Government Shill #2
2017-10-08 20:37:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.

Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Post by a***@gmail.com
I was laying here. Then I was taken by the Spirit to either the Artic, or Antartica. I was hovering there and saw thousands upon thousands of Military Troops.
August 3, 2017 - 4:36pm
http://dreamsofluke.bravehost.com/military/index.html
Shill #2
--
"I dreamed a bunch of things that made no sense..."
Andrew Luke Nichols
alt.conspiracy - 29 March 2017
Government Shill #2
2017-10-08 20:42:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!

Shill #2
--
I am so smart...S.M.R.T.
Homer J. Simpson
e***@hotmail.com
2017-10-08 21:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!
As WHAT is to happen and WHEN it is to happen is completely vague, the fact that nothing has happened yet means nothing to him.
Government Shill #2
2017-10-08 21:13:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!
As WHAT is to happen and WHEN it is to happen is completely vague, the fact that nothing has happened yet means nothing to him.
Oh, sure. Doesn't mean I can't ask. :-)

Shill #2
--
"I'm not a Smart man."
andrew luke nichols
alt.conspiracy - 05 April 2017
KWills Shill #3
2017-10-09 08:43:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!
As WHAT is to happen and WHEN it is to happen is completely vague, the fact that nothing has happened yet means nothing to him.
In the original post, Luke claimed he "...saw thousands upon
thousands of Military Troops."
So, WHAT is to happen isn't vague. But when this is to happen was
never given. As such, he can simply state his vision is yet to become
reality for as long as he lives.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
e***@hotmail.com
2017-10-09 17:01:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!
As WHAT is to happen and WHEN it is to happen is completely vague, the fact that nothing has happened yet means nothing to him.
In the original post, Luke claimed he "...saw thousands upon
thousands of Military Troops."
So, WHAT is to happen isn't vague. But when this is to happen was
never given. As such, he can simply state his vision is yet to become
reality for as long as he lives.
But the reason WHY those troops are there is the "something big" that's going to happen, and he's being deliberately vague about WHY those troops are there.
KWills Shill #3
2017-10-11 08:49:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by KWills Shill #3
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Bloody spell checker. Arctic!
As WHAT is to happen and WHEN it is to happen is completely vague, the fact that nothing has happened yet means nothing to him.
In the original post, Luke claimed he "...saw thousands upon
thousands of Military Troops."
So, WHAT is to happen isn't vague. But when this is to happen was
never given. As such, he can simply state his vision is yet to become
reality for as long as he lives.
But the reason WHY those troops are there is the "something big" that's going to happen, and he's being deliberately vague about WHY those troops are there.
I don't recall Luke hinting at why they were there. Just that
they were. As such, you are correct. The WHY they are there hasn't
been given.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
KWills Shill #3
2017-10-09 08:43:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 07:37:07 +1100, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by a***@gmail.com
Vision: Something big is going to happen in the Artic, or Antartica
October.
Still nothing big going on in the Aortic, or the Antarctic.
Nothing big will ever happen at either location.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Loading...